• No results found

Mobile applications for informal caregivers: a systematic review of existing mobile applications

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Mobile applications for informal caregivers: a systematic review of existing mobile applications"

Copied!
26
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Mobile applications

for informal caregivers: a systematic review of existing mobile applications

Kamila Skolik

s1416316

Master thesis Health Psychology & Technology

April 2018

Supervisors 1

st

Supervisor dr. N. Köhle 2

nd

Supervisor dr. C.H.C. Drossaert

University of Twente Drinerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede The Netherlands

Faculty of Behavioural, Management and

Social Sciences

(2)

1

Abstract

Worldwide, there are many informal caregivers who care for someone without any financial reward. As a result, they may experience stress and negative feelings. They have to manage their own life together with the life of the person they care for. To support informal caregivers in these challenging situations, many different face-to-face and web-based interventions have been developed. However, these interventions have some disadvantages such as their limited accessibility, as they may be dependent on personal appointments or the availability of a computer. Furthermore, they might be time-consuming. Mobile health (mHealth) could be a possible solution to these problems. It can be integrated in the informal caregivers’ everyday lives, which means access to an intervention at any time. This study aims to examine which mobile applications for informal caregivers exist at the moment, what their content is, and what kind of mHealth features are incorporated in these mobile applications.

A systematic review in Apple’s App Store was conducted with the Dutch and English search terms “caregiver”, “mantelzorger”, “informal caregiver”, “mantelzoger”, and “informal care”. All mobile applications were analyzed in a systematic way with two extraction sheets.

One was about the content of the mobile applications related to caregiving tasks, such as information, facilities to improve contact to health professionals, practical tools, and related to informal caregivers’ well-being, namely peer support, psychological exercises, recreation and practical tools. The other extraction sheet was related to mHealth related features, namely multimodal presentation of content, interactivity, integrated in daily life, use of other hardware and use of related software. All mobile applications were rated with these extraction sheets by one rater.

The results showed that mobile applications for this target group are scarce (N=35).

Most of the content related features refer to practical tools related to caregiving tasks such as creating a care team (17%), and information on certain topics such as medical information (22%). Referring to mHealth related features, it appeared that the most used modal presentation is text-based (48%). Besides, the results showed that the mobile applications studied are relatively new (not older than six years old) and do not have any ratings in Apple’s App Store.

This study emphasized the limited availability of mobile applications for informal

caregivers; people, who could benefit from supportive tools not only about how to provide and

organize care but also how to increase their own well-being. Significantly, the existing mobile

applications were not fully making use of the potential of mHealth. Further research is needed

to examine which features are interesting and effective to incorporate in mobile applications for

informal caregivers.

(3)

2

Table of contents

Abstract ... 1

1.Introduction ... 3

Study aim ... 6

2.Methods ... 7

Search strategy ... 7

Data extraction ... 8

3.Results ... 11

Overview mobile applications ... 11

Content of mobile applications ... 13

mHealth related features ... 16

4.Discussion ... 18

Strengths and limitations ... 20

Further Research ... 21

Conclusion ... 21

5.References ... 22

(4)

3

1. Introduction

By 2050, 22 per cent of all people around the world will be 60 years of age or older, which is around one quarter of the world’s population (Wadd & Galvani, 2014). Worldwide, many people will be affected by this demographic change (O'connell, Chin, Cunningham, & Lawlor, 2003). As the number of elderly people with chronic diseases will increase, health-related costs will also increase. The responsibility for care is shifting from healthcare providers to patients and their families (Kajaks, Longfield, Orozco, Holyoke, & Dutta, 2015). Patients are staying at home instead of in hospitals. Family members and friends who provide care for someone with specific health problems, chronic diseases or other disabilities without any salary or financial compensation are called informal caregivers (Walker, Pratt, & Eddy, 1995; through Guay et al., 2017). In the Netherlands, almost 15% of the population, 18.1% of the nation’s women and 11.7% of its men (Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, 2015), are giving care to a family member or friend for an average of eleven hours each week (Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek, 2016).

According to Guay et al. (2017), informal caregivers do not only care for their loved ones, but also carry out different tasks. For example, they provide emotional support, take responsibilities for the household and children, and manage the care receivers’ diseases by scheduling appointments or administering medication (Stenberg, Ruland & Miaskowski, 2010).

There are some informal caregivers who may find the different tasks and responsibilities as a positive experience and associate being an informal caregiver with positive aspects, such as the special and intimate relationship with the patient that has developed due to the level of care given over a (long) period of time (Cohen, Colantonio, & Vernich, 2002). But there are also informal caregivers who experience all kind of burdens, which can have a negative influence on the their physical, emotional and social well-being leading to depression, anxiety, and high levels of stress (Zarit, Todd, & Zarit, 1986; through Guay et al., 2017; Adelman, Tmanova, Delgado, Dion, & Lachs, 2014). For example, partners of cancer patients often experience negative aspects such as feelings of sadness, fatigue or sleeping problems (Stenberg, Ruland,

& Miaskowski, 2010). Furthermore, they may experience difficulties with accepting the illness and dealing with it. Moreover, they may feel like they have a duty of care and must be there to support their loved one at all times (De Klerk, de Boer, Plaisier, Schyns, & Kooiker, 2015).

Some partners even forget to care for themselves including taking care of their own needs, wishes, and free time. This can lead to emotional and physical exhaustion and a so called

“emotional roller-coaster” with feelings of fear, guilt, helplessness and frustration (Stenberg,

Ruland & Miaskowski, 2010). Besides, informal caregivers who are taking care of someone

(5)

4 with physical disabilities or difficulties have higher risks of low back pain and back injury due to the physical care that they are providing (Kajaks et al., 2015).

Informal caregivers have various needs while caring for their loved ones which can be divided into being related to caregiving tasks and being related to the informal caregivers’ own well-being. Occasionally, informal caregivers might not know enough about how to give proper care or how to be empathetic to the patients’ needs in the way that is required. This is mainly due to the fact that they have not been given professional training on how to correctly care for a person with a certain chronic disease such as cancer or diabetes. Also, they might not know how to behave in their challenging situation (Sermeus, 2016). Therefore, informal caregivers need information on these topics (Docherty et al., 2008; Sobnath et al., 2017). Further, informal caregivers should be in contact with health professionals, such as general practitioners, oncologists, nurses or psychologists, to be up to date about the development of the disease and to receive (medical) support from a health professional who has a different perspective than the informal caregiver (Feeney et al., 2001). For the informal caregivers it these professionals should be easy to reach. Therefore, there is a need of facilities to improve the contact with these professionals. Occasionally, informal caregivers also experience some difficulties with the planning of tasks and general management of their loved one (caregiving related tasks) (Osse, Vernooij-Dassen, Schadé, & Grol, 2006). In this situation, they could make use of practical tools to help them with provide and organize care for the loved one such as creating a sufficient schedule including all important and caregiving related appointments (Osse et al., 2006;

Sermeus, 2016; Syrowatka, Krömker, Meguerditchian, & Tamblyn, 2016).

