When well begun is half done
Peters, Annemijn Maron
DOI:
10.33612/diss.132605604
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from
it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date:
2020
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Peters, A. M. (2020). When well begun is half done: How the adoption of sustainable energy technologies
can lead to sustainable use of the technologies and other pro-environmental behaviours. University of
Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.132605604
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
135
136
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 136
137 Ik bedank hier:
mijn begeleiders Linda Steg en Ellen van der Werff
de vakgroep Omgevingspsychologie aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, in het bijzonder Josefine Geiger en Marko Milovanović
Mart van der Kam
en onze partners in het URSES SMARTER project:
Floor Alkemade (Technische Universiteit Eindhoven), Wilfried van Sark (Universiteit Utrecht), Arjen Jongepier (Enduris), John Hodemaekers en Arnoud Rijneveld (Stedin),
Matthijs Danes en Tom van Onna (Alliander)
de Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) mijn (in-)directe collega’s aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
het Kurt Lewin Instituut
de leden van de beoordelingscommissie en de promotiecommissie alle respondenten
mijn lieve familie, vrienden en de liefde: ik hou heel veel van jullie!
138
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 138
139
140
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 140
141
Curriculum vitae
Annemijn Maron Peters is geboren op 8 februari 1991 in Emmen. Ze ging na het behalen van haar vwo-diploma (profielen Economie en Maatschappij en Cultuur en Maatschappij) in 2009 studeren aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. In 2013 behaalde ze de bachelors Psychologie (cum laude propedeuse) en Filosofie van een bepaald wetenschapsgebied, en in 2014 de master Sociale psychologie en haar toepassingen. Na het afronden van de master werd ze aangenomen als promovenda in het SMARTER-project binnen het onderzoeksprogramma Uncertainty Reduction in Smart Energy Systems (URSES) van de Nederlandse Organisatie voor
Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO). Het SMARTER-project was een unieke samenwerking tussen psychologen aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, innovatiewetenschappers aan de Universiteit Utrecht en de netbeheerders Liander/Alliander, Stedin en Delta. In het SMARTER-project werden
simulatiemodellen ontwikkeld voor de impact van de adoptie en het gebruik van duurzame energietechnologieën op het energiesysteem. Deze modellen werden door Annemijn verrijkt met gedragswetenschappelijke kennis. Ze heeft artikelen
gepubliceerd in verschillende wetenschappelijke tijdschriften. Een hoogtepunt is een verwijzing naar een van haar publicaties in het rapport van het klimaatpanel van de VN (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) over de beperking van de
opwarming van de aarde tot 1.5 graden. Ze heeft deelgenomen aan summerschools in Dublin, Alghero en haar eigen woonplaats Groningen. Daarnaast heeft ze haar werk mogen presenteren op verschillende congressen, onder andere in Montreal, a Coruña, Insel Vilm, Utrecht en Amsterdam. Na het afronden van het SMARTER-project blijft Annemijn zich bezighouden met de sociaal-maatschappelijke kant van de
energietransitie, momenteel werkt ze als beleidsmedewerker in het energietransitie programma van de provincie Groningen.
142
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 142
143
144
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 144
145
List of publications
Peters, A. M., van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2018). Beyond purchasing: Electric vehicle adoption motivation and consistent sustainable behaviour in The Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 39, 234-247. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.008
Peters, A.M., Van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2019). Mind the Gap: The Implications of Not Acting in Line With Your Planned Actions After Installing Solar
Photovoltaics. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1423. doi: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2019.01423.
Van der Kam, M.J., Peters, A.M., Van Sark, W.G.J.H.M., & Alkemade, F. (2019). Agent-Based Modelling of Charging Behaviour of Electric Vehicle Drivers. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 22(4), 7. doi:
146
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 146
147
148
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 148
149
References
Abrahamse, W., & Shwom, R. (2018). Domestic energy consumption and climate change mitigation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(4), e525. doi: 10.1002/wcc.525
Ahn, C., Li, C. T., & Peng, H. (2011). Optimal decentralized charging control algorithm for electrified vehicles connected to smart grid. Journal of Power Sources, 196(23), 10369-10379. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.093
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1970). The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6(4), 466-487. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(70)90057-0.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European review of social psychology, 11(1), 1-33. doi: 10.1080/14792779943000116.
