Dialogues as a Dynamic Framework for Logic
Rückert, H.
Citation
Rückert, H. (2007, June 26). Dialogues as a Dynamic Framework for Logic. Retrieved from
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12099
Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version
License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the
Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden
Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/12099
Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).
Stellingen
1) Dialogical Logic is an ideal framework for the combination of different logics.
2) Concerning the formulation of non-classical logics dialogical logic offers a fruitful compromise between Došen's principle and Girard's principle.
3) In the dialogical framework it can be shown what is wrong with logical particles like tonk.
4) With the help of dialogical logic one can give two distinct readings of anti-realist talk of meaning in terms of assertibility conditions.
5) There are two important aspects of knowledge, one of which is neglected in standard epistemic logics.
6) An adequate logical analysis reveals that the existence of ‘intensional contexts’ is a myth.
7) Williamson’s new proposal of reference as knowledge maximising is a an interesting alternative to standard approaches to reference.
8) Kripke's distinction between rigid and non-rigid designators is flawed.
9) Kripke's conception of analyticity in Naming and Necessity is unconvincing.
10) If Wittgenstein had followed through the main line of thought of the Tractatus this should have led him to a language without tautologies and contradictions.
11) It is misleading to call Hume an irrationalist concerning induction.
12) The most famous doctor from Leiden by far often found himself in philosophically relevant circumstances.
