• No results found

University of Groningen Gene-environment interactions on the course of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms Brinksma, Djûke Maaike

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Gene-environment interactions on the course of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms Brinksma, Djûke Maaike"

Copied!
11
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Gene-environment interactions on the course of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

(ADHD) symptoms

Brinksma, Djûke Maaike

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from

it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date:

2018

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Brinksma, D. M. (2018). Gene-environment interactions on the course of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity

Disorder (ADHD) symptoms: From early into late adolescence. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)
(3)
(4)

129

S

Supplementary Information 2.1

Genotyping Length Polymorphisms of DRD4, 5-HTTLPR, and MAOA. Genotyping of

the length polymorphisms (LP) DRD4, HTTLPR, and SNP rs25331 (A/G SNP in L HTTLPR)

and MAOA was done at the Research lab for Multifactorial Diseases within the Human

Genetics department of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre in Nijmegen,

The Netherlands.

The 48-bp direct repeat polymorphism in exon 3 of DRD4 was genotyped on the

Il-lumina BeadStation 500 platform (IlIl-lumina). Three percent blanks as well as duplicates

between plates were taken along as quality controls during genotyping. Determination

of the length of the alleles was performed by direct analysis on an automated capillary

sequencer (ABI3730, Applied Biosystems, Nieuwerkerk a/d IJssel, The Netherlands) using

standard conditions. Call rate for DRD4 was 99.4%.

Genotyping of the HTTLPR polymorphism in the promoter region of SLC6A4 (5-HTT,

SERT) gene was performed by simple sequence length analysis. Call rate was 91.6%. A

custom-made TaqMan assay (Applied Biosystems) was utilized to genotype the single

nucleotide substitution (A to G), which is present in the HTTLPR long (l) allele (rs25531).

Call rate was 96.5%. Concordance between DNA replicates showed an accuracy of 100%.

All lg alleles were recoded into s’, because it has been shown that this polymorphism

represents low serotonin expression comparable to the s’ allele, while la was recoded

as l’. The 30bp variable number of tandem repeat polymorphism (called MAOA-LPR or

MAOA-uVNTR) was also genotyped on the Illumina BeadStation 500 platform. Three

percent blanks as well as duplicates between plates were taken along as quality controls

during genotyping. Call rate was 100% for MAOA. All polymorphisms were well within

Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE p-values ranged from 0.77 to 0.87).

Genotyping of DRD2, and Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT). The DRD2 TaqIA

(rs1800497), and the COMT val158met (rs4680) were genotyped by the Golden Gate

Illumina BeadStation 500 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) according to the

manu-facturers protocol. Call rates were 100% for DRD2 and 95% for COMT. All DNA samples

could be amplified, and concordance between DNA replicates (n = 53) showed 100%

genotyping accuracy (Nederhof et al., 2010). Both SNPs were well within

Hardy–Wein-berg equilibrium.

(5)

130

Supplementary Information 2.2

Two-way interactions between pre- and perinatal factors × time during the course of attention-deficit/hyperac-tivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms across adolescencea

Parameter Estimateb SEb p Interceptc 413.99 27.69 <.001 Time -23.93 3.67 <.001 MSDPd 125.20 26.51 <.001 MDDPd -10.31 29.34 .718 PDCse 97.88 24.98 <.001 LBWf 9.72 81.50 .905 MSDPd*Time -6.13 3.20 .055 MDDPd*Time -3.32 3.44 .334 PDCse*Time -8.10 2.95 .006 LBWf*Time -8.90 9.76 .362

Note. MSDP=Maternal smoking during pregnancy; MDDP=Maternal drinking during pregnancy;

PDCs=Index of pregnancy and delivery complications; LBW=Low birth weight

aAdjusted for sex and ADHD medication bValues multiplied by 1000 to increase readability

cSignificant variability (p < .001) in intercept for ADHD symptoms, var(u0j)=197.95, χ²(1)=22.23 dMSDP and MDDP coded as no (0), mild (1), or moderate (2)

ePDCs coded as no (0), few (1), or many (2) fLBW coded as yes (0) or no (1).

Supplementary Information 2.3

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptom levels plotted for different levels of an index score of pregnancy and delivery complications across T1 (M = 11.1 yrs), T2 (M = 13.4 yrs), and T3 (M = 16.2 yrs).