Babrowski, S., Heinrichs, H., Jochem, P., & Fichtner, W. (2014). Load shift potential of electric vehicles in Europe. Journal of power sources, 255, 283-293. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.019
Bahaj, A.S., & James, P. A. B. (2007). Urban energy generation: the added value of
photovoltaics in social housing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11(9), 2121-2136. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.007.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 6) (pp. 1–62). New York: Academic.
Bolderdijk, J. W., Gorsira, M., Keizer, K., & Steg, L. (2013). Values determine the (in) effectiveness of informational interventions in promoting pro-environmental behavior. PloS one, 8(12), e83911.
Borenstein, S. (2012). The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1), 67-92. doi: 10.1257 /jep.26.1.67.
Bradley, T. H., & Frank, A. A. (2009). Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 13(1), 115-128. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.003.
Cavoukian, A., Polonetsky, J., & Wolf, C. (2010). Smartprivacy for the smart grid: embedding privacy into the design of electricity conservation. Identity in the
Information Society, 3(2), 275-294. doi:10.1007/s12394-010-0046-y.
CBS (2018a). Bevolking; hoogst behaald onderwijsniveau en onderwijsrichting [Data file]. Retrieved from: https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/82816ned/table? dl=8083
150
CBS (2018b). Inkomensverdeling [Data file]. Retrieved from: https://www.cbs.nl/nl -nl/visualisatie/2016/11/inkomensverdeling
CBS (2018c). Regionale kerncijfers Nederland [Data file]. Retrieved from: http://statline.cbs .nl/Statweb/publication/?DM=SLNL&PA=70072ned
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Influence. New York: Quill.
Delmas, M. A., Fischlein, M., & Asensio, O. I. (2013). Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012. Energy Policy, 61, 729-739. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.109.
Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996). Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs. Psychological
methods, 1(2), 170.
Eising, J.W, van Onna, T, Alkemade, F. (2014). Towards smart grids: identifying the risks that arise from the integration of energy and transport supply chains. Applied Energy,
123, 448–55. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.017.
Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637– 642. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3.
Elaad (2013, May 16). Opladen elektrische autos zorgt voor piekbelastingen. Retrieved from https://www.elaad.nl/nieuws/opladen-elektrische-autos-zorgt-voor-piekbelastingen- 2/
European Automobile Manufacturers Association. (2017, February 2). Alternative fuel
vehicle registrations. Retrieved from http://www.acea.be/press- releases/article
/alternative-fuel-vehicle-registrations-37.6-in-first-quarter-of-2017. Eurostat. (2018). Primary production of renewable energy by type. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/ten00081.
Evans, L., Maio, G. R., Corner, A., Hodgetts, C.J., Ahmed, S., & Hahn, U. (2012). Self- interest and pro-environmental behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 3, 122-125. doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1662.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior
Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Evanston: Row Peterson.
Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and determinants of
environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and behavior, 34(3), 335-362.
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 150
151
Geelen, D., Reinders, A., & Keyson, D. (2013). Empowering the end-user in smart grids: Recommendations for the design of products and services. Energy Policy, 61, 151- 161. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.107
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships a natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and
behavior, 27(5), 699-718. doi:10.1177/0013916595275005.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process
analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
Hayes, A.F. (2016). PROCESS (Version 2.16) [add-on for SPSS and SAS]. Available from International Energy Agency (2018, May 30). Global EV Outlook 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.iea.org/gevo2018/
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018): Global Warming of 1.5°C.
An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-
industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the
context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change,
sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Retrieved from:
https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
Kashima, Y., Paladino, A., & Margetts, E. A. (2014). Environmentalist identity and environmental striving. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 64-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.014
Keirstead, J. (2007). Behavioural responses to photovoltaic systems in the UK domestic sector. Energy Policy, 35(8), 4128-4141. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.02.019.
Kobus, C. B., Klaassen, E. A., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. (2015). A real-life assessment on the effect of smart appliances for shifting households’ electricity demand. Applied
Energy, 147, 335-343. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.073
Korcaj, L., Hahnel, U. J., & Spada, H. (2015). Intentions to adopt photovoltaic systems depend on homeowners' expected personal gains and behavior of peers. Renewable
Energy, 75, 407-415. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.007
Kormos, C., & Gifford, R. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359-371 Lanzini, P., & Thøgersen, J. (2014). Behavioural spillover in the environmental domain: An intervention study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 381- 390. doi: 10.1016 / j.jenvp.2014.09.006.
