• No results found

Restitution of Cultural Objects in Post-Communist Romania: an examination of the impact of the communist period on current restitution procedures and cases at the Brukenthal National Museum and Medias Municipal Museum.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Restitution of Cultural Objects in Post-Communist Romania: an examination of the impact of the communist period on current restitution procedures and cases at the Brukenthal National Museum and Medias Municipal Museum."

Copied!
5
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Bibliography

Appiah, K.A. 2009. ‘Whose Culture is it?’ in J. Cuno (ed) Whose Culture? The Promise of Museums and the Debate over Antiquities. Princeton. 71-87.

Barrett J. 2015. ‘Museums, Human Rights and Universalism Reconsidered’ in WITCOMB, A., and Kylie M. The International Handbooks of Museum Studies. [1]: Museum Theory. Chichester, West Sussex. 93-117.

Bator, P.M. 1982. ‘An Essay on the International Trade in Art’, Stanford Law Review, 34: 275–384. Baxter, P. and Jack, S. 2008. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and

implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13: 544-559.

Bernard, R. 1988. Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Alta Mira Press.

Bienkowski P. 2015. ‘A Critique of Museum Restitution and Repatriation Practices’ in McCarthy, C. (ed.) The international handbooks of museum studies. [2]: Museum practice. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons. 431-455.

Boyland, P.J. 1995. ‘Illicit Trafficking in Antiquities and Museum Ethics’ in K.W. Tubb (ed.) Antiquities Trade or Betrayed: Legal, Ethical and Conservation Issues. London: Archetype Pub. 94-105.

Brett, D. 2015. 'Romania: Old Problems and New Challenges 'in Wolchik, C. et al. (ed.) Central and East European politics: From communism to democracy (Third ed.). Lanham, Maryland: Rowman &

Littlefield. 373-405.

Brodie, N. 2006. ‘An Archaeologist’s View of Trade in Unprovenanced Antiquities’ in B.T. Hoffman (ed.) Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy and Practice. Cambridge: 52-64.

Cimec.ro. ‘Pictura – Chladek, Anton. Portret de femeie’ http://clasate.cimec.ro/detaliu.asp?tit=Pictura--Chladek-Anton--Portret-de-femeie&k=504C204AE875457BB98372C9A85983ED. Accessed 12 May 2018.

Cimec.ro, ‘Registrul Bunurilor Culturale Mobile Distruse, Furate, Disparute, sau Exportate Ilegal’, http://furate.cimec.ro Accessed 07 Feb. 2018.

Clifford, J. 1997. Routes. Travel and Translation in the late Twentieth Century. Cambridge (MA); London: Harvard University Press.

Cuno, J. 2008. Who Owns Antiquity? Museums and the Battle over our Ancient Heritage. Princeton. Deacu, E. 2016. ‘Cum va solutina ANRP dosarele de retrocedare dupa scandalul despagubirilor ilegale pentru hemoroizi si paranoi’ Juranalistii.ro. https://www.jurnalistii.ro/cum-va-solutiona-anrp-dosarele-de-retrocedare-dupa-scandalul-despagubirilor-pentru-hemoroizi-si-paranoia/. Accessed 20 July 2018.

(2)

Farasiu, C. 2018. Muzeul de Arta din Cluj-Napoca. Retrocedari in dauna patrimoniului cultural al tarii, Ziarul Facila, http://ziarulfaclia.ro/muzeul-de-arta-din-cluj-napoca-retrocedari-in-dauna-patrimoniului-cultural-al-tarii/. Accessed on 23 Jan 2018.

Foucault, M. 1998. [1967] ‘Different spaces’ In J.D. Faubion (ed.) Aesthetics, methods, and epistemology: essential works of Foucault. Volume II. London: Penguin: 175-185.

Gilberg, T. 1990. Nationalism and communism in Romania: the rise and fall of Ceausescu's personal dictatorship. Oxford: Westview Press.

Glass, A. 2004. ‘Return to sender’. Journal of Material Culture 9(2): 115–139.

Greenfield, J. 1989. The return of cultural treasures, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. Hann, C. 1987. 'The Politics of Anthropology in Socialist Eastern Europe.' In:

Jackson, A. (ed.) Anthropology at Home, pp: 139-153. London: Tavistock Publications.

Harrison R. and Linkman, A. 2010. ‘Critical approaches to heritage’ in R. Harrison (ed.) Understanding the Politics of Heritage. Manchester University Press. 43-81.

Hennink, M., I. Hutter and A. Bailey, 2011. Qualitative Research Methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Hirsch, F. (2005). Empire of nations: Ethnographic knowledge and the making of the Soviet Union (Culture and society after socialism 280498829). Ithaca [etc.]: Cornell University Press. Hitchins, A. et al. 2018. ‘Romania’, Encyclopaedia Britannica.com.