Supplementary Information 2.3

(6)

131

S

Supplementary Information 2.4

Three-way interactions for the MAOA gene × pre- and perinatal factors × time during the course of ADHD symp-toms across adolescence for boys onlya

Parameter Estimateb SEb p Interceptc 610.31 42.06 <.001 Time -32.95 6.37 <.001 MAOAd -118.29 48.36 .015 MSDPe 90.03 45.96 .050 MDDPe -20.80 50.31 .679 PDCsf 70.99 39.34 .071 LBWg 459.56 132.00 .001 Genotyped*Time 5.01 7.27 .491 MSDPe*Time -6.14 6.79 .366 MDDPe*Time -11.01 7.70 .153 PDCsf*Time -8.34 5.98 .163 LBWg*Time -7.28 2.06 <.001 MAOAd*MSDPe*Time -2.97 7.65 .698 MAOAd*MDDPe*Time 11.04 8.52 .196 MAOAd*PDCsf*Time 0.40 6.81 .953 MAOAd*LBWg*Time 82.87 23.30 <.001

Note. MSDP=Maternal smoking during pregnancy; MDDP=Maternal drinking during pregnancy;

PDCs=Index of pregnancy and delivery complications; LBW=Low birth weight, see further Table 1.

aAdjusted ADHD medication

bValues multiplied by 1000 to increase readability

cSignificant variability (p < .001) in intercept for ADHD symptoms (var(u

0j)=206.11, χ²(1)=22.30) dMAOA as low (0) or high activity (1)

eMSDP and MDDP coded as no (0), mild (1), or moderate (2) fPDCs coded as no (0), few (1), or many (2)

(7)

132

Supplementary Information 4.1

The Long-Term Difficulties Questionnaire: This questionnaire was filled in by the

partici-pants’ parents with the instruction to indicate which (long-term) difficulties the adolescents

had been exposed to during the past two years.

Life stressors

Person-related life stressors

Chronic illnesses or physical handicaps of the child

High work pressure at school

Lack of friends

Being bullied

Long-lasting conflicts of self with a family member

Long-lasting conflicts of self with others

Environment-related life stressors

Chronic illnesses or physical handicaps of a family member

Housing problems

Neighborhood problems, such as violence or discrimination

Financial problems

(8)

133

S

Su

pp

le

m

en

ta

ry

In

fo

rm

at

io

n

5.

1

Sample char ac teristic s p er DRD4 (n = 1,848) and 5-HT TLPR (n = 1,763) status DRD4 genot yp e 5-HT TLP R genot yp e 7-rep ea t absent n = 1,167 (63.1%) 7-rep ea t present n = 681 (36.9%) Test st atistic SS n = 452 (25.6%) LS n = 871 (49.4%) LL n = 440 (25.0%) Test st atistic P opula tion-based c ohor t (%) 890 (76.3%) 536 (78.7%) χ²(1) = 1.46 338 (24.3%) 696 (50.1%) 355 (25.6%) χ²(2) = 5.95 A ge in y ears , M (SD ) T1 11.09 (.53) 11.09 (.57) F(1) = 0.04 11.07 (.54) 11.09 (.54) 11.09 (.55) F(2) = 0.19 T2 13.35 (.62) 13.38 (.61) F(1) = 0.74 13.34 (.63) 13.39 (.61) 13.36 (.60) F(2) = 0.80 T3 16.15 (.68) 16.17 (.69) F(1) = 0.17 16.15 (.69) 16.18 (.68) 16.15 (.70) F(2) = 0.37 M ale gender (%) 581 (49.8%) 375 (55.1%) χ²(1) = 4.80* 246 (54.4%) 435 (50.0%) 221 (50.0%) χ²(2) = 2.60 ADHD medica tion use a, N (%) T1 134 (11.5%) 62 (9.1%) χ²(1) = 2.57 49 (10.8%) 99 (11.3%) 34 (7.7%) χ²(2) = 4.36 T2 151 (12.9%) 71 (10.4%) χ²(1) = 2.57 51 (11.3%) 106 (12.2%) 45 (10.2%) χ²(2) = 1.11 T3 116 (9.9%) 55 (8.1%) χ²(1) = 1.78 39 (8.6%) 84 (9.6%) 31 (7.0%) χ²(2) = 2.49 Main v ariables ADHD sympt oms b,e, M (SD ) T1 0.69 (.53) 0.67 (.52) F(1) = 0.30 0.73 (.54) 0.66 (.53) 0.66 (.49) F(2) = 2.57 T2 0.54 (.50) 0.54 (.48) F(1) = 0.26 0.57 (.50) 0.52 (.50) 0.52 (.46) F(2) = 1.49 T3 0.49 (.47) 0.47 (.42) F(1) = 1.13 0.51 (.47) 0.48 (.46) 0.45 (.43) F(2) = 1.69 F amily clima te c,d , M (SD ) T1 1.79 (.37) 1.80 (.37) F(1) = 0.15 1.81 (.38) 1.80 (.38) 1.78 (.36) F(2) = 0.75 T2 1.68 (.41) 1.67 (.42) F(1) = 0.18 1.68 (.43) 1.68 (.41) 1.66 (.40) F(2) = 0.50 T3 1.66 (.41) 1.69 (.42) F(1) = 1.61 1.70 (.42) 1.68 (.42) 1.62 (.39) F(2) = 3.63* S chool clima te c,e, M (SD ) T1 2.28 (.69) 2.28 (.70) F(1) = 0.06 2.27 (.69) 2.29 (.70) 2.28 (.72) F(2) = 0.22 T2 2.37 (.61) 2.39 (.60) F(1) = 0.49 2.38 (.60) 2.38 (.59) 2.35 (.63) F(2) = 0.31 T3 2.50 (.57) 2.51 (.56) F(1) = 0.07 2.54 (.56) 2.61 (.57) 2.46 (.57) F(2) = 2.05 Not e. DRD4 = D opamine D4 R ec ept or G ene ADHD = A tt en tion-D eficit/H yper ac tivit y Disor der * p < .05, ** p <.01, *** p < .001 a M eth ylphenida te , de xamphetamine and a tomo xetine use a t an y time dur

