• No results found

Dit word aan die leser oorgelaat om te besluit of hierdie laaste stelling ’n dreigement is teen diegene wat die diskoers van die rykes besig. Dit kan as onskuldig afgemaak word, maar hoe sou Eyes, wat niks verstaan nie, seker kon wees? In die Editor’s Note word gesê dat sommige van die bande vir groot dele geen spraak bevat nie, maar bloot geluide, soos fietsklokkies, voëls, grepe uit musiek en in een geval ’n paar minute van aanhoudende en onverklaarbare gelag. Waaroor word daar gelag? Wat weet ons nie?

97

Saam met Elli moet ons uitroep: “HEY, ANIMAL’S PEOPLE! I DON’T FUCKING UNDERSTAND YOU!” (183) Meer nog as Elli: Ons is die Eyes wat ’n traan pik oor al die pyn in die wêreld en dan die boek toemaak. Ons is die Eyes wat aan die ander ent van die kapitalistiese stelsel die joernalis en sy uitgewer ryk maak en dan die boek toemaak. Ons sê saam met Elli: “Oh poor Animal, what a life!” (184). Waarop hy reageer:

I’ll tell you what disgusts me about this place, which isn’t what disgusts you, such as scorpions, filth, lack of hygiene, etc. It’s not that if I want a shit, I must visit the railway line [...] What really disgusts me is that we people seem so wretched to you outsiders that you look at us with that so-soft expression, speak to us with that so-pious tone in your voice (184).

In Zoo City sien die leser die heterotopiese ruimtes deur die oë van Zinzi as ruimtes wat haar walg of haar flymskerp sinisme en sarkasme ontlok. Die roman kom nie verder as die uitbeelding van heterotopiese ruimtes en die heterotopiese zoo-fenomeen nie. In Animal’s People is dit grootliks as gevolg van die wyse waarop taal en letterkunde uitgebeeld word, asook die wyse waarop Animal as verteller funksioneer, wat die roman dit in my oë regkry om ’n alternatiewe ordening van die kantlyne daar te stel. Die sussende sienings oor diegene wat geïgnoreer word en diegene wat uitbuit en/of simpatiseer word tot so ’n mate omvergegooi dat dit die leser met nuwe, dommer Oë laat kyk. Soos McHale (1987:44) oor heterotopiese literatuur sê: “Radically discontinuous and inconsistent, it juxtaposes worlds of incompatible structure”. Meer nog: Animal’s People vervul die krities-etiese heterotopiese funksie wat Hubbs (2011) as fundamenteel beskou in die konstituering van ’n teks as heterotopie. Dit funksioneer as heterotopie van dis-illusie omdat dit die hulpverlening en onskuld, die ‘basiese begeertes’ en ‘ontwikkelde behoeftes’ van Eyes en kie as illusie ontbloot.

98 Hoofstuk 5 Gevolgtrekking

Ek wil my oorspronklike vraag oor of Beukes se “high-concept” spekulatiewe fiksie in die geval van

Zoo City ’n ‘ontvlugtingsopsie’ is, as volg begin beantwoord: In my alledaagse omgang met my

portuurgroep en rondgaan in Kaapstad is die ideologiese landskap van Zoo City mý wêreld. Meestal minus die verbeeldingryke truuks. Ek is dus geneig om Corrigall se kommentaar oor The Shining Girls te eggo: Die narratiewe kompleksiteit van Zoo City is soms verblindend, maar op die ou end is die ideologiese argitektuur van die roman ’n mimetiese representasie van my leefwêreld.

Wanneer Jamal (2013) praat van die globale idioom waarby Beukes en ander jong Suid-Afrikaanse skrywers inskakel, kwalifiseer hy: “It is not of course the universalism of our suffering and triumph that our writers have tactically engineered that matters here, but the transnational commercial idiom they have finally mastered”. Nixon (2011:38) glo dat dit nodig is om gebiede en studievelde wat anderkant postkolonialisme se konvensionele rykwydte val, in transnasionale terme aan te spreek. Tog spreek hy sy kommer as volg uit: “I do feel some concern about how the categorical turn, in literary studies, to world literature often ends up deflecting attention away from the anti-imperial concerns that a materialist postcolonial studies foregrounded” (Nixon, 2011:38). Die invloed wat die transnasionale

kommersiële idioom het op die wyse waarop kwessies rondom diskriminasie en “rights, law, justice”46

(Sinha, 2007:3) aangepak word, weerhou Zoo City myns insiens daarvan om as teks ’n heterotopie te konstitueer. Anders as in die geval van Animal’s People word daar nie werklik bo die polities-korrekte uitgestyg nie en val die kritiek sag op liberaal-kapitalistiese oë.

