Get it together
Smit, Nienke
DOI:
10.33612/diss.160498701
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from
it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date:
2021
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Smit, N. (2021). Get it together: exploring the dynamics of teacher-student interaction in English as a
foreign language lessons. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.160498701
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
References
Allwright, D. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 156-171. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.2.156 Allwright, D. (1988). Observation in the language
classroom. London: Longman.
Arnold, J. (ed) (1999). Affect in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Assessment Reform Group (2002). Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles. Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. https://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/ S B A / H K D S E / E n g _ D V D/d o c /A fl _ principles.pdf
Alexander, R. A., Hardman, F. C., & Hardman, J. (2017). Dialogic Teaching: Evaluation report and executive summary: Classroom talk, social disadvantage and educational attainment: raising standard, closing the gap. Cited on the Education Endowment Foundation website. https:// educationendowmentfoundation.org. uk/our-work/projects/dialogic-teaching/ Basturkmen, H. (2012). A review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, 40, 282–295. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.05.001 Bell, D. (2007). Do teachers think that
methods are dead? ELT Journal,
61(2), 135–143, https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ ccm006
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (no. ASHE-ERIC higher education report no.1). Washington, DC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED336049.pdf
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education. London: Bloomsbury.
Bos, J., & Steenbeek, H.W. (2017). Mediacoder software for coding video and audio materials. [web-based computer software]. Groningen: University of Groningen. https://mediacoder.gmw. rug.nl/
Brown, H.D. (2002). English language teaching in the ‘‘post-method’’ era: toward better diagnosis, treatment, and assessment’. In J. C. Richards and W. A. Renandya (Eds.). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Burns, A., & Knox, J. (2011). Classrooms as
complex adaptive systems: A relational model. Tesl-Ej, 15(1), 1-25. http://www. tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume15/ ej57/ej57a1/
Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., & Bell, R. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
Cook, G. (2003). Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K.: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge. https://rm.coe.int/16802fc1bf
Council of Europe. (2018). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment - companion volume with new descriptors. Cambridge, U.K.: Press syndicate of the University of Cambridge. https://rm.coe.int/ common-european-framework-of- reference-for-languages-learning-teaching/16809ea0d4
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cullen, R. (2002). Supportive teacher talk: The
importance of the f-move. ELT Journal, 56(2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1093/ elt/56.2.117
Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Curriculum.nu. (2020). Leergebied Engels
/ MVT. Voorstel voor de basis van de herziening van de kerndoelen en eindtermen van de leraren en schoolleiders uit het ontwikkelteam Engels/Moderne Vreemde Talen. https://www.curriculum.nu/ voorstellen/engels-mvt/
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam etc.: Benjamins. De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007).
A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732
De Graaff, R., Koopman, G. J., Anikina, Y., & Westhoff, G. (2007). An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education & Bilingualism, 10(5), 603-624. https://doi. org/10.2167/beb462.0
Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. https:// doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Derrick, D. J. (2015). Instrument reporting
practices in second language research. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/ tesq.217
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impac t s tudies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 3 8( 3), 1 8 1 -1 9 9. h tt p s ://d o i . org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Dewaele, J.M. (2020). If classroom emotions were music, teachers would be conductors and learners would be members of the orchestra. In O. Mentz, & K. Papaja (Eds.), Focus on language (pp. 8-10). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Dewaele, J.M., Witney, J., Saito, K., & Dewaele,
L. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 676-697. https://doi. org/10.1177/1362168817692161
Dönszelmann, S. (2019). Doeltaal-Leertaal: Didactiek, professionalisering en leereffecten. PhD Dissertation Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Almere: Parthenon. https:// research.vu.nl/en/publications/target- language-a-vehicle-for-language-learning-pedagogy-professi
Dönszelmann, S., Van Beuningen, C., Kaal, A., De Graaff, R. (2020). Handboek Vreemde Talen Didactiek. Bussum: Coutinho. [Handbook for Foreign Language Teaching]
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117-135. https://doi. org/10.1017/S026144480001315X Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., Henry, A., &
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 19-47.
https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301
Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. A., & Short, D. J. (2010). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Ellis, N. C. (2019). Essentials of a theory of language cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/ modl.12532
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). Language as a complex adaptive system. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fasoglio, D. & Tuin, D. (2017). Eindniveau gespreksvaardigheid Engels in het voortgezet onderwijs. Enschede: SLO. https://www. slo.nl/publicaties/@4597/eindniveau/ Fasoglio, D., Jong, K. d., Trimbos, B., Tuin, D.,
& Beeker, A. (2015). Taalprofielen, herziene versie van taalprofielen 2004 . Enschede: SLO. https://www.slo.nl/ publicaties/@4301/taalprofielen-2015/ Foley, J. (1994). Key concepts in ELT:
Scaffolding. ELT Journal, 48(1), 101-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/48.1.101. Fröhlich, M., Spada, N., & Allen, P. (1985).
