Lipases in the preparation of beta-blockers
Citation for published version (APA):Kloosterman, M., Elferink, V. H. M., Iersel, van, J., Roskam, J. H., Meijer, E. M., Hulshof, L. A., & Sheldon, R. A. (1988). Lipases in the preparation of beta-blockers. Trends in Biotechnology, 6(10), 251-256.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7799(88)90057-1
DOI:
10.1016/0167-7799(88)90057-1 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/1988
Document Version:
Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)
Please check the document version of this publication:
• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.
• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.
• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.
Link to publication
General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:
www.tue.nl/taverne
Take down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at: openaccess@tue.nl
providing details and we will investigate your claim.
T I B T E C H - OCTOBER 1988 [Vol. 6]
13 Thorpe, P. E., Ross, W. C., Brown, A . N . et al. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 140, 63-71
14 Greenfield, L., Johnson, V. G. and Youle, R. J. (1987) Science 238, 536- 539
15 Chang, M-S., Russell, D. W., Uhr, J. w. and Vitetta, E.S. (1987) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 5640-5644 16 Richer, G., Carriere, D., Blythman,
H. E. and Vidal, H. (1982) in Lectins - Biology, Biochemistry, Clinical Bio- chemistry (Vol. 2) Walter de Gruyter 17 Robertus, J. D., Piatek, M., Ferris, R.
and Houston, L.L. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 19-20
18 Vitetta, E. S. and Thorpe, P. E. (1985) Cancer Drug Delivery 3, 191-197 19 Abuchowski, A., McCoy, J. R.,
Palcznk, N. C., van Es, T. and Davis, F. F. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 3582- 3586
20 K6hler, G. and Milstein, C. (1975) Nature 256, 495-497
21 Ghose, T. and Blair, A. H. (1986) CRC Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 3, 263-359
22 Laurent, G., Kuhlein, E., Casellas, P. et al. (1986) Cancer Res. 46, 2289-2294
23 Sears, H. F., Atkinson, B., Mattis, J. et al. (1982) Lancet i, 762-765
24 Till, M., May, R. D., Uhr, J.W., Thorpe, P. E. and Vitetta, E. S. (1988) Cancer Res. 48, 1119-1123
25 Fodstad, O., Kvalheim, G., Pihl, A., Godal, A. and Funderud, S. (1988) J. Natl Cancer Inst. 80, 439-443 26 Casellas, P., Bourrie, B. J., Gros, P. and
Jansen, F. K. (1984)J. Biol. Chem. 259, 9359-9364
27 Thorpe, P. E. and Ross, W. C. J. (1982) Immuno]. Rev. 62, 119-158
28 Carlsson, J., Drevin, H. and Axen, R. (1978) Biochem. J. 173, 723-737 29 King, T. P. and Kochoumian, L. (1978)
Biochemistry, 17, 1499-1506
30 Thorpe, P. E., Blakey, D. C., Brown, A. N. F. et al. (1987) J. Natl Cancer Inst. 79, 1101-1112
31 Blakey, D. C., Watson, G. J., Knowles, P. P. and Thorpe, P. E. (1987) Cancer Res. 47, 947-952
32 Thorpe, P. E., Wallace, P. M.,
Knowles, P.P. e t a ] . (1987) Cancer Res. 47, 5924-5931
33 Julian, R., Duncan, S., Weston, P. D. and Wrigglesworth, R. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 132, 68-73
34 Kitagawa, T., Fujiwara, K., Tomonoh, S., Takahashi, K., and Koida, M. (1983) J. Biochem. 94, 1165-1172 35 Blatter, W. A., Kuenzi, B. S., Lambert,
J.M. and Senter, P.D. (1985) Bio- chemistry 24, 1517-1524
36 Fujiwara, K., Saita, T. and Kitagawa, T. (1988) J. Immunol. Methods 110, 47-53
37 Vitetta, E., Fulton, R. J., May, R. D., Till, M. and Uhr, J. W. (1987) Science 238, 1098-1104
38 Harkonen, S., Stoudemire, S., Jr, Mischak, R. et al. (1987) Cancer Res. 47, 1377-1382
39 Loberboum-Galski, H., FitzGerald, D., Chandhary, V., Adhya, S. and Pastan, I. (1988) Proc. Nat] Acad. Sci. 85, 1922-1926
41 Brown, B. A., Davis, G. L., Saltzgaber- Muller, J. et al. (1987) CancerRes. 47, 3577-3583
[] [ ] [] [] [] [ ] [] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Lipases in the preparation
of 13-blockers
Marcel Kloosterman, Vincent H. M. Elferink, Jack van lersel,
Jan-Hendrik Roskam, Emmo M. Meijer, LumbertusA. Hulshof
and RogerA. Sheldon
[3-Adrenergic blocking agents are pharmaceutical products used for
the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris. These ~-blockers
can be prepared in optically active form by conventional
crystallization procedures, by asymmetric chiral synthesis and by
using stereoselective enzymes.