On the other hand, there are several needs regarding the informal caregivers’ own well- being separated from the act of giving care to the loved one. It is more about the informal caregivers themselves. They may experience the need to share their experience about personal feelings or to talk to people who are in the same situation to feel some support (Sermeus, 2016).

This can be done by being in contact with other informal caregivers, such as peer support. It is also possible to share information on social media or meet others in this way (Middelweerd et al., 2015). As already mentioned, some informal caregivers experience high levels of distress and difficulties coping with their emotions. In line with that, in studies, informal caregivers have indicated the need for information or exercises that can help them with these aspects.

Psychological exercises, such as mindfulness-based or relaxation exercises, may be helpful for them (Whitebird et al., 2012). Also, self-compassion, prayers or goal-setting can work as psychological exercises for informal caregivers to decrease stress levels (Neff, Hsieh, &

Dejitterat, 2005). Informal caregivers might also lack time for themselves and are often

(6)

5 consumed with feelings of responsibility and guilt when they do find some free time (Stenberg, Ruland & Miaskowski, 2010). This can be reduced by providing informal caregivers more personal recreation and free time, away from caring for their loved one (Cantor, 1983; Liu &

Yu, 2017). There are also practical tools related to themselves, such as recording own health records. To summarize, the following main categories play a crucial role for informal caregivers. First, related to caregiving tasks which are information, facilitaties to improve the contact with health professionals and related practical tools. Second, main categories related to informal caregivers’ own well-being which are peer support, psychological exercises, recreation, and related practical tools.

Several interventions have been developed to support informal caregivers in these domains, with the aim of supporting them in their daily life, reducing their burdens and maintaining their own health (Guay et al., 2017). There are many face-to-face interventions, but informal caregivers do not always have the time to meet with health professionals due to their caregiving tasks or other responsibilities. Also, some web-based interventions exist, such as “Hold on, for each other”, which support the partners of cancer patients (Köhle, Drossaert, Schreurs, Hagedoorn, Verdonck-de Leeuw, & Bohlmeijer, 2015) or the psychoeducational intervention

“Diapason” for informal caregivers of patients with Alzheimers (Cristancho-Lacroix, Wrobel, Cantegreil-Kallen, Dub, Rouquette, & Rigaud, 2015) . But some of the web-based interventions lack certain features, such as the availability of resources “on the go”, which means dependence on a computer for the informal caregivers.

A solution to this problem may lie in the possibilities mobile health (mHealth) could offer.

According to Roberts et al. (2016), informal caregivers’ preferences for communication is using a mobile application to text, such as a message from their children reminding them to take their medication or other treatment. They would also use mobile applications for monitoring and tracking purposes, such as medication intake (Roberts et al., 2016). mHealth is not only more affordable than face-to-face and web-based interventions, but also more accessible for informal caregivers (Chiarini, Ray, Akter, Masella, & Ganz, 2013). According to Silva, Rodrigues, De la Torre Díez, López-Coronado and Saleem (2015), mHealth can have major improvement on patients’ life. This is because of the possibility to connect to a smartphone anywhere anytime.

It is a “right-on-the-spot” opportunity. mHealth delivers healthcare services overcoming

geographical, temporal and even organizational barriers. Also, the size of a smartphone plays a

crucial role because it fits into hands and pockets, so informal caregivers can carry their

smartphones at all times (Miller, 2012). Mobile applications also include certain features that

other do not have. These features are the possibility to connect with other devices (Miller,

(7)

6 2012), GPS (Schoeppe et al., 2017), visual output and input of pictures or videos (Miller, 2012), audio output and input (Miller, 2012), haptic and motor features (Miller, 2012), sending awards and rewards (Schoeppe et al., 2017), push notifications (Schoeppe et al., 2017), reminder/alarm (Liu, & Yu, 2017; Schoeppe et al., 2017), uploading and downloading files (Liu & Yu, 2017), calendar (Liu & Yu, 2017), feedback (Syrowatka et al., 2016), making a personal account and offline usability. While dealing with mHealth, negative aspects have also been encountered, such as the use of private data and ethical issues (Gasser et al., 2006). The mHealth related features in this study are multimodal presentation, interactivity, integrated in daily life, use of other hardware, and use of software.

Although there are already existing mobile applications for informal caregivers that have been shown to be effective, such as PROTÉGÉ (Ferreira et al., 2013) and SafeBack (Kajaks et al., 2015), there has been no study about the exact features that can make the mobile applications more effective. Moreover, there is no study about the amount of available mobile applications for this target group including what kind of content the mobile applications have, and which mHealth features are used. That is why mobile applications for informal caregivers are interesting to investigate: they give new opportunities for global access of health services and medical care, especially for patients with chronic diseases and their informal caregivers (Chiarini et al., 2013).

Study aim

The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review to find out three things: First of all, what

kind of mobile applications already exist for informal caregivers who care for someone with a

chronic disease? Second, what is the content of these mobile applications? Third, what are the

mHealth features of these mobile applications?

(8)

7

2. Methods

A systematic review was conducted to get insights into the existing mobile applications for informal caregivers, their content and integrated mHealth features.

Search strategy

The search was conducted in Apple’s App Store on an iPhone 6 in the period from the beginning of October 2017 until the end of November 2017. The search was conducted using the following search terms: caregiver, mantelzorger, informal caregiver, mantelzoger, and informal care.

Certain inclusion and exclusion criteria were made. Only English and Dutch mobile applications that aimed to help and support informal caregivers who give care to someone with a chronic disease were included. Mobile applications about every other topic such as pregnancy, nannies, fitness or vaccines were not included in this study. Also, mobile applications dealing with finding (senior) care homes and caregivers, or those with technical problems or needing a special identification number or code to log in, were excluded. In addition, paid mobile applications, mobile applications only for patients, other languages than English and Dutch were excluded. Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of all included and excluded mobile applications.