Hoffmann, B.T. 2006. ‘European Union Legislation Pertaining to Cultural Goods’ in B.T. Hoffman (ed.) Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy and Practice. Cambridge: 191-194.

Iosif, C. 2008. ‘The Politics of Tradition: Practices of Ethnological Museology under Communism’ in V. Mihailescu & I. Iliev (ed.) Studying Peoples in the People’s Democracies II. Socialist Era

Anthropology in South-East Europe. LIT-Verlag. 81-114.

Jenkins, T. 2011. Contesting Human Remains in Museum Collections: the Crisis of Cultural Authority. New York: Routledge.

Joyce, R.A. 2004. ‘Academic freedom, stewardship and cultural heritage: weighing the interests of stakeholders in crafting repatriation approaches’ in C. Fforde (ed) The Dead and their Possessions: Repatriation in Principle, Policy and Practice. New York: Routledge. 87-92.

Kohler, E.M., 2007. ‘Repatriation of Cultural Objects to Indigenous Peoples: A Comparative Analysis of U.S. and Canadian Law’. The International Lawyer 41: 103–126.

Lazar, A. 2015. ‘Illicit Trafficking in Cultural Goods in South East Europe: ‘Fiat Lux’’ in F. Desmarais (ed.) Countering Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods: The Glocal Challenge of Protecting the World’s Heritage. ICOM. 107-125.

(3)

Lewis, G. 2006. ‘The “Universal Museum”: A Case of Special Pleading?’ in B.T. Hoffman (ed.) Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy and Practice. Cambridge: 379-386.

Lidchi, H. 2013. ‘The poetics and the politics of exhibiting other cultures’ in E.Hall and N. Hall (eds) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Open University, London. 151 – 208. Lord, B. 2006. ‘Foucault’s museum: difference, representation, and genealogy’ Museum & Society 4: 1-14. McIntyre, L.J. 2005. Need to Know: Social Science Research Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

McGuire R.H. 2004. ‘Contested Pasts: Archaeology and Native Americans’ in Meskell, et al. (eds) A Companion to Social Archaeology, Malden: Blackwell, 374-396.

Mulvaney, D. J. 1991. ‘Past regained, future lost: the Kow Swamp Pleistocene burials’, Antiquity 65: 12– 21.

Nicholas, L.H., 1994. The rape of Europa: the fate of Europe's treasures in the Third Reich and the Second World War. New York: Knopf.

Nicolescu, G. 2015. Art, Politics and the Museum: Tales of continuity and rupture in modern Romania. Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London [PhD Thesis].

Nicolescu, G., 2016. Decorativa: The Monopoly of Visual Production in Socialist Romania. The

Centralized Organization of Museum Displays in the 1960s and 1970s. Journal Of Design History 29: 71– 87.

Nitulescu, V.S. 2004. ‘A Guide to Museum Statistics in Europe: Romania’ European Group to Museum Statistics. http://www.egmus.eu/uploads/tx_usermusstatistic/Romania.pdf. Accessed 16 Jan 2018. Oprea, C. 2017. ‘Retrocedarea Muizeului Brukenthal catre Biserica Evangelica’ Cotidianul.ro,

https://www.cotidianul.ro/retrocedarea-muzeului-brukenthal-catre-biserica-evanghelica/, Accessed 20 July 2018.

Opriș, I. 2009. Cinci destine muzeografice [Five Museographical Destinies]. Bucharest: Oscar Print. Peters, R. 2015. ‘The Protection of Cultural Property in EU Law: Status Quo and Future Perspectives’ in F. Desmarais (ed.) Countering Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods: The Global Challenge of Protecting the World’s Heritage. ICOM. 141-151.

Ploscariu I.D. 2015. The struggle of Fortinbras and Horatio in Romania: removal and re-collection of the communist past in Romanian museums. Sprawy Narodowościowe. Seria nowa, 42: 37–50.

Polybius. The Histories. Trans. E. S. Shuckburgh.

Popa, C.N. 2012. ‘Archaeology and Nationalism in Europe: Two case studies from the Northwest and Southeast Europe’ Archaeological Review from Cambridge 2: 52-70.

Simpson, M. 2004. ‘The Plundered Past: Britian’s challenge for the future’ in C. Fforde (ed) The Dead and their Possessions: Repatriation in Principle, Policy and Practice. New York: Routledge. 157-170.

(4)

Smith, L. 2004. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. New York: Routledge. Smith, L. 2006. Uses of heritage, London: Routledge.