Differences in the communicative orientation of L2 classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 27-57. https://doi. org/10.1093/elt/48.1.101.
Gao, X. (2019). The Douglas Fir Group framework as a resource map for language teacher education. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 161-166. https://doi. org/10.1111/modl.12526
Gass, S.M. (2003). Input and Interaction. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (eds C.J. Doughty and M.H. Long). https://doi. org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch9 Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input,
interaction and output in SLA. In J. Williams & B. VanPatten (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 175-199). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning (2. ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and
researching reading (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Grossman, P., Cohen, J., & Brown, L. (2015). Understanding instructional quality in English language arts. In T. Kane, K. A. Kerr & R. C. Pianta (Eds), Designing Teacher Evaluation Systems:
New Guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project. (pp. 303-332). San Francisco: Wiley. https://doi. org/10.1002/9781119210856.ch10
Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55-77. https://doi. org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00207.x Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C.
(2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Philadelphia: Routledge. Hattie, J.A.C. (2012). Visible learning for
teachers. Maximizing impact on learning. Philadelphia: Routledge,
Hattie, J. A. C., & Yates, G. C. R. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. Philadelphia: Routledge.
Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., & Kraft, M. A. (2012). When rater reliability is not enough. Educational Researcher, 41(2), 56-64. https://doi. org/10.3102/0013189X12437203
Hiver, P. (2015). Attractor states. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 20-28). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-005
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. (2016). A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting complexity theory into practice. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12347 Hollenstein, T. (2007). State space grids:
Analyzing dynamics across development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 384-396. https://doi. org/10.1177/0165025407077765
Hollenstein, T. (2013). State space grids: Depicting dynamics across development. New York: Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/9781461450078
Housen , A. , & De G raaff, R. (2009). Investigating the Effects and Effectiveness of L2 Instruction. In M. Long, & C. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 736-755). Blackwell-Wiley.
Hulshof, H., Kwakernaak, E. & Wilhelm, F. (2015). Geschiedenis van het Talenonderwijs in Nederland. Groningen: Passage. [History of language teaching in the Netherlands]
James, W. (1899). Talks to Teachers on Psychology: And to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
Johnson, K. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 235–257. https://doi. org/10.2307/40264518
Juan-Garau, M., & Jacob, K. (2015). Developing English learners’ transcultural skills through content- and task-based lessons. System, 54, 55-68. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.017. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. (2006).
Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15326985ep4102_1
Kordes, J., & Gille, E. (2012). Vaardigheden Engels en Duits van Nederlandse leerlingen in Europees perspectief. Arnhem: Cito. https://www.cito.nl/-/media/files/ kennis-en-innovatie-onderzoek/cito_ oenw_onderzoek_eslc_2011.pdf Koudenburg, N. (2018). Regulating shared
reality with micro-dynamics in the form of conversation. Current Opinion in Psychology,23. 47-51 https://doi. org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.12.002
Kupers, E., Van Dijk, M., & Lehmann-Wermser, A. (2018). Creativity in the here and now: A generic, micro-developmental measure of creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpsyg.2018.02095
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The Postmethod Condition: (E)merging Strategies for Second/Foreign Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28: 27-48. https://doi. org/10.2307/3587197
Lamey, A., Hollenstein, T., Lewis, M. D., & Granic, I. (2004). GridWare version 1.1[computer software] http://130.15.96.140/SSG/?page_id=1604 Larsen-Freeman, D. (2016). Classroom-oriented research from a complex systems perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 6 (3), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.14746/ ssllt.2016.6.3.2
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques & principles in language teaching (Third edition.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, M. D., Lamey, A. V., & Douglas, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional d e v e l o p m e n t . D e v e l o p m e n t a l Science, 2(4), 457. https://doi. org/10.1111/1467-7687.00090
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (Fourth edition. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lightbown, P. M. (2015). Focus on content-based language teaching. Oxford: OUP.
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge, etc: Cambridge University Press. Long, M. H., & Doughty, C. J. (2009). The
handbook of language teaching. Chichester etc: Wiley-Blackwell.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C., & Bahtia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-68). New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in Ortega, L. (ed.), Second language acquisition: Critical concepts in linguistics. London: Routledge, 2011.
Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam etc: Benjamins.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(01), 37- 6 6 . htt p s://d o i.o rg/10.1017/ S0272263197001034.
Lyster, R. & Saito, K. (2010). Interactional feedback as instructional input: A synthesis of classroom SLA research. Language, Interaction & Acquisition 1(2). 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1075/ lia.1.2.07lys
MacIntyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2016). Positive psychology in SLA (1st. ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Macintyre, P. D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2019). Setting an agenda for positive psychology in SLA: Theory, practice, and research. The Modern Language Journal, 103(1), 262-274. https://doi. org/10.1111/modl.12544
MacIntyre, P.D., Clément R., Dörnyei Z., & Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4). 545–562. https://doi. org/10.2307/330224
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2012). Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. Maley, A. (2011). Squaring the circle,
reconciling materials as constraint with materials as empowerment. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed., pp. 379-402). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Meddings, L., & Thornbury, S. (2009). Teaching unplugged: Dogme in English language teaching. Peaslake: Delta Publishing. Meijer, D., & Fasoglio, D. (2007). Handreiking
schoolexamen moderne vreemde talen havo/vwo. Enschede: Stichting Leerplanontwikkeling. https://www.slo. nl/publish/pages/3038/handreiking- schoolexamen-mvt-duits-engels-frans-havo-vwo.pdf
Menninga, A. (2017). Language and science in young learners: Intervening in the balance between challenging and adapting. University of Groningen. https://www. rug.nl/research/portal/files/43320617/
Menninga, A., van Dijk, M., Steenbeek, H., & van Geert, P. (2017). Language use in real-time interactions during early elementary science lessons: The bidirectional dynamics of the language complexity of teachers and students. Language Learning, 67(2), 284-320. https:// doi.org/10.1111/lang.12219
Mercer, N. & Dawes, L. (2014). The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4). 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014. 934087
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mercer & Kostoulas. (2018). Language Teacher Psychology. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783099467 Murphy, P.K., Wilkinson, I.A.G., Soter, A.O.,
Hennessey, M.N., & Alexander, J.F. (2009) Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101 (3), 740-764. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015576 Muijs, R.D., Reynolds, D. & Kyriakides,L.
(2016). The scientific properties of teacher effects/effective teaching processes. In: Chapman, C., Muijs, R.D., Reynolds, D., Sammons, P. & Teddlie, C. (eds.) Routledge International Handbook of Educational Effectiveness and Improvement Research, 100-123. Abingdon: Routledge.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417. https://doi. org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Nuttall, C. (2005). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language (2nd ed.). Oxford: Macmillan.
Nystrand, M., Wu,L., Gamoran,A., Zeiser,S., & Long, D.A. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135 -19 8 . h tt p s ://d o i . o r g /10.1207/ S15326950DP3502_3
OECD. (2016). Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2016-en. Pennings, H. J. M., Van Tartwijk, J., Wubbels,
T., Claessens, L. C. A., Van der Want, A. C., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Real-time teacher–student interactions: A dynamic systems approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 183-193. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.016
Pennings, H.J.M. & Mainhard, T. (2016). Analyzing teacher-student interactions with state space grids. In Matthijs Koopmans and Dimitrios Stamovlasis (eds.), Complex dynamical systems in education, 233–272. Cham: Springer.
Piggott, L. (2019). First meaning then form. A Longitudinal Study on the Effects of Delaying and Reducing Explicit Form-focused Instruction for Young Adolescent EFL Learners. LOT Dissertation series. Utrecht University, Netherlands.
R Core Team. (2019). R: a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics [computer software] https:// www.r-project.org/
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge: CUP. Scrivener, J. (2012). Classroom management
techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA etc: Sage Publications.
Sinclair, J.M. & Coulthard,M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2020). Toetsing als kans om te leren. Een thematisch overzicht naar het waarom, wat, wanneer en hoe van formatief evalueren. [Testing as an opportunity to learn. A thematic overview of the why, what, when and how of formative evaluation.] Den Haag: NRO. https:// www.nro.nl/sites/nro/files/media-files/ Toetsing-als-kans-voor-leren-formatief-toetsen-en-evalueren.pdf
Smit, N., Van de Grift, W., De Bot, K., & Jansen, E. (2017). A classroom observation tool for scaffolding reading comprehension. System, 65, 117-129. https://doi.
Smit, N., Van Dijk, M., De Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (2021). The complex dynamics of adaptive teaching. International Review of Applied Linguistics. (in press).
