UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
Word-recognition processes in normal and dyslexic readers
Marinus, E.
Publication date
2010
Link to publication
Citation for published version (APA):
Marinus, E. (2010). Word-recognition processes in normal and dyslexic readers. UvA.
General rights
It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s)
and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open
content license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulations
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please
let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material
inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter
to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You
will be contacted as soon as possible.
Adelman, J. S., & Brown, G. D. A. (2007). Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neigh-bors, determine word naming latencies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 455–459. Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word
frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decison times. Psychological Science, 17, 814–822.
Allen, R., & Hulme, C. (2006). Speech and language processing mechanisms in verbal serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 64–88.
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 802– 814.
Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neigh-borhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439–461.
Andrews, S., Woollams, A., & Bond, R. (2005). Spelling-sound typicality only affects words with digraphs: Further qualifications to the generality of the regularity effect on word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 567–593.
Arduino, L. S., & Burani, C. (2004). Neighborhood effects on nonword visual processing in a language with shallow orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33, 75–95. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM).
Philadelphia: PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Bakker, N. C. M. (1990). TEL: Een computerprogramma voor het berekenen van woord-, letter-, bigram-, trigram- en tetragramfrequenties en versatiliteiten [TEL: A computer pro-gram to calculate word-, letter-, bipro-gram-, tripro-gram- and tetrapro-gram frequencies and versa-tility]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit.
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., & Spieler, D. H. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283–316.
Barca, L., Burani, C., di Filippo, G., & Zoccolotti, P. (2006). Italian developmental dyslexic and proficient readers: Where are the differences? Brain and Language, 98, 374–351. Beech, J. R. (2005). Ehri’s model of phases of learning to read: a brief critique. Journal of
Research in Reading, 28,50–58.
Berends, I. E., & Reitsma, P. (2005). Lateral and central presentation of words with limited exposure duration as remedial training for reading disabled children. Journal of Clinical
and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27,886–896.
Bergmann, J., & Wimmer, H. (2008). A dual-route perspective on poor reading in a regular orthography: Evidence from phonological and orthographic lexical decisions. Cognitive
Neuropsychology, 25,653–676.
140 REFERENCES
Bleichrodt, N. D., Drenth, P. J. D., Zaal, J. N., & Resing, W. C. M. (1987). Revisie
Amster-damse Kinder Intelligentie Test [Revised Amsterdam Child Intelligence Test]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Blomert, L. (2005). Dyslexie in Nederland. Theorie, praktijk en beleid [Dyslexia in The Netherlands. Theory, practice, policy]. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds.
Borgwaldt, S. R., Hellwig, F. M., & de Groot, A. M. B. (2004). Word-initial entropy in five languages. Written Language & Literacy, 7, 165–184.
Bosman, A. M. T., & Braams, T. (2005). Depressie en angst bij basisschoolleerlingen met dyslexie.[Depression and anxiety in primary school children with dyslexia] Tijdschrift
voor Orthopedagogiek, 44,213–223.
Bosman, A. M. T., van Leerdam, M., & de Gelder, B. (2000). The /O/ in OVER is differ-ent from the /O/ in OTTER: Phonological effects in children with and without dyslexia.
Developmental Psychology, 36,817–825.
Bowey, J. A. (1996). Orthographic onsets as functional units of adult word recognition. Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 25,571–595.
Bowey, J. A. (2007). Predicting individual differences in learning to read. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 155–172). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ldt.
Bowman, M., & Treiman, R. (2002). Relating print and speech: The effects of letter names and word position on reading and spelling performance. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology, 82,305–340.
Brand, M., Giroux, I., Puijalon, C., & Rey, A. (2007). Syllable onsets are perceptual reading units. Memory and cognition, 35, 966–973.
Bruck, M., & Treiman, R. (1990). Phonological awareness and spelling in normal children and dyslexics: The case of initial consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50,156–178.
Brus, B. T., & Voeten, M. J. M. (1995). Eén minuut test [One-minute test]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Carreiras, M., Perea, M., & Grainger, J. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23,857-871.