Mobile applications were downloaded based on their description in Apple’s App Store and if

they fitted in the inclusion criteria or not. After downloading them, 45 mobile applications were

checked once more to see if they matched all inclusion criteria. From the total of 45 mobile

applications, 14 had to be excluded from the sample for different reasons (seven were not

related to the study topic, three had technical problems, two were only aimed at patients, one

was in another language, and one was an online magazine which had to be paid). After that, 31

mobile applications remained. The sample consisted of 35 mobile applications, 31 English and

four Dutch. Table 5 shows all included mobile applications with a short description, target

group and year of publishing.

(9)

8

Figure 1. Flow diagram of included and excluded mobile applications of this study (N=35)

Data extraction

To review the mobile applications, two systematic data extraction sheets were developed. One was related to the content of the mobile applications related to the caregiving tasks including the main categories information, facilities to improve contact with professionals, practical tools, and related to informal caregivers’ own well-being including the main categories peer support, psychological exercises, recreation, and practical tools (see Table 1). The other sheet is related to the mHealth features with five main categories: multimodal presentation of content, interactivity, integrated in daily life, use of hardware, and use of software (see Table 2). Next to this, a short description, target group and year of publishing of the mobile applications were extracted. Based on the two extraction sheets it was decided if the content or mHealth features were included or integrated in the mobile application (present = 1, not present = 0). All mobile applications were rated by one rater.

Total found mobile applications Search terms: Caregiver (N=247), Mantelzorg (N=15), Caregiving (N=9), Mantelzorger (N=4),

Informal Caregiver (N=0), Informal Caregiving (N=0)

N=275

N=275

After check for in- and exclusion criteria - Different topic N=120 - Needed special login ID N=37

- Home care services N=21 - Technical problems N=20 - Caregiving finders N=15 - Paid mobile applications N=15

- Different language N=10 - Only for patients N=2

In total N=240 excluded mobile applications

Included mobile applications for this study

N=35

(10)

9

Table 1. Content of Mobile Applications with Sub-categories and Definitions Main categories Sub-categories Short definitions

Related to the caregiving tasks

Information

Facilities to improve contact with professionals

Practical tools

Information about caregiving Medical information News

Contacts around List with professional contacts

Chat contact with professionals

Creating a plan/schedule Managing appointment Creating a care team Drug and disease search Saving prescriptions Making a to-do list Managing medication intake

List of emergency contacts Useful links other web-sites

Information about caring including communication between caregivers and patients, tips on caring, how to react in certain situations, and how to behave in a certain situation.

Information on medication and medical details.

Information about the latest news on caring and illness-related news.

Personal contacts of users linked to their own location (if so wished).

A list with professional contacts, such as health professionals, hospitals, pharmacies and 24/7 helplines is given.

Users can get in contact with professionals via text message.

A function to create a plan or schedule all important things related to caregiving.

A function to make and share appointments with others, such as family members or other informal caregivers.

A function which connects different people (informal caregivers) to create a care team.

Integrated dictionary to look up unknown words, which are related to drugs and disease.

A function which allows the user to save all prescriptions.

A function which helps the user to create a to-do list.

A function which helps the user to manage the medication intake of the patient.

A list with people and professionals to contact in an emergency.

An option to be led to other web-sides for additional (caregiving and disease related) information.

Related to informal caregivers’ own well-being Peer support

Psychological exercises

Recreation

Practical tools

Social support

Linking/sharing on social media

Mindfulness Relaxation Self-compassion Meditation Inspiring quotes Prayers Goal setting Events

Quiz and questionnaire Music

Calculators Own health records Symptom checker Stress test Tips

Maximizing personal energy

Getting in contact with others via a chat function and sending for example

“well wishes”.

Sharing files, such as photos or videos, on social media, e.g. Facebook.

Exercises based on mindfulness.

Relaxation exercises.

Exercises based on self-compassion, which consists of self-kindness, humanity, and mindfulness.

Meditation exercises.

Motivational and inspiring quotes to stimulate positive thinking.

If religious, prayers can be requested.

Users can set their own personal goals.

Caregiving events are listed.

Questions about knowledge of giving care and the informal caregiver’

feelings.

A function to listen to music.

Calculator function, which calculates the Body Mass Index, Body fat percentage.

An option to write down one’s own health records.

An option to check one’s own symptoms.

The user can conduct a short stress test.

A list with all kinds of tips for the informal caregiver.

Exercise to maximize energy.

(11)

10

Table 2. mHealth features of Mobile Applications with Sub-categories and Definitions

Main categories Sub-categories Definitions

Multimodal presentation of content (system to user)

Information by video, text, audio Download information

Awards and rewards Making a personal account

Information given in video, text or audio form.

The possibility to download videos, photos or other files.

Awards or rewards for the user after completing something.

Creating a personal account including name, email, gender and password to be allowed to use the mobile application.

Interactivity User to system

- Uploading pictures, videos, other information

User to developer User to professional User to user

The mobile applications interact with the user.

The user can upload files such as pictures, videos or other information via a certain function.

The developer of the mobile applications interacts with the user.

Health Professionals can interact with the user.

Users can interact with each other.

Integrated in daily life

Push notifications Reminders/alarms Calendar Vibration Offline usability

A function to set up push notifications.

A function to set reminders and alarms.

Integrated calendar in the mobile application.

The option to turn the vibration on/off.

The mobile application can also be used offline.

Use of other hardware on mobile device

GPS

Connectivity with other devices

The mobile application can be connected to GPS.

The mobile application can be connected to other devices, such as a weight scale or Fitbit.

Use of related software

Data mining

Analysis of user patterns, such as voice or movement

The mobile application makes use of big data.

The mobile application can save user data, such as their voice, texts or movements.

(12)

11

3. Results

In the following, the results of the systematic review will be presented. First, a general description of the existing mobile applications will be given. After that the results regarding the content of the mobile applications and their mHealth features will follow.

Overview of mobile applications

In total 35 mobile applications were found and used for further analysis. An overview of all mobile applications including their names, short description, target group and year of publishing is presented in Table 3.

Twenty-four out of 35 mobile applications were not specific for one group of patients with a certain chronic disease, such as cancer, but for more general use. This means that all informal caregivers can use these mobile applications no matter which chronic disease their loved ones have. Out of the other eleven mobile applications, six were aimed for informal caregivers of Alzheimer or dementia patients, two for informal caregivers of cancer patients, one for informal caregivers of stroke patients, one for informal caregivers of patients with autism, and one for adults with parents who have a chronic disease in general (see Table 3).

