• No results found

The sound of sediments : acoustic sensing in uncertain environments - Bibliography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The sound of sediments : acoustic sensing in uncertain environments - Bibliography"

Copied!
13
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

The sound of sediments : acoustic sensing in uncertain environments

van Leijen, A.V.

Publication date 2010

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

van Leijen, A. V. (2010). The sound of sediments : acoustic sensing in uncertain environments.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

1. Leidraad maritiem optreden, de bijdrage van het Commando

Zeestrijd-krachten aan de Nederlandse Krijgsmacht. Commando ZeestrijdZeestrijd-krachten,

Den Helder, 2005. (In Dutch).

2. F. G. J. Absil and J.-P. Hermand. KIM research project: Shallow water rapid environmental assessment with a netcentric acoustic-oceanographic buoy sys-tem. Internal document, Den Helder, 29th August 2005.

3. M. A. Ainslie. A compendium of definitions for sonar performance mea-surements and modelling. TNO Booklet No. AOG-v9, The Hague, February 2005.

4. M. A. Ainslie. Review of published safety thresholds for human divers exposed to underwater sound. Techical Report TNO-DV 2007 A598, TNO D&V, April 2008.

5. T. Akal. Bathymetry and bottom structure of zones near the Island of Elba used for acoustical trials in shallow water. Technical Report TM-162, SACLANT ASW Reseach Centre, La Spezia, Italy, December 1970.

6. B. Allen, R. Stokey, T. Austin, N. Forrester, R. Goldsborough, M. Purcell, and C. von Alt. REMUS: a small, low cost AUV; system description, field trials and performance results. In OCEANS ’97. MTS/IEEE Conference

Proceedings, volume 2, pages 994–1000, 1997.

7. J. Appelman. One theatre, one forecast: ontwikkelingen op het gebied van Rapid Environmental Assessment. Working Paper Maritiem Optreden 2, Commando Zeestrijdkrachten, Maritiem Doctrine en Tactieken Centrum, Den Helder, May 2009. (In Dutch).

(3)

8. Applied Physics Laboratory. APL-UW high-frequency ocean environmental acoustic models handbook. Technical Report TR 9407, University of Wash-ington, October 1994.

9. D. J. Battle, P. Gerstoft, W. S. Hodgkiss, W. A. Kuperman, and P. L. Nielsen. Bayesian model selection applied to self-noise geoacoustic inversion.

J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 116(4):2043–2056, 2004.

10. D. J. Battle, P. Gerstoft, W. A. Kuperman, W. S. Hodgkiss, and M. Siderius. Geoacoustic inversion of tow-ship noise via near-fieldmatched-field processing.

IEEE J. Oc. Eng., 28(3):454–467, 2003.

11. S. P. Beerens, S. P. van IJsselmuide, and C. P. Camphuijsen. The hunt for the singing Ziphius : report on the marine mammal DCL trial 2004. Technical Report TNO-DV1 2004 A244, TNO D&V, 2005.

12. M. Birattari. The problem of tuning metaheuristics as seen from a machine

learning perspective. PhD thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2004.

13. M. Birattari, T. St¨utzle, L. Paquete, and K. Varrentrapp. A racing algorithm for configuring metaheuristics. In W. L. et al, editor, Proceedings of the

Ge-netic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pages 11–18, San Fransisco,

CA, USA, 2002. Morgan Kaufmann.

14. P. Blondel and A. Caiti. Buried Waste in the Seabed - Acoustic Imaging

and Bio-toxicity, Results from the European SITAR Project. Springer-Praxis,

Chichester, 2007.

15. C. Blum and A. Roli. Metaheuristics in combinatirial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison. Technical Report TR/IRIDIA/2001-13, IRIDIA, ULB, 50 av. F. Roosevelt, CP 194/6, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium, October 2001.

16. M. Bradley. Environmental Acoustics, Pocket Handbook. Slidell, Louisiana, March 1996. 2nd ed.

17. L. M. Brekhovskikh and Yu. P. Lysanov. Fundamentals of ocean acoustics. Springer, New York, 3rd edition, 2003.

18. M. J. Buckingham, E. M. Giddens, F. Simonet, and T. R. Hahn. Propeller noise from a light aircraft for low-frequency measurement of the speed of sound in marine sediment. J. Comp. Acoust., 10:445–464, 2002.

19. W. S. Burdic. Underwater Acoustic System Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Los Altos, 1984.

(4)

20. A. Caiti, N. R. Chapman, J.-P. Hermand, and S. M. Jesus, editors. Acoustic

Sensing Techniques for the Shallow Water Environment Inversion Methods and Experiments. Springer, 2006.

