Werk_Kenm -,610 ,199 -3,1 asymmetrie links ,194 ,395 0,5 normaal
Aut_Mot -,846 ,199 -4,3 asymmetrie links ,360 ,395 0,9 normaal
Ctrl_Mot -,207 ,199 -1,0 normaal -,507 ,395 -1,3 normaal
Werk_perform. -,769 ,199 -3,9 asymmetrie links 1,452 ,395 3,7 piek hoger dan normaal
ZMT j/n ,316 ,199 1,6 normaal -1,926 ,395 -4,9 piek lager dan normaal
Eenheid -,258 ,199 -1,3 normaal -1,523 ,395 -3,9 piek lager dan normaal
Opleiding -,100 ,199 -0,5 normaal ,139 ,395 0,4 normaal
Geslacht ,041 ,199 0,2 normaal -2,026 ,395 -5,1 piek lager dan normaal
Leeftijd ,057 ,199 0,3 normaal -1,083 ,395 -2,7 piek lager dan normaal
Jaren in dienst Org ,723 ,199 3,6 asymmetrie rechts -,589 ,395 -1,5 normaal
Jaren huidige Ftie 1,680 ,199 8,5 asymmetrie rechts 2,711 ,395 6,9 piek hoger dan normaal
Fulltime/Parttime ,640 ,199 3,2 asymmetrie rechts -1,612 ,395 -4,1 piek lager dan normaal
Intern/Extern ,769 ,199 3,9 asymmetrie rechts -1,428 ,395 -3,6 piek lager dan normaal
WK_FFJ -,385 ,199 -1,9 normaal -,170 ,395 -0,4 normaal
WK_FFO -,335 ,199 -1,7 normaal -,346 ,395 -0,9 normaal
WK_SV -1,052 ,199 -5,3 asymmetrie links ,710 ,395 1,8 normaal
WK_TV -,606 ,199 -3,1 asymmetrie links -,325 ,395 -0,8 normaal
WK_TI -,786 ,199 -4,0 asymmetrie links ,218 ,395 0,6 normaal
WK_WA -,603 ,199 -3,0 asymmetrie links -,159 ,395 -0,4 normaal
MOT_ExtReg ,047 ,199 0,2 normaal -,560 ,395 -1,4 normaal
MOT_Introj -,490 ,199 -2,5 asymmetrie links ,006 ,395 0,0 normaal
MOT_Ident -1,136 ,199 -5,7 asymmetrie links 1,694 ,395 4,3 piek hoger dan normaal
MOT_Intrin -,667 ,199 -3,4 asymmetrie links -,228 ,395 -0,6 normaal
WO_WE -1,506 ,199 -7,6 asymmetrie links 4,736 ,395 12,0 piek hoger dan normaal
WO_WQ -,461 ,199 -2,3 asymmetrie links ,668 ,395 1,7 normaal
WO_JS1 -1,500 ,199 -7,6 asymmetrie links 4,512 ,395 11,4 piek hoger dan normaal
Z-score = Statistic/ Standard Error; Score <-1,96 of >+1,96 is niet normaal;
Grens van 1,96 is herleid van α=5%; α/2 geeft Z,025; Z-tabel levert de waarde 1,96 op bij de 1-0,025
N=149; SE: Standard Error
Kur- tosis SE Kurtosis Z-Skewness Z-Kurtosis Variabele Skew- ness SE Skew-
65
Literatuurlijst:
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Beleidsdocument (2014). 7Up, 25-06-2014.
Brouwer, A. (2007) Management Control Systemen & Organizational Citizenship Behavior. http://www.scriptiesonline.uba.uva.nl/, 31-05-2015.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group
characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel psychology, 46(4), 823-847.
Coers, M. (2013). Job control binnen 'Het Nieuwe Werken': De effecten op motivatie en job performance. http://www.scriptiesonline.uba.uva.nl/, 10-02-2015.
Deci, E.L. & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behaviour. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 11, (4), p. 182 - 185.
Delarue, A., Van Hootegem, G., Procter, S., & Burridge, M. (2008). Teamworking and organizational performance: A review of survey‐based research. International Journal of Management
Reviews, 10(2), 127-148.
Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2011). Intrinsic motivation as a moderator on the relationship between perceived job autonomy and work performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 367-387.
Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2013). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The moderating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 412-430. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Los Angeles: Sage Publications
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331–362
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.-H., Aubé, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2010). The Motivation at Work Scale: Validation Evidence in Two Languages. Educational and Psychological
Measurement, 70(4), 628–646.
