to be discussed

EB: Hilde De Clercq GB: 

to be discussed

Members

• 18 countries

• Not a member: Denmark, Finland, Germany,  Austria and Greece (most are observers)

GB and EB

EB: Hilde De Clercq

GB: Hilde De Clercq 

and OE 

(Nathalie Vernimme, 

) 

JHEP1

Strategic Research Agenda (SRA)  Action Programme 

Pilot call (open in 2013, 89 proposals, total budget: 3,3 Meuro, 9 projects are granted

Belgium: 400 000 Belspo – 400 000 FWO

Heritage +

350 proposals, total budget: 7,4 Meuro (Member States) – 2,5  Meuro EC

16 projects are granted Belgium: 167 000 Belspo

JHEP2 (H2020, total budget: 1M euro)

2016‐2019, 4 years Focus on 

alignment‐sustainability‐monitoring

JHEP2 Beneficiaries (13)

Italy (Coordinator) – Ministry of Cultural Heritage and

Activities (MiBACT); Education, University and Research (Miur) Italy

Belgium – Federal Public Planning Service Science Policy ( BELSPO) Cyprus – Research Promotion Foundation (RPF)

France – Ministry of Culture and Communication (MCC); Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Lithuania - The Research Council of Lithuania (RCL) Norway – The Research Council of Norway (RCN)

Poland – Ministry of Culture and National Heritage (MKDN) Portugal – Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)

Romania – Autoritatea Nationala Pentru Cercetare Stiintifica (ANCSI) Spain – Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO)

Sweden – Swedish National Heritage Board (SNHB)

The Netherlands – Dutch Cultural Heritage Agency (RCE); Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research–Humanities Department (NWO)

The United Kingdom – Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)

WP1. : Alignment of national research

programmes and activities with JPI Cultural Heritage

• Further develop the overview of national research

programmes and activities relevant to Cultural Heritage mapping these to the priorities of the SRA identifying best practices in policy initiatives as well as policy instruments.

• Actively promoting the implementation of alignment of the national research programmes and activities relevant to Cultural Heritage of the Participants, based on the SRA,

across the consortium and beyond the JPICH.

7

WP1. : Alignment of national research

programmes and activities with JPI Cultural Heritage

• Task 1.1: overview of policies and instruments (Belspo, KIK)

• Task 1.2: best practices (RCN, NO)

• Task 1.3: engagement with decision makers (ANR, Fr and RPF, Cy)

8

State of the art 

• JHEP2, WP1: alignment of national research programmes and activities with JPI CH

• Task 1.1 : overview on politics and instruments BELSPO (KIK)

• Task 1.2: Best practices RCN (NO)

On‐line questionnaire related to 1.1 and 1.2; 

open from 1 May – 9 Sept 2016 Content questionnaire: 

Net‐heritage survey, Eralearn and a WG (B, NO, SE, ES)

Some results

14 countries participated

Cyprus, Czech Republic, France, Italy, Lithuania, Norway, Poland,  Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands and United Kingdom

Is there a national/federal strategy on research which also applies to CH?

Yes (14)

The number of national/regional research programmes/country: from 1 to 8, mostly

dedicated to CH (minority part of a larger programme)

Main CH priorities of the research strategy?

• Varies from ‘no real priority’, to global aspects  (environmental threats) to very focused items  (fe built environment)

Focus of the programme (aims)

• Research within cutting edge fields

• Support government it its strategy to promote

« green transition »

• Climate change

• Fundamental research

• Stimulate interdisciplinary research

• Address societal challenges through public‐

private collaborations

• Alignment to creative industries

• Foster scientific research in museum sector

Focus of the programme (aims)

• National and cultural identity

• Knowledge about the past

• Archaeological research

« Funding groups participating in transnational calls  (JPI, Eranet, etc…) »

Is the programme aligned to or influenced by other national or international 

programmes or initiatives within CH?

• JPI CH (through SRA)

• H2020

• Regional/national programmes

Alignment –

definition and approach

• A modification of national research programmes,  priorities or activities to bring them in line with joint research priorities in the context of joint  programming

• 3 levels: 

SRA – calls – activities – networking activities State‐of‐the‐art; possibilities in the future, 

bottlenecks and difficulties and how to deal with them

Alignment ‐ Strategic level

• More than 50% have changed their strategy as  a consequence of JPI CH

• Even more state they have the possibility to  change (to align more with the JPI CH)

But … some bottlenecks/difficulties are  pointed out hereby suggesting some

improvements and actions to tackle them

17

WP 2. Implementation of joint activities including joint calls

18

JHEP 2 work package 2

Tasks

• 2.1 Joint calls

• 2.2 Heritage practice

• 2.3 Follow up Action Programme and CH governance strategies

• 2.4 Case studies

• 2.5 Knowledge Hub

19

Task 2.1 Joint calls (NWO, AHRC)

- Aim: to explore possibilities for new joint research calls in variable geometries

- Start with consultation on SRA-based research priorities (January 2016)

- Develop a roadmap for consecutive and focused calls (December 2016) - Ambition: 3 calls to be funded by the national Partners (2017-2019) and

1 COFUND (2018)

SRA‐Research priorities

NCP‐members participated in the elaboration of  the SRA out of which common Research Priorities  have been identified:

‐ Developing a reflective society

‐ Connection people with heritage

‐ Creating knowledge

‐ Safeguarding our cultural heritage resource.

21

Task 2.1 SRA-based areas ranked by each country

1. Management and policy;

2. Technological improvements;

3. Conservation and protection;

4. Identity and perception;

5. Involvement;

6. Changing environments;

7. Digital heritage;

8. Overarching heritage questions.

22

Task 2.1 SRA-based TOPICS (37) under the 8 areas

Belgian ranking

Changing environments;

Conservation and protection;

Digital heritage;

Identity and perception;

Oct 2016: Financial committment from MS.

Input for a roadmap of calls 2017-2019

of variable geometry (proposal to be discussed Nov 2016)

23

Task 2.3 Action programme

2014: 56 topics-subjects

15 topics proposed by Belgian stakeholders (after info- session at KIK-IRPA)

2016: 56 topics have been re-evaluated in terms of:

Relevance?

Which instruments?

Who can join?

Financial commitment?

13 topics left over; each country has to coordinate one

Belgium: project proposed by KUL « changing meaning and value of CH across Europe for ‘old’ and ‘new’ citizens », coordinated by KIK-IRPA Cyprus, Portugal and UK

24

WP 3. Monitoring and evaluation

25

WP 3. Monitoring and evaluation

Task 3.1

Monitoring the alignment process of joint research programming, at the level of national research programmes and research acitivities

FCT, PT

Autumn 2016: set of KPI’s is proposed Task 3.2

Assessment of the alignment process BELSPO (KIK)

26

Internationalisation

27

Initiatives at which non-European countries are invited (workshops, …)