• No results found

University of Groningen Time & Other Dimensions Schlichting, Nadine

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Time & Other Dimensions Schlichting, Nadine"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Time & Other Dimensions

Schlichting, Nadine

DOI:

10.33612/diss.97434922

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2019

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Schlichting, N. (2019). Time & Other Dimensions. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.97434922

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Propositions

Magnitudes or quantities of different dimensions that define an event (e.g., numerosity) influence the perceived duration of this event in a “more (other dimension) is more (time)” way.

How strongly other dimensions affect duration judgements varies greatly bet-ween participants, but is a stable psychological bias within participants.

The CNV, once thought to reflect the accumulator of an internal clock system, really reflects something else.

We can flexibly translate temporal information into different formats like spati-al, symbolic, or motor representations.

Our environment and all of our cognition is inherently temporal – we can use this temporality in many ways to make duration judgements.

However participants make duration judgements, the observed behavioral per-formance adheres to psychophysical laws of time perception.

We may miss out on figuring out how minds tell or keep track of time because our preconceived idea of (internal) clocks affects the way we design experiments and interpret results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In the second experiment, we used a more complex task: Participants were presented a stream of di- gits and one target letters and were subsequently asked to reproduce both

Although reproduced durations are more variable then observed in laboratory studies, the data adheres to two interval timing laws: Relative timing sensitivity is constant across

So far, theories and models of interval timing can be grouped into two camps, the first holding the assumption that there is a dedicated cognitive process for interval

A common pro- cessing system for duration, order and spatial information: Evidence from a time estimation task.. SMA selectively codes the active accumulation of

In lab experiments we can isolate the time dimension by designing stimuli in such a way that they only differ in duration: Participants see two circles, equal in size, color,

Sarah, Robbert, Max, Josh, Wouter, Martin, Joost, Soha and Sajad: Thank you all for interesting discussions, for your support, and for the time that we spent together outside of

Especially in neuroimaging studies in which a control task involving another dimension is simply subtracted from the time task, either the paradigm needs to ensure that participants

Lemma 85 Suppose that the CARE of the system (A, B, C, D) has a solu- tion Q, the FARE of the system has a solution F, the system is approximately controllable and