Nine draft genome sequences of Claviceps purpurea s.lat., including C. arundinis, C. humidiphila, and C. cf. spartinae, pseudomolecules for the pitch canker pathogen Fusarium circinatum, draft genome of Davidsoniella eucalypti, Grosmannia galeiformis, Qua
Hele tekst
(2) \*>&_! #
(3) % 4 >
(4) @ >
(5) G !K \
(6) ` &<+=&q;;< I q!K \
(7) 4 3 A 4 >
(8) A4>% A @ %A@? $ I I $ A ";<D I <<;+G v. ^ xA B z%A@ K =. 5. 3 ! $ [ [G
(9) ? $ I $ A {&> |*<;G . Abstract: E Claviceps purpurea s.lat., including C. arundinis, C. humidiphila and C. cf. spartinae.E Davidsoniella eucalypti, Quambalaria eucalypti and Teratosphaeria destructans, . The insect associate Grosmannia galeiformis
(10) E Fusarium circinatum
(11)
(12)
(13) }
(14) Fusarium fujikuroi "E
(15) F. circinatum $ &; .
(16) F. circinatumE
(17)
(18) %%G!
(19) .
(20) ".. Key words:
(21) . Eucalyptus . Poaceae. Article info: G
(22) x;&F$
(23) ;<&+v x;*F$
(24) ;<&+vI
(25) x&q3
(26) ;<&+.. IMA Genome-F 10A. Nine draft genome sequences of Claviceps purpurea s.lat., including C. arundinis, C. humidiphila and C. cf. spartinae INTRODUCTION Claviceps purpurea (Clavicipitaceae, Hypocreales) is a plant (Poaceae
(27) .
(28) ! " # et al. 1986, Miles et al. 1996, Scott 2009). These $ % &'*+! 1976, Miles et al. &''*3 4 et al. &''+;<<=
(29) . $ conditions 3 4 et al. &''+! ;<<*> et al. 2006) ? $ . "
(30) @ $ $ $ " . © 2018 International Mycological Association You are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work, under the following conditions: Attribution:
(31)
(32)
(33) Non-commercial: No derivative works:
(34) For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work, which can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author’s moral rights.. VOLUME 9 · NO. 2. 401.
(35) ART I CLE. et al.. $
(36) I K$~et al. 2000) in C. purpurea s. latE
(37) ^ C. arundinis, C. humidiphila, and C. spartinae (Douhan et al. ;<<+I $~et al. ;<&_ G
(38) "` # et al. 2016). In Canada,
(39) G >
(40)
(41) ;<<; > K ] E ;<&q3 $ ! $ x
(42) C. spartinae 4= !. humidiphila, and
(43)
(44) the C. purpurea s. lat. "% &D $ $ }
(45)
(46)
(47) . SEQUENCED STRAINS Claviceps purpurea s.str. Canada: Saskatchewanx [ $ GP& q'&q F &<;'' B Triticum aestivum, 2000, R. Clear
(48) J4> K #>;+3U>!;_<*q|Czech Republic: A K q'+= F &q<= [ Secale cereale, ;<<=
(49) GI $~#>_+;3U>!;_&|;= !!!||& "^ Claviceps purpurea s.lat. Canada: AlbertaxF G _+_=F&&+&;B Bromus inermis|G &'_*
(50) BI!
(51) #>|+ 3U>! ;_<_|+v > _;q& F &&<*= B Elymus albicans|G &'_*
(52) B I!
