• No results found

University of Groningen Nose In, Fingers Out Mostert, Irene

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Nose In, Fingers Out Mostert, Irene"

Copied!
23
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Nose In, Fingers Out

Mostert, Irene

DOI:

10.33612/diss.132018621

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from

it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date:

2020

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Mostert, I. (2020). Nose In, Fingers Out: Essays on Board-Governance Effectiveness. University of

Groningen, SOM research school. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.132018621

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 123PDF page: 123PDF page: 123PDF page: 123

123

REFERENCES

Abernethy, M. A., Kuang, Y. F., & Qin, B. 2015. The influence of CEO power on compensation contract design. The Accounting Review, 90: 1265-1306. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50971

Acharya, A. G., & Pollock, T. G. 2013. Shoot for the stars? Predicting the recruitment of prestigious directors at newly public firms. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1396-1419. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0639

Adams, R. B. 2016. Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow? The Leadership Quarterly,

27(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2015.11.001

Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFINECO.2008.10.007

Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. 2010. The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1): 58– 107. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58

Aguilera, R., Florackis, C., & Kim, H. 2016. Advancing the Corporate Governance Research Agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24: 172-180.

https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12167

Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: SAGE Publications.

Amason, A. C. 1996. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management

Journal, 39(1): 123–148. https://doi.org/10.5465/256633

Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. 1997. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23(4): 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300401

Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. 1994. Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5: 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022745

Anderson, C., Angus D. Hildreth, J., & Howland, L. 2015. Is the Desire for Status a Fundamental Human Motive? A Review of the Empirical Literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781

Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. 2009. The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295-298. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8721.2009.01655.x Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. 2012. The Local-Ladder Effect: Social Status

and Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Science, 23(7), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434537

(3)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 124PDF page: 124PDF page: 124PDF page: 124

124 Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. 2006. Knowing your place:

Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

91(6), 1094-1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1094

Anderson, S. E., & Williams, L. J. 1996. Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 282--296. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.282

Ashburn-Nardo, L., Voils, C. I., & Monteith, M. J. 2001. Implicit associations as the seeds of intergroup bias: How easily do they take root? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 789– 799. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.789

Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & VandeWalle, D. V. 2003. Reflections on the Looking Glass: A Review of Research on Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 29(6), 773– 799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00079-5

Atwater, L.E., & Brett, J.F. 2006. Feedback format: Does it influence manager's reactions to feedback?

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(4), 517-532.

https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X58656

Atwater, L. E., Waldman, D. A., & Brett, J. F. 2002. Understanding and optimizing multisource feedback. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business

Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 41(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.10031

Atwater, L.E., Waldman, D.A, Ostroff, C., Robie, C., & Johnson, K. M. 2005. Self-Other Agreement: Comparing its Relationship with Performance in the U.S. and Europe. International Journal of

Selection and Assessment, 13(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2005.00297.x

Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. 1997. Self-other rating agreement: A review and model. In G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 15 (pp. 121-174). US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press

Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. 2004. Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and Weil-Being in two work settings 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 34: 2045-2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x

Badolato, P. G., Donelson, D. C., & Ege, M. 2014. Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3): 208-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.006

Baldenius, T., Melumad, N., & Meng, X. 2014. Board composition and CEO power. Journal of Financial

Economics, 112: 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.10.004

Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: does the

composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10: 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709

Barnett, M.L. 2007. Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of management review, 32: 794-816. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275520

(4)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 125PDF page: 125PDF page: 125PDF page: 125

125 Becker, T.E. 2005. Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research:

A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8: 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1094428105278021

Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch Jr, M. 1980. Status organizing processes. Annual review of

sociology, 6(1), 479-508. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.002403

Bergh, D.D. 2001. Executive retention and acquisition outcomes: A test of opposing views on the influence of organizational tenure. Journal of Management, 27(5), 603-622.

https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014920630102700506

Berle, A. & Means, G. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York: MacMillan. Bettencourt, B. A., Dill, K. E., Greathouse, S. A., Charlton, K., & Mulholland, A. 1997. Evaluations of

ingroup and outgroup members: The role of category-based expectancy violation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(3), 244-275. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.1323 Bezemer, P. J., Maassen, G. F., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. 2007. Investigating the

Development of the Internal and External Service Tasks of Non-executive Directors: the case of the Netherlands (1997–2005). Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), 1119-1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00635.x

Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Billings, L. S. 1999. Black sheep and expectancy violation: Integrating two models of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(4), 523-542.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4%3C523::AID-EJSP944%3E3.0.CO;2-J Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data

aggregation and analysis. San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.

