• No results found

APPENDIX 1 Figure 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "APPENDIX 1 Figure 1"

Copied!
17
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

APPENDIX 1

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)

APPENDIX 2

Figure 1

Scatter plot for the whole sample with adding squared term of internationalization

Regression Standardized Predicted Value

3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3

R

e

g

re

s

s

io

n

S

ta

n

d

a

rd

iz

e

d

R

e

s

id

u

a

l

2 0 -2 -4

Scatterplot

(7)

Scatter plot for the whole sample with adding cubed term of internationalization

Regression Standardized Predicted Value

3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3

R

e

g

re

s

s

io

n

S

ta

n

d

a

rd

iz

e

d

R

e

s

id

u

a

l

2 0 -2 -4

Scatterplot

(8)

Figure 3

Scatterplot for cases with national heterogeneity below 0.42 and squared

internationalization term added

Regression Standardized Predicted Value

4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2

R

e

g

re

s

s

io

n

S

ta

n

d

a

rd

iz

e

d

R

e

s

id

u

a

l

2 1 0 -1 -2

Scatterplot

(9)

Regression Standardized Predicted Value

2 1 0 -1 -2 -3

R

e

g

re

s

s

io

n

S

ta

n

d

a

rd

iz

e

d

R

e

s

id

u

a

l

2 1 0 -1 -2 -3

Scatterplot

Dependent Variable: logperfinperc

National heterogeneity index (Binned): .42+

(10)

Figure 5

Scatteplot for cases with national heterogeneity below 0.42 and cubed

internationalization term added

Regression Standardized Predicted Value

4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2

R

e

g

re

s

s

io

n

S

ta

n

d

a

rd

iz

e

d

R

e

s

id

u

a

l

2 1 0 -1 -2

Scatterplot

(11)

Scatteplot for cases with national heterogeneity equal and above 0.42 and cubed

internationalization term added

Regression Standardized Predicted Value

2 1 0 -1 -2 -3

R

e

g

re

s

s

io

n

S

ta

n

d

a

rd

iz

e

d

R

e

s

id

u

a

l

2 1 0 -1 -2 -3

Scatterplot

(12)

APPENDIX 3A

Independent variables Model 1 Model 2 Model3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7 Model 8 Constant -.464 -.309 -.270 -.365 -.359 -.291 -.387 -.375 (-.827) (-.535) (-.467) (-.627) (-.610) (-.504) (-.665) (-.636) Logdebttoeq -.261** -.257* -.272** -.264* -.265* -.275** -.267* -.269* (-2.395) (-2.360) (-2.479) (-2.408) (-2.391) (-2.502) (-2.428) (-2.421) Logsize -.150 $ -.187 -.188 -.174 -.175 -.185$ -.172$ -.175$ (-1.367) (-1.631) (-1.635) (-1.508) (-1.496) -1.615 (-1.490) (-1.492) TMT size .198* .188$ .205$ .182$ .182$ .208 .186$ .185$ (1.845) (1.753) (1.892) (1.656) (1.640) (1.914) (1.682) (1.662) (1.846) Industry manufactuirng 0.35 -.010 -.024 -.023 -.023 -.025 -.023 -.023 Vs. Nonmanufacturing) .331 (-.085) (-.206) (-.200) (-.196) (-.217) (-.203) (-.198) Internationalization .129 -.150 -.288 -.277 -.043 -.128 -.120 Ratio (1.096) (-.509) (-.911) (-.822) (-.219) (-.611) (-.556) Internationalization .300 .391 .378 Ratio² (1.030) (1.301) (1.145) Internationalization .208 .250 .237 Ratio ³ (1.094) (1.295) (1.149) National heterogeneity . .143 .143 .133 .135 Index of TMT (1.201) (1.197) (1.137) (1.142)

National heterogeneity index of TMT x 0.12 .021

(13)