(53) #>+&3U>!;_<_+&Quebecx! F >\! > I ^I _<&= F *&<+ B Ammophila sp., 8 Sep. 2015, J. Cayouette]Y. Dalpé #>q_+3U>!;_&+'+ Claviceps cf. spartinae Canada: Manitobax 4 % G q'<_ F '+** B Phalaris arudinacea, 2014, J. Menzies
(54) > # #>;&+ 3U>! ;_&+q= Quebec: > ^! I ^E $ # G ^J q+*|F|&+|B Ammophila breviligulata=&;<&qJ. Cayouette
(55) ># #>q_q3U>!;_&+q_3U>__<;q*
(56) Claviceps humidiphila Germany: Bavariax I q++* F &=*+ [ Dactylis sp., 1998 and
(57) #>_|* 3U>!;_&|&|!!!q=q "^ Claviceps arundinis Czech RepublicxD $3$ G `
(58) q'<& F&qq=[ Phragmites australis, 11 Jan. 2008, #>_+=3U>!;_&|;q!!!'== "^ . 402. NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE ACCESSION NUMBERS E 33AJ[>A#4 A A I I\JFqq'=*&E $
(59) $ [\3<&<<<<<< [B<&<<<<<< [{<&<<<<<< [<&<<<<<< [O<&<<<<<< [\<&<<<<<< [\A<&<<<<<< [\!<&<<<<<< [\[<&<<<<<< \ F!A@ G\ x
(60) $
(61) G\I&='*&<. MATERIALS AND METHODS % I 3 " I3v A3 3 TM
(62) I $
(63) &< at 20 °! > &; $ } F2
(64) 3F "
(65) !EA 3 ] 3 &'+| E $ \F
(66) " \F
(67) x & K |<<;{!EA&q<\F ! TM [K > " q" $ x ;_ _< v @$
(68) E % G ;+ \FG[q" $ x&&<< *| ; &< I P _< # v % G
(69) E % G
(70) ; __°!=A 3F =_ \F ! $ "
(71) q_ &
(72) *_<#!D!4 &=<<< &_ I \F 3F
(73) & ;*<;+< F 3 &<<< G $=+E % G \F 3F }
(74) ® 2 .0 % @$
(75) # E E " 3F K q<< =<<
(76) !$ #[;;< E I!\ #
(77). F"G }%\[[#3F#
(78). # . @ "
(79). $ } . F "G } @ v > E #
(80) U \ ] 3 $ ! ^% ! ;"&_<
(81) F "G }> U\ P @ E % ! $<&&_x
(82)
(83)
(84) } . } I } $ E $<=* A et al. 2014) x HEADCROP:20 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:20 MINLEN:36. The . . A D F et al. ;<&=. De novo
(85) IMA FUNGUS.
(86) IMA Genome – F10. (&
(87) . %"# %"# $(%$ . ART I CLE. !" !" . !$# !$# 99/100. !$# !$# . 80/98. !$# . . !$# 100/100.
(88)
(89) . 60/85.
(90) " #
(91)
(92) . . $$ $$ $$ 97/100 $$ $$ $$ . . $$
(93) ! $$ &$!%& &$!%& %#$ )&!&*# )&!&*# %&
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97) # # # # . 86/100. . # 90/100. # # # #
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101) . 68/92. ))$# %&' ("%## . Fig. 1. U >I
(102) Claviceps
(103) [%&^ '' $ =<;!@<*<*\@<+<|\!<q+'D@<='q4^^|_<+'`
(104) >I
(105) A@
(106)
(107) . GI $=&<&A $ et al. ;<&; .
(108) ! VOLUME 9 · NO. 2. &<<<
(109) ?GE$q_ 4 $ et al. ;<&= $
(110) !. . 403.
(111) 404. E }
(112) G et al. ;<&=.. ["^ x!!!||& "^ !!!q=q "^ !!!'== "^ . Claviceps purpurea . RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. b. ++;= 20,1. 1442. =<'<&+|;. 46498. 197. 51,6. ='. 97,6.