Further, all analyzed mobile applications are from no earlier than 2011 and do not have any ratings in Apple’s App Store. Five mobile applications are relatively new, as they were published last year (2017).

Table 3. Overview of Included Mobile Applications (N=35)

Applications’ names Description Target group Year of

publishing 1. genieMD Mobile application, which allows connection to other

devices and data, such as Apple HealthKit.

General 2013

2. Tender loving Elderly- Family Caregiver’s guide

Mobile application, which focuses on caregiving including “how-to’s”.

General 2016

3. Alzheimer’s Association Caregiver Buddy

Mobile application, which gives tips, support in areas of daily routine, communications, and behaviors.

For caregivers of dementia patients.

2015 4. American Caregiver

Association

Mobile application, which provides information for caregivers.

General 2015

5. Med Helper- Pill Reminder and Medication Tracker

Mobile application, which helps to keep all

appointments and medication information in one place.

General 2011

6. S3 Care-giver Wellness (Stroke-Support-Station)

Mobile application, which gives information, useful links, and enables the caregiver to keep track of their own (mental) health. It includes mindfulness exercises.

For caregivers of stroke patients.

2015

7. The Caregiver- PeaceHealth News

Mobile application, which gives an overview of information and news all about caregiving.

General 2015

8. Caregiver Community about Cancer

Mobile application, which helps to learn how to communicate about the fact of knowing someone who has cancer.

For caregivers of cancer patients.

2016

9. Caregiver Prayer Mobile application with daily encouragement. General 2016

10. OHCA caregiver (Oregon Health Care Association)

Mobile application, which gives access to the Oregon Caregiver, which is a magazine about caregiving.

General 2016

(13)

12

Table 3. Overview of Included Mobile Applications (Continued) 11. Alzheimer’s and Dementia

Tips for families (ALZ Videos)

Mobile application, which provides fast and easy access information by videos for caregivers.

For caregivers of dementia patients.

2015

12. My Cancer Circle (MCC) Mobile application, which is a community application, which helps coordinate help, such as transportation to medical appointments or giving support and information to caregivers.

For caregivers of cancer patients.

2013

13. Lotsa- helping hands This is a calendar mobile application, which helps to coordinate and communicate within family members and friends. It helps to organize stuff and provides the feeling of being connected. Is connected to My Cancer Circle.

General 2013

14. Birdhouse Mobile application, which helps parents to get organized with everything related to their children’s autism.

For parents of children with autism.

2013

15. DoseDirect Mobile application, which helps to organize the medication intake and works as a pill reminder.

General 2016

16. Caregivnig Events Mobile application, which provides family/care with information about caregiving events, such as conferences.

General 2017

17. 7th international carers conference (ICC 2017)

Mobile application about the international carers conference in October 2017.

General 2017

18. Carelocal- Alzheimer’s and Dementia Magazine

Mobile application, which is an online magazine with information all about Alzheimer’s and dementia.

For caregivers of patients with Dementia.

2016

19. GATSS Mobile application, which helps family members to stay connected with older family members who live alone. The iPhone or iPad works as an automated call for help. This is an alert application “when you can’t press the button”.

General 2014

20. CeyHello Medication Adherence & Patient

Mobile application, which is a personalized medication and management application. It supports all family members by giving a reminder to taking medicine.

General 2016

21. Caregivers Matter brought to you by GLSS

Mobile application, which is aimed to help caregivers by providing powerful tools anytime anywhere.

General 2017

22. SafeWander Mobile application, which sends an alert to caregivers’

mobile phone when the loved one gets up from bed or chair and leaves the room. It monitors the loved one from everywhere and includes a wearable sensor.

General 2015

23. Carely- Caregiving app for families

Mobile application, which wants to bring family members and caregivers together to reduce overall stress and create a good social network. Their motto is: care + family = carely

General 2013

24. Flower: Support Registry to help family & friends

With this mobile application, the user can easily ask for help. It is a “we take care of each other” application.

General 2016

25. eCare Vault Mobile application, which helps to create virtual care teams for loved ones.

General 2017

26. eCare App Mobile application, which helps to enroll every family/

care member into the application, so they are connected.

General 2016

27. Old Smarts Mobile application, which is aimed to help the elderly, their family members and caregivers to find everything that can help the elderly in daily life.

General 2016

28. CareZapp Mobile application, which supports the user in caregiving, helping him/her to share the care and bring peace of mind.

General 2015

29. CareZone Health organizer Mobile application, which helps to manage caring of a loved one.

General 2017

30. Caregiving Quiz Mobile application about a quick quiz including several questions on the topic of caregiving.

General 2012

31. Caregiving groups Mobile application, which helps to create caregiving groups.

General 2016

32. Fello Mobile application, which helps to create caregiving groups and manage/divide tasks related to it, including a calendar.

General (Dutch) 2015

33. Alzheimer Assistent Mobile application with all kinds of information about Alzheimer’s. It helps to connect with others and gives links to other useful sites.

For caregivers of patients with Dementia (Dutch)

2013

34. Zorgsamen Mobile application, which helps to create tasks and divide them with others; including a logbook.

General (Dutch) 2016 35. Empowerment Mobile application, which helps young adults (10-20

years) to learn how to deal with a parent who has a chronic disease. This mobile application includes information and a test.

For caregivers who have a parent with chronic disease (Dutch)

2016

(14)

13

Content of mobile applications

Eighteen out of 35 mobile applications, used integrated information related to caregiving tasks, which means how to give care, what to do in emergency situation, what to say to the loved one or in general what it means to be an informal caregiver (see Table 4).

