• No results found

Study of the Calibration Channel Width for a Digital Sideband Separating System for SIS 2SB Receiver

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Study of the Calibration Channel Width for a Digital Sideband Separating System for SIS 2SB Receiver"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Study of the Calibration Channel Width for a Digital Sideband Separating System for SIS 2SB Receiver

Khudchenko, Andrey; Finger, R.; Baryshev, A.~M.; Mena, F.~P.; Rodriguez, R.; Hesper, R.; Fuentes, R.; Bronfman, L.

Published in:

Atacama Large-Aperture Submm/mm Telescope (AtLAST) DOI:

10.5281/zenodo.1159039

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2018

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Khudchenko, A., Finger, R., Baryshev, A. M., Mena, F. P., Rodriguez, R., Hesper, R., Fuentes, R., & Bronfman, L. (2018). Study of the Calibration Channel Width for a Digital Sideband Separating System for SIS 2SB Receiver. In Atacama Large-Aperture Submm/mm Telescope (AtLAST) (pp. 19)

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1159039

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

A.  Khudchenko

1

, R. Finger

2

, A. M. Baryshev

1

, F. P. Mena

3

, R. Rodriguez

2

, R. Hesper

1

,

R. Fuentes

2

and L. Bronfman

2

1 - NOVA/Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

2- Astronomy Department, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.

3

Electrical Engineering Department, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Abstract

• Digital Sideband Separating (DSS):

–  Very promising concept for future (multipixel) heterodyne receivers. –  Relaxes requirements for the Image Rejection Ratio (IRR) of analog

receivers.

–  It improves the IRR substantially with simple hardware.

–  Ideal for spectral line surveys (it practically eliminates line confusion and atmospheric noise in the image band).

–  It is a potential option for a future ALMA upgrade. • Recent work:

–  Applied to a full 2SB receiver (i.e. including the analog IF hybrid). –  It allows reaching an IRR of 45 dB across the full band.

–  Calibration is more stable respect to the case without IF hybrid. • Important question:

–  How wide should the calibration-channel width be in order to reach a desired IRR level?

–  It determines, for a large part, the calibration speed of the DSS system and influences the back-end architecture.

Study of the calibration channel width for a

Digital Sideband Separating system

for SIS 2SB receivers

Advantage compared to receiver without the IF hybrid

SUMMARY

Ø  Digital Sideband Separating can strongly relax requirements

for analog components of 2SB SIS receivers, providing at the

same time the sideband rejection up to 40dB.

Ø  Callibration stability proved stable on 24 hours and 9 mixer

reset cicles (deflux, demagnitisation)

Ø  The channel width of 46 MHz guarantees IRR above 30dB

current ALMA receivers.

Contact: A.Khudchenko@sron.nl, rfinger@u.uchile.cl.

Concept of Digital Sideband Separating System

Estimation of IF reflections for currently installed ALMA bands (B3-B8) and the corresponding possible calibration channel width.

DSS system with 46MHz calibration channel width will guarantee 30dB IRR level for all the bands.

Implementation for ALMA Band-9 2SB receiver

Scheme: A – 2SB SIS receiver for Band 9, B - second down conversion

stage, C – digital back-end, D – set to measure calibration stability,

E – optical scheme for injection of the test tone. Results will be

published in A&A (paper was accepted in Dec 2017).

IRR level Band 3 Band 4 Band 5 Band 6 (???)

Band 7 Band 8 Band 9 no Isolators Band 9 with Isolators Cable length (mm) 200 350 100 200 200(?) 250 400 300 Reflection period (MHz) 500 285 1000 500 500(?) 400 250 330 SIS mixer S22, (dB) 5(?) 5(?) 5(?) 15(?) -amplifier 1 5(?) 5(?) 5(?) 5(?) S11 of Isolator (or amplifier) (dB) 18 19 19 18 18 19 10 18 dF for IRR of 30 dB (MHz) 33 23 80 33 33 32 7 22 dF for IRR of 20 dB (MHz) 110 77 270 110 110 108 23 73

The digitally compensated IRR is above 40 dB.

Digital Polarization Synthesis using similar approach has been demonstrated [].

The DSS system can be used either as:

–  An adaptive IF hybrid to reach ultra-pure image rejection [Finger et al. A&A 2015]

–  It can be applied to a full 2SB receiver for IRR correction [Rodriguez et al. A&A 2018].

–  The latest option has advantages in stability and in possibility to be applied directly to existing instruments.

Width of calibration channel to reach certain IRR level

Mechanism of the main contribution to imbalance:

Reflection from Amplifiers and SIS mixers trough the Hybrid {AmplßàSIS} :

Imbalance amplitude S22_SIS·SH_ISO = (-5dB)+(-10..-20dB) = -15..-25dB,

periodic – determined by the cable length between SIS and amplifier (isolator).

Phase error (degrees)

Amp lit ud e erro r (a .u . l in ea r) 2SB SIS receicer

Sideband ratio correction scheme

FPGA processing board

Second down-conversion stage

Error zones, providing 30 dB IRR level: red line - system without IF hybrid, black lines - full 2SB receiver with different level of analogue IRR. Error is injected between the receiver and the FPGA board.

Scheme of experiment: DSS sytem +

Band 9 2SB receiver

Analysis of measured data: calibration channel can be 244kHz x 64 = 15.6 MHz

Degradation of the analogue IRR level vs. offset frequency from the calibration point df. Here the period of IF reflections is taken 1000MHz.

IF Im b a la n ce -1 5 d B IF Im b a la n ce -1 7 d B IF Im b a la n ce -2 0 d B 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0 10 20 30 40 50

Frequency offset df from the calibration pointHMHzL

IRR

HdB

L

IRR _ dig(df ) = 10Log10

1 AIFsin(2π df T ) ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ 2

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

The temperature profiles (also in their correct places) during the experiments and the annealing durations are given in the upper halves of the figures.. It

Het plangebied wordt aan de noordzijde begrensd door de Laarheidestraat, aan de oostzijde door Hof ter Motten, de zuidzijde door een agrarisch gebied en aan

The algorithm to find the optimal correction for a current source is explained using a segmented DAC architecture, of which the Least Significant Bits (LSBs) are implemented

used to load the required test mode data, iii) the clock of the shift- register, iv) the signal, which is connected to the clock ports on the update register and is used to

Systematic decision stage offset (λ) moves the decision levels, while the stage gain error (η) scales the total range of residue signal and causes an error in the analog input to

Figure 4.6: Comparison between the direct response spectrum (thick grey line) and some heterodyne detection spectra at different LO frequencies (thin lines) with mixer 2

Res Publica: Roman Poli- tics and Society according to Cicero... Violence in Republican

geeft aan de betrokkenheid van ZN, pleiten de zorgvuldige ontwikkeling van het product in het pilottraject van het Zorginstituut en de tripartiete betrokkenheid en voordracht