21. N. R. Chapman, R. M. Dizaji, and R. L. Kirlin. Inversion of geoacoustic model parameters using ship radiated noise. In A. Caiti, N. R. Chapman, J.-P. Hermand, and S. M. Jesus, editors, Acoustic sensing techniques for the

shallow water environment, pages 289–302, Dordrecht, 2006. Springer.

22. C. T. Chen and F. J. Millero. Re-evaluation of Wilson’s sound speed mea-surement for pure water. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 60:1270–1273, 1976.

23. C. T. Chen and F. J. Millero. Speed of sound in seawater at high pressures.

J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 62:1129–1135, 1977.

24. R. E. Church and K. R. Allison. Petroleum geology feature - new data redefines petroleum potential of the Saba Bank area, Netherlands Antilles.

First Break, 23:71–77, 2005.

25. F. Dilrosun. Monitoring the Saba Bank Fishery. Department of Public Health and Environmental Hygiene, Cura cau, 2000.

26. M. Dorigo and T. St¨utzle. Ant Colony Optimization. MIT press, 2004. 27. K. A. Dowsland. Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems,

chapter Simulated Annealing, pages 20–69. McGraw-Hill, 1995.

28. G. L. D’Spain, W. A. Kuperman, L. P. Berger, and W. S. Hodgkiss. Geoa-coustic inversion using fish sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 100:2665, 1996. 29. G. L. D’Spain, W. A. Kuperman, L. M. Dorman, L. P. Berger, and W. S.

Hodgkiss. Offshore geoacoustic inversion using sounds from land vehicle ac-tivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103:2936, 1998.

30. P. C. Etter. Recent advances in underwater acoustic modelling and simula-tion. J. Sound Vib., 240(2):351–383, 2001.

31. P. C. Etter. Underwater Acoustic Modeling and Simulation. Spon press, 2003. 32. M. R. Fallat and S. E. Dosso. Geoacoustic inversion via local, global, and

hybrid algorithms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 105(6):3219–3230, June 1999. 33. G. V. Frisk. Ocean and seabed acoustics, a theory in wave propagation.

(5)

34. J.-C. Le Gac, J.-P. Hermand and M. Demarte. BP’07 cruise report. Techni-cal Report NLDA-CSD-2007-02, Netherlands Defence Academy, Den Helder, 2007.

35. J.-C. Le Gac, Y. St´ephan, T. Garlan and N. Weber. Acoustic Sensing

Tech-niques for the Shallow Water Environment, chapter On the assessment of

geoacoustic parameters in shallow water environments, pages 1–15. Springer, 2006.

36. A. E. Gelfand and A. F. M. Smith. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J. Am. Stat. Ass., 85(410):398–409, June 1990.

37. P. Gerstoft. Inversion of seismoacoustic data using genetic algorithms and a posteriori probability distributions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 95(2):770–782, 1994.

38. P. Gerstoft. SAGA Users guide 2.0, an inversion software package. Technical Report SM-333, SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, Italy, 1997. Updates and SAGA package can be found on http://www.mpl.ucsd.edu/people/gerstoft/saga/saga.html.

39. P. Gerstoft and C. F. Mecklenbr¨auker. Ocean acoustic inversion with estima-tion of a posteriori probability distribuestima-tions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 104(2):808– 819, August 1998.

40. P. Gerstoft and Z.-H. Michalopoulou. Global optimization in matched-field inversion. In Fourth European conference on underwater acoustics, Rome, 1998.

41. F. Glover. Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial-intelligence. Comp. Op. Res., 13(5):533–549, 1986.

42. F. Glover and M. Laguna. Tabu Search. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997. 43. V. A. D. Grosso. New equation for the speed of sound in natural waters (with

comparison to other equations). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 56:1084–1091, 1974. 44. E. L. Hamilton. Geoacoustic modeling of the sea floor. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,

68(5):1313–1340, November 1980.

45. E. L. Hamilton and R. T. Bachman. Sound velocity and related properties of marine sediments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 72(6):1891–1904, 1982.

46. C. H. Harisson and D. G. Simons. Geoacoustic inversion of ambient noise: a simple method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 112:1377–1389, 2002.

(6)

47. J.-P. Hermand. Broad-band geoacoustic inversion in shallow water from waveguide impulse response measurements on a single hydrophone: Theory and experimental results. IEEE J. Oc. Eng., 24:41–66, 1999.