Boeker, W. 1997. Strategic change: The influence of managerial characteristics and organizational growth. Academy of management journal, 40: 152-170. https://doi.org/10.5465/257024 Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. 2016. Are boards designed to fail? The

implausibility of effective board monitoring. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 319-407. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1120957

Boivie, S., Graffin, S. D., & Pollock, T. G. 2012. Time for me to fly: Predicting director exit at large firms. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1334-1359.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.1083

Bono, J. E., & Colbert, A. E. 2005. Understanding responses to multi-source feedback: The role of core self-evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00633.x

Boyd, B. K., Haynes, K. T., & Zona, F. 2011. Dimensions of CEO–board relations. Journal of

Management Studies, 48(8): 1892-1923. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00943.x

Bradley, B. H., Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., & Klotz, A. C. 2015. When conflict helps: Integrating evidence for beneficial conflict in groups and teams under three perspectives. Group Dynamics:

Theory, Research, and Practice, 19(4): 243-272.

(5)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 126PDF page: 126PDF page: 126PDF page: 126

126 Bradley, B. H., Postlethwaite, B. E., Klotz, A. C., Hamdani, M. R., & Brown, K. G. 2012. Reaping the

benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. Journal

of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024200

Brett, J. F., & Atwater, L. E. 2001. 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 930–942. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930

Bruynseels, L., & Cardinaels, E. 2014. The audit committee: Management watchdog or personal friend of the CEO?. The Accounting Review, 89(1): 113-145. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50601 Buchholtz, A. K., Amason, A. C., & Rutherford, M. A. 2005. The Impact of Board Monitoring and

Involvement on Top Management Team Affective Conflict. Journal of Managerial Issues. Pittsburg State University. https://doi.org/10.2307/40604512

Bunderson, J. S. 2003. Recognizing and Utilizing Expertise in Work Groups: A Status Characteristics Perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 557–591.

https://doi.org/10.2307/3556637

Burke, R. J. 1997. Women directors: selection, acceptance and benefits of board membership.

Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5: 118-125.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00052

Burkert, M., Davila, A., Mehta, K., & Oyon, D. 2014. Relating alternative forms of contingency fit to the appropriate methods to test them. Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MAR.2013.07.008

Cadbury Committee. 1992. Report on the Financial Aspect of Corporate Governance. London: Moorgate.

Canavan, J., Jones, B., & Potter, M.J. 2004. Board tenure: How long is too long? Directors and Boards- American Edition, 28: 39-42.

Cardinaels, E., & Soderstrom, N. 2013. Managing in a complex world: Accounting and governance choices in hospitals. European Accounting Review, 22(4): 647-684.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2013.842493

Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making.

Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 639–660. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069408

Carter, C., & Lorsch, J. 2004. Back to the drawing board: Designing corporate boards for a complex

world. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. 2011. Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2): 202-237. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0001839211427534

Clark, A. E. 1997. Job satisfaction and gender: why are women so happy at work?. Labour economics,

(6)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 127PDF page: 127PDF page: 127PDF page: 127

127 Colbert, A. E., Bono, J. E., & Purvanova, R. K. 2016. Flourishing via workplace relationships: Moving

beyond instrumental support. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1199-1223. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0506

Cole, M. S., Carter, M. Z., & Zhang, Z. 2013. Leader–team congruence in power distance values and team effectiveness: The mediating role of procedural justice climate. Journal of Applied

Psychology, 98(6), 962. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0034269

Cortina, J.M, 1993. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of

applied psychology, 78: 98. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

Cuomo, F., Mallin, C., & Zattoni, A. 2016. Corporate governance codes: a review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24: 222-241.

https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12148

Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella Jr., A. A. 2003. Corporate governance : decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 371–382.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703

Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,

19(3), 269–290.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.0.CO;2-K

Dalton, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 2005. Boards of directors: Utilizing empirical evidence in developing practical prescriptions. British Journal of management, 16, S91-S97.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00450.x

Dalton, D. R., & Dalton, C. M. 2011. Integration of Micro and Macro Studies in Governance Research: CEO Duality, Board Composition, and Financial Performance. Journal of Management, 37(2): 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206310373399

Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. 2007. The Fundamental Agency Problem and Its Mitigation: Independence, Equity, and the Market for Corporate Control. Academy of

Management Annals, 1: 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/078559806

Dane, E. 2010. Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 579-603. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.4.zok579

De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. 2003. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741

De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. 2001. Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6): 1191–1201. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191

De Haan, J., & Vlahu, R. 2016. Corporate governance of banks: A survey. The Journal of Economic

(7)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 128PDF page: 128PDF page: 128PDF page: 128

128 De Maere, J., Jorissen, A., & Uhlaner, L. M. 2014. Board Capital and the Downward Spiral:

Antecedents of Bankruptcy in a Sample of Unlisted Firms. Corporate Governance: An

International Review, 22(5): 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12078

Demb, A., & Neubauer, F. F. 1992. The Corporate Board - Confronting the Paradoxes. New York: Oxford University Press.

Demski, J. S., & Feltham, G. A. 1976. Cost determination: A conceptual approach. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N. 2000. Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved?.

Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 129-139.

https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.2909845

DeSimone, J.A., Harms, P.D., & DeSimone, A.J., 2015. Best practice recommendations for data screening. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36: 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1962 De Wit, F. R. C., Jehn, K. A., & Scheepers, D. 2013. Task conflict, information processing, and

decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human

Decision Processes, 122(2): 177–189 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.07.002

Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. 2012. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1955

Diekmann, K. A., Sondak, H., & Barsness, Z. I. 2007. Does fairness matter more to some than to others? The moderating role of workplace status on the relationship between procedural fairness perceptions and job satisfaction. Social Justice Research, 20(2), 161-180.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0036-x

Drymiotes, G. C. 2011. Information Precision and Manipulation Incentives. Journal of Management

Accounting Research, 23(1), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-10067

Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. 2001. The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of

social issues, 57(4), 781-797. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241

Edmondson, A. 1999. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative

science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Edwards, J. R. 1994. The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 51–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/OBHD.1994.1029

Edwards, J. R. 2002. Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In F. Drasgow & N. W. Schmitt (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data

analysis (pp. 350–400). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. 2009. The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology,

94(3), 654–677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014891

Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. 2007. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1

(8)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 129PDF page: 129PDF page: 129PDF page: 129

129 Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. 1993. On the Use of Polynomial Regression Equations As An Alternative

to Difference Scores in Organizational Research. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1577– 1613. https://doi.org/10.5465/256822

Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. 1999. Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational behavior and human

decision processes, 77(2), 85-129. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2813

Ehrhart, M. G., Ehrhart, K. H., Roesch, S. C., Chung-Herrera, B. G., Nadler, K., & Bradshaw, K. 2009. Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47: 900-905

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.012

Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

Ellwood, S., & Garcia-Lacalle, J. 2015. The Influence of Presence and Position of Women on the Boards of Directors: The Case of NHS Foundation Trusts. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(1), 69– 84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2206-8

Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. 2002. Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business

Venturing, 17(4), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00065-3

Faleye, O., Hoitash, R., & Hoitash, U. 2011. The costs of intense board monitoring. Journal of

Financial Economics, 101: 160-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.010

Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of political economy, 88(2), 288-307. https://doi.org/10.1086/260866

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26(2): 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037

Farh, J.-L., Lee, C., & Farh, C. I. C. 2010. Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1173–1180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020015 Feldman, E.R., & Montgomery, C.A. 2015. Are incentives without expertise sufficient? Evidence from

Fortune 500 firms. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2211

Fentrop, P. 2013. De geschiedenis van corporate governance. Assen: Koninklijke van Gorcum B.V. Finkelstein, S. 1992. Power and top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation.

Academy of Management Journal, 35: 505-538. https://doi.org/10.5465/256485

Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1990. Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3): 484–503. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/2393314

Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. 1996. Strategic Leadership - Top executives and their effects on

organizations. Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.

Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella Jr, A. A. 2009. Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research

on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards. (M. A. Hitt, R. D. Ireland, & R. E. Hoskisson,

(9)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 130PDF page: 130PDF page: 130PDF page: 130

130 Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. 2003. Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make

boards better. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(2), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.10025204

Fleenor, J. W., Smither, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Braddy, P. W., & Sturm, R. E. 2010. Self–other rating agreement in leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1005–1034.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2010.10.006

Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 489– 505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202133

Gehlbach, H. 2015. Seven Survey Sins. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 0272431615578276. http://doi.org/10.1177/0272431615578276

Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. 2001. When will boards influence strategy? Inclination x power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12): 1087–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.202

Goldsmith, D. J., & Fitch, K. 1997. The normative context of advice as social support. Human communication research, 23(4): 454-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00406.x Gordon, J. N. 2007. The rise of independent directors in the United States, 1950-2005: Of shareholder

value and stock market prices. Stanford Law Review, 59: 1465-1568.

Graham, K. A., Dust, S. B., & Ziegert, J. C. 2018. Supervisor-employee power distance incompatibility, gender similarity, and relationship conflict: A test of interpersonal interaction theory. Journal of

Applied Psychology, 103(3), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000265

Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. 2003. Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 322-339. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.322

Gupta, A., Otley, D., & Young, S. 2008. Does superior firm performance lead to higher quality outside directorships?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7): 907-932.

https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810907410

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory.

Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(2), 250-279.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7

Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2): 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254

Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella Jr, A. A. 1993. Relative standing: A framework for understanding departures of acquired executives. Academy of Management journal, 36(4), 733-762. https://doi.org/10.5465/256757

Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. 1993. Top Executive Commitment to the Status Quo: Some Tests of Its Determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140602

Hambrick, D. C., & Jackson, E. M. 2000. Outside directors with a stake: The linchpin in improving governance. California Management Review, 42: 108-127.

