• No results found

Master Thesis Defense

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Master Thesis Defense"

Copied!
15
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Master Thesis Defense

By Ilse Mein

S3540545

University of Groningen

Faculty of Economics and Business

MSc Marketing

(2)

Table of

contents

Objective of the research

3

Theoretical framework

5

Methodology

9

Findings

10

(3)

Nowadays, increasingly complex online customer

journeys.

People can easily switch between:

Customer-initiated touchpoints and

firm-initiated touchpoints.

Using fixed devices and using mobile devices.

How do people engage with touchpoints and devices

during their path to purchase?

Understanding these effects:

Clarify opportunities for budget allocations.

Identify wasted marketing spend.

(4)

To what extent do branded customer-initiated touchpoints, generic customer-initiated touchpoints and

firm-initiated touchpoints influence an online purchase decision and do these effects differ between

using mobile or fixed devices?

(5)

Theoretical framework

TOUCHPOINTS

Firm-initiated touchpoints

Customer-initiated touchpoints

Branded customer-initiated touchpoints

The active use of the retailer’s brand name to initiate the contact.

Generic customer-initiated touchpoints

Unbranded keywords (Anderl et al., 2016a).

DEVICES

Fixed devices

Laptops and desktops

Mobile devices

(6)

Theoretical framework

➔ Firm-initiated touchpoints affect people that have not yet recognized a specific need.

➔ Customer-initiated touchpoints require a level of interest from the consumer.

➔ Customer-initiated touchpoints are more effective than firm-initiated touchpoints (De Haan et al., 2016).

➔ Mobile devices as the preferred option in the pre-purchase stage.

➔ Fixed devices are the preferred option in the purchase stage (De Haan et al., 2018).

H1a: Firm-initiated touchpoints positively affect a

customer’s purchase probability. H1b: The effect of firm-initiated touchpoints is stronger across fixed devices compared to mobile devices.

H2a: Customer-initiated touchpoints positively affects a

customer’s purchase probability. H2b: The effect of customer-initiated touchpoints is stronger across fixed devices compared to mobile devices.

H3: Customer-initiated touchpoints are more effective than

(7)

Theoretical framework

➔ Branded customer-initiated touchpoints positively affect purchase probability.

➔ Generic customer-initiated touchpoints positively affect purchase probability (Anderl et al., 2016a). ➔ Branded customer-initiated touchpoints account for

the highest purchase probability across mobile devices.

➔ Generic customer-initiated touchpoints account for the highest purchase probability across fixed devices (Kaatz et al., 2019).

H4a: Branded customer-initiated touchpoints positively affect

a customer’s purchase probability. H4b: The effect of branded customer-initiated touchpoints is stronger across mobile devices compared to fixed devices.

H5a: Generic customer-initiated touchpoints positively affect

(8)

Theoretical framework

➔ The purchase probability is higher if the path-to-purchase started with firm-initiated touchpoints and ended with customer-initiated touchpoints (Anderl et al., 2016a).

➔ The purchase probability is significantly higher when customers switch from a mobile device to a fixed device (De Haan et al., 2018).

➔ Fixed devices are more suitable for high-involvement products (Lin et al., 2019).

H6: The purchase probability is higher if people first

encounter firm-initiated touchpoints and then use customer-initiated touchpoints compared to only firm-customer-initiated touchpoints or customer-initiated touchpoints.

H7: The purchase probability is higher if people first use a

(9)

A binary logistic regression with interaction effects between all forms of touchpoints and devices.

The dependent variable, the purchase decision, is a binary outcome variable.

The purchase decision is a 0/1 decision. 0 indicates a non-purchase decision and 1 indicates a purchase decision.

The independent variables are classified as continuous and factor predictors.

The different touchpoints consumers are exposed to, classified as firm-initiated touchpoints, branded customer-initiated touchpoints and generic customer-initiated touchpoints.

The type of devices that are used, classified as mobile devices and fixed devices.

