• No results found

Achmea. (z.d.). Achmea is vanaf 1 januari 100% rookvrij. Geraadpleegd op 3 juni 2020, van: https://nieuws.achmea.nl/achmea-is-vanaf-1-januari-100-rookvrij/

Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of management review, 2(2), 217-230.

Andersen, R. (2019). Deliveroo-koeriers hebben recht op arbeidscontract. De Volkskrant, 15 januari 2019. Geraadpleegd op 9 april 2020, van: https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws- achtergrond/rechtbank-amsterdam-deliveroo-koeriers-hebben-recht-op-

arbeidscontract~b0c65055/

Baringhorst, S. (2009) ‘Introduction: Political campaigning in changing media cultures – Typological and historical approaches’, in Political Campaigning on the Web, eds S. Baringhorst, V. Kneip & J. Niesyto, transcript, Verlag, Bielefeld, pp. 9–30.

Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2015). The politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America. University of Chicago Press

Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (2001). Interest niches and policy bandwagons: Patterns of interest group involvement in national politics. The Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1191-1213. Baroni, L., Carroll, B. J., Chalmers, A. W., Marquez, L. M. M., & Rasmussen, A. (2014).

Defining and classifying interest groups. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 3(2), 141-159. Betzold, C. 2013. Business insiders and environmental outsiders? Advocacy strategies in

international climate change negotiations. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2(3), 302-322. Berg, C van den & Venetië, E. (2014). Startdocument capstone grassroots. September 2014,

Universiteit Leiden.

Beyers, J. (2004) Voice and access: Political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics 5(2): 211–240.

Beyers, J., Dür, A., & Wonka, A. (2018). The political salience of EU policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(11), 1726-1737.

Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., & Pedersen, H. H. (2015). Interest Group Access to the Bureaucracy, Parliament, and the Media. Governance, 28(1), 95-112.

Binderkrantz, A. S., & Krøyer, S. (2012). Customizing strategy: Policy goals and interest group strategies. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 1(1), 115-138.

Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related

Bogosavac, N. (2018). Deliveroo nog meer onder druk na nieuwe undercover #Boos-aflevering. Geraadpleegd op 9 april 2020, van: https://vance.nl/deliveroo-nog-meer-onder-druk-na- nieuwe-undercover-boos-aflevering/

Brady, S. R., Young, J. A., & McLeod, D. A. (2015). Utilizing digital advocacy in community organizing: Lessons learned from organizing in virtual spaces to promote worker rights and economic justice. Journal of Community Practice, 23(2), 255-273.

Breindl, Y. (2013). Assessing success in internet campaigning: the case of digital rights advocacy in the European Union. Information, Communication & Society, 16(9), 1419- 1440.

Brighenti, A. M. (2010). Visibility in social theory and social research. Springer.

Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the EU institutions. European Journal of Political Research 43(3): 337–369 Bouma, J & F. Straver. (2020). Er is ook een winnaar in de coronacrisis: het milieu. Trouw, 3 april. Geraadpleegd op 2 juni, van: https://www.trouw.nl/duurzaamheid-natuur/er-is- ook-een-winnaar-in-de-coronacrisis-het-milieu~b8516992/

Chalmers, A. W., & Shotton, P. A. (2016). Changing the face of advocacy? Explaining interest organizations’ use of social media strategies. Political Communication, 33(3), 374-391. Courville, S., & Piper, N. (2004). Harnessing hope through NGO activism. The Annals of the

American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592(1), 39-61.

Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H. (1984) ‘Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organization design’, in L. Cummings and B. Staw (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. pp. 191–233.

Dahlgren, P. (2015). The internet as a civic space. In Handbook of digital politics. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Dahlgren, P. (2013a). Force-Fields of the Web Environment. In The Political Web (pp. 36-64). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Dahlgren, P. (2013b). Democracy, Participation, and Media Connections. In The Political Web (pp. 9-35). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Dardis, F.E., Baumgartner, F.R., Boydstun, A.E., De Boef, S. & Shen, F. (2008) Media Framing of Capital Punishment and Its Impact on Individuals' Cognitive Responses, Mass Communication and Society, 11:2, 115- 140.

Davis, S. F. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of research methods in experimental psychology. John Wiley & Sons.

De Vita, C. J. (2004). Organizational factors influencing advocacy for children.

Dorfman, L., Wallack, L., & Woodruff, K. (2005). More than a message: framing public health advocacy to change corporate practices. Health education & behavior, 32(3), 320-336. Duk, W. (2018). De achterkamertjespolitiek is totaal doorgeschoten. Telegraaf. Geraadpleegd

op 12 maart: https://www.telegraaf.nl/nieuws/2941762/de-achterkamertjespolitiek-is- totaal-doorgeschoten

Dür, A., & Mateo, G. (2013). Gaining access or going public? Interest group strategies in five E uropean countries. European Journal of Political Research, 52(5), 660-686.