Lipases (triacylglycerol a c y l h y d r o -lase EC 3.1.1.3) o c c u r w i d e l y in nature. T h e y b e l o n g to the class of serine h y d r o l a s e s , a n d t h e r e f o r e do n o t r e q u i r e cofactors. T h e i r bio- logical f u n c t i o n is to catalyse the
Marcel Kloosterman and E m m o Meijer are at D S M Research, Bio-organic chem- istry section, PO B o x 18, 6160 MD Geleen, Netherlands. Vincent Elferink, Jack van Iersel, Jan-Hendrik Roskam, Lumbertus H u l s h o f and Roger Sheldon are at A n d e n o BV, Process Research Labora- tory, PO B o x 81, 5900 A B Venlo, Netherlands.
h y d r o l y s i s of t r i a c y l g l y c e r o l s to y i e l d free fatty acids, di- a n d m o n o - a c y l g l y c e r o l s a n d glycerol. T h e re- a c t i o n is reversible: lipases can also catalyse the f o r m a t i o n of acyl- glycerols f r o m free fatty acids a n d glycerol 1.
Lipases are active at o i l - w a t e r interfaces of a h e t e r o g e n e o u s re- a c t i o n s y s t e m , a n d are t h u s differ- e n t i a t e d f r o m esterases w h i c h act on w a t e r - s o l u b l e substrates in a h o m o - g e n e o u s m i l i e u . T h e p r e f e r e n c e of lipases for substrates at interfaces seems to be c o n f e r r e d b y the p r e s e n c e of interfacial b i n d i n g sites o n the
e n z y m e a n d n o t b y u n i q u e p r o p e r t i e s of t h e catalytic site. S i n c e lipases f u n c t i o n at an o i l - w a t e r interface t h e i r c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n is r a t h e r c o m p l i c a t e d - o n e of the r e a s o n s w h y lipases h a v e b e e n s t u d i e d less e x t e n s i v e l y t h a n o t h e r i n d u s t r i a l e n z y m e s s u c h as a m y l a s e s a n d proteases.
Applications of lipases
D u r i n g the last d e c a d e s , l i p o l y t i c e n z y m e s h a v e b e e n u s e d in the d a i r y a n d f o o d i n d u s t r y (cheese r i p e n i n g , p r o d u c t i o n of flavors a n d c o c o a b u t t e r substitutes), in detergents, for tanning, s e w a g e t r e a t m e n t a n d cos- m e t i c s 2~. For drugs (and agro- c h e m i c a l s ) t h e r e is a n i n c r e a s i n g t r e n d t o w a r d s the use of o p t i c a l l y p u r e s t e r e o i s o m e r s , w h i c h are m o r e target-specific a n d s h o w f e w e r side- effects t h a n r a c e m i c m i x t u r e s of isomers. C o n s e q u e n t l y , a p p r o v a l p r o c e d u r e s f r o m the FDA a n d equiv- alent r e g u l a t o r y b o d i e s are l i k e l y to t i g h t e n in the n e a r future. T h e r e are t h e r e f o r e i m p o r t a n t stimuli for c o m p a n i e s to m a r k e t o p t i c a l l y p u r e isomers. T h i s leads to an i n c r e a s i n g d e m a n d for efficient p r o c e s s e s for the i n d u s t r i a l - s c a l e s y n t h e s i s of optic- ally active c o m p o u n d s , w h i c h in t u r n © 1988, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd (UK) 0 1 6 7 - 9 4 3 0 / 8 8 / $ 0 2 , 0 0TIBTECH - OCTOBER 1988 [Vol. 6]
- - F i g . 1
ArO NHR
H OH
Typical structure of t~-blockers.
stimulates increased research and development on the production of specialty chemicals via, for instance, lipases or esterases 5. Development, in some cases, is well advanced: at Chemie-Linz in Austria, a process for the resolution of racemic a-halo- propionic acids by lipases 6-8 is operating on pilot-plant scale; and at A n d e n o - D S M 9 the resolution of racemic alkanoic acid oxyranyl methyl esters (glycidyl esters) is performed on a commercial scale.