Table 4. Overview of Content offered in the analyzed Mobile Applications (N=35)

Main categories N=35 % Sub-categories N %

Related to caregiving tasks Information

Facilities to improve contact with professionals

Practical tools

18

9

29 51

26

83

Information about caregiving [3;4;5;7;8;11;12;18;21;24;27;33;35]

Medical information [1;11;12;20;21;33]

News [1;7;10;18;27]

Psycho-education [11;27;33]

List with professional contacts [1;3;5;20;29;33]

Contacts around [1;17;31]

Chat contact with professionals [4;17;20]

Useful links to other websites

[1;3;4;6;9;10;11;12;17;18;21;24;26;27;32;33;35]

Creating a planning/schedule

[1;5;12;13;14;15;17;20;22;23;24;26;31;32]

Creating a care team [1;12;13;19;22;23;24;25;28;31;32]

Managing appointments [5;12;13;14;15;22;23;32]

Drug and disease search [1;8;24;27]

Managing medication intake [5;15;20;29]

Making a to-do list [8;29;34]

List of emergency contacts [1;5]

Saving prescriptions [5]

N=27 13 6 5 3 N=12 6 3 3 N=64 17 14 11 8 4 4 3 2 1

48 22 19 11

50 25 3

27 22 17 13 6 6 5 3 2 Related to informal

caregivers’ own well-being Peer support

Psychological exercises

Recreation

Practical tools

10

6

11

10 29

17

31

29

Social support [12;13;14;17;20;24;33;34]

Linking/sharing social media [4;10;14]

Inspiring quotes [1;9;26]

Mindfulness [6]

Meditation [8]

Requesting prayers [9]

Relaxation [21]

Events [7;16;17;24;31]

Quiz and questionnaire [6;12;28;30;35]

Music [21]

Tips [3;8;21;26]

Own health records [1;20;29]

Calculators [1;20]

Symptom checker [20;29]

Stress test [27;35]

Maximizing personal energy [2]

N=11 8 3 N=7 3 1 1 1 1 N=11 5 5 1

N=14 4 3 2 2 2 1

73 27

43 14 14 14 14

45 45 10

29 21 14 14 14 7

(15)

14 Further, information on how to care for someone with a chronic disease was given in thirteen mobile applications (see Figure 2). Also, medical information, such as side effects and information about the disease itself was given in five out of all mobile applications.

Figure 2. My Cancer Circle (Information)

In addition, nine out of 35 mobile applications used features to facilitate contact with different health professionals, such as psychologists, general practitioners or nurses. This was done by providing a list with professional contacts including addresses or telephone numbers to make it more visible for the informal caregiver. Three out of all mobile applications offered to find professional contacts in the vicinity, located by a GPS function. So, the informal caregivers can access professional help and support not far away. Almost all mobile applications, 29 out of 35, used features as a practical tool related to caregiving. The practical tool used the most is providing links to other web-sites. This was done in 17 mobile applications. Fourteen mobile applications included a function to create a plan or schedule for the informal caregiver and their loved one, eleven for creating a care team with their family members or close friends (see Figure 3), and eight for managing appointments (see Figure 4).

Further, four mobile applications included a function to search for drug and disease information

and managing the medication intake of the loved one. Only ten out of 35 mobile applications

integrated tools for the informal caregiver themselves. Four out of the ten mobile applications,

integrated several tips especially for informal caregivers (see Figure 5). Further, informal

caregivers could write down their own health records, check their own symptoms (if applicable)

or fill in a stress test.

(16)

15

Figure 3. Carely (Creating Care Team) Figure 4. Lotsa (Calendar) Figure 5. Caregiver Buddy (Tips)

Some mobile applications integrated features related to informal caregivers’ own well-being.

Ten out of 35 mobile applications used functions to stimulate peer support to get in touch with others. This is usually done by giving users the opportunity to contact other users via the mobile application. Further, it was possible to be linked to others or just sharing personal information, such as files, pictures or videos (on social media such as Facebook) so other users can read and see each other’s stories and start to get in contact with each other. Moreover, there is also an option to send “well -wishes” to each other with the hope and support that the loved one will make it through, and just as a support for each other. Remarkably, psychological exercises to increase well-being of the informal caregivers are only offered in six out of 35 mobile applications. Three mobile applications used inspiring and motivational quotes to stimulate positive thinking. Further, only one mobile application integrated a mindfulness exercise, one mobile application a meditation exercise and one mobile application a relaxation exercise.

There was also one mobile application giving the user the opportunity to request a prayer from

someone else within the application. Self-compassion and goal-setting exercises have not been

integrated in the mobile applications at all. The next category, which is integrated in eleven out

of the 35 mobile applications, is the recreation and free time of the user. Five out of the eleven

mobile applications integrated some information about events and conferences that informal

caregivers might visit in their free time. Further, there is one mobile applications with some

music function, so the informal caregiver may listen to music if so wished.

(17)

16

mHealth related features

All analyzed mobile applications included some features from the multimodal presentation category. Twenty-eight out of 35 mobile applications included text-based information. Only seven out of 35 mobile application offered information via videos and two via audio files.

Twenty-two out of 35 mobile applications integrated the function to create a personal account before starting to use the mobile application. This option included personal details of the informal caregivers, such as name, email address, age, gender, and sometimes also if other informal caregivers are involved.

Table 5. Results of mHealth Features

Main categories N % Sub-categories N %

Multimodal presentation (user to system)

35 100

Information by:

- Text

[2;3;7;8;10;12;13;14;15;16;17;18;19;20;22;23;24;25;26;27;

28;29;30;31;32;33;34;35]

- Video [1;4;6;11;21]

- Audio [5;9]

Making a personal account to make use of the mobile application [1;5;12;13;14;16;17;19;20;21;22;23;24;25;26;27;28;31;32;33;34;35]

Download information Awards and rewards

N=58

28 5 2 22 1 0

48 9 3 37 2 0

Interactivity 35 100

User to system [5;6;8;9;15;16;17;21;22;25;26;27;30;31;34;35]

Uploading:

- Pictures [8;12;17;23;25;29]

- Videos [25;29]

- Information [8;12;29]

User to developer [1;2;7;11;14;18;28;29;33]

User to user [1;12;13;19;20;23;24;28;32]

User to professional [1;3;4;10;33]

N=50 16 6 2 3 9 9 5

32 12 4 6 18 18 10 Integrated in daily life 28 80

Offline usability [5;6;7;8;9;11;15;16;17;18;21;24;26;27;29;30;33;35]

Calendar [5;12;13;14;15;22;23;29;31;32]

Reminders/alarms [1;8;14;15;19;26;28]

Push notifications Vibration

N=35 18 10 7 0 0

51 29 20 0 0 Use of other hardware

on smartphone

5 14

GPS [1;17;31]

Connectivity and connections with other devices [1;20;22]

N=6 3 3

50 50 Use of related

software

1 3 Analysis of user patterns, such as voice or movement [22] N=1 100

Also, all analyzed mobile applications included features with interaction. In total, 16 out of 35

mobile applications had an interaction between the user and the mobile application. That means

that the user was interacting and receiving feedback from the mobile application itself. Nine

mobile applications integrated an interaction between the user and the developer of the mobile

application, and nine mobile applications integrated an interaction between all users. Only five

(18)

17 mobile applications included an interaction or the opportunity for interaction between the user of the mobile application and a health professional, such as a nurse or psychologist.