48. J.-P. Hermand and P. Gerstoft. Inversion of broad-band multitone acous-tic data from the Yellow Shark summer experiments. IEEE J. Oc. Eng., 21(4):324–346, 1996.

49. J.-P. Hermand and C. W. Holland. Geoacoustic characterisation of fine-grained sediments using single and multiple bottom reflection data. In

Shal-low Water Environments, volume Marine Geophysical Researches, Special

Volume on Subsurface Imaging and Sediment Characterization of 26, pages 267–274, 2005.

50. J.-P. Hermand, M. Meyer, and A. V. van Leijen. Saba bank sea trial report. technical report, ULB, Brussels, 2007.

51. J.-P. Hermand, P. P. Boni, E. Michelozzi, P. Guerrini, M. Agate, A. Bor-ruso, A. D’Argenio, D. D. Maio, L. I. C, M. Mancuso, and M. Scannavino. Geoacoustic inversion with drifting buoys: Enverse 1997-98 experiments. In A. Caiti, J.-P. Hermand, S. M. Jesus, and M. B. Porter, editors, Proceedings of

the Workshop on Experimental Acoustic Inversion Methods for Exploration of the Shallow Water Environment, pages 263–286, Dordrecht, 2000. Portuguese

Foundation for Science and Technology, Kluwer Academic.

52. J. H. Holland. Genetic algorithms. Scientific American, 267(1):44–50, July 1992.

53. J. D. Holmes, W. M. Carey, J. F. Lynch, A. E. Newhall, and A. Kukulya. An autonomous underwater vehicle towed array for ocean acoustic measure-ments and inversions. In IEEE OCEANS’05 Europe Conference Proceedings, volume 2, pages 1058–1061, Brest, France, 2005.

54. P. Hursky, M. Siderius, M. B. Porter, V. K. McDonald, M. Gillcrist, B. Granger, R. Jones, A. Bratten, A. Huizenga, P. T. Sullivan, and S. G. Briest. Applications of an ultra low-drag towed array deployed from a glider.

J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 121(5)(Pt. 2):3108, May 2007. 3aAO5.

55. L. Ingber. Very fast simulated re-annealing. Mathl. Comput. Modelling, 12(8):967–973, 1989.

56. L. Ingber. Simulated annealing: Practice versus theory. Mathl. Comput.

(7)

57. M. Jasny and J. Reynolds. Sounding the depths II, the rising toll of sonar, shipping and industrial ocean noise on marine life. Technical report, Natural Resources Defense Council, Los Angeles, November 2005.

58. F. B. Jensen, W. A. Kuperman, M. B. Porter, and H. Schmidt. Computational

ocean acoustics. American Institute of Physics, New York, 1994.

59. I. Karasalo and P. Skogqvist. Acoustic sensing techniques for the shallow

water environment, chapter Acoustic scattering from submerged and buried

objects, pages 137–153. Springer, Dordrecht, 2006.

60. I. Karasalo, P. Skogqvist, P. Blondel, and P. F. Dobbins. Buried Waste in the

Seabed - Acoustic Imaging and Bio-toxicity, chapter Buried waste inspection:

acoustical images and inversion from multiple-aspect scattering, pages 115– 125. Springer-Praxis, Chichester, 2007.

61. L. E. Kinsler, A. R. Frey, A. B. Coppens, and J. V. Sanders. Fundamentals

of Acoustics. Wiley & Sons, 4th edition, 2000.

62. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220(4598):671–680, May 1983.

63. V. O. Knudsen, R. S. Alford, and J. W. Emling. Underwater ambient noise.

J. Mar. Res., 7:410–429, 1948.

64. R. A. Koch and D. P. Knobles. Geoacoustic inversion with ships as sources.

J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 117(2):626–637, 2005.

65. J. R. Koza. Genetic programming. In J. G. Williams and A. Kent, editors,

Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, volume 39, pages 29–43.

Marcel-Dekker, 1998.

66. J. van der Land. The Saba bank - a large atoll in the northeastern caribbean.

FAO Fisheries Report, 200:469–481, 1977.

67. M. A. Larsen and J. M. Hovem. Buried Waste in the Seabed - Acoustic

Imag-ing and Bio-toxicity, chapter Geoacoustic inversion, pages 105–111. SprImag-inger-

Springer-Praxis, Chichester, 2007.

68. A. V. van Leijen. Propagatie en sensoren onderwater. Reader, Royal Nether-lands Naval College, August 2005. (in Dutch).