Lauren, N., Fielding, K.S., Smith, L. & Louis, W.R. (2016). You did, so you can and you will: self-efficacy as a mediator of spillover from easy to more difficult pro-
environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 191-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.10.004.
152
Maki, A. Carrico, A.R., Raimi, K.T., Truelove, H.B., Yueng, S., & Araujo, B. (2019). Meta- analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover. Nature Sustainability, 2, 307-315. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological methods, 7(1), 105 - 125. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.105.
Nicolson, M., Huebner, G. M., Shipworth, D., & Elam, S. (2017). Tailored emails prompt electric vehicle owners to engage with tariff switching information. Nature Energy, 2. doi: 10.1038/nenergy.2017.73.
Nilsson, A., Bergquist, M., & Schultz, W. P. (2017). Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda. Environmental
Education Research, 23(4), 573-589. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1250148.
Nilsson, A., Bergstad, C. J., Thuvander, L., Andersson, D., Andersson, K., & Meiling, P. (2014). Effects of continuous feedback on households’ electricity consumption: Potentials and barriers. Applied Energy, 122, 17-23. doi:
10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.060.
Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bockarjova, M., & Steg, L. (2015). The adoption of
sustainable innovations: The role of instrumental, environmental, and symbolic attributes for earlier and later adopters. Journal of Environmental Psychology,
44, 74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.002.
Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of
sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global
Environmental Change, 25, 52-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.012.
Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Milovanovic, M., & Steg, L. (2016). The importance of instrumental, symbolic, and environmental attributes for the adoption of smart energy systems. Energy Policy, 98, 12-18.doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.007. Peters, A. M., van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2018). Beyond purchasing: Electric vehicle adoption motivation and consistent sustainable behaviour in The
Netherlands. Energy Research & Social Science, 39, 234-247. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.008
Plötz, P., Schneider, U., Globisch, J., & Dütschke, E. (2014). Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and
Practice, 67, 96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.006.
Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., Suffolk, C. (2013). The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: attitude change and behavioural spillover effects. Journal of
Environmental Psychology, 36, 240 - 247. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.001.
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 152
153
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Assessing mediation in communication research. The
Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research,
13-54.
Pritoni, M., Meier, A. K., Aragon, C., Perry, D., & Peffer, T. (2015). Energy efficiency and the misuse of programmable thermostats: The effectiveness of crowdsourcing for understanding household behavior. Energy Research & Social Science, 8, 190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.002.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Simon and Schuster. Ryghaug, M., & Toftaker, M. (2014). A transformative practice? Meaning, competence, and material aspects of driving electric cars in Norway. Nature and Culture, 9(2), 146-163. doi:10.3167/nc.2014.090203.
Schick, L., & Gad, C. (2015). Flexible and inflexible energy engagements—A study of the Danish Smart Grid Strategy. Energy Research & Social Science, 9, 51-59. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.013.
Schmalfuss, F., Mair, C., Döbelt, S., Kaempfe, B., Wuestemann, R., Krems, J. F., & Keinath, A. (2015). User responses to a smart charging system in Germany: Battery electric vehicle driver motivation, attitudes and acceptance. Energy Research & Social
Science, 9, 60-71. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.019.
Schwartz, D., Bruine de Bruin, W., Fischhoff, B., & Lave, L. (2015). Advertising energy saving programs: The potential environmental cost of emphasizing monetary savings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(2), 158. doi: 10.1037/xap0000042.
Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 7(4), 422-445. doi: 10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.422.
Sintov, N. D., & Schultz, P. (2015). Unlocking the potential of smart grid technologies with behavioral science. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00410. Smale, R., van Vliet, B., & Spaargaren, G. (2017). When social practices meet smart grids: Flexibility, grid management, and domestic consumption in The Netherlands. Energy
Research & Social Science, 34, 132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.037.
Steg, L. (2016). Values, norms, and intrinsic motivation to act proenvironmentally. Annual
Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 277-292. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ
-110615-085947
Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., & van der Werff, E. (2015). Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg .2015.00805.
154
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004.
Steinhorst, J., Klöckner, C. A., & Matthies, E. (2015). Saving electricity–For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 125-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp .2015.05.012.
Taufik, D., Bolderdijk, J.W. & Steg, L. (2015). Acting green elicits a literal warm glow.
Nature Climate Change, 5, 37 – 40. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2449.
Tiefenbeck, V., Staake, T., Roth, K., & Sachs, O. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioural energy conservation campaign. Energy
Policy, 57, 160 – 171. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.021.