46

99

Beukes sê (met aanhalings uit Ben Williams van BookSA se opmerkings oor Suid-Afrikaanse literatuur) die volgende:

[A]lthough South African literary fiction is still wedded to “one white man’s lonely journey into his own interior through the country’s interior”, it’s in genre fiction that the readers will find fast, gritty stories “densely populated with a cross-section of South African society. That’s very exciting. And very new” (in Ansell, 2011:7).

Hierdie siening inaggenome klink die volgende aanhaling van die kritikus Nicholas Fagan dalk soos ’n pryslied vir die Suid-Afrikaanse literêre fiksie waarna Beukes en Williams verwys. Tog wil ek op hierdie punt ’n passasie van hom betrek:

Every Kurtz must have his Marlow – and Marlow will always come to take Kurtz home. It is a mark of our respect for those who lead us into darkness that we bring them back for burial, pay their debts and console their loved ones with lies. This process is played out over and over – and with every journey up the river, we discover that Kurtz has penetrated just a little farther than his counterparts before him. Poor old Marlow! Every time he heads upstream, he is obliged to a longer journey, through darker mysteries (in Pordzik, 2001:158).

Die donkerte of heterotopie waarheen ’n roman die leser kan neem, het myns insiens nie te make met of dit ‘literêre’ of ‘genre’ fiksie is nie. Dit wil wel voorkom of die ‘postnasionale psige’ redelik kieskeurig en selfs voorskriftelik is oor die tipe of graad van donkerte waarmee sy gekonfronteer wil word. As daar ’n soeke na ’n ‘bevryde verbeelding’ is, is dit dalk nie Gaylard se weergawe – wat die fondamente kan verskaf vir die oplossing van ingewikkelde en sensitiewe postkoloniale kwessies – wat in aanvraag is nie. Die verbeelding wat by die ‘transnasionale kommersiële idioom’ inskakel, is ’n verbeelding wat ons van die onuithoudbaarheid van sekere sosio-politiese realiteite ‘bevry’ deur dit binne ’n globale raamwerk aan te bied. Hierteenoor staan die effek van ’n roman soos Animal’s People wat spore van die Ander in jou agterplaas en ’n beklemming op jou bors laat.

Die donkerte waarheen Beukes se Zoo City ons neem, is nie ’n donkerte wat Marlow óf Zinzi noop om ’n ent vérder stroomop te reis nie. Soos wat Szczurek (2013:30) oor die roman opmerk: “As with

100

geen sprake van Zoo City of hierdie weergawe van die bevryde verbeelding as volwaardig heterotopiese skip nie. Die troosbootjies is genoeg en voldoen aan eerstewêreldse standaarde.

101 Bronnelys

An Intermediate Greek-English Lexicon Founded on the 7th Edition of Liddell and Scott’s Greek English Lexicon. 1972. S.v. ‘héteros’ en ‘tópos’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ansell, Gwen. 2011. Behind all the monkey business. Mail and Guardian, 12 Mei:7.

Barendse, Joan-Mari. 2013. Distopiese toekomsromans in die Afrikaanse literatuur ná 1999. Universiteit van Stellenbosch. Proefskrif ingelewer vir die graad Doktor in the Wysbegeerte in die Fakulteit Lettere en Sosiale Wetenskappe.

Bayne, Annette. 2010. Dark City. A magic twist on a very real place. Citizen, 10 Julie:1.

Beebee, Thomas O. 2008. Geographies of Nation and Region in Modern European and American

Fiction. Comparative Literature and Culture [Elektronies]. 10(3). Beskikbaar:

http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb [2013, 18 Mei].

Best, S. 1991. Window Dressing up as Art. Transition, 35: 20-31.

Beukes, Lauren. 2010. Zoo City. Johannesburg: Jacana.

Bindella, M. en G. Davis (reds.). 1993. Imagination and the creative impulse in the New Literatures in

English. Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi.

Blackburn, S. 1994. Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford en New York: Oxford University Press.

Boyer, M.C. 2008. The many mirrors of Foucault and their architectural reflections. In M. Dehaene en L. De Cauter (reds.) Heterotopia and the City: Public space in a postcivil society. Londen & New York: Routledge.

Carruth, Allison. 2011. The City Refigured. In S. LeMenager, T. Shewry en K. Hiltner (reds.).

102

Cenzatti, M. 2008. Heterotopias of difference. In M. Dehaene en L. De Cauter (reds.). Heterotopia and

the City: Public space in a postcivil society. Londen & New York: Routledge.

