1 | 25-06-2019
How do different coping strategies affect
embarrassment, and how does gender
influence this effect in a public setting?
Elisa Thiescheffer
S3523438
July 8th, 2019
1. Introduction
› Embarrassment
▪
Embarrassment can be defined as feeling exposed, inadequate and awkwardly self-consciousness
(Modigliani, 1968)
▪
Goffman
(1956)defines embarrassment as loss of dignity and disability to part take in an encounter due
to undesirable events arising, representing breakdowns in the social encounters
(Dahl et al., 2001).
- The term ‘public identity’ can be defined as characteristics displayed to others in a particular situation (Reysen, Landau
& Branscombe, 2012; Sherwood, 1965; Tetlock & Manstead, 1985)
› Coping strategies
▪
The concept of coping can be defined as “cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage troubled ‘person -
environment encounters’”
(Folkman & Lazarus, 1988a)▪
Whilst experiencing negative emotions including stress and embarrassment, individuals may use
coping strategies to reduce and/or discard the emotion
(Carver, Scheier & Weintraub, 1989; Folkman, Lazarus, Dunkel-Schetter, DeLongis & Gruen, 1986)1. Introduction
TABLE I
Coping strategies
Coping strategy Explanation
Planful problem-solving
Full attention to the problem, to come up with a plan of action, which “can
affect emotional response in two ways: plans of action ultimately changing
emotional response, or direct affect on cognitive appraisal”
(Stein et al., 1990).
Confrontive coping
Because it is more aggressive and can be slightly hostile, it is more prone to
trigger negative emotions in the confronted person. This can lead to a
decrease in the person-environment relationship
(Stein et al., 1990).
Positive reappraisal
This can generate positive emotional responses, whilst lessening the
negative ones through selective attention. Often individuals try to find
positive meaning in harm already done, after which emotions like pride and
satisfaction can arise
(Stein et al., 1990).
Distancing
This can help get individuals through highly stressful situations and
facilitate its problem solving. Here individuals often try to detach
themselves. Also, “a person acknowledges the troubling problem but doesn’t
1. Introduction
› Gender
▪ In general, females tend to experience emotions more strongly and more explosive than males do (Miller, 1996). Building
on this, Miller (1996) further argues that women thus experience negative emotions, including shame, embarrassment and
guilt more strongly
- Different upbringing
▪ The embarrassment surrounding these sex related purchases is additionally felt more strongly by women (Miller, 1992)
› Public purchase setting
▪ The purchase setting refers to whether consumers decide to physically enter a store, or visit a store privately through its
website. Previous research argues that to risk obtaining a negative public identity or social image in the minds of others,
2. Hypotheses
Five hypotheses emerge from the detailed conceptual model. These are as follows:
› H1: The planful problem-solving coping strategy has a
negative
influence on
embarrassment
› H2: The positive reappraisal coping strategy has a
negative
influence on
embarrassment
› H3: The confrontive coping coping strategy has a
positive
influence on
embarrassment
› H4: The distancing coping strategy has a
positive
influence on embarrassment
› H5: Gender effects the different coping strategies chosen in a public purchase
4. Method
› Pretest:
4. Method
› Experiment: Survey
▪ Survey on Qualtrics (quantitative data)
▪ Respondents were reached through social media network (Facebook, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Instagram)
▪ 206 respondents, Millennials (born between: 1980-2000), participated (61.7% females, average birth year: 1994.42
)
▪ Mixed design: 4 x 2 levels
TABLE II
Variables Research
Concepts
Variable Type
1. Embarrassment
Dependent Variable
2. Coping strategies
Independent Variable
4. Method
TABLE III Coping strategies scale
Coping scale 4 point likert scale
1. Planful problem-solving 0,1,2,3,NA (never used-regularly used & NA)
2. Positive reappraisal 0,1,2,3,NA (never used-regularly used & NA)
3. Confrontive coping 0,1,2,3,NA (never used-regularly used & NA)
4. Distancing 0,1,2,3,NA (never used-regularly used & NA)
TABLE IV Embarrassment scale
Embarrassment 7 point likert scale
1. Embarrassment Not embarrassed at all-very embarrassed
2. Uncomfortable Not uncomfortable at all-very uncomfortable
5. Results
Table V
Males and coping strategies
Model N Mean Std. Deviation
Planful problem-solving 77 2.61 .784
Confrontive coping 77 2.17 .763
Positive reappraisal 77 2.26 .647
Distancing 77 2.43 .714
Table VI
Females and coping strategies
Model N Mean Std. Deviation
Planful problem-solving 126 2.19 .819
Confrontive coping 126 1.93 .674
Positive reappraisal 126 2.15 .581
5. Results
› Additional analysis and control variables:
▪Control variables
- Education (-), nationality (-) and birth year (+) all turned out not to have a significant effect on the relation between
coping strategies and embarrassment.