(10)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 131PDF page: 131PDF page: 131PDF page: 131

131 Hambrick, D.C., & Mason, P.A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top

managers. Academy of management review, 9:193-206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628

Hambrick, D.C., Misangyi, V.F., & Park, C.A. 2015. The quad model for identifying a corporate director’s potential for effective monitoring: Toward a new theory of board sufficiency.

Academy of Management Review, 40: 323-344. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0066

Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A. V., & Zajac, E. J. 2008. New directions in corporate governance research.

Organization Science, 19: 381-385. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0361

Harrison, J. S., Boivie, S., Sharp, N. Y., & Gentry, R. J. 2018. Saving face: How exit in response to negative press and star analyst downgrades reflects reputation maintenance by directors.

Academy of Management Journal, 61: 1131-1157. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0471

Harrison, D.A., & Klein, K.J. 2007. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of management review, 32:1199-1228.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096

Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. 1998. Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of management journal,

41(1): 96-107. https://doi.org/10.5465/256901

Harvey, S. 2015. When Accuracy Isn’t Everything. Group & Organization Management, 40(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114561786

Haynes, K., & Hillman, A. 2010. The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change.

Strategic Management Journal, 31(11): 1145–1163. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.859

He, J., & Huang, Z. 2011. Board informal hierarchy and firm financial performance: Exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1119-1139. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0824

Hendry, K., & Kiel, G. C. 2004. The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and

organisational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4): 500-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00390.x

Hermalin, B. E. 2005. Trends in corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 60(5), 2351-2384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00801.x

Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. 2003. Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature. Economic Policy Review, 9(1): 7–26. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. 2002. CEO successor characteristics and the choice of foreign market

entry mode: An empirical study. Journal of International Business Studies, 33: 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491031

Herrmann, P., & Datta, D.K. 2005. Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16, pp.69-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00429.x

Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. 2003. Boards of directors and firm-performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729

(11)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 132PDF page: 132PDF page: 132PDF page: 132

132 Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. 2008. Directors' multiple identities, identification, and

board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19(3), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0355

Hillman, A.J., Shropshire, C., Certo, S.T., Dalton, D.R., & Dalton, C.M. 2011. What I like about you: A multilevel study of shareholder discontent with director monitoring. Organization Science, 22: 675-687. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0542

Hooghiemstra, R., Hermes, N., Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. 2019. Strangers on the board: The impact of board internationalization on earnings management of Nordic firms. International Business

Review, 28(1): 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.08.007

Hooghiemstra, R., & van Manen, J. 2004. The independence paradox: (Im)possibilities facing non-executive directors in The Netherlands. Corporate Governance: An International Perspective, 12: 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00372.x

Hughes, G.D. 2009. The Impact of Incorrect Responses to Reverse-Coded Survey Items. Research in

the Schools, 16: 76-88.

Hurst, J., Leberman, S., & Edwards, M. 2017. Women managing women: An holistic relational approach to managing relationships at work. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.10

Huse, M. 2005. Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British journal of management, 16: S65-S79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00448.x

Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R. 1991. The structure of work: Job design and roles. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 165-207). Palo Alto, CA, US: Consulting Psychologists Press.

James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1984. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 85-98.

https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85

James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. 1993. r wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 306-309.

https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306

Janssen, O., Van De Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. 1999. How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25: 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014920639902500201

Jarzabkowski, P., & Searle, R. H. 2004. Harnessing diversity and collective action in the top management team. Long Range Planning, 37(5): 399-419.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2004.07.007

Jehn, K. A. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict.

Administrative science quarterly, 256-282. doi:10.2307/2393638

Jehn, K.A., & Mannix, E.A. 2001. The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.

(12)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 133PDF page: 133PDF page: 133PDF page: 133

133 Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. 1999. Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study

of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054

Jeong, S.-H., & Harrison, D. A. 2017. Glass Breaking, Strategy Making, and Value Creating: Meta-Analytic Outcomes of Women as CEOs and TMT members. Academy of Management Journal,

60(4), 1219–1252. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0716

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Jermias, J., & Gani, L. 2014. The impact of board capital and board characteristics on firm performance. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 135–153.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BAR.2013.12.001

Johnson, S., Schnatterly, K., Bolton, J. F., & Tuggle, C. 2011. Antecedents of new director social capital. Journal of Management Studies, 48: 1782-1803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01020.x

Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. 2013. Board Composition Beyond Independence. Journal

of Management, 39(1), 232–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312463938

Jonsson, E. I. 2005. The role model of the board: A preliminary study of the roles of Icelandic boards.

Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(5), 710-717.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00462.x

Judge, T. A. 1994. Person–organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational behavior, 44(1), 32-54. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1003

Judge, T. A., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. 2006. Loving yourself abundantly: relationship of the narcissistic personality to self-and other perceptions of workplace deviance, leadership, and task and contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 762.

https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.762

Judge, W. Q., & Talaulicar, T. 2017. Board involvement in the strategic decision making process: A comprehensive review. Annals of Corporate Governance, 2(2), 51-169.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/109.00000005

Judge, T. A., Weiss, H. M., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Hulin, C. L. 2017. Job attitudes, job satisfaction, and job affect: A century of continuity and of change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000181

Kaczmarek, S., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. 2012. Board task-related faultlines and firm performance: A decade of evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(4): 337–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00895.x

Kang, E., & Kroll, M. 2014. Deciding Who Will Rule: Examining the Influence of Outside Noncore Directors on Executive Entrenchment. Organization Science, 25(6): 1662–1683.

(13)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 134PDF page: 134PDF page: 134PDF page: 134

134 Kaplan, R. E., & Palus, C. J. 1994. Enhancing 360-degree feedback for senior executives: How to

maximize the benefits and minimize the risks. Center for Creative Leadership.

Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. 2009. Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of

Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and

Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(6), 785-804. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/job.571

Katz, R. 1982. The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance.

Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(1): 81–104. doi:10.2307/2392547

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. 1978. The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

Khurana, R., & Pick, K. 2004. The social nature of boards. Brooklyn Law Review, 70: 1259-1285. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical

review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological bulletin,

119(2), 254-284. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

Koopmann, J., Lanaj, K., Wang, M., Zhou, L., & Shi, J. 2016. Nonlinear effects of team tenure on team psychological safety climate and climate strength: Implications for average team member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7), 940-957.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000097

Kor, Y. Y. 2006. Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11): 1081–1099.

https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.554

Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C. 2009. Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management, 35(4): 981–1006.

https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206308321551

Kroll, M., Walters, B. A., & Wright, P. 2008. Board vigilance, director experience, and corporate outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4): 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.649 Lattin, J., Carroll, J.D., & Green, P.E. 2003. Analyzing Multivariate Data, London: Thomson Learning. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. 1998. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional

dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2): 325-340. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533229

Leblanc, R., & Schwartz, M. S. 2007. The Black Box of Board Process: gaining access to a difficult subject. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5): 843–851.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00617.x

LeBreton, J.M., & Senter, J. L. 2008. Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 815-852.

https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1094428106296642

Liu, D., Zhang, Z., & Wang, M. 2012. Mono-level and multilevel mediated moderation and moderated mediation: Theorization and test. Empirical methods in organization and management research, 553-587.

(14)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 135PDF page: 135PDF page: 135PDF page: 135

135 London, M., & Smither, J. W. 2002. Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal

performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(01)00043-2

Longenecker, C. O., & Gioia, D. A. 1988. Neglected at the top-executives talk about executive appraisal. MIT Sloan Management Review, 29(2), 41-47.

Lorsch, J. W. 1989. Pawns or potentates. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Lorsch, J. W. 1995. Empowering the board. Harvard Business Review, 73: 107-117.

Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. 1989. Pawns or potentates: The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.

Loyd, D. L., Wang, C. S., Phillips, K. W., & Lount, R. B. 2013. Social Category Diversity Promotes Premeeting Elaboration: The Role of Relationship Focus. Organization Science, 24(3), 757–772. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0761

Mace, M.L. 1971. Directors: Myth and Reality. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Mace, M. L. 1976. Designing a plan for ideal board. Harvard Business Review, 54(6), 20. Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. 2008. 8 social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and

status. Academy of Management annals, 2(1), 351-398. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211628

Marr, J. C., & Thau, S. 2014. Falling from great (and not-so-great) heights: How initial status position influences performance after status loss. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 223-248. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0909

Matta, F. K., Scott, B. A., Koopman, J., & Conlon, D. E. 2015. Does Seeing “Eye To Eye” Affect Work Engagement and Organizational Citizenship Behavior? A Role Theory Perspective on LMX Agreement. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1686–1708.

https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0106

Mayo, M., Kakarika, M., Pastor, J. C., & Brutus, S. 2012. Aligning or inflating your leadership self-image? A longitudinal study of responses to peer feedback in MBA teams. Academy of

Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 631-652. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0069

McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. 2010. A little help here? Board control, CEO identification with the corporate elite, and strategic help provided to CEOs at other firms. Academy of Management

Journal, 53(2), 343-370. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49389006

McKee, R. A., Lee, Y. T., Atwater, L., & Antonakis, J. 2018. Effects of personality and gender on self– other agreement in ratings of leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational

Psychology, 91(2), 285-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12209

McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. 1996. The contribution, power and influence of part-time board members. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 4: 160-179.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.1996.tb00145.x

McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. 1999. Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20(1): 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0170840699201003

(15)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 136PDF page: 136PDF page: 136PDF page: 136

136 Meyer, H. H. 1980. Self-Appraisal of Job Performance. Personnel Psychology, 33(2), 291–295.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1980.tb02351.x

Mezirow, J. 1991. Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Mills, M. 2011. Introducing survival and event history analysis. Sage.

Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. 2012. Board task performance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Journal of Organizational

Behavior, 33(1): 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.743

Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., & Zona, F. 2009. Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management, 20(1): 55-74.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00591.x

Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. 2006. The conditional nature of embeddedness: a study of borrowing by large US firms, 1973–1994. American Sociological Review, 71(2): 310-333.

https://doi.org/10.1177%2F000312240607100207

Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. 2011. Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183–191.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020744

Musteen, M., Datta, D. K., & Kemmerer, B. 2010. Corporate reputation: do board characteristics matter?. British Journal of Management, 21(2): 498-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00676.x

Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. 2006. Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams.

Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(7), 941-966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413

Netemeyer, R.G., Bearden, W.O., & Sharma, S. 2003. Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Sage Publications.

Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological safety: A systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521-535.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001

Nordberg, D., & McNulty, T. 2013. Creating better boards through codification: Possibilities and limitations in UK corporate governance, 1992–2010. Business History, 55: 348-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2012.712964

Nowack, K. M. 2009. Leveraging multirater feedback to facilitate successful behavioral change.

Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61(4), 280–297.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017381

Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New-York: McGraw-Hill.

Ocasio, W. 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+%3C187::AID-SMJ936%3E3.0.CO;2-K

(16)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 137PDF page: 137PDF page: 137PDF page: 137

137 Oliver, A. G., Krause, R., Busenbark, J. R., & Kalm, M. 2018. BS in the boardroom: Benevolent sexism

and board chair orientations. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2698

Olson, B. J., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y. 2007. Strategic Decision Making: The Effects of Cognitive Diversity, Conflict, and Trust on Decision Outcomes. Journal of Management, 33(2), 196–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306298657

O'Neal, D., & Thomas, H. 1996. Developing the strategic board. Long Range Planning, 29: 314-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)00027-1

Park, S. H., & Westphal, J. D. 2013. Social Discrimination in the Corporate Elite. Administrative Science

Quarterly, 58(4), 542–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213509364

Payne, G. T., Benson, G. S., & Finegold, D. L. 2009. Corporate Board Attributes, Team Effectiveness and Financial Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 704–731.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00819.x

Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. 1999. Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2667029

Peterson, R. S., & Behfar, K. J. 2003. The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision

Processes, 92(1–2), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00090-6

Petrovic, J. 2008. Unlocking the role of a board director: a review of the literature. Management Decision, 46(9): 1373-1392.

Pettigrew, A. M. 1992. On studying managerial elites. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 163–182. Pettit, N. C., Yong, K., & Spataro, S. E. 2010. Holding your place: Reactions to the prospect of status

gains and losses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 396-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.007

Pfeffer, J. 1983. Organizational demography. In L. L. Cummings and B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, 5. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 299-537.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource-Dependence

Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

Phillips, K. W. 2003. The Effects of Categorically Based Expectations on Minority Influence: The Importance of Congruence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202238367

Phillips, K. W., Kim-Jun, S. Y., & Shim, S. H. 2011. The value of diversity in organizations: A social psychological perspective. Social psychology and organizations, 253-271.

Phillips, K. W., & Loyd, D. L. 2006. When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 143– 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OBHDP.2005.12.001

(17)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 138PDF page: 138PDF page: 138PDF page: 138

138 Phillips, K. W., Mannix, E. A., Neale, M. A., & Gruenfeld, D.H., & 2004. Diverse groups and information

sharing: The effects of congruent ties. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 497– 510. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JESP.2003.10.003

Phillips, K. W., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. 2006. Surface-Level Diversity and Decision-Making in Groups: When Does Deep-Level Similarity Help? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206067557

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of

applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Ponomareva, Y., Shen, W., & Umans, T. 2019. Organizational discretion, board control, and shareholder wealth: A contingency perspective. Corporate Governance: An International

Review, 27(4): 248-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12274

Post, C., & Byron, K. 2015. Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis.

Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0319

Pozen, R. C. 2010. The case for professional boards. Harvard Business Review, 88(12): 50–58. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. 2007. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses:

Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate behavioral research, 42(1), 185-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316

Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. 2010. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209-233.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020141

Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. 2012. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.

Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. 2006. What Can You Expect? The Influence of Gender Diversity in Dyads on Work Goal Expectancies and Subsequent Work Commitment. Group Processes & Intergroup

Relations, 9(4), 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430206067560

Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. 2007a. The Role of Expectancies in Accepting Task-Related Diversity: Do Disappointment and Lack of Commitment Stem From Actual Differences or Violated Expectations? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 842–854.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301016

Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. 2007b. Diversity as a Basis for Shared Organizational Identity: The Norm Congruity Principle. British Journal of Management, 18(s1), S17–S27.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00523.x

Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. 2010. Benefiting from deep-level diversity: How congruence between knowledge and decision rules improves team decision making and team perceptions. Group

Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(3), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430209344866

Rizzo, J., House, R., & Lirtzman, S. 1970. Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations.

