• No results found

University of Groningen Driving adoption Noppers, Ernst Harm

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Driving adoption Noppers, Ernst Harm"

Copied!
11
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Driving adoption Noppers, Ernst Harm

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2018

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Noppers, E. H. (2018). Driving adoption: The symbolic value of sustainable innovations. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Abrahamse, W., and Steg, L. (2009) How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households' direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic

Psychology, 30 , 711-720.

Abrahamse, W., and Steg, L. (2011) Factors related to household energy use and intention to reduce it: The role of psychological and socio-demographic variables. Human Ecology

Review, 18 (1), 30-40.

Aiken, L. S., and West, S. G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting

Interactions, London: Sage.

ANWB (2017) Elektrisch Rijden Monitor. Algemene Nederlandse Wielrijders Bond. retreived from: https://www.anwb.nl/belangenbehartiging/duurzaam/elektrisch-rijden-monitor

Arts, J. W., Frambach, R. T., & Bijmolt, T. H. (2011). Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior. International

Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(2), 134-144.

Axsen, J., and Kurani, K.S. (2012a) Interpersonal influence within car buyers’ social networks: applying five perspectives to plug-in hybrid vehicle drivers. Environment and

Planning A, vol. 44, 1047-1065.

Axsen, J., and Kurani, K.S. (2012b) Developing sustainability-oriented values: Insights from households in a trial of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Global Environmental Change 23(1), 10-80 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.08.002

Bamberg, S., and Schmidt, P. (2003) Incentives, morality or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz and Triandis. Environment and

Behaviour, 35, 264–285.

Belk, R.W. (1981) Determinants of Consumption Cue Utilization in Impression Formation: an Association Derivation and Experimental Verification. In: Advances in Consumer

Research Volume 08, eds. Kent B. Monroe, Advances in Consumer Research Volume 08: Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 170-175.

Belk, R.W. (1988) Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 139-68.

Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in experimental social psychology, 6, 1-62.

Berger J., and Heath C. (2007) Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121–134.

Bergmann, A., Hanley, N., and Wright, R. (2006) Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments. Energy Policy. 34 (9), 1004-1014.

(3)

Bhattacharjee, A., Berger, J., & Menon, G. (2014). When identity marketing backfires: consumer agency in identity expression. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 294-309. BMW (2012) Onderzoek E-Mobility: De ervaring leert. BMW Group. Retrieved from: https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/pressclub/p/nl/Onderzoek_eMobility_De_Ervaring_Leert _def.pdf

Bockarjova, M. (2013, September). Modelling diffusion of innovations: various consumers in electric vehicle adoption. Paper presented at 10th Biennial Conference on Environmental Psychology, Magdeburg, Germany.

Bockarjova, M., & Steg, L. (2014). Can Protection Motivation Theory predict pro-environmental behavior? Explaining the adoption of electric vehicles in the Netherlands.

Global Environmental Change, 28, 276-288.

Bolderdijk, J. W., Steg, L., Geller, E. S., Lehman, P. K., & Postmes, T. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature

Climate Change, 3(4), 413-416.

BOVAG-RAI (2012). Mobiliteit in cijfers; Auto’s 2010/2011. BOVAG-RAI, Amsterdam. Brown, S. A., and Venkatesh, V. (2005) Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 399−426.

Bunch, D., Bradley M., Golob T., Kitamura R., and Occhiuzzo, G. (1993) Demand for Cleanfuel Vehicles in California: A Discrete Choice Stated Preference Pilot Project.

Transporation Research A, 27A, 237-253.

Burgess, M., King, N., Harris, M., & Lewis, E. (2013). Electric vehicle drivers’ reported interactions with the public: Driving stereotype change?. Transportation research part F:

traffic psychology and behaviour, 17, 33-44.

Calder, B. J., & Burnkrant, R. E. (1977). Interpersonal influence on consumer behavior: An attribution theory approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(1), 29-38.

Campbell, A. R., Ryley, T., & Thring, R. (2012). Identifying the early adopters of alternative fuel vehicles: A case study of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Transportation Research Part

A: Policy and Practice, 46(8), 1318-1327.

Caperello, N. D., & Kurani, K. S. (2012). Households’ stories of their encounters with a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. Environment and behavior, 44(4), 493-508.

Carley, S., Krause, R. M., Lane, B. W., & Graham, J. D. (2013). Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation Research

Part D: Transport and Environment, 18, 39-45.