69. A. V. van Leijen. An autonomous underwater vehicle as sound source for geoacoustic inversion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 122:2951, July 2007. New Orleans, Abstract.

(8)

70. A. V. van Leijen. Geoacoustic inversion with recreational boat noise. J.

Acoust. Soc. Am., 123(5):3365, June 2008. Paris, Abstract.

71. A. V. van Leijen. LOBSTER design document. Technical Report NLDA-CSD-2008-02, Netherlands Defence Academy, Den Helder, 2008.

72. A. V. van Leijen. NL ARMS Netherlands Annual Review of Military Studies

2008, Sensors, Weapons, C4I and Operations Research, chapter From the

lab to the sea, acoustic sensing in uncertain environments, pages 153–163. Nederlandse Defensie Academie, Breda, 2008.

73. A. V. van Leijen and J.-P. Hermand. Geoacoustic inversion and uncertainty analysis with MAX-MIN Ant System. In Proceedings of the Fifth

Interna-tional Workshop on Ant Colony Optimization and Swarm Intelligence, LNCS,

pages 420–427, Brussels, Belgium, 4-7 September 2006. Springer.

74. A. V. van Leijen and J.-P. Hermand. Geoacoustic inversion with Ant Colony Optimisation. In S. M. Jesus and O. C. Rodrguez, editors, Proceedings of

the Eighth European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, 8th ECUA, pages

515–520, Carvoeiro, Portugal, 12-15 June 2006.

75. A. V. van Leijen, J.-P. Hermand, and K. B. Smith. Geoacoustic inversion based on both acoustic pressure and particle velocity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 120(5):3355–3356, November 2006. Honolulu, Hawaii, Abstract.

76. A. V. van Leijen, J.-P. Hermand, and M. Meyer. Geoacoustic inversion in the north-eastern Caribbean using a hydrographic survey vessel as a sound source of opportunity. J. Mar. Sys., 78(1–1):S333–S338, November 2009. 77. A. V. van Leijen, L. J. M. Rothkrantz, and F. C. A. Groen. Metaheuristic

optimisation of acoustic inverse problems. J. Comp. Ac. Submitted.

78. A. V. van Leijen, L. J. M. Rothkrantz, and F. C. A. Groen. Acoustic inversion with self noise of an autonomous underwater vehicle to measure sound speed in marine sediments. In Proc.12th Int. Conf. Inf. Fusion, Seattle, Washington,

USA, 6-9 July, pages 41–47, 2009.

79. A. V. van Leijen, W. L. van Norden, and F. Bolderheij. Unification of radar and sonar coverage modellling. In Proc.12th Int. Conf. Inf. Fusion, Seattle,

Washington, USA, 6-9 July, pages 1673–1678, 2009.

80. C. C. Leroy. Development of simple equations for accurate and more realistic calculation of the speed of sound in seawater. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 46:216– 226, 1969.

(9)

81. J. J. Lok. Military hydrography technology ventures into unchartered waters.

Jane’s International Defence Review, 38:42–46, October 2005.

82. X. Lurton. An introduction to underwater acoustics: principles and

applica-tions. Springer-Praxis, Chichester, 2002.

83. N. Martins, C. Soares, and S. Jesus. Environmental and acoustic assessment: The AOB concept. J. Mar. Sys., 69:114–125, 2008.

84. K. McCarthy. Cover story: REMUS - a role model for AUV technology transfer. Int. Ocean Sys., 7(6):22–23, 2003.

85. C. F. Mecklenbr¨auker and P. Gerstoft. Objective functions for ocean acoustic inversion derived by likelyhood methods. J. Comp. Ac., 8(2):259–270, 2000. 86. H. Medwin. Speed of sound in water: A simple equation for realistic

param-eters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 58:1318–1319, 1975.

87. H. Medwin. Sounds in the sea, from ocean acoustics to acoustical

oceanogra-phy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005.

88. M. Meyer. The adjoint method of optimal control for the acoustic monitoring

of a shallow water environment. PhD thesis, ULB, 2007.

89. M. Meyer, J.-P. Hermand, M. Berrada, and M. Asch. Remote sensing of tyrrhenian shallow waters using the adjoint of a full-field acoustic propagation model. J. Mar. Sys., 2009. In press.

90. Z.-H. Michalopopoulou and U. Ghosh-Dastidar. Tabu for matched-field source localization and geoacoustic inversion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,

115(1):135–145, January 2004.