Ssorin-Chaikov, N. 2006. 'On Heterochrony: Birthday Gifts to Stalin, 1949’ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12: 355-375.

Stake, R., 1995. The Art of Case Study Research. California: Thousand Oaks.

Stefu, V. 2017. Muzeul Alt-Mediasch: Marturii ale comunitatii sasesti de la Medias. Cluj-Napoca: Mega. Stoica, C.A., 2005. Once upon a Time There Was a Big Party: The Social Bases of the Romanian

Communist Party (Part I). East European Politics & Societies 19: 686–716.

Timonea, D. 2006. ‘ Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia a ‘parafat’ retrocearea Muzeului Brukenthal’

RomaniaLibera.ro, https://romanialibera.ro/actualitate/proiecte-locale/curtea-de-apel-alba-iulia-a-parafat-retrocedarea-muzeului-brukenthal-62343. Accessed 20 July 2018.

Tismaneanu, V. 2008. Democracy and Memory: Romania Confronts Its Communist Past. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 617: 166–180.

Thornton, R. 2004. ‘Repatriation as healing the wounds of the trauma of history: caes of Native Americans in USA’ in C. Fforde (ed.) The Dead and their Possessions: Repatriation in Principle, Policy and

Practice. New York: Routledge. 27-31.

TVR.ro, 2013. ‘”Mafia retrocedarilor” si plangerile la CEDO pentru recuperarea proprietatilor de drept’

http://stiri.tvr.ro/mafia-retrocedarilor-si-plangerile-la-cedo-pentru-recuperarea-proprietatilor-de-drept_28583.html#view. Accessed 21 July 2018.

Verdery, K. (1991). National ideology under socialism: identity and cultural politics in Ceausescu’s Romania. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Vrodoljak, A.F. 2008. International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects, Cambridge. Yates, D. 2012. ‘Dacian Gold Bracelets’ Trafficking Culture: Research the global traffic in looted cultural objects. http://traffickingculture.org/encyclopedia/case-studies/dacian-gold-bracelets/. Accessed 10 March 2018.

Young & Light, 2001. Place, national identity and post-socialist transformations: an introduction. Political Geography, 8: 941–955.

Zbuchea, A. 2015. ‘Patrimoniul Risipit: studiu realisat de RMNR privind retrocedarea patrimoniului muzeal (2001-2014)’ Reteaua Nationala a Muzeelor din Romania: 1-26.

− International Legislation and Framework: ICOM (2017) Code of Ethics.

(5)

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (1958) [Treaty of Rome).

UNESCO (1958) Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict.

UNESCO (1970) Convention on the means of prohibiting and preventing the illicit import, export, and transfer of ownership of cultural property.

UNIDROIT (1995) Convention on stolen or illegally exported cultural objects.

1938 International Convention for Protection of Historic Buildings and Works of Art in Time of War. 1984 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage (Interim Protection) Bill.

1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. − EU Legislation:

2007 Treaty on the Functioning of European Union. 1992 Regulation 3911/92.

Regulation 116/2009. Directive 93/7/EEC.

1954 European Cultural Convention.

2017 (1985) European Convention on Offences relating to Cultural Property. − Romanian Legislation: Nr. 182/2000. Nr. 10/2001. Nr. 2044/2001. Nr. 247/2005. Nr. 165/2013. Nr. 311/2013. Nr. 123/2017.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Op 26 mei, 24 juni, 30 augustus en 27 september werden monsters genomen van jong volgroeid blad (incl. bladsteel), gemiddeld voor alle behandelingen.. Monsters werden

The projects that are developed according to the CeHRes roadmap undergo formative evaluation after each of these phases, namely contextual inquiry, value specification, design

Pursuant to resolutions, statements and reports of the General Assembly, the Human Rights Council, the CESCR, UN independent experts, and NGO’s, this thesis argues that it is broadly

« Cette loi a pour objectif de définir la langue française comme langue officielle et obligatoire dans tous les services de l’état (bien que les traductions en anglais

Furthermore, since the European Union is supposed to accede to the European Convention of Human Rights, a comparative analysis of the approach of the

Hoofdstuk 8 uit het GEKR bestaat uit drie afdelingen en is in z’n geheel gewijd aan de inhoudscontrole van voorwaarden die deel van een overeenkomst vormen.. toepassing is

Met de invoering van het systeem van promoveren en degraderen is een regime ontwikkeld waarin gedetineerden op basis van hun goede gedrag en motivatie in aanmerking komen voor

Wanneer echter bij echtscheiding naar Nederlands recht de vraag naar voren komt of het reeds gegeven gedeelte van de bruidsgave buiten de gemeenschap van goederen kan worden