In this paper we describe the potential application of lipases in the chemoenzymatic synthesis of chiral intermediates for optically active D-adrenergic blocking agents (D- blockers) and compare it with com- peting technologies.
~-Blockers
D-Blockers are effective in h u m a n s for the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris. In the pharma- ceutical industry some fifty different compounds having D-blocking act- ivity have been brought to some stage of commercial development. About two dozen of these are approved for use and accounted worldwide for $2.2 billion in revenues in 1985 (Ref. 10).
The aryloxypropanolamine struc-
ture containing one chiral center (Fig. 1) is characteristic of almost all of the FDA-approved [3-blockers. In general, D-blocking activity resides in the
(S)-enantiomer.
For instance,(S)-
propranolol (Ar, 1-naphthyl; R, iso- propyl) is 100 times more active thanthe
(R)-isomer.
However, with theexceptions of
(S)-timolol
(Merck,Sharp & Dohme),
(S)-penbutolol
(Hoechst) and
(S)-levobunolol
(Warner-Lambert) (Fig.
2) 11-13,
all ofthe FDA-approved D-blockers are marketed as racemates.
For some compounds benefits have
been claimed for the
(R)-enantiomer
(e.g. anti-glaucoma activity). Of the ophthalmic D-blockers, both enanti- omers are reported to be equally effective in the treatment of glau- coma. Nevertheless, in this case, reduction of the u n w a n t e d side-effect (cardiovascular D-blocking) can only
be accomplished by removing the
(S)-
isomer.
Preparation of optically active
D-blockers
Until the early 1980s, only a few methods, all non-enzymatic, had been described for the preparation of optically active D-blockers. They could be prepared from o-man-
nitol via
(R)-2,3-O-8-isopropylidene
glyceraldehyde 14'15, from racemic D- blockers by optical resolution 16'17, or
from racemic
3-tert-butylamino-l,2-
propanediol by optical resolu-
tion 18'19 (Fig. 3). Subsequently, the list of publications and patents concerning enzyme-catalysed pro- cesses to chiral intermediates of D- blockers has been growing.
Iriuchijima and colleagues at
Sagami hydrolysed (+)-l,2-diacet- oxy-3-chloropropane enantioselec-
F i g . 2
":"T
oH OH H OH H OH
(S)-timolol (S)-penbutolol (S)-Ievobunolol
Structures of (S)-timolol, (S)-penbutolol and (S)-Ievobunolol.
tively with lipoprotein lipase to
produce the
(S)-enantiomer
in 90%enantiomeric excess 2° (Fig. 4a).
Under alkaline conditions, the
(S)-
enantiomer could be converted with various phenols into the correspond-
ing
(S)-3-aryloxy-l,2-propanediols
from w h i c h several [~-blockers [e.g.
(S)-propranolol]
were synthesizedchemically.
Iriuchijima's group also investi- gated the asymmetric hydrolysis of
(+) 1-acetoxy-2,3-dichloropropane
(Fig. 4b), w h i c h is easily prepared from 1-chloro-2-propene (Ref. 21).
The recovered ester,
(S)-l-acetoxy-
2,3-dichloropropane was converted,
u n d e r basic conditions, into
(R)-
epichlorohydrin, w h i c h was con-
verted
in situ
into(S)-2,3-dichloro-
propylphenylcarbamate (a compound
with herbicidal activity)
(S)-
propranolol and
(S)-pindolol.
Optically active epichlorohydrin is a potentially attractive intermediate for a n u m b e r of industrially relevant chiral chemicals (e.g. D-blockers, L-carnitine, insect pheromones) and the preparation of its separate isomers has been the subject of m u c h research lately. For instance, chiral epichloro- hydrin has also been prepared by:
• stereoselective hydrolysis of
2-acyloxy-3-chloropropyl-p-toluene-
sulphonate by lipase from
Pseudo-
monas aeruginosa22;
• esterification of 2,3-dichloro-1-
propanol by lipase from
Candida
cylindracea
and tributyrin23;• removal of
(R)-(+)-2,3-dichloro-1-
propanol from a racemic mixture by
a strain of
Pseudomonas
to yield the(S)-isomer24;
• stereospecific epoxidation of 3-
chloro-l-propene by a
Mycobac-
terium
sp.25;
• chemical means (see for example Refs 26 and 27).
Other chiral intermediates of
D-blockers have also been pro- duced enzymatically. Ohno and colleagues from Sumitomo used
lipase from a
Pseudomonas
speciesto catalyse asymmetric hydrolysis
of
(R,S)-l-acetoxy-2-aryloxypropio-
nitrile 28 (Fig. 4c).
