• No results found

Title: The typology and formal semantic of adnominal possession

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Title: The typology and formal semantic of adnominal possession "

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Cover Page

The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/62062 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Author: Karvovskaya, Lena

Title: The typology and formal semantic of adnominal possession

Date: 2018-05-02

(2)

220 499

The typology and for mal semantics of adnominal possession

The typology and formal semantics of adnominal possession

This book is an inquiry into the relation between the formal marking of possessive constructions and their corresponding interpretations. On the one hand, a single language can have multiple marking strategies to express adnominal possession. In English, for instance, this student’s friend and a friend of this student represent distinct strategies for marking adnominal possession.

On the other hand, a single possessive construction can have multiple interpretations, some of which are more prominent than others. Thus, John’s head is more readily interpreted as John’s body part than as a bust representing John.

This thesis offers a unified analysis of the semantics of adnominal possessive constructions. A fundamental distinction is established between idiosyncratic and non-idiosyncratic possessive strategies. Idiosyncratic possessive strategies are reserved for stereotypical relations that are systematically derived from the possessed noun. Typically, idiosyncratic strategies are limited in distribution and involve less morphology than non-idiosyncratic ones. The choice between an idiosyncratic and a non-idiosyncratic strategy is determined by the principle, Maximize Presupposition. A speaker intending to refer to a stereotypical relation will choose the idiosyncratic strategy. By contrast, the choice of a non- idiosyncratic strategy gives rise to the inference that the stereotypical relation does not hold. This hypothesis is tested against a typologically rich sample of languages. The analysis is extended to account for more complex systems of possessive marking, including languages that make use of possessive classifiers.

Through its combination of formal semantics and descriptive linguistics, the thesis will be of interest to theoretically and typologically oriented linguists alike.

ISBN 978-94-6093-283-0

Lena Karvovskaya

Lena Kar vovskaya

Lena Karvovskaya

The typology and formal

semantics of adnominal

possession

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Chomsky (1986) suggests that m sentences mvolvmg small clauses, the verb and the predicate of the small ciause may jointly s- select the subject of the small ciause The

Towards the late fourties Jaap became instruc- tor at Delft, where I happened to be a young professor.. I caused a little revolution there by putting Analytical Geometry on the basis

whatever move John ever made [ec] If it were possible to fully formalize the idea that the John’s every move construction involves a light verb construction embedded in a

Thus, the database does not only contain marking strategies that exemplify canonical adnominal possession; it also contains marking strategies like that in Shughni (22a) that can

Als we dit vertalen naar het 12 competenties model (voor het Feedback Seminar) dan heeft het ProMES als voordeel het grotere acceptatieniveau. De 12 Henkel competenties zijn vanaf

In contrast, the second measurement in June at the 27th, showed no significant difference between survival rates of the different treatments, with only trends suggesting a

This research aims to is to investigate what the effect of a Room for the River project is on the risk perception of the inhabitants of the cities of Zwolle and Kampen and what

(i) The possessive verbs wәnte ‘to have’ and mәnte ‘to have not’ transpar- ently reflect the incorporation of a locative-comitative preposition әnte into a copula element