(18)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 139PDF page: 139PDF page: 139PDF page: 139

139 Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. 2005. Beyond Agency Conceptions of the Work of the

Non-Executive Director: Creating Accountability in the Boardroom. British Journal of Management,

16(s1), S5–S26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00444.x

Rudman, L. A. 1998. Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of personality and social psychology,

74(3), 629. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629

Ruigrok, W., Peck, S.I., & Keller, H. 2006. Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: Evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies, 43: 1201-1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00634.x

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55: 68.

Sala, F. 2003. Executive Blind Spots: Discrepancies Between Self-and Other-Ratings. Consulting

Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 55(4), 222.

https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1061-4087.55.4.222

Sanner, B., & Bunderson, J. S. 2015. When feeling safe isn’t enough: Contextualizing models of safety and learning in teams. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(3), 224–243.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614565145

Sargeant, J., Mann, K., & Ferrier, S. 2005. Exploring family physicians’ reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Medical Education, 39(5), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02124.x

Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. 2008a. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances

in Health Sciences Education, 13(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-006-9039-x

Sargeant, J., Mann, K., van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. 2008b. “Directed” self-assessment: Practice and feedback within a social context. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health

Professions, 28(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.155

Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. 2000. Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management journal, 43:1248-1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556348

Schriesheim, C.A., Cogliser, C.C., Scandura, T.A., Lankau, M.J., & Powers, K.J. 1999. An empirical comparison of approaches for quantitatively assessing the content adequacy of paper-and-pencil measurement instruments. Organizational Research Methods, 2:140-156.

https://doi.org/10.1177%2F109442819922002

Schriesheim, C.A., Powers, K.J., Scandura, T.A., Gardiner, C.C., & Lankau, M.J. 1993. Improving construct measurement in management research: Comments and a quantitative approach for assessing the theoretical content adequacy of paper-and-pencil survey-type instruments.

Journal of Management, 19:385-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-2063(93)90058-U

Shah, P. P., & Jehn, K. A. 1993. Do friends perform better than acquaintances? the interaction of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2(2): 149–165.

(19)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 140PDF page: 140PDF page: 140PDF page: 140

140 Shanock, L. R., Baran, B. E., Gentry, W. A., Pattison, S. C., & Heggestad, E. D. 2010. Polynomial

Regression with Response Surface Analysis: A Powerful Approach for Examining Moderation and Overcoming Limitations of Difference Scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(4), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4

Shen, W. 2003. The dynamics of the CEO-board relationship: an evolutionary perspective. Academy

of Management Review, 28(3): 466–476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196776

Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. 1999. CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 54: 1829-1853. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00168

Silva, P., & Tosi, H. L. 2004. Determinants of the Anonymity of the CEO Evaluation Process. Journal of

Managerial Issues. Pittsburg State University. https://doi.org/10.2307/40601185

Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. 1999. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 662-673. https://doi.org/10.5465/256987

Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Bantam Classic Edition March 2003 ed.). New York: Bantam Dell.

Smither, J. W., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. 2005. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel

psychology, 58(1), 33-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x

Sonnenfeld, J.A., 2002. What makes great boards great. Harvard business review, 80(9), 106-113. Sonnenfeld, J.A, Kusin, M., & Walton, E. 2013. What CEOs really think of their boards. Harvard

Business Review, 91(4): 93–106.

Sousa-Poza, A., & Sousa-Poza, A. A. 2000. Well-being at work: a cross-national analysis of the levels and determinants of job satisfaction. The journal of socio-economics, 29(6), 517-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00085-8

Sprinkle, G. B. 2003. Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting. Accounting,

Organizations and Society, 28(2-3): 287-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00058-7

Srikanth, K., Harvey, S., & Peterson, R. 2016. A Dynamic Perspective on Diverse Teams: Moving from the Dual-Process Model to a Dynamic Coordination-based Model of Diverse Team Performance.

The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 453–493.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1120973

Srinivasan, S. 2005. Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2): 291-334.

Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E., & Dutton, J.E., 1981. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative science quarterly, 501-524. doi:10.2307/2392337

Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Burgess, S. M. 2002. Optimum stimulation level and exploratory consumer behavior in an emerging consumer market. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19: 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00063-0

(20)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 141PDF page: 141PDF page: 141PDF page: 141

141 Stiles, P., & Taylor, B. 2001. Boards at Work - How Directors view their Roles and Responsibilities.

Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. 2003. Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy

of Management Review, 28(3): 397–415. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196737

Swain, S.D., Weathers, D., & Niedrich, R.W., 2008. Assessing three sources of misresponse to reversed Likert items. Journal of Marketing Research, 45: 116-131.

https://doi.org/10.1509%2Fjmkr.45.1.116

Tajfel, H. 1978. Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: 61-76. London: Academic Press.