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., ... & Westbye, C. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178-196.
66
Gallie, D., Zhou, Y., Felstead, A., & Green, F. (2012). Teamwork, skill development and employee welfare. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(1), 23-46.
Gillet, N., Gagné, M., Sauvagère, S., & Fouquereau, E. (2013). The role of supervisor autonomy support, organizational support, and autonomous and controlled motivation in predicting employees' satisfaction and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 450-460.
Godschalk, L. (2008). Het belang van uitdaging op werkuitkomsten. http://www.scriptiesonline.uba.uva.nl/, 05-05-2015.
Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393-417.
Graves, L. M., Cullen, K. L., Lester, H. F., Ruderman, M. N., & Gentry, W. A. (2015). Managerial motivational profiles: Composition, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 87, 32-42.
Güntert, S. T. (2015). The impact of work design, autonomy support, and strategy on employee outcomes: A differentiated perspective on self-determination at work. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 74-87.
Haas, M. R. (2010). The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 989- 1008.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1974). The job diagnostic survey: An instrument for the diagnosis of jobs and the evaluation of job redesign projects (US Department of Defense No.
AD0779828) New Haven. CT: United States Department of Defense.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied psychology, 60(2), 159.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332.
Lambe, C. J., Webb, K. L., & Ishida, C. (2009). Self-managing selling teams and team performance: The complementary roles of empowerment and control. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(1), 5-16.
Maas, V.S. (2009). A concise guide to quantitative data analysis for Msc students, UvA-Blackboard, https://blackboard.ic.uva.nl/webapps/login/, 17-2-2015.
67
Maynard, M. T., Gilson, L. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2012). Empowerment—fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1231-1281.
Melo, C. D. O., Cruzes, D. S., Kon, F., & Conradi, R. (2013). Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management. Information and Software Technology, 55(2), 412-427.
Merchant, K.A. & Van der Stede, W.A. (2003). Management Control Systems. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Moe, N. B., Dingsøyr, T., & Dybå, T. (2010). A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project. Information and Software Technology, 52(5), 480-491.
Moran, C. M., Diefendorff, J. M., Kim, T. Y., & Liu, Z. Q. (2012). A profile approach to self- determination theory motivations at work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(3), 354-363. Moreau, E., & Mageau, G. A. (2012). The importance of perceived autonomy support for the
psychological health and work satisfaction of health professionals: Not only supervisors count, colleagues too!. Motivation and Emotion, 36(3), 268-286.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and Validating a Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and the Nature of Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339.
Otis, N., & Pelletier, L. G. (2005). A Motivational Model of Daily Hassles, Physical Symptoms, and Future Work Intentions Among Police Officers1. Journal of applied social psychology, 35(10), 2193-2214.
Parker, S. K. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual review of psychology, 65, 661-691.
Parker, S. K., & Ohly, S. (2008). Designing motivating jobs. Work motivation: Past, present, and future, 233-284.
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., & Cordery, J. L. (2001). Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 74(4), 413-440.
Richer, S. F., Blanchard, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (2002). A motivational model of work turnover. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2089-2113.
Rolfsen, M. (2013). “We put teamwork back on the agenda again and again” The role of support systems in autonomous teamwork. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 292-304.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68. Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work?—A quantitative analysis of agile project
68
Sisaye, S. (2005). Management control systems and organizational development: New directions for managing work teams. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(1), 51-61. Van den Bor, L. (2014). Managing behaviour as a determinant of self-managing team performance.
http://www.scriptiesonline.uba.uva.nl/, 07-03-2015
Van den Broeck, A. (2013). Het Job-demands resources model: Een motivationele analyse vanuit de Zelf-Determinatie Theorie. Gedrag en Organisatie, 26(4), 449-466.
Van den Broeck, A., Lens, W., De Witte, H., & Van Coillie, H. (2013). Unraveling the importance of the quantity and the quality of workers’ motivation for well-being: A person-centered
perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(1), 69-78.
Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., Lens, W., & Andriessen, M. (2009). De zelf- determinatie theorie: kwalitatief goed motiveren op de werkvloer. Gedrag & Organisatie, 22(4), 316-335.
Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work‐related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981-1002.
Van Dijk, M.R., (2013). Super 7 operations, the next step for lean in financial services. Bloomington: iUniverse LLC.
Wtenweerde, N. (2013). Telewerken: invloed op management control systeem en motivatie. UvA thesis.