• No results found

10 billion years of massive Galaxies Taylor, E.N.C.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "10 billion years of massive Galaxies Taylor, E.N.C."

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

10 billion years of massive Galaxies

Taylor, E.N.C.

Citation

Taylor, E. N. C. (2009, December 15). 10 billion years of massive Galaxies. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14509

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14509

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

1. The quenching of star formation within the massive galaxy population (as opposed to individual galaxies) is a long and gradual process and is not a simple function of stellar mass (Chapter III).

2. The massive, ‘passive’ galaxies seen at z & 2 have not finished their evolu- tion: they must undergo significant structural evolution, without substan- tially increasing their stellar mass. Major mergers cannot be the sole driver of this evolution (Chapter IV).

3. Stellar mass-to-light ratios derived on the basis of a single rest-frame optical color are just as good — and in some circumstances better — than those derived from a full SED (Chapters III and V).

4. In photometric lookback studies, stellar mass is a more robustly measured quantity than absolute magnitude (Chapter III).

5. Galaxies are not homologous and should not be treated as such (Chapter V).

6. More than better data, future photometric lookback surveys will require better analysis to improve on current measurements of the galaxy stellar mass function and its evolution.

7. By providing a large sample of massive galaxies at 0.1 . z . 0.4, the Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) survey will not only yield much stronger con- straints on the recent evolution of the general galaxy population, it will also significantly reduce the uncertainties on past and future studies that focus on higher redshifts.

8. It is remarkable that the vast majority of professional astronomers have had little to no formal training in the four key aspects of their day-to-day work:

programming, writing, teaching, and management. Providing this kind of training offers an easy, practical way of increasing the productivity of both individual researchers and scientific collaborations.

9. Language encourages us to ignore one of the most profound conclusions ar- rived at via science or philosophy — that of a fundamental unity of all things.

10. As an economically and physically viable means of mitigating the worst ef- fects of climate change, geoengineering (including CO2 removal and solar radiation management) deserves serious study and debate.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

We find no statistically significant systematic trends in M ∗ /M d,n as a function of observed quantities (e.g., apparent magnitude, redshift), or as a function of tracers of

Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden. Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/14509 Note: To

71 III The Rise of Massive Red Galaxies 75 1 Validating the MUSYC catalog photometric redshift determinations 83 2 z phot errors, and their effect on other derived

This work was the first of its kind to include a detailed investigation of the systematic uncertainties associated with these kinds of measurements. By sys- tematically

Photometric Redshifts — There are some systematic discrepancies between the COMBO-17 and MUSYC photometric redshift determinations in the ECDFS, ow- ing to the lack of NIR data in

Are the discrepancies between the COMBO-17 and MUSYC results due to dif- ferent systematic effects inherent in our different methods for deriving restframe photometry and stellar

— Each panel shows the sizes and masses of galaxies based on, from top to bottom, the spectroscopic sample using spectroscopic redshifts, the spectroscopic sample using

0DUWLQ%DUWKRORPHXV$OH[DQGHU+HHPVNHUNZHUGJHERUHQRSMXQLWH+DDUOHP$DQ KHW 0HQGHO &ROOHJH WH +DDUOHP EHKDDOGH KLM LQ  ]LMQ +$92 GLSORPD HQ LQ