Charley, J. 2012. Time, Space and Narrative – Reflections on architecture, literature and modernity. In S. Edwards en J. Charley (reds.). Writing the Modern City: Literature, architecture, modernity. Londen: Routledge.

Corrigall, Mary. 2013. She glitters, but now she must be bold. The Sunday Independent, 12 Mei:18.

Craig, E. (red.) 2005. The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Londen & New York: Routledge.

De Cauter, L en M. Dehaene. 2008. The space of play: Towards a general theory of heterotopia. In M. Dehaene en L. De Cauter (reds.). Heterotopia and the City: Public space in a postcivil society. Londen & New York: Routledge.

Dehaene, Michiel & De Cauter, Lieven (reds.) 2008. Heterotopia and the City: Public space in a

postcivil society. Londen & New York: Routledge.

Dehaene, M en L. De Cauter. 2008. Introduction. In M. Dehaene en L. De Cauter (reds.) Heterotopia

and the City: Public space in a postcivil society. Londen & New York: Routledge.

De Kock, Leon. 2013. Does ‘SA Literature’ matter?. Beskikbaar:

http://sundayindybooks.blogspot.com/2013/03/does-sa-literature-matter.html. 24 Februarie. [2013, 13 Mei].

Dumm, Thomas L. 1996. Michel Foucault and the Politics of Freedom. Modernity and Political

Though, Volume 9. Thousand Oaks & Londen & New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

Eagleton, Terry. 2006 (1976). Criticism And Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory. Londen & New York: Verso.

103

Edwards, S. & Charley, J. (reds.) 2012. Writing the Modern City: Literature, architecture, modernity. Londen: Routledge.

Ferrier, Elizabeth. 1990. Mapping Power: Cartography and Contemporary Cultural Theory. Antithesis, 4(1): 35-49.

Foucault, Michel. 2002 (1970). The Order of Things: An archaeology of the human sciences. Londen & New York: Routledge Classics.

–. 1986. Of Other Spaces. Vertaal uit die Frans deur J. Miskowiec. Diacritics, 16(1): 22–27.

–. 2008. Of Other Spaces. Vertaal uit die Frans deur L. De Cauter en M. Dehaene. In M. Dehaene en L. De Cauter (reds.). Heterotopia and the City: Public space in a postcivil society. Londen & New York: Routledge.

Genocchio, B. 1995. Discourse, Discontinuity, Difference: The Question of ‘Other’ Spaces. In Watson, S. en K. Gibson (reds.). Postmodern Cities and Spaces. Oxford: Blackwell.

Guiley, R.E. 1999. The Encyclopedia of Witches and Witchcraft. New York: Checkmark Books.

Haw, P. 2013. Time travel and the tricks of marketing. Business Day, 7 Mei:9.

Hetherington, Kevin. 1997. The Badlands of Modernity: Heterotopia & Social Ordering. Londen & New York: Routledge.

Hubbs, T. 2011. “Civilizations Without Boats”: Stories. Universiteit van Texas. Tesis ingehandig vir ’n meestersgraad.

104

Jamal, Ashraf. 2013. Lauren Beukes: At the forefront of the global invasion. Mail and Guardian [Aanlyn], 1 Maart. Beskikbaar: http://mg.co.za/article/2013-03-01-00-lauren-beukes-at-the-forefront- of-the-global-invasion/. [2013, Augustus 1]

Johnson, Peter. 2006. Unravelling Foucault’s ‘different spaces’. History of the Human Sciences, 19(4):75-90.

Johnson, Peter. 2012. Interpretations of Heterotopia [Aanlyn]. Beskikbaar:

http://www.heterotopiastudies.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/3.1-Interpretations-pdf.pdf [2013,

April 20].

Kern, K. 2008. Heterotopia of the theme park street. In M. Dehaene en L. De Cauter (reds.).

Heterotopia and the City: Public space in a postcivil society. Londen & New York: Routledge.

King, A.D. (red.) 1996. Re-presenting the City: Ethnicity, Capital and Culture in the 21st-Century Metropolis. Londen: Macmillan Press.

King, A.D. 1996. Introduction: Cities, texts and paradigms. In A. D. King (red.). Re-presenting the

City: Ethnicity, Capital and Culture in the 21st-Century Metropolis. Londen: Macmillan Press.

LeMenager, S., Shewry, T. en K. Hiltner (reds.). Environmental Criticism for the Twenty-First

Century. New York: Routledge.

Lotz, Sarah. 2011. Interview with Lauren Beukes by Sarah Lotz. In L. Beukes. 2de Druk. Zoo City. Johannesburg: Jacana Media.