CBS (2007) Mobiliteit; voertuigenbezit naar achtergrondkenmerken. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. retreived from:

http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?VW=T&DM=SLNL&PA=37856&LA=NL CBS (2010). Statistical Yearbook 2010. Statistics Netherlands, the Hague.

(4)

CBS (2012) CBS Statline. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. retreived from: http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/dome/?LA=nl&TH=3430.

Chen, K. K. (2014). Assessing the effects of customer innovativeness, environmental value and ecological lifestyles on residential solar power systems install intention. Energy Policy,

67, 951-961.

Cheron, E., and Zins, M. (1997) Electric vehicle purchasing intentions: the concern over battery charge duration. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 31 (3), 235– 243.

Choo, S., and Mokhtarian, P. (2002) The Relationship Of Vehicle Type Choice to Personality, Lifestyle, Attitudinal, and Demographic Variables. University of California, Davis, Report UCD-ITS-RR-02-06.

Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.4th ed. Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances

in experimental social psychology, 24(20), 1-243.

De Groot, J., and Steg, L. (2007) Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38 (3), 318-332.

De Groot, J., and Steg, L. (2008) Value orientations to explain beliefs related to

environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40 (3), 330-354.

De Groot, J., Steg, L., Farsang, A., Keizer, M. and Watt, A. (2012) Environmental values in Hungary. Czech Sociological Review. (In Press).

Deloitte (2010), Gaining traction: A customer view of electric vehicle mass adoption in the U.S. automotive market. Retrieved from:

http://www.deloitte.com.br/publicacoes/2007/MFG.Gaining_Traction_customer_view_of_ele ctric_vehicle_mass_adoption.pdf

Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. Hemet Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf / New York: St. Martin's Press.

Durlak, J.A. (2009). How to Select, Calculate, and Interpret Effect Sizes. Journal of Pediatric

Psychology, 34 (9), 917-928. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004

Egbue,O. & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729.

Ericksen, M.K. (1997) Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase intention: a European perspective. Journal of Euro-Marketing 6, 41–56.

Fennis, B.M., and Pruyn, A.T.H. (2007) You are what you wear: Brand personality influences on consumer impression formation. Journal of Business Research. 60(6), 634– 639.

(5)

Franke, T., Neumann, I., Bühler, F., Cocron, P., & Krems, J. F. (2012). Experiencing range in an electric vehicle: Understanding psychological barriers. Applied Psychology, 61(3), 368-391.

Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2013). Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 109-122.

Gallagher, K. S., & Muehlegger, E. (2011). Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and

Management, 61(1), 1-15.

Gärling, A., & Thøgersen, J. (2001). Marketing of electric vehicles. Business Strategy and

the Environment, 10(1), 53-65.

Gartrell, J. W., Wilkening, E. A., & Presser, H. A. (1973). Curvilinear and linear models relating status and innovative behavior: A reassessment. Rural Sociology.

Gatersleben, B. (2007) Affective and symbolic aspects of car use. In T. Gärling, and L. Steg (Eds.), Threats to the quality of urban life from car traffic: Problems, causes, and solutions (pp. 219–233). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T. S. (1985). A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. Journal of consumer research, 849-867.

Gerpott, T.J. and Mahmudova, I. (2010) Determinants of green electricity adoption among residential customers in Germany. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 464–473. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gneezy, A., Imas, A., Nelson, L. D., Brown, A., and Norton, M. I. (2012) Paying to be Nice: Costly Prosocial Behavior and Consistency, Management Science, 58,179-187.

Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.

Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of

the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209-221.

Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of consumer

Research, 35(3), 472-482.

Graziano, M., & Gillingham, K. (2014). Spatial patterns of solar photovoltaic system adoption: the influence of neighbors and the built environment. Journal of Economic

Geography, 15(4), 815-839.

Griskevicius, V., Tyber, J.M., and Van den Bergh, B. (2010) Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 98, 392–404.

Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods,

(6)

41(3), 924-936.

Heffner, R.R. (2007) Semiotics and Advanced Vehicles: What Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs) Mean and Why it Matters to Consumers, PhD Dissertation, Institute of

Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, Research Report UCD-ITSRR-07-30.

Heffner, R.R., Kurani K.S., and Turrentine T.S. (2007). Symbolism in California’s early market for hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and

Environment, 12, 396–413.

IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Retrieved from: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/

Jager, W. (2006). Stimulating the diffusion of photovoltaic systems: A behavioural perspective. Energy Policy, 34(14), 1935-1943.