(S)-l-acetoxy-2-a-
naphthyloxypropionitrile, obtained by lipolytic resolution, was con-
verted in two steps into
(S)-
TIBTECH - OCTOBER 1988 [Vol. 6] Fig. 3 ~ O IPA H O ~ * " ~ N H C(CH3) 3 HO + ( C H 3 ) 3 C N H 2 ~ OH i I " ~ 0 /N ~---.T.--Nv..J
H OH
(S)-timolol various routes \l
resolution with (S)-pyroglutamic acidH O ~ N H C(CH3) 3
H OH
32% yiela (S)Synthesis of (S)-timolol via optical resolution of racemic 3-t-butylamino-1,2- propanediol.
followed by Ohta et el. 29 who used growing cells of a Bacillus strain.
Another route has been developed at Kanegafuchi. Watanabe et el. 3° synthesized 2-0xazolidinone esters, from glycidol or allylalcohol. The racemic mixtures were subsequently selectively hydrolysed by lipopro-
tein lipase. Thus, (R,S)-5-acyl-
oxymethyl-3-alkyl-2-0xazolidinones were converted into the correspond- ing (R)-5-hydroxymethyl-3-alkyl-2- oxazolidinones together with the (S)- enantiomer of the original 5-acyloxy-
methyl derivative (Fig. 4d). Treat- ment of this (S)-derivative with
sodium hydroxide yielded the
desired (S)-oxazolidinone; the
unwanted (R)-by-product could be inverted, giving (S)-hydroxymethyl-
3-alkyl-2-0xazolidinone in high
overall yield 31.
Recently an elegant .method for lipase-mediated enantioselective hy- drolysis of esters of epoxy alcohols was reparted by Ladner and White- sides32: optically active (R)-glycidyl esters were isolated at laboratory
scale using a commercially available lipase preparation from porcine pancreas.
At Andeno-DSM the lipase-cata- lysed resolution of racemic glycidyl
butyrate (R in Fig. 4e,
C3H7)
has beenimproved considerably and is now being exploited on a commercial scale to give (R)-glycidyl butyrate and
(R)-glycidol (Fig. 4e) with high en- antiomeric excesses. From these chiral products both (R)- and (S)- glycidyl tosylate of high enantio- meric purity are prepared.
The high selectivity for Oonucleo- philic attack at C-1, makes these tosylates highly attractive inter- mediates for a number of industrially important chemicals 33'34 (Fig. 5). In addition, these chiral glycidyl tosyl- ates exhibit an excellent thermal stability, both chemical and optical. Both (R)- and (S)oglycidyl tosylate are being marketed*.
*For industrial purposes, samples may be obtained from: Mr P. Mfzris, Adeno BV, New Products Development Department, PO Box 81, 5900 AB Venlo, Netherlands.
Fig. 4 C I , , / ~ OA c l i p o p r o t e i n /ipsse OAc (+)-l,2-diacetoxy- 3-chloropropane CI'~'OA¢.~. + (R)-alcohol H OA¢ (S)-l,2-diacetoxy- 3-chloropropane b C I / ' ~ , " ~ O A ¢ p a n c r e a t i n C I ~ O A c +(R)-alcohol H20 Cl H Cl (+)-1 -acetoxy-2, (S)-1 -acetoxy-2, 3-dichloropropane 3-dichloropropane
I
(S)-l~-blockers ~ ~ I '~"~'C! I o ' ; Co" y N lipase ~ +(R)-alcohol
OAc H OAc
(R,S)-I
-acetcxy-
(S)-1 -acetoxy-
2-aryloxypropionitrile 2-aryloxypropionitrile
o lipoprotein o
R2-C-O -R' .,
lipase H
o o
( R,S)-5-acyloxymethyl- (S)-5-acyloxy- t (R)-5-hydroxymethyl-
3-alkyl-2-oxazolidinone methyl-3-alkyl- 3-alkyl-2-oxazolid-
2-oxazolidinone inone
t NaOH inversion
blockers(S)-l~- ~NaOH IArONa. TosCl . o ~ . . ~_ ..
(S)-5-hydroxymethyl- 3-alkyl-2-oxazolidinone e o porcine
3 pancreat,
,
1
H o lipase r ~ 0 H 0(R,S)-glycidyl ester (R)-glycidyl ester (R)-glycidol
Potential applications of lipases in the preparation of chiral intermediates to/3-blockers.