Carroll, J. M., Maughan, B., Goodman, R., & Meltzer, H. (2005). Literacy difficulties and psy-chiatric disorders: Evidence for comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
46,524–532.
Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47,
149–180.
Castles, A., Davis, C., Cavalot, P., & Forster, K. (2007). Tracking the acquisition of ortho-graphic skills in developing readers: Masked priming effects. Journal of Experimental
Child Psychology, 97,165–182.
Castles, A., Davis, C., & Letcher, T. (1999). Neighbourhood effects on masked form-priming in developing readers. Language and Cognitive processes, 14, 201–224.
Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal
of Learning Disabilities, 35,386–406.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108,
204–256.
Compton, D. L. (2003). Modeling the relationship between growth in rapid naming speed and growth in decoding skill in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 225–239.
Dalby, J. T. (1986). Note: An ultimate view of reading ability. International Journal of Neuroscience, 30,227–230.
Das-Smaal, E. A., Klapwijk, M. J. G., & van der Leij, A. (1996). Training of perceptual unit processing in children with a reading disability. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 221–250. Davis, C., & Bryant, P. (2006). Causal connections in the acquisition of an orthographic rule: A
test of Uta Frith’s developmental hypothesis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,
47, 849–856.
de Jong, P. F., Bitter, D. J. L., van Setten, M., & Marinus, E. (2009). Does phonological recoding occur during silent reading, and is it necessary for orthographic learning. Journal
of Experimental Child Psychology, 104,267–282.
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 95,22–40.
de Jong, P. F., & Vrielink, L. (2004). Rapid automatic naming: Easy to measure, hard to improve (quickly). Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 65–88.
de Luca, M., Borelli, M., Judica, A., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Reading words and pseudowords: An eye movement study of developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language,
80,617–626.
Duñabeitia, J. A., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2008). Children like dense neighborhoods: Orthographic neighborhood density effects in novel readers. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 26– 35.
Ecalle, J., Magnan, A., & Calmus, C. (2009). Lasting effects on literacy skills with a computer-assisted learning using syllabic units in low-progress readers. Computers & Education,
52, 554–561.
Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relation-ship to recoding. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsale & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ehri, L. C. (2007). Development of sight word reading: Phases and findings. In M. J. Snowl-ing & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of readSnowl-ing: A handbook (pp. 135–154). Oxford: Blackwell publishing ltd.
Ehri, L. C., & Saltmarsh, J. (1995). Beginning readers outperform older disabled readers in learning to read words by sight. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 295–326.
Ehri, L. C., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental variation in word recognition. In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman, B. Ehren & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy
development and disorders.New York: Guilford.
Elbro, C. (1996). Early linguistic abilities and reading development: A review and a hypothesis.
Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8,453–485.
Elbro, C. (2005). Literacy acquisition in Danish: A deep orthography in cross-linguistic light. In R. M. Joshi & P. G. Aaron (Eds.), Handbook of Orthography and Literacy (pp. 31–46). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
142 REFERENCES
Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological aware-ness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.
Garlock, V. M., Walley, A. C., & Metsala, J. L. (2001). Age-of-aquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. Journal
of Memory and Language, 45,468–492.
Geurts, H. M., Grasman, R. P. P. P., Verte, S., Oosterlaan, J., Roeyers, H., van Kammen, S. M., & Sergeant, J.A. (2008). Intra-individual variability in ADHD, autism spectrum disorders and Tourette’s syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 46, 3030–3041.
Gross, J., Treiman, R., & Inman, J. (2000). The role of phonology in a letter detection task.
Memory and Cognition, 28,349–357.
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.
Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Ellis, A. W. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrat-ing the teachintegrat-ing of readintegrat-ing and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis.
Child Development, 65,41–57.
Hawelka, S., Huber, C., & Wimmer, H. (2006). Impaired visual processing of letter and digit strings in adult dyslexic readers. Vision Research, 46, 718–723.
Hawelka, S., & Wimmer, H. (2005). Impaired visual processing of multi-element arrays is associated with increased number of eye movements in dyslexic reading. Vision Research,
45,855–863.