91. F. J. Millero and X. Li. Comments on ‘on equations for the speed of sound in seawater’. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 95(5):2757–2759, 1994.

92. C. van Moll and D. G. Simons. Improved performance of global optimisation methods for inversion problems in underwater acoustics. In Proceedings of the

Seventh European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, ECUA 2004, Delft,

The Netherlands, July 2004.

93. P. Moren, A. Caiti, M. Zakharia, M. A. Larsen, P. Blondel, and J. Dybedal.

Buried Waste in the Seabed - Acoustic Imaging and Bio-toxicity, chapter

Acoustic sea trial in the M¨oja S¨oderfj¨ard dumpsite, pages 87–101. Springer-Praxis, Chichester, 2007.

(10)

94. W. H. Munk, P. Worchester, and C. Wunsch. Ocean acoustic tomography. Cambridge University Press, 1995.

95. National Research Council, Committee on Characterizing Biologically Sig-nificant Marine Mammal Behavior. Marine mammal populations and ocean

noise, determining when noise causes biologically significant effects. National

Academies Press, 2005.

96. National Research Council, Committee on Environmental Information for Naval Use. Environmental information for naval warfare. National Academies Press, Washington D.C, 2003.

97. National Research Council, Ocean Studies Board. Oceanography and naval

special warfare, opportunities and challenges. National Academies Press,

Washington D.C., 1997.

98. National Research Council, Ocean Studies Board. Oceanography and mine

warfare. National Academies Press, Washington D.C., 2000.

99. National Research Council, U.S.. Committee on Potential Impacts of Ambient Noise in the Ocean on Marine Mammals. Ocean noise and marine mammals. National Academic Press, Washington, D.C., 2003.

100. National Defense Research Committee. Physics of Sound in the Sea. Sum-mary Technical Report of Division 6, NRDC Vol. 8, Reprinted by Dept.of the Navy, Naval Material Command, 1969, NAVMAT P-9675, Washington, DC, 1946.

101. A. Nehorai and E. Paldi. Acoustic vector-sensor array processing. IEEE

Trans. Sig. Proc., 42:2481–2491, 1994.

102. Netherlands Hydrographic Office. Hydrographic survey instructions NL-Caribbean Survey 2006. Den Hague, The Netherlands, 2006.

103. P. J. Oonicx and J.-P. Hermand. Gabor atomic decomposition of Green’s functions for geoacoustic inversion and segmentation of a shallow water en-vironment. In Oceans 2005 - Europe, volume 2(20), pages 1264–1269. IEEE, June 2005.

104. C. Park, W. Seong, and P. Gerstoft. Geoacoustic inversion in time domain using ship of opportunity noise recorded on a horizontal towed array. J.

(11)

105. M. Porter. The KRAKEN normal mode program. Technical Report SACLANT-SM-245, NATO SACLANT Undersea Research Centre, La Spezia, 1991.

106. L. A. te Raa, M. Colin, M. A. Ainslie, M. W. Schouten, and F. P. A. Lam. Range-dependent acoustic modelling. Technical Report TNO-DV 2008 A416, TNO, November 2008.

107. P. Ratilal, P. Gerstoft, and J. T. Goh. Subspace approach to inversion by genetic algorithms involving multiple frequencies. J. Comp. Ac., 6(1-2):99– 115, 1998.

108. C. R. Reeves. Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems. McGraw-Hill, 1995.

109. C. R. Reeves. Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems, chapter 4 Genetic Algorithms, pages 151–196. McGraw-Hill, 1995.

110. W. J. Richardson, C. R. Greene Jr, C. I. Malme, and D. H. Thomson. Marine

Mammals and Noise. Academic Press, 1995.

111. D. Ross. Mechanics of underwaters noise. Peninsula publishing, Los Altos, 1987.

112. M. Sen and P. L. Stoffa. Global optimization methods in geophysical inversion. Elsevier, 1995.

113. D. G. Simons, M. A. Ainslie, S. H. E. Muller, and W. Boek. RUMBLE technical report on inversion models. Technical Report TNO-FEL-02-A132, TNO, 2002.

114. M. I. Skolnik. Introduction to Radar Systems. McGraw-Hill, New York, 3rd edition, 2001.

115. K. B. Smith. Convergence, stability, and variability of shallow water acoustic predictions using a split-step fourier parabolic equation model. J. Comp.

Acoust., 9:243–285, 2001.

116. K. B. Smith, J.-P. Hermand, and A. V. van Leijen. Estimation of sediment attenuation from measurements of the acoustic vector field. In Proceedings of

the 8th International Conference on Theoretical and Computational Acous-tics, Crete, Greece, 2–5 July 2007.