Competing technologies
Alternative methods for the pre- paration of chiral intermediates for [~-blockers have been reported. For instance, microbial epoxidation of aryl allyl ethers yielding (+)-aryl glycidyl ethers has been reported by scientists from Ibis 35'36. So far, the reaction has only been performed at low substrate concentrations and the microorganisms appear not to have a broad substrate specificity. In a more recent patent application from Ibis 37
it is disclosed that
(R)-l,3-dioxolane-
4-methanol
[(R)-solketal]
can be pre-pared by treating racemic solketal with microbial cells that stereo-
selectively metabolize the
(S)-isomer.
Nevertheless, the large number of
chemical steps needed to convert
(R)-
solketal into ~-blockers seems to prohibit its use in this way.
An elegant chemical approach to the production of chiral glycidols by
asymmetric epoxidation of allyl
alcohol was developed b y Sharpless and co-workers 38. In the original paper, poor yields were obtained because of low extraction yields but improvements have been reported 34. When compared with these tech- nologies or with the production of chiral epichlorohydrin 22-27 the pro- duction of chiral epoxides by a lipase-catalysed resolution of glycidyl
esters is very attractive. It is
simple, easy to scale up and the reactions can be performed at very high substrate concentrations. In general, for a lipase-catalysed hydro- lytic reaction, separation of the emulsified layers can be a serious problem on an industrial scale. Thus selection of a suitable solvent for extraction is essential. In optimizing our process for the lipase-mediated resolution of racemic glycidyl esters we have managed to solve these problems effectively without re- course to immobilizing the lipase or using a membrane reactor.
Future developments
This review has shown that m a n y chiral intermediates to industrially
relevant c o m p o u n d s [e.g.
(S)-~-
blockers,
(R)-
and(S)-epichloro-
hydrin] are easily p r o d u c e d using lipolytic enzymes. In our opinion, more attention should be directed towards two ends in particular:
Fig. 5
T I B T E C H - OCTOBER 1988 [Vol. 6]Me3N ~'/~"~CO2
HO HL-carnitine
O C H O ~'" A II e) 18,37^'...~'~,, "O-P~O'VN M e3 rl 3L;LJU 1"1 U II Oplatelet aggregation
~. ' A Nf a c t o r \
"-[',,IOCH2P(OH)2 \S-HMPA -"OH
(anti-viral)
ferro-electric
liquidcrystals
O . , oo-!-R
R'O H
6 e
j
3,~1
O
I~("~O--S--(C) ~-C H 3 L~_~. I~ ~,;J O H O~.~2 1
o-s H
~ z--~
phospholipids HO H ...-p.-chiralglycols
chiral
polymersA r O ~ N H R
H OH (S)-8-blockersApplications of (R)- and (S)-glycidyltosylates.
(1) screening for novel lipases with industrially relevant properties (e.g.
thermostability, stereoselectivity);
and (2) regulating the synthesis of exocellular microbial lipase in order to produce the biocatalyst.
Screening
Some general criteria for goal-
orientated screening programmes
have been put forward by Cheet- ham39: one can consider using such methods as recombinant-DNA tech- niques, mutagenesis, m e d i u m engin- eering, and isolation of microorgan- isms from extreme environments 39'4°. Laborious random screening pro- grammes can also be successful; such programmes performed by Japanese scientists from Sumitomo, Sagami and Kanegafuchi led to systems for the resolution ofracemates 2°'21'28'3°'31. It has been estimated that less than 1% of the world's microorganisms have been properly examined, so it seems that much scope remains in this area.
Lipase synthesis
In general, the activity and amount of lipase produced by microorgan- isms is strongly d e p e n d e n t on en- vironmental factors such as m e d i u m composition and culture conditions. Moreover, culture conditions may also influence the ratio of extra- to intra-cellular lipase production and their specific properties. With re- spect to m e d i u m composition, lipase production is often stimulated by lipids such as lard, olive oil, butter and fatty acids. Effects of poly- saccharides, inorganic substances and nitrogen and carbon sources have also been reported.
For fungi, the use of submerged cultures may enhance lipase pro- duction in some species, whereas semi-solid cultivation is favorable
to others (e.g.
Aspergillus
sp.41).