Hawelka, S., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Visual target detection is not impaired in dyslexic children.
Vision Research, 48,850–852.
Healy, A. F. (1994). Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 333–344.
Hintikka, S., Landerl, K., Aro, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2008). Training reading fluency: Is it important to practice reading aloud and is generalization possible? Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 59–79.
Hoffman, L., & Rovine, M. J. (2007). Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: Foundations and illustrative examples. Behavior Research, 39, 101–117.
Huemer, S., Aro, M., Landerl, K., & Lyytinen, H. (in press). Repeated reading of syllables among Finnish-speaking children with poor reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading. Huemer, S., Landerl, K., Aro, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2008). Training reading fluency among poor
readers of German: Many ways to the goal. Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 115–137.
Hutzler, F., & Wimmer, H. (2004). Eye movements of dyslexic children when reading in a regular orthography. Brain and Language, 89, 235–242.
Jackson, N. E., & Coltheart, M. (2001a). Chapter 2: Proximal and distal causes of individual differences in reading. In Routes to reading success and failure: Toward an integrated
cognitive psychology of atypical reading(pp. 11–37): Sheridan Books, Ann Arbor, MI. Jackson, N. E., & Coltheart, M. (2001b). Chapter 3: Dual-route theories of reading. In Routes
to reading success and failure: Toward an integrated cognitive psychology of atypical
read-ing(pp. 39–70): Sheridan Books, Ann Arbor, MI.
Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687–715.
Jorm, A. F., Share, D. L., Maclean, R., & Matthews, R. G. (1984). Phonological recoding skills and learning to read: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 201–207. Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time
measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 145–171.
Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial prac-tices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3–21.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.
Lavidor, M., Johnston, R., & Snowling, M. J. (2006). When phonology fails: Orthographic neighbourhood effects in dyslexia. Brain and Language, 96, 318–329.
Laxon, V., Coltheart, V., & Keating, C. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly too: Words with many orthographic neighbors are easier to read and spell. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 58,103–119.
Laxon, V., Gallagher, A., & Masterson, J. (2002). The effects of familiarity, orthographic neigh-bourhood density, letter-length and graphemic complexity on children’s reading accuracy.
British Journal of Psychology, 93,269–287.
Laxon, V., Masterson, J., & Moran, R. (1994). Are children’s representations of words dis-tributed? Effects of orthographic neighbourhood size, consistency and regularity of nam-ing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 1–27.
Laxon, V., Smith, B., & Masterson, J. (1995). Children’s nonword reading: Pseudohomo-phones, neighbourhood size, and priming effects. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 126– 144.
Levine, J. H. (1993). Exceptions are the rule: An inquiry into methods in the social sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Levitt, A., Healy, A. F., & Fendrich, D. W. (1991). Syllable-internal structure and the sonority hierarchy: Differential evidence from lexical decision, naming and reading. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 20,337–363.
Levy, B. A. (2001). Moving the bottom: Improving reading fluency. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia,
fluency and the brain(pp. 357–379). Timonium: York Press.
Maas, C. J. M., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2003). The multilevel approach to repeated measures for complete and incomplete data. Quality and Quantity, 37, 71–89.
Manis, F. R. (1985). Acquisition of word identification skills in normal and disabled readers.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 77,78–90.
Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (2008). The use of sublexical clusters in normal and dyslexic readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 253–280.
Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (in press). Variability in the word-reading performance of dyslexic readers: Effects of letter length, phoneme length and digraph presence. Cortex.
Martens, V. E. G. (2006). Orthographic knowledge in children with and without reading
difficul-ties. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Martens, V. E. G., & de Jong, P. F. (2006). The effect of word length on lexical decision in
dyslexic and normal reading children. Brain and Language, 98, 140–149.
Martensen, H., Maris, E., & Dijkstra, T. (2003). Phonological ambiguity and context sensitivity: On sublexical clustering in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language,
49,375–395.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review,
88,375–407.
Messbauer, V. C. S. (2005). The phonological representations hypothesis of dyslexia:
Con-sequences for the formation of associations. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Meyer, M. S., & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283–306.