APPENDIX 3B

Independent variable Model1 Model2 Model3 Model4 Model5 Model6 Model7 Model 8 Constant .538 .475 .514 .386 .267 .508 373 -.231 (.736) (.625) (.669) (.489) (.346) (.663) (.474) (-1.587) Logdebttoequity -.336* -.337* -.341* -.342* -.254$ -.345* -.347* -.261$ (-2.152) (-2.137) (-2.143) (-2.138) (-1.548) (-2.166) (-2.167) (-1.587) Log size -.391* -.376* -.379* -.353* -.278$ -.377* -.350* -.279$ (-2.518) (-2.310) (-2.306) (-2.096) (-1.641) (-2.303) (-2.085) (-1.646) TMT size .300$ .306$ 1.968$ 286$ .277$ .312$ .287$ .278$ (1.952) (1.958) (1.968) (1.765) (1.757) (1.980) (1.776) (1.766) Industry Manufacturing vs. .038 .055 .041 .057 .043 .037 .054 .042 No manufacturing (.249) (.339) (.247) (.340) (.264) (.227) (.322) (.259) Internationalization -.057 -.315 -.452 -.912$ -.246 -.344 -.729 Ratio (-.361) (-.678) (-.909) (-1.651) (-.778) (-1.014) (-1.807) Internationalization .275 .381 .454 Ratio² (.591) (.783) (.954) Internationalization .217 .285 .297 Ratio³ (.692) (.875) ( .931) National Heterogeneity .130 .049 .132 .049 Index of TMT (.799) (.296) (.815) ( .295)

National heterogeneity index of TMT X -.494$ -.475.$

Internationalization ratio (-1.732) (-1.672)

0.215 0.218 0.225 0.238 0.299 .228 .242 .298

(14)

APPENDIX 3C

Internationalization variable Model1 Mode2 Model3 Model4 Model5 Model6 Model7 Model8 Constant -1.487$ -1.205 -1.205 -1.354 -1.577 -1.213 -1.376 -1.560 (-1.684) (-1.312) (-1.312) (-1.447) (-1.442) (-1.326) (-1.475) (-1.435) Logdebttequity -.194 -.193 -.193 -.164 -.162 -.196 -.167 -.165 (-1.196) (-1.172) (-1.172) (-.978) (-.954) (-1.189) (-.995) (-.968) Log size .063 -.006 -.006 -.037 -.020 -.004 -.036 -.021 (.395) (-.034) (-.034) (-.212) (-.108) (-.023) (-.204) (-.116) TMT size .135 .149 .149 .140 .143 .154 .146 .147 (.843) (.908) (.908) (.849) (859) (.932) (.882) (.880) Industry Manufacturing vs. .029 -.055 -.058 -.106 -.111 -.062 -.112 -.115 Nonmanufacturing (.186) (-.322) (-.337) (-.585) (-.605) (-.355) (-.616) (-.624) Internationalization .219 .127 .072 .282 .133 .106 .266 Ratio (1.235) (.235) (.132) (.374) (.382) (.303) (.453) Internationalization 097 .185 .105 Ratio² (.180) (.339) (.178) Internationalization .099 .164 .112 Ratio³ (.289) (.468) (.289) National heterogeneity . .158 .184 .163 185 Index of TMT (.903) (.978) (.933) (.982)

National Heterogeneity index of TMT X -.158 -.136

Internationalization Ratio (-.408) (-.342)

.079 .115 .116 .136 .140 .117 .139 .142

R change .079 .036 .001 .020 .004 .002 .021 .003

(15)

APPENDIX 4 A

Spearman correlation for the whole sample

* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

logperf logdebttoeq logsize TMT size Industry

(16)

APPENDIX 4 B

Spearman correlation for TMT with high national heterogeneity index

logperf logdebttoeq logsize TMT size Industry

Internationali zation ratio

National heterogeneity

index Spearman's rho logperf Correlation Coefficient 1.000

logdebttoeq Correlation Coefficient -.297 1.000

logsize Correlation Coefficient .021 .021 1.000

TMT size Correlation Coefficient .093 .093 .027 1.000

Industry Correlation Coefficient .070 .070 -.057 .082 1.000

Internationalization ratio Correlation Coefficient .231 .231 .278 .031 .310(*) 1.000 .

(17)

APPENDIX 4 C

Spearman correlation for TMT with high national heterogeneity index

* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

.

logperf logdebttoeq logsize TMT size Industry

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Schrijf je naam op elke bladzijde en start een nieuwe pagina bij elke vraag.. Kladwerk dien je ook in,

Analysis of various European noxious species lists for their species occurrences in crop and/or non-crop habitats (crop vs. environmental weeds) and their origin (native vs. alien

peptide vaccination days: NKG2A relative

[r]

[r]

An individual can work as unskilled in both periods, or investment in human capital in the first period and work as a skilled worker in the second period, where h>0,

Only one model indicated a positive relationship between firm size and R&D expenditures divided by sales, and mixed results were found for the models with the logarithm of

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level