Twenty-nine out of 35 mobile applications used features which are integrated in daily life. The most integrated feature was offline usability, which means that the user may use the mobile application any time without needing to be connected to the internet. Further, ten mobile applications included a calendar function for all caregiving related appointments. Seven mobile applications had the function of setting reminders or alarms. There was no function to regulate the use of vibration.

Five out of 35 mobile applications made use of integrated hardware on the smartphone.

Three mobile applications used a GPS function, which may help the user to find health professionals and other users in their vicinity. Three mobile applications made use of the possibility to connect with other devices or mobile applications, such as the Fitbit or Apple HealthKit (see Figure 6 and Figure 7). Only one of all the mobile applications made use of related software, which is a mobile application that counts and analyzes the foot-steps the user makes. No mobile applications make use of data mining such as big data.

Figure 6. CeyHello Figure 7. GenieMD

(19)

18

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the existing mobile applications for informal caregivers who care for someone with a chronic disease. We wanted to get insights into the existing mobile applications, the content of the mobile applications and the mHealth features of these based on several main- and sub- categories.

First, it is noticeable that there is a low number of mobile applications for this specific target group of informal caregivers of people with chronic diseases. Although the number of informal caregivers is growing and the need for support is too, not many mobile applications exist for this target group. Until now there are more specific web-based interventions for informal caregivers of patients with a chronic disease than mobile applications (Chi, & Demiris, 2015). In their study, Chi and Demiris (2015) demonstrated the positive effects of telehealth interventions for informal caregivers. Their outcomes were satisfying and telehealth interventions had positive effects similar to face-to-face interventions. In their study, they included video, web-based and telephone-based components including only phone calls or text messages and no mobile applications. This demonstrates the new development of mHealth in the field of health, which is why only a limited number of mobile applications for this target group currently exist.

When we have a deeper look at the analyzed mobile applications, we see that the

majority work as a practical helping tool for the informal caregivers in terms of how to provide

and organize care, but less about how to reduce the caregivers’ burdens and to increase their

own well-being. This result is in line with studies by e.g. Northouse (2010) that showed that

most existing interventions are targeted at the patient or the care for the patient. This is not

sufficient, because of the fact that a considerable number of informal caregivers experience

high levels of distress due to their caregiving responsibilities. As already mentioned informal

caregivers may experience many negative aspects while caregiving (Adelman et al., 2014). That

is why it is important that they have a certain tool or intervention which supports their own

well-being and helps to increase or compensate the negative aspects such as the mount of stress

of physical exhaustion. There are different options to increase their well-being and reduce their

burdens of stress including psychological exercises, such as mindfulness or relaxation

(Whitebird et al., 2012). These were used in the mobile applications, but in a scare way. Only

six mobile applications integrated these exercises. Because informal caregivers experience a lot

of stress and have to deal with their new situation and different emotions, mobile applications

should integrate more of these practical tools related to informal caregivers’ own well-being to

(20)

19 help manage caregivers’ own health by for example lowering stress (Stenberg, Ruland, &

Miaskowski, 2010). This can be done by linking to more psychological exercises, including short or long mindfulness sessions (Whitebird et al., 2012), self-management, coping strategies (Cooper, Katona, Orrell, & Livingston, 2008), and understanding of the importance of self-care (Bardunias, 2016). Most of the mobile applications are not even aimed at a specific group, such as informal caregivers of cancer patients or Alzheimer patients, but more generalized to someone who provides care in general. It would be better if mobile applications were aimed at a more specified target group, more tailored to the needs of target group and chronic disease.

The developers of mobile applications could add relevant and more tailored information, tips or recommendations to increase the user satisfaction, quality of caregiving and also the increase of the users’ well-being while being an informal caregiver (Brodie et al., 2000). It might be too general if an informal caregiver is using a mobile application not tailored enough for the loved one’s chronic disease. As an example, the care for someone with Alzheimer might be partly different than for someone with cancer.

Furthermore, the literature and practice show that supportive interventions or other programmes are crucial for informal caregivers. A cancer diagnosis for example does not only affect the cancer patients, but also their close relatives (Tang, Chan, So, & Leung, 2014).

Surprisingly, no German mobile applications for this target group were found although there is a growing number of informal caregivers in Germany too. The reason for this could be that there is no German term which describes an informal caregiver unlike the term “Mantelzorger”

in Dutch. Also, the technological development in German healthcare is behind other countries such as the Netherlands. In 2015, 2.9 million people were in need of care in Germany (Statistisches Bundesamt, 2017). From this almost three million people, 73% are cared at home, of whom who 1.38 million are cared for by informal caregivers (Statistisches Bundesamt, 2017). In comparison, in the Netherlands almost 15% of all Dutch people are giving care to a family member or friend (Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, 2015).

Further, it would be als possible to add some quality criteria around to mobile applications, because this study deals more with the content of the mobile applications and less about the quality. An idea is to add some more information about different quality criteria to start creating standards in mHealth, which might answer the question “how do you build apps?”.

Some quality rate scales already exist, such as the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS)

(Stoyanov, Hides, Kavanagh, Zelenko, Tjondronegoro, & Mani, 2015). Unfortunately, the sub-

items from the MARS do not totally fit to this study, as MARS’ subscales refer more to the

general use and quality of mobile applications than to the content of this study.

(21)

20 This study also provided some interesting insights into mobile applications and the use of mHealth features. It was found that although mobile applications could offer several unique possibilities for the delivery of information, not many do so. For example, nearly all of the analyzed mobile applications are mostly text-based only. That means that most of the interaction and information is presented by text and only a small number of other features such as the use of videos or audio files is integrated. To make use of the possibilities mobile applications offer, also information about a certain disease could be presented in a short and demonstrative video, for example. As already mentioned, mobile applications have the advantages of providing multimodal information (Vartanian, 2011). The feedback users receive is more based on the system itself. For better and faster communication, a straight interaction between the user and health professionals could be developed by also providing a mobile application for health professionals. Additionally, the interaction between users should be more visible, faster and easier to interact with and allows users to help each other in case of questions.