Fhm. (2018). Tim Hofman is terug met Boos en pakt Deliveroo aan. Geraadpleegd op: 9 april 2020, van: https://fhm.nl/boos-deliveroo/

FNV. (2019). Bezorgers Deliveroo zijn geen zzp’ers. Vindt nu ook de rechter. FNV. Geraadpleegd op 9 april 2020, van: https://fnvzzp.nl/nieuws/2019/01/bezorgers- deliveroo-zijn-geen-zzpers-vindt-nu-ook-de-rechter

Grant, W. (2000). Pressure Groups and British Politics. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Greenpeace (z.d.). Kom in actie. Geraadpleegd op 3 juni 2020, van:

https://www.greenpeace.org/nl/acties/

Hall, J. A. (1980). Voice tone and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 924.

Hanegraaff, M., J. Beyers, and I. De Bruycker. (2016). Balancing Inside and Outside Lobbying: The Political Strategies of Lobbyists at Global Diplomatic Conferences European Journal of Political Research DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12145.

Johansson, H., & Scaramuzzino, G. (2019). The logics of digital advocacy: Between acts of political influence and presence. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1528-1545.

Johnson Jr, J. H., Mirchandani, D. A., & Meznar, M. B. (2015). The impact of internationalization of US multinationals on public affairs strategy and performance: a comparison at 1993 and 2003. Business & Society, 54(1), 89-125.

Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. University of Chicago Press.

Jordan, G., Halpin, D., & Maloney, W. (2004). Defining interests: Disambiguation and the need for new distinctions? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(2), 195-212.

Halpin, D.R. (2006) The participatory and democratic potential and practice of interest groups: Between solidarity and representation. Public Administration 84(4): 919–940.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.

Keller, B., Labrique, A., Jain, K. M., Pekosz, A., & Levine, O. (2014). Mind the gap: social media engagement by public health researchers. Journal of medical Internet research, 16(1), e8.

Keulemans, M. (2020). Nieuw virus opgedoken in China. De Volkskrant, 11 januari 2020. Geraadpleegd op 2 juni 2020 van:

https://advance-lexis- com.ezproxy.leidenuniv.nl:2443/document/?pdmfid=1516831&crid=447fbd44-3d7f- 4fa1-aae4- d160b5830788&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fnews%2Furn%3Aconte ntItem%3A5XYB-X2M1-DYRY-X3RM-00000- 00&pdcontentcomponentid=259070&pdteaserkey=sr10&pditab=allpods&ecomp=kb6 3k&earg=sr10&prid=2565a6f4-1bcc-4672-85df-107fe25629f4

Klimaatstaking. Geraadpleegd op 9april 2020, van: https://klimaatstaking.nl

Klüver, H., Braun, C., & Beyers, J. (2015). Legislative lobbying in context: towards a conceptual framework of interest group lobbying in the European Union.

Kollman, K. (1998). Outside lobbying: Public opinion and interest group strategies. Princeton University Press.

Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage publications. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news

media? In Proceedings of the 19th International Con- ference on World Wide Web (WWW ’10) (pp. 591–600). New York: ACM Press.

Lee, K. T., & Koo, D. M. (2012). Effects of attribute and valence of e-WOM on message adoption: Moderating roles of subjective knowledge and regulatory focus.

Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1974–1984.

Leuffen, D., Malang, T., & Wörle, S. (2014). Structure, capacity or power? Explaining salience in EU decision-making. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(3), 616-631. LTO, (z.d). Nieuwsarchief, LTO Lobby. Geraadpleegd op 3 juni 2020, van:

https://www.lto.nl/nieuws/page/3/?sector&portefeuille&auteur&category=lto-

lobby&sorteer&search#038;portefeuille&auteur&category=lto-lobby&sorteer&search Marx, T. G. (1990). Strategic planning for public affairs. In Strategische Unternehmungsplanung/Strategische Unternehmungsführung (pp. 944-955). Physica, Heidelberg.

Mahoney, C. (2007a). Networking vs. allying: the decision of interest groups to join coalitions in the US and the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 366-383.

Mahoney, C. (2007b). Lobbying success in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Public Policy, 27(1), 35-56.

Mcmanus, J., & Dorfman, L. (2005). Functional truth or sexist distortion?: Assessing a feminist critique of intimate violence reporting. Journalism, 6(1), 43-65.

McCormick, T. H., Lee, H., Cesare, N., Shojaie, A., & Spiro, E. S. (2017). Using Twitter for demographic and social science research: Tools for data collection and processing. Sociological methods & research, 46(3), 390-421.

Montesquieu Instituut. Z.d. Negatieve klank lobby onterecht. Geraadpleegd op 12 maart, van: https://www.montesquieu-

instituut.nl/id/vjdajx845mq4/negatieve_klank_lobby_onterecht

Naaman, M., Boase, J., & Lai, C.-H. (2010). Is it really about me? Message content in social awareness streams. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’10) (pp. 189–192). New York: ACM Press. Nisbet, M. C., & Huge, M. (2006). Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology

debate: Managing power and participation through the press/policy connection. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(2), 3-40.