(12)

117. K. B. Smith and A. V. van Leijen. Steering vector sensor array elements with linear cardioids and nonlinear hippioids. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 122(1):370–377, 2007.

118. K. B. Smith, M. A. Wolfson, and A. V. van Leijen. Correction to attenua-tion treatment in the Monterey-Miami Parabolic Equaattenua-tion model. Technical Report NPS-PH-07-001, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, May 2007. 119. M. Snellen and D. G. Simons. An assessment of the performance of global

optimization methods for geo-acoustic inversion. J. Comp. Ac., 16(2):199– 223, 2008.

120. M. Snellen, D. G. Simons, and C. van Moll. Application of differential evo-lution as an optimisation method for geo-acoustic inversion. In Proceedings

of the Seventh European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, ECUA 2004,

Delft, The Netherlands, November 2004.

121. R. Storn and K. Price. Differential evolution - a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. Technical Report TR-95-012, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, CA, March 1995.

122. R. Storn and K. Price. Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global

Optimiza-tion, 11:341–359, 1997.

123. T. St¨utzle and H. Hoos. TheMAX − MIN ant system and local search for the traveling salesman problem. In T. B¨ack, Z. Michalewicz, and X. Yao, edi-tors, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary

Computation (ICEC’97), pages 309–314, Piscataway, NJ, 1997. IEEE Press.

124. A. M. Thode, G. L. D’Spain, and W. A. Kuperman. Matched-field pro-cessing, geoacoustic inversion, and source signature recovery of blue whale vocalizations. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 107(3):1286–1300, 2000.

125. D. Tollefsen, S. E. Dosso, and M. J. Wilmut. Matched-field geoacoustic inversion with a horizontal array and low-level source. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 120(1):221–230, 2006.

126. A. Tolstoy. Matched field processing for underwater acoustics. World Scien-tific, Singapore, 1993.

127. H. G. Urban. Handbook of underwater acoustic engineering. STN ATLAS Elektronik GmbH, Bremen, 2002.

(13)

128. R. J. Urick. Principles of Underwater Sound. McGraw-Hill, New York, 3rd edition, 1983.

129. R. J. Urick. Ambient noise in the sea. Peninsula publishing, Los Altos, 1984. 130. M. N. Vego. Naval strategy and operations in narrow seas. Frank Cass,

London, 1999.

131. A. D. Waite. Sonar for practising engineers. Thomson Marconi Sonar Ltd, 1998.

132. A. J. Warner. The cretaceous age sediments of the Saba bank and their petroleum potential. Transactions of the 12th Caribbean Geological

Confer-ence, St. Croix, pages 341–354, 1989.

133. G. M. Wenz. Acoustic ambient noise in the ocean: Spectra and sources. J.

Acoust. Soc. Am., 34:1936–1956, 1962.

134. W. D. Wilson. Speed of sound in sea water as a function of temperature, pressure and salinity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 32:641–644, 1960.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

1 In een werkomgeving waar zij een minderheid vormen van tussen ± 15 en ± 35 procent, zullen vrouwen meer geconfronteerd worden met onge­ wenste omgangsvormen dan in een

Voor deze toetsen is er steeds tenminste één gemeente die aan de norm van de Onderzoekscommissie voldoet.5 Onderdelen die in negatieve zin opval­ len zijn de

komt derhalve, naast het spanningsveld tussen differentiatie en standaardisatie, de mogelijkheid van institutionele benadeling van cliëntcategorieën tot uiting. Van belang

Figuur 1 Het zeven-sectoren model: door de frequentieverdeling op de variabelen leeftijd, oplei­ ding, werkervaring en bereidheid op de arbeidsmarkt weer te geven in

In een zich ont­ wikkelende branche zoals toerisme en recreatie zien we dat de economische ontwikkeling van de sector voorafgaat aan professionalisering, want de

Deze benadering is eveneens terug te vinden in een onlangs in op­ dracht van de Commissie gelijke behandeling van mannen en vrouwen bij de arbeid verricht onder­ zoek

Het valt te verwachten dat de eisenbundels van de vakbonden voor het op te starten of inmiddels opgestarte1 interprofessioneel sociaal overleg bijna uitsluitend gevuld

Het tijdseffect doet vermoede dat voor samenwonende mannen de seksespecifit ke normen ten aanzien van het verrichten va huishoudelijke en gezinstaken enigszins zij