Most mHealth specific features as offline usability, calenders, reminders, push notifications, and uploading or downloading photos, videos or other personal information were little used in the mobile applications. The use of hardware and software is also not ideel. An idea would be to connect the mobile applications to other devices such as Apple HealthKit, FitBit, and weight scales. The use of big data, analysing certain patterns of the user or data mining which might include text messages, online games, blogs, and social media, is not really employed by the analyzed mobile applications (Hashem, Yaqoob, Anuar, Mokhtar, Gani, & Khan, 2015).

Strengths and limitations

As far as we know, this is the first systematic review of existing mobile applications for informal caregivers who give care to someone with a chronic disease. We gained interesting insights into the content and mHealth features integrated in these. This information can be used for further research to reduce informal caregivers’ burden, and to create a useful helping tool, not only for caregiving but also for their own well-being. Because of the growing number of informal caregivers worldwide, this information is important and may affect many people across the globe. Next to the strengths of this study, limitations have to be mentioned. In this study, only free mobile applications were used, so the results cannot be generalized to all mobile applications for informal caregivers because paid mobile applications were not included.

Furthermore, we only searched in Apple’s App Store and not in Google’s Play Store. This

search could have led to more mobile applications. The extraction sheets of this systematic

review were based on the literature and not on valid instruments. Stoyanov et al. (2015) showed

(22)

21 in their study that little mobile application quality assessments are available, even though the number of mobile applications for personal health and well-being has expanded. In their study, the MARS was used to rate the quality of different mobile applications based on the engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality, but not regarding the content.

Last, it has to be mentioned that the mobile applications were only rated by one rater and not by two as they should have been. However, to minimize a possible bias, results were discussed in a team.

Further Research

The information from this study can not only be used to improve the existing mobile applications for informal caregivers, but also to create a basis for the development of new mobile applications. Within this improvement and development, the target group may also be included to use their own experience and ideas in creating mobile applications. Mobile applications made together with the target group could be first tested (with prototypes) before being made accessible to everybody in Apple’s App Store or Google Play Store. Including the informal caregivers in the process of developing those mobile applications may lead to a more user-centered design, in which developers and informal caregivers working together and share their experiences and may also increase the effectiveness and the adherence of the intervention (McCurdie et al., 2012). Using mobile applications for informal caregivers is a relatively new topic, so more research is needed to make stronger and more generalizable conclusions on this topic.

Conclusion

This study emphasizes the limited availability of mobile applications for informal caregivers of

patients with chronic diseases, who could make use of a supportive tool or intervention not only

on how to provide and organize care for someone with a chronic disease, but also how to

decrease their burdens and increase their own well-being. Most of the mobile applications focus

more on being a supportive tool in only caregiving related tasks and less in only focusing on

the informal caregiver. Noticeably, the analyzed mobile applications are not fully making use

of the potential of mHealth. There are still a lot of features that are not yet fully used in the

mobile applications. That is why further research is needed to examine which mHealth features

are interesting and effective to incorporate in mobile applications for informal caregivers.

(23)

22

5.References

Adelman, R., Tmanova, L. Delgado, Dion, S., & Lachs, M. (2014). Caregiver burden: a clinical review. Jama, pp. 311(10), 1052-1060.

Bardunias, M. (2016). Educational support program for the caregivers of older adults: A grant proposal. California State University, Long Beach.

Brodie, M., Flournoy, R, Altman, D., Blendon, R., Benson, J., & Rosenbaum, M. (2000).

Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. Health affairs, pp. 19(6), 255- 265.

Cantor, M. (1983). Strain among caregivers: A study of experience in the United States. The gerontologist, pp. 23(6), 597-604.

Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek. (2016). Opgehaald van Een op zeven mantelzorgers vindt zichzelf zwaarbelast: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2016/45/een-op-zeven- mantelzorgers-vindt-zichzelf-zwaarbelast

Chi, N. C., & Demiris, G. (2015). A systematic review of telehealth tools and interventions to support family caregivers. Journal of telemedicine and telecare , pp. 21(1), 37-44.

Chiarini, G., Ray, P., Akter, S., Masella, C., & Ganz, A. (2013). mHealth technologies for chronic diseases and elders: A systematic review. Ieee Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, p. 31(9). doi:10.1109/JSAC.2013.SUP.0513001.

Cohen, C., Colantonio, A., & Vernich, L. (2002). Positive aspects of caregiving: rounding out the caregiver experience. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 17(2), 184-188.

Cooper, C., Katona, C., Orrell, M., & Livingston, G. (2008). Coping strategies, anxiety and depression in caregivers of people with Alzheimer's disease. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, pp. 23(9), 929-936.

Cristancho-Lacroix, V., Wrobel, J., Cantegreil-Kallen, I., Dub, T., Rouquette, A., & Rigaud, A. S. (2015). A web-based psychoeducational program or informal caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a pilot randomized controlled trial . Journal of medical Internet research, p. 17(5).

De Klerk, M., de Boer, A., Plaisier, I., Schyns, P., & Kooiker, S. (2015). Informele hulp: wie doet er wat? Omvang, aard en kenmerken van mantelzorg en vrijwilligerswerk in de zorg en ondersteuning in 2014. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.

Docherty, A., Owens, A., Asadi-Lari, M., Petchey, R., Williams, J., & Carter, Y. (2008).

nKowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: a qualitative systematic review. . Palliative Medicine, pp. 22(2), 153-171.

Feeney Mahoney, D., Tarlow, B., Jones, R., Tennstedt, S., & Kasten, L. (2001). Factors

affecting the use of a telephone-based intervention for caregivers of people with

Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, pp. 7(3), 139-148.

(24)

23 Ferreira, F., Dias, F., Braz, J., Santos, R., Nascimento, R., Ferreira, C., & Martinho, R.

(2013). Protege: A mobile health application for the elder-caregiver monitoring paradigm. Procedia Technology, pp. 9(1), 1361-1371.

doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.153.

Gasser, R., Brodbeck, D., Degen, M., Luthiger, J., Wyss, R., & Reichlin, S. (2006).

Persuasiveness of a mobile lifestyle coaching application using social facilitation.

Persuasive technology, pp. 27-38.

Guay, C., Auger, C., Demers, L., Mortenson, B., Miller, C., Gélinas-Bronsard, D., &

Ahmed,S. (2017). Components and outcomes of internet-Based interventions for caregivers of older adults: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, pp. 19(9), 3.

Hashem, I., Yaqoob, I., Anuar, N., Mokhtar, S., Gani, A., & Khan, S. (2015). The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: Review and open research issues. Information Systems, pp.