Jansson, J., Marell, A., and Nordlund, A. (2010) Green consumer behavior: determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing 27, 358–370. Johansson-Stenman, O., and Martinsson, P. (2006). Honestly, why are you driving a BMW?

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60, 129–146.

Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application

to some educational problems. Statistical research memoirs.

Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 219-266.

Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In Nebraska symposium on

motivation. University of Nebraska Press.

Korcaj, L., Hahnel, U. J., & Spada, H. (2015). Intentions to adopt photovoltaic systems depend on homeowners' expected personal gains and behavior of peers. Renewable Energy,

75, 407-415.

McCracken, G (1990) Culture and Consumption. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Meilhan, N. (2012) Will electric cars rule the future? Paris: Frost & Sullivan. Retrieved from: http://www.slideshare.net/NicolasMeilhan/mai-2011-the-car-of-the-future-from-petrol-to-electricity

Miller, G. F. (2009) Spent: Sex, evolution, and consumer behavior. New York, NY: Viking. Morwitz, V. G., Steckel, J. H., & Gupta, A. (2007). When do purchase intentions predict sales? International Journal of Forecasting, 23(3), 347-364.

Nemry, F., and Brons, M. (2010) Plug-in Hybrid and Battery Electric Vehicles. Market penetration scenarios of electric drive vehicles, JRC 58748 Technical Note.

Nolan, J. M., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and social psychology bulletin,

(7)

Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bockjarova, M., & Steg, L. (2015). The adoption of sustainable innovations: the role of instrumental, environmental, and symbolic attributes for earlier and later adopters. Journal of Environmental Psychology, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.002 Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environmental Change,

25, 52-62.

Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2217-2227.

Palda, K.S. (1966) The Hypothesis of a Hierarchy of Effects: A Partial Evaluation. Journal of

Marketing Research, 3, 13-24.

Park, C.W., Jaworski, B.J., and Maclnnis, D.J. (1986) Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4) October, pp.135-145.

Peters, A., & Dütschke, E. (2014). How do consumers perceive electric vehicles? A comparison of German consumer groups. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning,

16(3), 359-377.

Poortinga, W., Steg, L., and Vlek, C. (2004) Values, environmental concern and

environmental behavior: a study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36 (1), 70-93.

RAI (2013) Nieuwverkoop personenauto’s 2013 Retrieved from:

http://www.raivereniging.nl/ecm/?id=workspace://SpacesStore/00d36229-cbba-4f2e-ad76-c3f8e35c2d08

Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22(3), 218-233.

Rogers, E.M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations, 1st Edition. New York : The Free Press. Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th Edition. New York : The Free Press. Schuitema, G., & Groot, J. I. (2015). Green consumerism: The influence of product attributes and values on purchasing intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(1), 57-69.

Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation

Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39-49.

Schultz, W. P., Nolan, J. N., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science,

18, 429-434.

Shah, A. (2011) Pros and Cons of Renewable Energy – A Detailed Explanation. Retrieved from: Greenworldinvestor.com http://www.greenworldinvestor.com/2011/04/04/pros-and-cons-of-renewable-energy-a-detailed-explanation/

Shanan, Z. (2014) Electric vehicle market share in 19 countries. ABB conversations. Retrieved from:

(8)

http://www.abb-conversations.com/2014/03/electric-vehicle-market-share-in-19-countries/

Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research.

Journal of consumer research 15(3), 325-343.

Shove, E., and Warde, A. (2002) Inconspicuous consumption: the sociology of consumption, lifestyles and the environment. In: Sociological Theory & the Environment: classical

foundations, contemporary insights, (ed.) Dunlap, R. Buttel, F. Dickens, P. Gijswijt, A, 230-251. Lanham MA: Rowman and Littlefield.

Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, 183-194.

Simonson, I., and Nowlis, S.M. (2000) The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. Journal of Consumer

Research, 27(1), 49-68

Sintov, N.D. & Schultz, P.W. (2015). Unlocking the potential of smart grid technologies with behavioral science. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 410

Sirgy, M.J. (1985). Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase intentions.

Journal of Business Research, 13, 195-206.

Sirgy, M.J. (1986) Self-congruity: toward a theory of personality and cybernetics. New York, NY: Praeger.

Sonnenberg, N. C., Erasmus, A. C., & Schreuder, A. (2014). Consumers’ preferences for eco‐ friendly appliances in an emerging market context. International Journal of Consumer

Studies, 38(5), 559-569.

Spiller, S. A., Fitzsimons, G. J., Lynch Jr, J. G., & McClelland, G. H. (2013). Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal

of Marketing Research, 50(2), 277-288.

