• No results found

The hare or the tortoise? Modeling optimal speed-accuracy tradeoff settings - Appendix B (chapter 4)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The hare or the tortoise? Modeling optimal speed-accuracy tradeoff settings - Appendix B (chapter 4)"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

The hare or the tortoise? Modeling optimal speed-accuracy tradeoff settings

van Ravenzwaaij, D.

Publication date

2012

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2012). The hare or the tortoise? Modeling optimal speed-accuracy

tradeoff settings.

General rights

It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulations

If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

(2)

Appendix

B

Appendix to Chapter 4: “Do the

Dynamics of Prior Information Depend

on Task Context? An Analysis of

Optimality and an Empirical Test”

B.1

Derivation of Equation 4.6

To understand the derivation of Equation 4.6 from Equation 4.5 (see section 4.3 for details), let us focus on the first part Φh(ξ+vc)T +z

s√T

i

(the treatment of the second part is analogous) and write it as Φ [Aξ + B], with A =

√ T

s and B = vcT +z

s√T . We then have the

following integral I:

I =

Z +∞

−∞

Φ [Aξ + B] φ(ξ; v, η2)dξ,

where φ(ξ; v, η2) stands for the normal density function for ξ with mean v and variance η2. We can continue as follows:

I = Z +∞ −∞ Φ [Aξ + B] φ(ξ; v, η2)dξ = Z +∞ −∞ Z Aξ+B −∞ φ(x; 0, 1)dxφ(ξ; v, η2)dξ = Z +∞ −∞ Z B −∞ φ(x; −Aξ, 1)φ(ξ; v, η2)dxdξ = Z +∞ −∞ Z B/A −∞ φ(x; −ξ, 1/A2)φ(ξ; v, η2)dxdξ = Z B/A −∞ Z +∞ −∞ φ(x; −ξ, 1/A2)φ(ξ; v, η2)dξdx.

The inner integral is a known integral in Bayesian statistics (see Gelman, Carlin, Stern, & Rubin, 2004). The kernel of the product of the two normals contains an exponent with

(3)

B. Appendix B

quadratic terms in ξ and x (Gelman et al., 2004). Thus, ξ and x have a bivariate normal distribution and thus marginalizing over ξ results in a normal distribution for x.

Using the double expectation theorem (see Gelman et al., 2004), we can find the marginal mean of x:

E(x) = E[E(x|ξ)]

= E[−ξ]

= −v.

Applying a similar theorem for the marginal variance of x gives (Gelman et al., 2004): Var(x) = E[Var(x|ξ)] + Var[E(x|ξ)]

= E[1/A2] + Var(−ξ) = 1/A2+ η2.

Therefore, we can simplify the inner integral to φ(x; −v, 1/A2+ η2):

I = Z B/A −∞ φ(x; −v, 1/A2+ η2)dx = Z √B/A+v 1/A2 +η2 −∞ φ(x; 0, 1)dx = Φ " B/A + v p1/A2+ η2 # = Φ " v cT +z T + v ps2/T + η2 # = Φ " (vc+ v)T + z spT + T2η2/s2 # ,

which is, after multiplication with β, equal to the first term of Equation 4.6. The second part can be found in a similar way.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Om hoge lonen en een hoog niveau van sociale zekerheid te kunnen handhaven moeten landen zich een plaats zien te veroveren op de markten voor produkten met een hoge toegevoegde

Respondenten die hun keuze meer laten bepalen door hun ervaring met bepaalde typen aanpak, vinden de omstandigheden een minder belangrijke rol spelen bij de keuze.. Wanneer

verwachten over tien jaar carrière te maken of te hebben gemaakt, verdienen ze in hun aan- vangsbaan significant meer.21 Bovendien wordt gevonden dat bij

Voor de Vlaamse mannelijke beroepsbevolking kunnen we dus de hypothese niet confirmeren, dat wil zeggen dat het beroep verklaart waarom men van werk of werkgever

Het hoofdstuk Arbeid van het recent versche­ nen Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport 1992 bevat een intrigerende grafiek.1 Voor de jaren 1975, 1985 en 1990 is op grond

rende confrontatie van ‘markets, contracts, and power’ aan de ene kant, ‘organization, statusses, and authority’ aan de andere kant (zie al op p. Deze confrontatie is

Opvallend is dat we het inhoudelijk niet zo erg met elkaar oneens zijn (Veit Bader kan zich wel vinden in mijn geschiedschrijving van de Amerikaanse arbeidsmarkt,

It is also shown that t often used class scheme of Goldthorpe does n deal adequately enough with this fragmentation The second research question deals with tht