For instance,
Rhizopus delamar
insemi-solid cultures mainly p r o d u c e d
amylase and protease activity,
whereas in submerged cultures there was a substantial production of
T I B T E C H - OCTOBER 1988 [Vol. 6]
m u l t i f o r m (A, B a n d C) lipases w i t h o u t the p r o d u c t i o n of pro- teases 42. W h e t h e r the o r g a n i s m pro- d u c e d B or C lipases c o u l d be c o n t r o l l e d u s i n g s e l e c t e d n i t r o g e n s o u r c e s a n d p h o s p h o l i p i d s 42. Large- scale p r o d u c t i o n of n a t u r a l l y occur- ring lipases in g e n e t i c a l l y e n g i n e e r e d o r g a n i s m s is also b e c o m i n g a reality. S o l v e n t s t u d i e s Investigations o n m o d e l s y s t e m s for l i p a s e - c a t a l y s e d reactions s h o u l d be e m p h a s i z e d in o r d e r to o b t a i n a b e t t e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g of the factors t h a t i n f l u e n c e t h e stereo- a n d regio- s e l e c t i v i t y of t h e s e reactions. Initial results i n d i c a t e that a d d i t i o n of organic c o - s o l v e n t s m a r k e d l y in- f l u e n c e s the regio- a n d stereo- selectivity, stability a n d activity of s o m e lipases. F o r instance, a 24-fold i n c r e a s e in e n z y m e activity was n o t e d w h e n a c e t o n e was r e p l a c e d b y m o r e a p o l a r c o - s o l v e n t s (e.g. h e x a n e , d i - n - b u t y l e t h e r ) d u r i n g the regio- selective h y d r o l y s i s of a per-O- a c e t y l a t e d c a r b o h y d r a t e b y lipase f r o m C a n d i d a cylindracea 4a. Sol- v e n t s s u c h as c a r b o n t e t r a c h l o r i d e 6-8 a n d i s o o c t a n e 44 also affected the s t e r e o s e l e c t i v i t y , e n z y m e stability a n d activity of lipase from C a n d i d a
cylindracea. Lipases can r e t a i n t h e i r
e s t e r i f i c a t i o n a n d t r a n s e s t e r i f i c a t i o n activity in n e a r l y a n h y d r o u s organic solvents, e v e n at h i g h e r t e m p e r - atures 45. By c o v a l e n t a t t a c h m e n t to an a m p h i p a t h i c p o l y e t h y l e n e glycol p o l y m e r , lipases can e v e n be m a d e soluble in organic solvents w i t h (partial) r e t e n t i o n of activity 46.
Protein engineering
P r o p e r t i e s of lipases that are p o t e n t i a l targets of m o d i f i c a t i o n in the f u t u r e i n c l u d e , for. e x a m p l e , s t e r e o s e l e c t i v i t y , substrate specifi- city a n d affinity, p H a n d t e m p e r a t u r e o p t i m a , a n d r e s i s t a n c e to inactiva- t i o n b y n o n - a q u e o u s solvents, heat, h i g h salt c o n c e n t r a t i o n s , p r o t e o l y s i s or o x i d i z i n g substances. C u r r e n t k n o w l e d g e of s t r u c t u r e - f u n c t i o n re- l a t i o n s h i p s of lipases is limited: a l t h o u g h m o r e t h a n 300 p r o t e i n s t r u c t u r e s h a v e b e e n d e t e r m i n e d , o n l y o n e of t h e s e is of a lipase (from G e o t r i c h u m c a n d i d u m , d e t e r m i n e d at 2.5 A r e s o l u t i o n ) 47. T h u s it will take c o n s i d e r a b l e time to a c c u m u l a t e sufficient k n o w l e d g e o n s t r u c t u r e - f u n c t i o n r e l a t i o n s h i p s in lipases to be able to d e s i g n a l i p o l y t i c e n z y m e w i t h m o r e d e s i r a b l e p r o p e r t i e s .
Effective f u t u r e w o r k o n the im- p r o v e m e n t of l i p a s e - b a s e d s y s t e m s for p r o d u c i n g p h a r m a c e u t i c a l s will d e m a n d a c o o r d i n a t e d m u l t i d i s c i - p l i n a r y a p p r o a c h i n c o r p o r a t i n g gen- etics, r e c o m b i n a n t DNA t e c h n o l o g y , m i c r o b i a l p h y s i o l o g y , b i o c h e m i c a l e n g i n e e r i n g , e n z y m o l o g y , p r o t e i n c h e m i s t r y a n d c r y s t a l l o g r a p h y . References