47, 98-115.

Kajaks,T., Longfield, A., Orozco, F., Holyoke, P., & Dutta, T. (2015). Pilot quality improvement study of SafeBack: A mobile application for estimating low back

compression forces for caregivers in the field. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonom Society Annual Meeting, pp. 59(1), 610-614.

doi:10.1177/1541931215591134.

Köhle, N., Drossaert, C., Schreurs, K., Hagedoorn, M., Verdonck-de Leeuw, I., & Bohlmeijer, E . (2015). A web-based self-help intervention for partners of cancer patients based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

BMC public health, pp. 15(1), 303.

Liu, N., & Yu, R. (2017). Identifying design feature factors critical to acceptance and usage behavior of smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 131-142.

McCurdie, T., Taneva, S., Casselman, M., Yeung, M., McDaniel, C., Ho, W., & Cafazzo, J.

(2012). mHealth consumer apps: the case for user-centered design. Biomedical instrumentation & technology, pp. 46(s2), 49-56.

Middelweerd, A., van der Laan, D., van Stralen, M., Mollee, J., Stuij, M., te Velde, S., &

Brug, J. (2015). What features do Dutch university students prefer in a smartphone application for promotion of physical activity? A qualitative approach. International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1),31.

Miller, G. (2012). The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspectives on psychological science, 7(3), 221-237.

Neff, K., Hsieh, Y., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and identity, pp. 4(3), 263-287.

O'connell, H., Chin, A., Cunningham, C., & Lawlor, B. (2003). Alcohol use disorders in

elderly people—redefining an age old problem in old age. BMJ: British medical

journal, 327(7416), 664.

(25)

24 Osse, B., Vernooij-Dassen, M., Schadé, E., & Grol, R. (2006). Problems experienced by the

informal caregivers of cancer patients and their needs for support. Cancer nursing, pp.

29(5), 378-388.

Roberts, C. A., Geryk, L. L., Sage, A. J., Sleath, B. L., Tate, D. F., & Carpenter, D. M.

(2016). Adolescent, caregiver, and friend preferences for integrating social support and communication features into an asthma self-management app. Journal of Asthma, 53(9),948-954.

Schoeppe, S., Alley, S., Rebar, A., Hayman, M., Bray, N., Van Lippevelde, W., Gnam, J., Bachert, P., Direito, A., & Vandelanotte, C. (2017). Apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents: a review of

quality,features and behaviour change techniques. . International Journal of Behavioral utrition and Physical Activity, 14(1), 83.

Sermeus, W. (2016). What Features of Smartphone Medication Applications Are Patients with Chronic Diseases and Caregivers Looking for? Nursing Informatics 2016, 515.

Silva, B., Rodrigues, J., De la Torre Díez, I., López-Coronado, M., & Saleem, K . (2015).

Mobile-health: A review of current state in 2015. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 56(1pt2), 265-272. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.003.

Sobnath, D., Philip, N., Kayyali, R., Nabhani-Gebara, S., Pierscionek, B., Vaes, A., Spruit, M., & Kaimakamis, E. (2017). Features of a Mobile Support App for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Literature Review and Current Applications.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth, , 5(2).

Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. (2015). Informele hulp: wie doet er wat? Retrieved from https://www.scp.nl/Publicaties/Alle_publicaties/Publicaties_2015/Informele_hulp_wie _doet_er_wat

Statistisches Bundesamt. (2017). Pflegestatistik. Retrieved from Pflege im Rahmen der Pflegeversicherung 2015:

https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Gesundheit/Pflege/PflegeDeuts chlandergebnisse5224001159004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

Stenberg, U., Ruland, C. M., & Miaskowski, C. (2010). Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. . Psycho‐Oncology, 19(10), 1013-1025.

Stoyanov, S., Hides, L., Kavanagh, D., Zelenko, O., Tjondronegoro, D., & Mani, M. (2015).

Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps.

JMIR mHealth and uHealth, p. 3(1).

Syrowatka, A., Krömker, D., Meguerditchian, A., & Tamblyn, R. (2016). Features of computer-based decision aids: systematic review, thematic synthesis, and meta- analyses. Journal of medical Internet research, 18(1).

Tang, W., Chan, C., So, W., & Leung, D. (2014). Web-based interventions for caregivers of cancer patients: A review of literatures. Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, pp.

1(1), 9.

(26)

25 Vartanian, H. (2011). U.S. Patent No. 8,068,886. . Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and

Trademark Office.

Wadd, S., & Galvani, S. (2014). Working with older people with alcohol problems: insight from specialist substance misuse professionals and their service users. . Social Work Education, 33(5), 656-669.

Walker, A., Pratt, C., & Eddy, L. (1995). Informal caregiving to aging family members: A critical review. Family Relations, 402-411.

Whitebird, R., Kreitzer, M., Crain, A., Lewis, B., Hanson, L., & Enstad, C. (2012).

Mindfulness-based stress reduction for family caregivers: a randomized controlled trial. The Gerontologist, 53(4), 676-686.

Zarit, S., Todd, P., & Zarit, J. (1986). Subjective burden of husbands and wives as caregivers:

A longitudinal study. The Gerontologist, 26(3), 260-266.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

More specifically, this research investigated what the effects of congruency (congruent vs. Incongruent) and ad- position (pre-roll vs. mid roll) of in-stream video ads are on

Tijdens het maken van zijn werk op zijn eigen plek was deze leerling, zowel tijdens de reguliere rekenles als tijdens de OOL rekenles, taakgericht en liet hij zich niet

Andere positieve aspecten van de tuin, zoals het feit dat braakliggende grond weer constructief wordt gebruikt en een plek waar iedereen uit de buurt langs kan komen voor een

• Onkruidbeheersing in de boomkwekerij Testen en aanpassen van nieuwe technieken voor onkruidbeheersing in verschillende teelten, waarbij zoveel mogelijk gebruik wordt gemaakt van

In part two, participants were randomly assigned to one of three Supergirl viewing conditions, namely (1) violent Supergirl, in this condition Supergirl used violence to defy the

Hypothesis 3b: A paid partnership disclosure will lead to the use of more negative source derogations and consequently to a less positive brand attitude than a

The presented prosthetic flexure-based finger joint is able to achieve 20N of contact force with an additional 5N of out of plane load over the entire 80˚ range of motion,

These emission bands are linked to the presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), large carbon molecules that consist of multiple fused benzene rings.. Because of