Steg, E.M., and Vlek, C.A.J., (1997) The role of problem awareness in willingness-to-change car use and evaluating relevant policy measures. In: Rothengatter, T., Carbonell Vaya, E.

(Eds.), Traffic and Transport Psychology. Pergamon, Amsterdam, New York, 465–475. Steg, L. (2005). Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(2), 147-162.

Steg, L. and De Groot, J.I.M. (2012) Environmental values. In: Clayton, S., ed. The Oxford

Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. Oxford University Press. (In Press)

Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., and Abrahamse,W. (2005) Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: testing VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415–425. Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., & van der Werff, E. (2015). Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 805.

(9)

Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., Van der Werff, E. and Lurvink, J. (2012) The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions. Environment and Behavior Advance Online Publication doi:10.1177/0013916512454730 Steg, L., Vlek, C., Slotegraaf, G. (2001) Cognitive-Reasoned and Affective-Emotional Motives for Using a Motor Car. Transportation Research-F: Psychology and Behaviour 4 (3), 1–19.

Steinhilber, S., Wells, P., and Thankappan, S. (2013) Socio-technical inertia: understanding the barriers to electric vehicles’, Energy Policy, 2013, 60, 531–539 doi:

10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.076

Stern, P.C. (1986). Blind spots in policy Analysis: What economics doesn't say about energy use. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5, 200-227.

Stern, P.C., Aronson, E., Darley, J.M., Hill, D.H., Hirst, E., Kempton, W., and Wilbanks, T.J. (1986). The effectiveness of incentives for residential energy conservation. Evaluation

Review, 10(2), 147-176.

Tertoolen, G., Van Kreveld, D., and Verstraten, B. (1998) Psychological resistance against attempts to reduce private car use. Transportation Research A, 32, 171–181.

Van der Werff, E., Steg, L. and Keizer, K.E. (2013) The value of environmental self-identity: The relationship between biospheric values, environmental self-identity and environmental preferences, intentions and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 55-63. Vandercasteele, B., and Geuens, M. (2010) Motivated Consumer Innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation. Intern. J. of Research in Marketing, 27, 308–318.

Vrkljan, B., and Anaby, D. (2011) What vehicle features are considered important when buying an automobile? An examination of driver preferences by age and gender. Journal of buying an automobile? An examination of driver preferences by age and gender. Journal of

Safety Research. 42(1), 61-65.

Zhang, X., Shen, L., and Chan, S.Y. (2012) The diffusion of solar energy use in HK: what are the barriers? Energy Policy 41, 241–249.

(10)

Kurt Lewin Institute Dissertation Series

The “Kurt Lewin Institute Dissertation Series” started in 1997. Since 2017, the following dissertations have been published in this series:

2016-01: Anna van ‘t Veer: Effortless morality — cognitive and affective processes in deception and its detection

2016-02: Thijs Bouman: Threat by association: How distant events can affect local intergroup relations

2016-03: Tim Theeboom: Workplace coaching: Processes and effects

2016-04: Sabine Strofer: Deceptive intent: Physiological reactions in different interpersonal contexts

2016-05: Caspar van Lissa: Exercising Empathy: The Role of Adolescents’ Developing Empathy in Conflicts with Parents

2016-06: Marlon Mooijman: On the determinants and consequences of punishment goals: The role of power, distrust, and rule compliance

2016-07: Niels van Doesum: Social mindfulness

2016-08: Leonie Venhoeven: A look on the bright side of an environmentally-friendly life: Whether and why acting environmentally-friendly can contribute to well-being 2016-09: Florien Cramwinckel: The social dynamics of morality

2016-10: Junhui Wu: Understanding Human Cooperation: The Psychology of Gossip, Reputation, and Life History

2016-11: Elise C. Seip: Desire for vengeance. An emotion-based approach to revenge

2016-12: Welmer E. Molenmaker: The (un)willingness to reward cooperation and punish non-cooperation

2016-13: Liesbeth Mann: On Feeling Humiliated. The Experience of Humiliation in Interpersonal, Intragroup, and Intergroup Contexts

2016-14: Angela M. Ruepert: Working on the environment

2016-15: Femke Hilverda: Making sense of food risk information: The case of organic food. 2016-16: Debora E. Purba: Antecedents of turnover, organizational citizenship behavior, and

workplace deviance: Empirical evidence from Indonesia.