1 Borgstr6m, B. and Brockman, H.L., eds (1984) Lipases, Elsevier
2 Dziezak, J. B. (1986) Food Techno]. 114-120
3 Stead, D. (1986)J. DairyRes. 53,481- 505
4 Seitz, E. W. (1974) J. Am. Oil Chem.
Soc. 51, 12-16
5 Kamphuis, J., Kloosterman, M., Schoemaker, H.E., Boesten, W. H. J. and Meijer, E. M. (1987) in Proceed-
ings of the 4th European Congress of Biotechnology (Vol. 4) (Neijssel, O.M., van der Meer, R.R. and Luyben, K. C. A. M., eds), pp. 331- 348, Elsevier
6 Kirchner, G., Scollar, M.P. and Klibanov, A. M. (1985) J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 107, 7072-7076
7 Klibanov, A. M. (1986) US Patent No. 4 601 987
8 Dahod, S. K. and Siuta-Mangano, P. (1987) Biotechnol. Bioeng. 30, 995- 999
9 Sheldon, R. A. (1987) Biotechnol.
Ned. 1, 18-19
10 Pharmaceutical Products Worldwide (1987) Flemings Research, London 11 Wasson, B. K., Gibson, W. K., Stuart,
R.S., Williams, H. W. R. and Yates, C.H. (1972) J. Med. Chem. 15, 651- 655
12 Hfirtfelder, G., Lessenich, H., and Schmitt, K. (1972) Arzneim-Forsch./
Drug Res. 22, 930-932
13 Schwender, C. F., Farber, S., Blaum, C. and Shavel, J. (1970) J. Med. Chem. 13,684-688
14 Tsuda, Y., Yoshimoto, K. and Nishikawa, T. (1981) Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 29, 3593-3595
15 Jurczak, J., Pikul, S. and Bauer, T. (1986) Tetrahedron 42,447-488 16 Howe, R. and Shanks, R. G. (1966)
Nature 210, 1336-1338
17 Waite, R. (1978) Nouv. Presse Med. 7, 2707-2709
18 Rheinhold, D. F. (1976) US Patent No. 4 097 490
19 Weinstock, L. M., Mulvey, D. M. and Tull, R. (1976)]. Org. Chem. 41, 3121- 3124
20 Iriuchijima, S. and Kojima, N. (1982)
Agric. Biol. Chem. 46, 1153-1158
21 Iriuchijima, S., Keiyu, A. and Kojima, N. (1982) Agric. Biol. Chem. 46, 1593- 1597
22 Hamaguchi, S., Ohashi, T. and Watanabe, K. (1986) Agric. Biol.
Chem. 50, 375-380
23 Cambou, B. and Klibanov, A.M. (1984) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 2687- 2692
24 Kasai, N. (1986) European Patent No. 0207636
25 Habets-Crfitzen, A. Q. H., Carlier, S. J. N., de Bont, J. A. M. et al. (1985)
Enzyme Microb. Technol. 7, 17-21
26 Baldwin, J. J., Raab, A. W., Mensler, K., Arison, B. H. and McClure, D. E. (1978) J. Org. Chem. 43, 4876-4878 27 Ellis, M. K., Golding, B. T. and
Watson, W. P. (1984) J. Chem. Soc.
Chem. Commun. 1600-1601
28 Matsuo, N. and Ohno, N. (1985)
Tetrahedron Lett. 26, 5533-5534
29 Ohta, H., Miyamae, Y. and Tsuchi- hashi, G. (1986) Agric. Biol. Chem. 50, 3181-3184
30 Kan, K., Miyama, A., Hamaguchi, S., Ohashi, T. and Watanabe, K. (1985)
Agric. Biol. Chem. 49, 207-210
31 Hamaguchi, S., Asada, M., Hasegawa, J. and Watanabe, K. (1985) Agric. Biol.
Chem. 49, 1661-1667
32 Ladner, W. E. and Whitesides, G. M. (1984) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 7250- 7251
33 McClure, D. E., Arison, B. H. and Baldwin, J. J. (1979)J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101, 3666-3668
34 Klunder, J. M., Ko, S. Y. and Sharpless, K. B. (1986) J. Org. Chem. 51, 3710-3712
35 Robertson, B. W. et al. (1986) European Patent No. 0193.228 36 Johnstone, S. L., Phillips, G. T.,
Robertson, B. W. et a]. (1987) in Biocatalysis in Organic Media (Laane, C., Tramper, J. and Lilly, M., eds), pp. 387-392, Elsevier
37 Bertola, M. A., Koger, H. S., Phillips, G. T., Marx, A. F. and Cinneren, V. P. (1987) European Patent No. 0244912 38 Katsuki, T. and Sharpless, K.B. (1980) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 5976- 5980