Smit, N., Van Dijk, M., De Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (2020). In the Zone? Analyzing patterns of stability in teacher-student interaction [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Snow, Catherine E. (2014). Input to interaction to instruction: Three key shifts in the history of child language research. Journal of Child Language 41(s1). 117–123. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0305000914000294 Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989).
A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23(2), 201-217. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587333.
Spada, N., & Lyster, R. (1997). Macroscopic and microscopic views of L2 classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 787-795. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587763.
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature. Language Learning, 60(2), 263-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x.
Steenbeek, H., & Van Geert, P. (2013). The emergence of learning-teaching trajectories in education: A complex dynamic systems approach. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychology and Life Sciences, 17(2), 233-267.
Stichting Leerplan Ontwikkeling. (2013). Leerplan in beeld. Retrieved from http:// leerplaninbeeld.slo.nl/havo_v wo_ bovenbouw/moderne-vreemde-talen/ engels/engels-po-havo-vwo/.
Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Recent theoretical advances. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno & R. Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 29-47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511844744.004
Tammenga-Helmantel, M., & Maijala, M. (2019). The position of grammar in Finnish, Dutch, and global course books for German as a foreign language. Language teaching research, 23(5), 562-583. https://doi. org/10.1177/1362168817752542
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. (1994). A dynamical systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thelen, E. (1991). Motor aspects of emergent speech: A dynamic approach. In N. A. Krasnegor, D. M. Rumbaugh, R. L. Schiefelbusch, & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.)Biological and behavioral determinants of language development, 339-362. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. The National Standards Collaborative Board.
(2015). World-readiness standards for learning languages. Alexandria, VA: Author. https://www.actfl.org/resources/world-readiness-standards-learning-languages
Thornbury, S. (2011). Language teaching methodology. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 185-199). Philadelphia: Routledge Handbooks Online. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780203835654.ch13 Ur, P. (2012) A Course in English Language
Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Batenburg, E.S.L., Oostdam, R. J., van Gelderen, A.,J.S., Fukkink, R. G., & de Jong, N.,H. (2018). Evaluating opportunities in Dutch EFL course books for developing pre-vocational learners’ oral interactional ability. Language Tea ch i n g R e sea rch , h tt p s ://d o i . org/10.1177/1362168818804258
Van de Grift, W. (2007). Quality of teaching in four European countries. Educational Research, 49(2), 127-152. https://doi. org/10.1080/00131880701369651
Van de Grift, W. (2009). Reliability and validity in measuring the value added of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(2), 269-285. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243450902883946. Van de Grift, W., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana,
R. (2014). Teaching skills of student teachers: Calibration of an evaluation instrument and its value in predicting student academic engagement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 150-159. htt p s:// htt p s://d o i.o rg/10.1016/j. stueduc.2014.09.003.
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher–Student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Research, 22(3), 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2011).Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher–student interaction. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 46-57. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.10.004 Van de Pol, J., Volman, M.L.L. & Beishuizen,
J. (2012). Promoting teacher scaffolding in small-group work: A contingency perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, (pp. 193)-205). https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.009
Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005a). The dynamics of scaffolding. New Ideas in Psychology, 23(3), 115-128. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.05.003 Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005b).
Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25(3-4), 408-442. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003
Van Geert, P., & Van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25(4), 340-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0163-6383(02)00140-6
Van Gorp, K., & Van den Branden, K. (2015). Teachers, pupils and tasks: The genesis of dynamic learning opportunities. System, 54, 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. system.2015.04.018.
Van Vondel, S., Steenbeek, H., Van Dijk, M., & van Geert, P. (2017). Ask, don’t tell; A complex dynamic systems approach to improving science education by focusing on the co-construction of scientific understanding. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 243-253. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.012 Verspoor, M., & De Bot, K. (2011). A dynamic
approach to second language development. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Verspoor, M., De Bot, K., & Xu, X. (2015). The effects of English bilingual education in the Netherlands. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.01ver. Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction
for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180. https://doi. org/10.1080/13670050608668639. Walqui, A., & Van Lier, L. (2010). Scaffolding
the academic success of adolescent English language learners. San Fransisco: WestEd. Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, B. D. (2015). Questioning for classroom discussion: Purposeful speaking, engaged listening, deep thinking. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Waninge, F., Dörnyei, Z. and De Bot, K. (2014), Motivational Dynamics in Language Learning: Change, Stability, and Context. The Modern Language Journal, 98: 704-723. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12118
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x Wood, D., Wood, H., & Middleton, D. (1978).
An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1(2), 131-147. https://doi. org/10.1177/016502547800100203
Wragg, E. C., & Brown, G. A. (2016). Questioning in the primary school. Philadelphia: Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (Second edition. ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