144 REFERENCES
Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401–426.
Peereman, R., Brand, M., & Rey, A. (2006). Letter-by-letter processing in the phonological conversion of multiletter graphemes: Searching for sounds in printed pseudowords.
Psy-chological Bulletin & Review, 13,38–44.
Peereman, R., & Content, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 21,409–421.
Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquistion. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of
Reading, 11,357–383.
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 2, 273–315.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. E. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.
Psychological Review, 103,56–115.
Poole, H., & Levy, B. A. (2007). Patterns of reading succes following rime family training. Paper presented at the SSSR meeting, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pringle-Morgan, W. (1896). A case of congenital word-blindness (inability to learn to read).
British Medical Journal, 2,1543–1544.
Quené, H., & van den Berg, H. (2004). On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Communication, 43, 103–121.
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Schrijnemakers, J. M. C., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solu-tions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416–426.
Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in dyslexia.
Reading Research Quarterly, 27,29–53.
Rasbash, J., Steele, F., Browne, W., & Prosser, B. (2004). A user’s guide to MLwiN version 2.0. London: Institute of Education.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 5, 277–282.
Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1986). Standard progressive matrices. London: H. K. Lewis & Co Ltd.
Reitsma, P. (1983). Word-specific knowledge in beginning reading. Journal of Research in
Reading, 6,41–56.
Reitsma, P. (1988). Tussen letter en woord: Het effect van oefening met wisselrijen [Between letter and word: The effects of training with word family lists]. Pedagogische Studiën, 65, 344–357.
Rey, A., Jacobs, A. M., Schmidt-Weigand, F., & Ziegler, J. C. (1998). A phoneme effect in visual word recognition. Cognition, 68, B71-B80.
Rey, A., & Schiller, N. O. (2005). Graphemic complexity and multiple print-to-sound associa-tions in visual word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 33, 76–85.
Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units.
Rey, V., de Martino, S., Espesser, R., & Habib, M. (2002). Temporal processing and phono-logical impairment in dyslexia: Effect of phoneme lengthening on order judgment of two consonants. Brain and Language, 80, 576–591.
Richter, T. (2006). What is wrong with ANOVA and Multiple Regression? Analyzing sentence reading times with hierarchical linear models. Discourse processes, 41, 221–250. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh,
PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
Schrooten, W., & Vermeer, A. (1994). Woorden in het basisonderwijs: 15.000 woorden
aange-boden aan leerlingen[Words in primary education: 15.000 words presented to students]. Tilburg, The Netherlands: TUP.
Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 21,876–900.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisi-tion. Cognition, 55 151–218.
Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95–129. Share, D. L. (2008). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The
perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615. Share, D. L., & Gur, T. (1999). How reading begins: A study of preschoolers’ print
identifica-tion strategies. Cogniidentifica-tion and Instrucidentifica-tion, 17, 177–213.
Share, D. L., & Shalev, C. (2004). Self-teaching in normal and disabled readers. Reading and
Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17,769–800.
Share, D. L., & Stanovich, K. E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education,
1, 1–57.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and
advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publishers. Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2007). The science of reading: A handbook. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Spinelli, D., de Luca, M., di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming in reading: Role of reading experience and reading deficit in Italian readers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 217–235.
Staphorsius, G., Krom, R. S. H., & de Geus, K. (1988). Frequenties van woordvormen en letterposities in jeugdlectuur [Frequencies of word forms and letter positions in children’s books]. Arnhem: Instituut voor Toetsontwikkeling (Cito).
Struiksma, A. J. C. (2003). Lezen gaat voor [Reading first]. Unpublished PhD, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Struiksma, A. J. C., van der Leij, A., & Stoel, R. (2009). Response to fluency-oriented inter-vention of Dutch poor readers. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 541–548. Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. East Sussex, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Thaler, V., Ebner, E. M., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (2004). Training reading fluency in dysfluent readers with high reading accuracy: Word specific effects but low transfer to
146 REFERENCES
untrained words. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 89–111.
Torgesen, J. K. (2007). Recent discoveries on remedial interventions for children with dyslexia. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 521–537). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Im-mediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning
Disabilities, 34,33–58.
Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Alexander, A. W. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia,
fluency and the brain(pp. 333-335). Timonium. MD: York Press.
Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset- and rimelike units in printed words. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 281–298). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107–136.
Tressoldi, P. E., Vio, C., & Iozzino, R. (2007). Efficacy of an intervention to improve fluency in children with developmental dyslexia in a regular orthography. Journal of Learning
Disabilities, 40,203–209.
Valdois, S., Bosse, M. L., & Tainturier, M. J. (2004). The cognitive deficits responsible for developmental dyslexia: Review of evidence for a selective visual attentional disorder.
Dyslexia, 10,339–363.
van Daal, V. H. P., Reitsma, P., & van der Leij, A. (1994). Processing units in word reading by disabled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57, 180–210.
van den Bos, K. P., lutje Spelberg, H. C., Scheepstra, A. J. M., & de Vries, J. (1994). De klepel
vorm A en B: Verantwoording, handleiding, diagnostiek en behandeling[The klepel form A and B: Rationale, manual diagnostics, and treatment]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Berkhout.
van den Bosch, K. (1991). Poor readers’ decoding skills: effects of training, task, and word
characteristics. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
van den Bosch, K., van Bon, W. H. J., & Schreuder, R. (1995). Poor readers’ decoding skills: Effects of training with limited exposure duration. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 110– 125.
van der Leij, A., Struiksma, A. J. C., Ruijssenaars, A. J. C., Verhoeven, L., Kleijnen, R., & Henneman, K. e. a. (2004). Diagnose van dyslexie [Diagnosis of dyslexia]
van der Sluis, S., de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2004). Inhibition and shifting in children with learning deficits in arithmetic and reading. Journal of Experimental Child
Psychol-ogy, 87,239–266.
Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry, 45,2–40.
Verhoeven, L. (1995). Drie-Minuten-Toets: Handleiding [Three-minute test: Manual]. Arn-hem: CITO.
Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (2003). Units of analysis in reading Dutch bisyl-labic pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 255–271.
Wagenmakers, E. J. M., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2006). Long-term priming of neighbors biases the word recognition process: Evidence from a lexical decision task. Canadian
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60,275–284.
Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 439–456.
Wentink, H. W. M. J., Van Bon, W. H. J., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Training of poor read-ers’ phonological decoding skills: Evidence for syllable-bound processing. Reading and
Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9,163–192.
Williams, B. R., Hultsch, D. F., Strauss, E. H., Hunter, M. A., & Tannock, R. (2005). Inconsis-tency in reaction time across the life span. Neuropsychology, 19, 88–96.
Wimmer, H. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 14,1–33.
Wise, B. W. (1992). Whole words and decoding for short-term learning: Comparisons on a “talking-computer” system. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 147–167. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for developmental dyslexias.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 91,415–438.
Yap, R., & van der Leij, A. (1993). Computergestuurde remediëring van dyslexie door het opvoeren van de herkenningssnelheid van subwoordeenheden [Computer-based remedia-tion of reading disability by sublexical speed training]. Pedagogische Studiën, 70, 402– 419.
Yates, M., Locker, L. J., & Simpson, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighbour-hood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 452–457.
Ziegler, J. C., Castel, C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., Alario, F. X., & Perry, C. (2008). Devel-opmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition, 10, 151–178.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. C. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia and skilled reading across languages: A Psycholinguistic Grain Size Theory. Psychological
Bulletin, 131,3–29.
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U. C. (2006). Becoming literate in different languages: Similar problems, different solutions. Developmental Science, 9, 429–453.
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal? Journal
of Experimental Child Psychology, 86,169–193.
Zoccolotti, P., de Luca, M., di Pace, E., Gasperini, F., Judica, A., & Spinelli, D. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language, 93, 369–373.
Zoccolotti, P., de Luca, M., di Pace, E., Judica, A., Orlandi, M., & Spinelli, D. (1999). Markers of developmental surface dyslexia in a language (Italian) with high grapheme-phoneme correspondence. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 191–216.