Tasheva, S. N., & Hillman, A. 2018. Integrating diversity at different levels: multi-level human capital, social capital, and demographic diversity and their implications for team effectiveness.

Academy of Management Review, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0396

Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. 2009. Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17: 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x

Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. 2000. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest european companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6), 689–705.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200006)21:6%3C689::AID-SMJ115%3E3.0.CO;2-Y Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. 2011. Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to

Critical Mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z

Torelli, C. J., Leslie, L. M., Stoner, J. L., & Puente, R. 2014. Cultural determinants of status: Implications for workplace evaluations and behaviors. Organizational Behavior and Human

Decision Processes, 123(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.11.001

Tosi, H. L., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 1994. CEO Compensation Monitoring and firm performance.

Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1002–1016. https://doi.org/10.5465/256609

Triana, M. del C., Miller, T. L., & Trzebiatowski, T. M. 2014. The Double-Edged Nature of Board Gender Diversity: Diversity, Firm Performance, and the Power of Women Directors as Predictors of Strategic Change. Organization Science, 25(2), 609–632.

https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0842

Tubre, T. C., & Collins, J. M. 2000. Jackson and Schuler (1985) Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Job Performance. Journal of Management, 26(1), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600104

Tuggle, C. S., Schnatterly, K., & Johnson, R. A. 2010. Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues. Academy of

Management Journal, 53: 550-571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468687

Tuggle, C. S., Sirmon, D. G., Reutzel, C. R., & Bierman, L. 2010. Commanding board of director attention: investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members' attention to monitoring. Strategic management journal, 31(9), 946-968. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.847

(21)

546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert 546813-L-sub01-bw-Mostert Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020 Processed on: 11-8-2020

Processed on: 11-8-2020 PDF page: 142PDF page: 142PDF page: 142PDF page: 142

142 Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. 1987. Rediscovering the social

group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.

Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. 2016. A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42: 1195-1229. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0149206316632058

Van der Kolk, B., Van Veen-Dirks, P. M., & Ter Bogt, H. J. 2019. The impact of management control on employee motivation and performance in the public Sector. European Accounting Review, 28: 901-928. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1553728

Van der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. 2005. Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 532-547. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407918

Van der Vegt, G. S., Bunderson, J. S., & Oosterhof, A. 2006. Expertness diversity and interpersonal helping in teams: Why those who need the most help end up getting the least. Academy of

Management Journal, 49(5), 877-893. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798169

Van Dijk, H., Meyer, B., van Engen, M., & Loyd, D. L. 2017. Microdynamics in Diverse Teams: A Review and Integration of the Diversity and Stereotyping Literatures. Academy of Management Annals,

11(1), 517–557. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0046

Van Ees, H., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M., 2009. Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 307-319.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00741.x

Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. 2004. Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 1008 -1022. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008

Vansteenkiste, M., Neyrinck, B., Niemiec, C. P., Soenens, B., De Witte, H., & Van den Broeck, A. 2007. On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of occupational and organizational

psychology, 80: 251-277. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X111024

Van Veen-Dirks, P. 2010. Different uses of performance measures: The evaluation versus reward of production managers. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2): 141-164.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.02.002

Veltrop, D. B., Molleman, E., Hooghiemstra, R., & van Ees, H. 2018. The Relationship Between Tenure and Outside Director Task Involvement: A Social Identity Perspective. Journal of Management,

44(2), 445–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315579510

Walters, B. A., Kroll, M. J., & Wright, P. 2007. CEO tenure, boards of directors, and acquisition performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(4), 331–338.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2006.12.001

Westphal, J. D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1): 7–24.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Het is niet zozeer het verminderen van stress (stressoren verdwijnen namelijk echt niet!) waar de medewerkers en uiteindelijk de organisatie beter van wordt, maar een

The path of the winning number of this game and the performance of the players are analysed in order to see what happens to the price of an asset and the performance of traders,

Dank voor de inzichten die je mij hebt gegeven in het werk als onderzoeker en voor jouw bijdrage aan mijn ontwikkeling hierin!. Dank voor onze

In line with this perspective, governance researchers and practitioners alike have persistently asserted that boards must be comprised of independent directors because they are

This implies that TMT-board cognitive conflict is less likely to exacerbate the negative association between TMT tenure and board advice giving when board tenure is high, because

Specifically, Chapter 2 showed that boards taking a critical stance towards the TMT might seriously undermine their advice giving task towards management, Chapter 3 demonstrated

Hoofdstuk 2 laat zien dat de aanstellingsduur van de RvB een negatief effect heeft op zowel de toezicht- en adviesrol van de RvC: hoe langer de aanstellingsduur van de RvB,

The simple yet often overlooked fact in corporate governance research to date is that directors are socially situated when challenging top management (This dissertation) 2. To truly