(10)

Findings

➔ Customer-initiated touchpoints are more effective on a final purchase decision compared to firm-initiated touchpoints.

➔ Branded customer-initiated touchpoints are more effective on a final purchase decision compared to generic customer-initiated touchpoints.

➔ For travel agencies, the most effective firm-initiated touchpoints are e-mail, retargeting and pre-rolls.

➔ E-mail and retargeting are most effective across fixed devices, while pre-rolls are most effective across mobile devices.

➔ Fixed devices are the preferred option for a purchase decision among all touchpoints.

(11)

Recommendations

➔ Invest in e-mail and retargeting to increase the effect of firm-initiated touchpoints on a purchase decision.

• The effect is highest among fixed devices. ➔ If firms invest in pre-rolls, the effect is highest among

people reached via mobile devices • Use one pre-roll at a time.

➔ Adapt marketing activities to fixed devices. ➔ Invest in an omnichannel strategy as people use

mobile and fixed devices interchangeably.

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE

➔ A richer data set, resulting in more insights.

➔ Useful information since only a few studies have done this before.

➔ The study clarifies opportunities for budget allocation for travel agencies.

(12)
(13)

Anderl, E., Schumann, J. H., & Kunz, W. (2016a). Helping firms reduce complexity in multichannel online data: a new taxonomy-based approach for customer journeys. Journal of Retailing, 92(2), 185-203.

De Haan, E., Wiesel, T., & Pauwels, K. (2016). The effectiveness of different forms of online advertising for purchase conversion in a multiple-channel attribution

De Haan, E., Kannan, P. K., Verhoef, P. C., & Wiesel, T. (2018). Device switching in online purchasing: examining the strategic contingencies. Journal of Marketing, 82(5), 1-19.

Kaatz, C., Brock, C., & Figura, L. (2019). Are you still online or are you already mobile?-Predicting the path to successful conversions across different devices. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 10-21.

Lin, P. J., Jones, E., & Westwood, S. (2009). Perceived risk and risk-relievers in online travel purchase intentions. Journal of Hospitality

Marketing & Management, 18(8), 782-810.

(14)

Hypothesis 1a:

Partially confirmed

Hypothesis 1b:

Partially confirmed

Hypothesis 2a:

Confirmed

Hypothesis 2b:

Partially confirmed

Hypothesis 3:

Confirmed

Hypothesis 4a:

Confirmed

Hypothesis 4b:

Not confirmed

Hypothesis 5a:

Confirmed

Hypothesis 5b:

Partially confirmed

Hypothesis 6:

Not confirmed

Hypothesis 7:

Confirmed

(15)

Appendix

Classification Touchpoint Device

Generic customer-initiated Accommodations search Fixed

Flight ticket search Fixed

Accommodations app Fixed

Information/comparison Mobile Branded customer-initiated Tour operator website focus brand Fixed

Firm-initiated E-mail Fixed

Retargeting Fixed

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

To understand the effect of each touchpoint across different devices in the online path-to- purchase in the travel industry, the study addresses the following research question: To

The gap in the literature on segments based on demographical variables and the rise in use of (multiple) devices in the customer journey do make research on this crucial. In

impact of average satisfaction levels during prior experiences on the current overall customer experience is mediated by the level of pre-purchase satisfaction. H4 Customers

ANCOVA outcomes: Interaction effects goal framing and temporal framing on attitudes and intentions: Frequency of eating meat as covariate.. Exploring

However, the positive effects of Focus brand’s platform (Factor 1) on own- conversion model and Non-focus brand website (Factor 3) on competitor- conversion model indicate that

● Out of 8 significant moderation effects by ‘Evening’ timing variable on all of the three conversions, only 1 effect is positive, i.e., the moderation effect of ‘Evening’

FAVAR allows to make use of extracted factors that contain common dynamics in order to make predictions (Bai et al., 2016)...

Theoretical Background Type of Advertisement Extent of Inference of Manipulative Intent Depth of Information Processing H 1 H 2 H 3.. ›  H 2 : Depth of