Thøgersen, J. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and
inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behaviour. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 24, 93 – 103. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00039-2.
Thøgersen, J. & Ölander, F. (2003). Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour.
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 225-236. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944
(03)00018-5.
Thomas, G. O., Poortinga, W., & Sautkina, E. (2016). The Welsh Single-Use Carrier Bag Charge and behavioural spillover. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.008.
Truelove, H.B., Carrico, A.R., Weber, E.U., Raimi, K.T., & Vandenbergh, M.P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127-138. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
Van Der Kam, M., & van Sark, W. (2015). Smart charging of electric vehicles with photovoltaic power and vehicle-to-grid technology in a microgrid; a case study. Applied Energy, 152, 20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.092.
Van der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2016). The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity- personal norm model. Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 107-114. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.022.
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2013a). It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 154
155
environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1258-1265. doi: 10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2013.07.018.
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L. & Keizer, K. (2013b). The value of environmental self-
identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and pro-environmental preferences, intentions and behaviour. Journal of Environmental
Psychology, 34, 55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.006.
Van der Werff, E. Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2014a). Follow the signal: when past pro-
environmental actions signal who you are. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 273-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.004.
Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2014b). I am what I am by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behaviour on environmental self-identity.
Environment and Behavior, 46(5), 626-657. doi: 10.1177/0013916512475209.
Venhoeven, L.A., Bolderdijk, J.W., & Steg, L. (2016). Why acting
environmentally-friendly feels good: exploring the role of self-image. Frontiers in
Environmental Psychology, 7, 1846. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01846.
Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro- environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-
environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003.
Wolske, K.S. & Stern, P.C. (in press). Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change: Opportunities through consumer behavior. In S. Clayton & C. Manning (Eds.), Psychology and Climate Change. Elsevier.
156
Kurt Lewin Institute Dissertation Series
The “Kurt Lewin Institute Dissertation Series” started in 1997. Since 2016, the following dissertations have been published in this series:
2016-01: Anna van ‘t Veer: Effortless morality — cognitive and affective processes in deception and its detection
2016-02: Thijs Bouman: Threat by association: How distant events can affect local intergroup relations
2016-03: Tim Theeboom: Workplace coaching: Processes and effects 2016-04: Sabine Strofer: Deceptive intent: Physiological reactions in different
interpersonal contexts
2016-05: Caspar van Lissa: Exercising Empathy: The Role of Adolescents' Developing Empathy in Conflicts with Parents
2016-06: Marlon Mooijman: On the determinants and consequences of punishment goals: The role of power, distrust, and rule compliance
2016-07: Niels van Doesum: Social mindfulness
2016-08: Leonie Venhoeven: A look on the bright side of an environmentally-friendly life: Whether and why acting environmentally-environmentally-friendly can contribute to well-being
2016-09: Florien Cramwinckel: The social dynamics of morality
2016-10: Junhui Wu: Understanding Human Cooperation: The Psychology of Gossip, Reputation, and Life History
2016-11: Elise C. Seip: Desire for vengeance. An emotion-based approach to revenge
2016-12: Welmer E. Molenmaker: The (un)willingness to reward cooperation and punish non-cooperation
2016-13: Liesbeth Mann: On Feeling Humiliated. The Experience of Humiliation in Interpersonal, Intragroup, and Intergroup Contexts
2016-14: Angela M. Ruepert: Working on the environment
2016-15: Femke Hilverda: Making sense of food risk information: The case of organic food.
2016-16: Debora E. Purba: Antecedents of turnover, organizational citizenship behavior, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence from Indonesia.
2016-17: Maja Kutlaca: The Role of Values and Value-Identity Fit in Motivating Collective Action
2016-18: Felicity Turner: A New Psychological Perspective on Identity content, its Conceptualization, Measurement, and Application
2016-19: Tim W. Faber: When Imitation Falls Short: The Case of Complementary Actions.
2016-20: Daniela Becker: Self-control conflict in the eating domain: A cognitive, affective and behavioral perspective
2016-21: Zoi Manesi: Prosocial Behavior Under Surveillance: Understanding the Eye-Images Effect
2017-01: Tracy Cheung: Turning vice into virtue - when low self-control states facilitate goal-oriented behaviours
2017-02: Pum Kommattam: Feeling the Other: Emotion Interpretation in Intercultural Settings
145613-Peters_BNW.indd 156