39 Cheetham, P. S. J. (1987) Enzyme
Microb. Technol. 9, 194-213
40 Rowlands, R. T. (1984) Enzyme
Microb. Techno]. 6, 3-10
41 Fukumoto, J., Iwai, M. and Tsujisaka, Y. (1963) J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 9, 353-361
42 Iwai, M. (1963) Bull. Osaka Munic.
T I B T E C H - OCTOBER 1988 [Vol. 6]
43 Kloosterman, M., Mosmuller, E. W. J., Schoemaker, H. E. and Meijer, E. M.
(1987) Tetrahedron Lett. 28, 2989-
2992
44 Sohn, H. S., Chung, S. S. and Rhee,
J. S. (1987) Biotechnol. Lett. 9, 117-
122
45 Klibanov, A. M. (1986) Chem. Tech.
355-359
46 Inada, Y., Yoshimoto, T., Matsushima,
A. and Saito, Y. (1986) Trends
Biotechnol. 4, 68-73
47 Hate, Y., Tanaka, N., Kakudo, N., Sugihara, A., Iwai, M. and Tsujisaka,
Y. (1981) Acta Crystallogr. A37, C38
[ ] [] [ ] [ ] [ ] [] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] []
Enzymatic synthesis of
oligosaccharides
Kurt G. I. Nilsson
As the importance of the oligosaccharide moieties of glycoproteins
and glycolipids is being increasingly recognized, efforts to synthesize
them are expanding. The number of functional groups of
carbohydrate monomers and the variety of configurations that
oligomers can adopt is greater than with nucleotides/nucleic acids or
amino acids/peptides. By reversing the hydrolytic action of
glycosidases and by using highly regiospecific glycosyltransferases,
enzymatic oligosaccharide synthesis can be performed.
Why is it necessary to synthesize oligosaccharides? The fundamental answer is that we want to explore and exploit for h u m a n ends the biological activity of these polymers following synthetic and biosynthetic work on oligopeptides and oligonucleotides. The complex oligosaccharide chains (glycans) of glycoproteins and glyco- lipids mediate or modulate a variety of biological processes 1-9. For ex- ample, the glycoconjugate oligo- saccharides serve as cell surface receptors (e.g. for influenza and other viruses, bacteria, bacterial toxins, blood-group and tumor-specific anti- bodies, circulating lymphocytes and for a variety of lectins); they are important for intracellular migration and secretion of glycoproteins and for clearance of glycoproteins from circulation by hepatocytes; they are involved in cell adhesion; they serve as modulators of cell growth; and they change during cellular differentiation. Moreover, there are numerous reports on alterations of glycans after malignant trans- formation 2'4'6-11. Antibodies against cancer-associated carbohydrate anti-
Kurt Nilsson is at Swedish Sugar Co. R&D, Carbohydrates International PO Box 6, S-232 O0 Arlov, Sweden.
gens are being used in diagnostic kits (e.g. pancreas, colon cancer) 6 or in i m m u n o t h e r a p y (e.g. m e l a n o m a patients) 2. The importance of the carbohydrate portion of serum glyco- proteins for their half-lifes in the circulation and their immunogenicity
has been recognized 12 and in-vitro
glycosylation of recombinant proteins has been attempted 13.
Knowledge of the various glyco- protein and glycolipid glycan struc- tures has increased dramatically in the last decade because of the development of permethylation 14 and NMR analysis. It is well k n o w n that the combination of different amino acids gives a huge variety of peptides and proteins. But the number of possible combinations of a given number of carbohydrates monomers is m u c h higher because there are m a n y possible linkage sites on each and at each site there is the possibility of different anomeric configuration (oc- or [3-glycosidic linkages). However, the glycan struc- tures of glycoconjugates are not r a n d o m l y constructed. On the con- trary, they may be divided into families in w h i c h structures are similar and contain c o m m o n oligo- saccharide sequences (Table 1). The most c o m m o n carbohydrate chains
(~) 1988, Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd (UK) 0167 - 9430188/$02.00
in glycoproteins are high-mannose- and complex-type, asparagine-linked (N-glycosidic) or serine/threonine- linked (O-glycosidic) oligosacchar- ides. Similarly, glycolipids can be divided into five main structural series. Nevertheless, the diversity of the glycoconjugate oligosaccharides evident from Table 1 allows for biological specificity. Indeed, it has been proposed that 'the specificity of m a n y natural polymers is written in terms of sugar residues and not of amino acids or nucleotides' (Ref. 15). The synthesis of such complexes represents a stiff challenge.
Importantly, however, short frag- ments of glycan structures (Table 1) are sufficient for biological speci-
ficity 1'2'6'11. These have been
used in affinity chromatography, for preparing neoglycoconjugates, for in- corporation into liposomes, for im- munization, and for characterization of antibodies, glycosidases, glyco- syltransferases and lectins. They have also been used in the develop- ment of diagnostic kits or targeting of drugs 7-9A6-19. For example, a sensi- tive and specific assay for identifica-