5. Results
Table X
Results hypotheses
Hypotheses
Result
H1: The planful problem-solving coping strategy has a negative influence on embarrassment
√
H2: The positive reappraisal coping strategy has a negative influence on embarrassment
-
H3: The confrontive coping coping strategy has a positive influence on embarrassment
-
H4: The distancing coping strategy has a positive influence on embarrassment
-
H5: Gender effects the different coping strategies chosen in a public purchase setting against
embarrassment positively
6. Discussion
› Conclusions
›
The interaction effects between gender and the coping strategies on embarrassment were all insignificant. It cannot beconcluded that gender had a moderating effect on the relation between coping strategies on embarrassment.
›
The level of embarrassment an individual experiences decreased. The result is in line with the findings of Folkman andLazarus, stating that it is “associated with an improved emotion state” (Folkman & Lazarus, 1988)
›
It was predicted, the level of embarrassment would decrease. This was not reflected back in the results. Positive reappraisal“was associated with improved emotional states” (Folkman & Lazarus, 1988)
› It was predicted the level of embarrassment would increase. This did not reflect back in the obtained results. This did not align with literature: Folkman and Lazarus expressed it worsened emotion states, as expressing negative emotions can make one feel worse.
› The level of embarrassment was predicted to increase, but this did not reflect back in the results. According to Folkman and Lazarus, distancing is hard to achieve, but did have a link to negative emotions. It is also hard to sustain.
› Gender had a positive and significant effect on embarrassment. females were more prone to experiencing negative effects of embarrassment than males. However, when it comes to the effect of gender on just the coping strategies, males appeared to have a higher score when it came to the usage of coping strategies than females.
H1
H2
H3
H4
6. Discussion
› Limitations
› Eliminated responses
› Factor analysis and VIF scores
› Social media - personalities
› Fictative situation
› Not all WCQ items tested
6. Discussion
› Implications for practice
▪
Making the store display window more subtle
▪
The store can put a sign outside with a slogan on it that unconsciously lessens the
consumer’s embarrassment, encouraging them to enter the store
› Theoretical contributions
▪
Females appeared to be more prone to experiencing embarrassment, and showed
distancing to be the most prominent coping strategy
▪
Planful problem-solving has the largest significant embarrassment reduction effect on
embarrassment
› Future research
▪
Investigate the situation using virtual reality or interviewing actual consumers entering sex
18 | 25-06-2019
References
› Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1994). Situational coping and coping dispositions in a stressful transaction. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 66(1), 184-195. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.184
› Dahl, D., Manchanda, R., & Argo, J. (2001). Embarrassment in consumer purchase: The roles of social presence and purchase familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 473-481.
› Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. (1988a). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 466-475. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.3.466
› Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. J. (1986). Dynamics of a stressful encounter:
Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5), 992.
› Krishna, A., Herd, K., & Aydınoğlu, N. (2015). Wetting the bed at twenty-one: Embarrassment as a private emotion. Journal
of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 473-486. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2015.02.005
› Miller, R. (1996). Embarrassment: Poise and peril in everyday life (Emotions and social behavior). New York: Guilford Press.
› Miller, R. (1992). The nature and severity of self-reported embarrassing circumstances. Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin, 18(2), 190-198. doi:10.1177/0146167292182010
› Modigliani, A. (1968). Embarrassment and embarrassability. Sociometry, 31(3), 313-313. doi:10.2307/2786616
› Reysen, S., Landau, M., & Branscombe, N. (2012). Copycatting as a threat to public identity. Basic and Applied Social
Psychology, 34(3), 226-235. doi:10.1080/01973533.2012.674418
› Sherwood, John J. (1965), “Self Identity and Referent Others,” Sociometry, 28 (March), 66–81.
› Stein, N. L., Leventhal, B., & Trabasso, T. (1990). Psychological and biological approaches to emotion. Retrieved from h t t p s : / / b o o k s . g o o g l e . n l / b o o k s ? h l = n l & l r = & i d = i Z G M W f 2 -CoAC&oi=fnd&pg=PA313&dq=Coping+strategies+Folkman+and+Lazarus&ots=wO_KWstKfz&sig=2BZt3U8LRF76r2Y MuaIcM7Jni6g#v=onepage&q=Coping%20strategies%20Folkman%20and%20Lazarus&f=false