Nu.nl. (2020). Tijdlijn: Het coronavirus in Nederland. Nu.nl, 7 april. Geraadpleegd op 2 juni, van:https://www.nu.nl/coronavirus/6040831/tijdlijn-het-coronavirus-in-nederland.html Oh, J., & Ki, E. J. (2019). Factors affecting social presence and word-of-mouth in corporate social responsibility communication: Tone of voice, message framing, and online medium type. Public relations review, 45(2), 319-331.

O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss- framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 296-316.

Park, H., & Cameron, G. (2014). Keeping It Real: Exploring the Roles of Conversational Human Voice and Source Credibility in Crisis Communication via Blogs. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(3), 487-507.

Parry K (2015) Visibility and visualities: ‘ways of seeing’ politics in the digital media

environment. In: Coleman S and Freelon D (eds) Handbook of Digital Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 417–432.

Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of communication, 56(suppl_1), S202-S220.

Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychological bulletin, 121(1), 3.

RTLnieuws. (2020a). Tijdlijn: hoe Nederland te laat het testen op corona uitbreidde. RTLnieuws, 2juni, 2020. Geraadpleegd op 2 juni, van:

https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/nieuws/artikel/5136981/reconstructie-testen-traceren-corona RTLnieuws. (2020b). Mondkapjeswinkel geopend in Amsterdam: 'Er is geen schaarste',

RTLnieuws, 19 april, 2020. Geraadpleegd op 2 juni, van:

https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/nieuws/nederland/artikel/5095161/mondkapjes- mondmaskers-te-koop-amsterdam-winkel-euro-ijssalon

RTLnieuws. (2019). Tienduizenden lopen klimaatmars in Den Haag: 'Mensen met macht doen niks'. Geraadpleegd op 9 april 2020, van:

https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/nieuws/nederland/artikel/4864151/klimaatmars-den-haag- klimaatpanel-rtl-nieuws-protest-malieveld

Ruts. H. (2017). Deliveroo & zzp’ers: simpelweg boeven of aanleiding voor nuttig debat? Zipeconomy. Geraadpleegd op 9 april, 2020, van:

https://www.zipconomy.nl/2017/08/deliveroo-zzpers-gewoon-boeven-of-aanleiding- voor-nuttig-debat/

Segev, S., Fernandes, J., & Wang, W. (2015). The effects of gain versus loss message framing and point of reference on consumer responses to green advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 36(1), 35-51.

Short, J., Williams, E. and Christie, B. (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. New York: Wiley.

Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 656- 667.

Stroud, N.J. 2017. Attention as a Valuable Resource, Political Communication, 34:3, 479-489. Telegraaf. (2020). Frankrijk zet zich schrap. Telegraaf, 25 januari 2020. Geraadpleegd op 2 juni

2020 van: https://advance-lexis- com.ezproxy.leidenuniv.nl:2443/document/?pdmfid=1516831&crid=0f28a5db-54b2- 4a72-9b01- 8dfc6413a796&pddocfullpath=%2Fshared%2Fdocument%2Fnews%2Furn%3Aconte ntItem%3A5Y2C-00S1-DYTV-D15B-00000- 00&pdcontentcomponentid=168873&pdteaserkey=sr125&pditab=allpods&ecomp=kb 63k&earg=sr125&prid=fb7ca3de-3b52-4e12-8c38-23e7a4112ee3

Thiessen, M. 2018. Het is tijd voor een nieuwe lobby. Frankwatching. Geraadpleegd op: https://www.frankwatching.com/archive/2018/05/06/tijd-voor-een-nieuwe-lobby/ Timmermans, A., Coops, R., van Keep, S. de Lange, R. en van Venetië, E. 2019. Public affairs

in maatschappelijk perspectief. Uitgever Wolters Kluwer.

Titley, S. (2003). How political and social change will transform the EU public affairs industry. Journal of Public Affairs, 3(1), 83-89.

Thomson, R. and Stokman, F.N. (2006) Research Design: Measuring Actors’ Positions, Saliences and Capabilities’. In Thomson, R., Stokman, F.N., Achen, C.H. and König, T. (eds).

Van Dale. (z.d). Betekenis Bedrijf. Geraadpleegd op 15 april 2020, van: https://www.vandale.nl/gratis-

woordenboek/nederlands/betekenis/bedrijf#.XpccLC2YOqQ Van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society. Sage Publications.

Van Dongen, A. (2019). ‘Meer dan 35.000 mensen bij klimaatmars Den Haag’, eindpunt verplaatst door drukte. Algemeen Dagblad, 27 september 2019. Geraadpleegd op 9 april van: https://www.ad.nl/nieuws/meer-dan-35-000-mensen-bij-klimaatmars-den-haag- eindpunt-verplaatst-door-drukte~a80d8c37/

Van Venetie, E. (2019). Laat eindgebruikers meelobbyen. Vm, juni 2019.

Warntjen, A. (2012). Measuring salience in EU legislative politics. European Union Politics, 13(1), 168-182.

Bijlage 1: Coderingsschema en voorbeeld tweets