Low, S. 2008. The gated community as heterotopia. In M. Dehaene en L. De Cauter (reds.).

Heterotopia and the City: Public space in a postcivil society. Londen & New York: Routledge.

Maczynska, Magdalena. 2010. This Monstrous City: Urban Visionary Satire in the Fiction of Martin Amis, Will Self, China Miéville, and Maggie Gee. Contemporary Literature, 51(1): 58-86.

105

Maditla, Neo. 2013. Artists take a page out of Beukes novel to raise funds. Cape Argus, 23 Augustus:11.

Mahala, S. 2014. Why 2013 was a good year for readers. Sunday Independent, 5 Januarie:15

Marcuse, P. 1995. Not chaos, but walls: Postmodernism and the partitioned city. In S. Watson en K. Gibson (reds.). Postmodern Cities and Spaces. Oxford: Blackwell.

Marks, John. 1995. A New Image of Thought. New Formations, 25: 66-76.

McHale, Brian. 1997. Postmodernist Fiction. New York & Londen: Methuen.

Mumford, L. 1966. The City in History. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Muzzio, D. en J. Muzzio-Rentas. 2008. ‘A kind of instinct’: The cinematic mall as heterotopia. In M. Dehaene en L. De Cauter (reds.). Heterotopia and the City: Public space in a postcivil society. Londen & New York: Routledge.

Nadeau, M. 1965. Love and Laughter. Surrealism reappraised. Vertaal uit die Frans deur R. Howard. New York: Collier Books.

Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.

Norwood-Young, Jason. 2010. A wash in the simile. Mail and Guardian, 8 Julie:6.

Platz, N.H. 1993. Janet Frame’s Novels, in M. Bindella & G. Davis (reds.) 1993. [208-214]

Pordzik, Ralph. 2001. The Quest for Postcolonial Utopia: A Comparative Introduction to the Utopian

106

Purdy, Anthony. 2005. Toward an Anthropology of Place in Migrant Writing: Place, Non-Place, and “Other Spaces” in Fiction by Régine Robin. Quebec Studies, 39:17-31, Lente/Somer.

Roos, H. 2011. The war of the worlds: Relocating the boundaries between the human and the non- human. Journal of Literary Studies, 27(4):50–70.

Sassen, S. 1996. Rebuilding the Global City: Economy, Ethnicity and Space. In A. D. King (red.). Re-

presenting the City: Ethnicity, Capital and Culture in the 21st-Century Metropolis. Londen: Macmillan

Press.

Schoolman, M. 1996. Preface. In Dumm, Thomas L. Michel Foucault and the Politics of Freedom.

Modernity and Political Though, Volume 9. Thousand Oaks & Londen & New Delhi: SAGE

Publications.

Shattuck, R. 1965. Introduction. In Nadeau, Maurice. Love and Laughter. Surrealism reappraised. New York: Collier Books.

Sohn, H. 2008. Heterotopia: anamnesis of a medical term. In M. Dehaene en L. De Cauter (reds.).

Heterotopia and the City: Public space in a postcivil society. Londen & New York: Routledge.

Soja, Edward W. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. Londen & New York: Verso.

–. 1995. Heterotopologies: A remembrance of other spaces in the Citadel-LA. In S. Watson en K. Gibson (reds.). Postmodern Cities and Spaces. Oxford: Blackwell.

Stobie, C. 2012. Dystopian dreams from South Africa: Lauren Beukes’s Moxyland and Zoo City.

African Identities, 10(4):367–80.

107

Topinka, Robert J. 2010. Foucault, Borges, Heterotopia: Producing Knowledge in Other Spaces.

Foucault Studies, 9, September:54-70.

Van der Leek, N. 2013. The state of publishing in South Africa. Finweek, 26 September:20.

Viktor, Anél. 2013. Koningin van gruwel. Beeld, 26 April:14.

Wainwright, J.& Barnes, T.J. 2009. Nature, economy, and the space-place distinction. Environment

and Planning D: Society and Space, 27:966-986.

Watson, S. & Gibson, K.(reds.). 1995. Postmodern Cities and Spaces. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wertlen, Erika. 2011. There is a place for science fiction in SA. Daily Dispatch, 25 Junie:16.

Wirtz, Patrick H. 1997. Zoo City: Bourgeois values and scientific culture in the industrial landscape.

Journal of Urban Design [Elektronies], 2(1), Februarie: 61-83. Beskikbaar:

http://search.ebscohost.com.ez.sun.ac.za/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=9707262309&site=eho st-live [2012, 30 November].

http://www.subzin.com/search.php?q=Here.+Buy+yourself+something+nice. [2014, 25 Mei]

108 IKABOD