ing the past y

ear (1) v ersus non-use (0) b M ean of 7-it ems DSM -IV -or ien

ted ADHD subscale of the CBCL (

Achenbach, 1991; sc or e r ange 0-2) c T1-T2 < T2-T3 a t p < .001. d M ean of 12-it em F amily F unc

tioning scale of the F

AD (Epst ein et al ., 1983; sc or e r ange 0-4) e M ean of 7 selec ted it ems of the t

eacher and classma

tes subscales of the S

ocial P roduc tion F unc tions (SPF ; Or mel et al ., 1997, Or mel , 2002; sc or e r ange 0-5).

(9)

134

Supplementary Information 5.2

Standardized path coefficients of within-person level from the random intercept cross-lagged panel model for the associations between ADHD symptoms and family and school climate across adolescence while controlling for ADHD medication at all time points.

Supplementary Information 5.2

Note. ADHD = Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Left, and right path coefficients represent absences (n = 1,167), and presence 7-repeat variant (n = 681) of the DRD4 genotype, respectively.

*p < .05, **p < .01, and ***p < .001 indicate significant path coefficients within the respective variation of the DRD4.

(10)

135

S

Supplementary Information 5.3

Standardized path coefficients of within-person level from the random intercept cross-lagged panel model for the associations between ADHD symptoms and family and school climate across adolescence while controlling for ADHD medication at all time points.

Supplementary Information 5.3

Note. ADHD = Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Left, middle, and right path coefficients represent S-allele homozygotes (n = 452), L-allele heterozygotes (n = 871), and L-allele homozygotes (n = 440) of the 5-HTTLPR genotype, respectively.

*p < .05, **p < .01, and ***p < .001 indicate significant path coefficients within the respective variation of the 5-HTTLPR.

(11)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

De laatste deelvraag van dit onderzoek luidt: hoe is een uitbreiding van de bestaande risicoanalyse mogelijk? In de voorgaande paragraaf zijn de elementen uit de risicoanalyse van

2.5 presents the phase difference between the flow velocity and tidal elevation (e.g. 13a) as a function of depth, width of intertidal area, and bed friction.. 2.6 presents

After domain analysis and formal specification of the savings accounts FORS was able to find a scenario in which the invariant of positive balance does not hold.. Although this

Deze overgangslaag wordt grenslaag (boundary layer) genoemd. De dikte van de grenslaag hangt bij harmonische signalen af van de frequentie en van de kinematische viscositeit

Gene-environment interactions on the course of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms: From early into late adolescence..

This PhD thesis focuses on the associations of several candidate genes, environmen- tal factors, and their interaction (i.e., gene-environment [G×E] interactions)

The simultaneous presence of the low activity MAOA genotype and low birth weight (p &lt; .001) and of the 5-HTTLPR LL-allele and respectively pregnancy and delivery complications

In the present study, we examined perceived parental rejection, overprotection, and emotional warmth, as well as their interaction with three plasticity genes as predictors