2016-17: Maja Kutlaca: The Role of Values and Value-Identity Fit in Motivating Collective Action

2016-18: Felicity Turner: A New Psychological Perspective on Identity content, its Conceptualization, Measurement, and Application

2016-19: Tim W. Faber: When Imitation Falls Short: The Case of Complementary Actions. 2016-20: Daniela Becker: Self-control conflict in the eating domain: A cognitive, affective and

behavioral perspective

2016-21: Zoi Manesi: Prosocial Behavior Under Surveillance: Understanding the Eye-Images Effect

2017-01: Tracy Cheung: Turning vice into virtue - when low self-control states facilitate goal-oriented behaviours

2017-02: Pum Kommattam: Feeling the Other: Emotion Interpretation in Intercultural Settings 2017-03: Lotte Veenstra: Taming Tempers: A situated motivational approach to anger

management

2017-04: Jolien van Breen: The path of most Resistance: How groups cope with implicit social identity threat

2017-05: Yuije Cheng: Creativity Under the Gun: How Threat Features and Personal Characteristics Motivate Creative Responding

2017-06: Eftychia Stamkou: The dynamic nature of social hierarchies: The role of norm violations and hierarchical concerns

2017-07: Anne Marthe van der Bles: Societal Discontent -- Deciphering the Zeitgeist

(11)

2017-09: Julia Sasse: More Than a Feeling: Strategic Emotion Expression in Intergroup Conflicts

2017-10: Nils Köbis: The Social Psychology of Corruption

2017-11: Tim de Wilde: Struggling to decide. Competition in group decision-making

2017-12: Nathalie Boot: The creative brain: Some insights into the neural dynamics of flexible and persistent creative processes

2017-13: Johannes Seehusen: Foregone and Forethought: Motivation in the Context of Past and Future Alternatives

2017-14: Ernst Willem Meerholz: The ‘other’ side of compassion. How the self avoids responsibility for past wrongs

2017-15: Wieke Scholten: Banking on Team Ethics: A team climate perspective on root causes of misconduct in financial services

2018-01: Mike Keesman: Observing the mind instead of acting on it: How mindfulness empowers people to live healthily

2018-02: Marije Bakker: Turning Crisis into Opportunity: the Influence of the Government and the Social environment

2018-03: Miriam Oostinga: Breaking (the) ice: Communication error management in law enforcement interactions

2018-04: Xia Fang: Perceiving and Producing Facial Expressions of Emotion: The Role of Dynamic Expressions and Culture

2018-05: David Maij: Sensing Supernatural Agency - An empirical quest on the socio-cognitive foundations of supernatural beliefs

2018-06: Mariko Visserman: The Art of Sacrifice: Self-Other Dilemmas, Biased Perceptions, and the Emergence of Gratitude

2018-07: Caroline Schlinkert: Minding the body: The role of rumination and stress in embodied information processing

2018-08: Aafke van Mourik Broekman: An Experimental Approach to Group Growth: When Boundaries Between Performers and Observers Are Breached

2018-09: Judith Rachl: Unconscious Bonding - Forming Bonds Quickly in Today’s Fast-Paced Society

2018-10: Bibiana Armenta Gutierrez: Stepping into old age. A dynamic perspective on age identity change in the transition from midlife to older adulthood

2018-11: Dalya Samur: From reading to feeling: A language-based approach to alexithymia 2018-12: Marloes Huis: Women’s empowerment in the context of microfinance services 2018-13: Ernst Noppers: Driving adoption. The symbolic value of sustainable innovations

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Chapter 3: The adoption of sustainable innovations: The role of instrumental, environmental, and symbolic attributes for earlier and later

More specifically, we investigated to what extent evaluations of the instrumental attributes, environmental attributes, and symbolic attributes are related to adoption likelihood

To establish the relative importance of the three types of attributes for adoption of local energy systems, we first regressed acceptability of local energy systems on

Following our reasoning in the Introduction section, in each regression model we included (1) all main effects, that is adoption stage 4 and evaluations of the three attributes,

Symbolic attributes were more strongly related to interest in and intention to use smart energy systems and interest in electric cars (but not intentions to buy electric cars)

To conclude, what adopting smart energy systems says about a person is an important factor determining its adoption, as evaluations of the symbolic attributes explain actual

symbolic attributes were more strongly related to both interest in electric cars and smart energy systems when people perceived relatively weak adoption norms, that is, when they

symbolische attributen vooral een goede voorspeller van adoptie van duurzame innovaties zou kunnen zijn wanneer men verwacht dat de duurzame innovaties enige instrumentele nadelen