(113) A ; $;<< # ] G K
(114) ;<&;
(115) A ; G> $ A>
(116) G>$<&&'# et al. ;<<' $ $;;4 R ^ et al. ;<&; E $
(117) ? $ G ^! U A?G!U $; (Simão et al. ;<&_
(118)
(119) ' 4 . 4 > ^[G$q=+# K et al. ;<<_
(120) E ^D$ et al. ;<<+ $ 4 4 D et al. ;<&q
(121) ; x
(122) $
(123)
(124) ; ; K E
(125) & E 3F } &^ "
(126) Geneious 10.0.9 P et al. ;<&;v $ } $
(127) I $~ et al. (2015) and Van # et al. ;<&* >%%E $ | https://
(128) $ ) P ] G ;<&=. > " I >I PAUP q<
(129) &<G ;<<; ;<<.
(130) &<<<. A @ A@ > A =;\} et al. 2012) &<<<<<<<<>!>! ;_
(131) ^ . a. 96,9 56 51,4 219 =''+' 8855 &*&= QEQZ01000000 3U>!;_&|;q!!!'==a #>_+=.
(132). Claviceps arundinis. [\A<&<<<<<< LM576 Claviceps humidiphila. 3U>!;_&|&|!!!q=qa. 9040. =<<__=+&. 97,9. 97,9 *= 51,5 257 =_&='. 97,6. &+=&. =<q++;q=. 126. 214 51,4. 51,4 =<|. 229 =''+q. 28795 =<*';_+q. =<_'+;_< 8960. '<=+. &*=<. 2108. [\[<&<<<<<<. [\!<&<<<<<<. 3U>!;_&+q= LM218. LM454. Claviceps cf. spartinae. Claviceps cf. spartinae. 3U>!;_&+q_. 98. 96,9 =<_. 66 51,9. 51,5 190. 189 41916. 46550 =<*'q'&=. =_+|__'q. 9008. ';=<. &q;=. 1698 LM458 Claviceps purpurea s.lat.. [B<&<<<<<<. [{<&<<<<<<. 3U>!;_&+'+. LM81 Claviceps purpurea s.lat.. 3U>!;_<_+&. '|= 52 51,4 416 21589 8410 LM78 Claviceps purpurea s.lat.. 3U>!;_<_|+. [<&<<<<<<. ;=;&. 28571566. 97,9. 98,6 72. =' 51,7. 51,7 =;|. 269 =;q'q. ;||== =<&''_<' 8777. =<;_&|_' 8977. 2207 [\<&<<<<<<. &'=< [\3<&<<<<<<. Claviceps purpurea s.str.. 3U>!;_&|;=!!!||&a. LM28. LM582. Claviceps purpurea s.str.. 3U>!;_<*q|. Number of protein coding gene models Voucher # Strain Species. Table 1. Statistics of Claviceps } . Version #. number of contigs. Total length (bp). N50 (bp). L50. GC (%). Coverage (x). ART I CLE. Complete BUSCO’s (%). et al.. E } x Claviceps purpurea s.str. and C. cf. spartinae C. humidiphila and C. arundinis C. purpurea s.lat E
(133) & % & E
(134) &q;= ;=;&
(135) K =<+ >
(136) . ;+*>
(137) =_'>
(138) E $ 4! _&_E F_< ;&*
(139) q**
(140) E
(141) A?G!U '*''+*v
(142) +q&<';=< The genome of Claviceps purpurea ;<& F!A@ !4<<<<<<<<& $
(143)
(144) G et al. ;<&= E
(145)
(146) &qq;
(147) ++;=
(148) K =<'>
(149) F_<q*_
(150) 4! _&*
(151)
(152) .
(153)
(154) D $ &'& B A?G!U
(155)
(156) '|* U } Claviceps $ $
(157) . Authors: H.D.T. Nguyen, W. Findlay, K. Dadej, O. Pochopski, P. Shoukouhi, J.G. Menzies, * &' *+/3 6 &7;<=> ; 6 ?@ * Contact: Miao Liu, z IMA FUNGUS.
(158) IMA Genome – F10. IMA Genome-F 10B. INTRODUCTION Fusarium $ 4 et al. ;<&= > +< $ $ associated Fusarium # ] G ;<<* B Fusarium fujikuroi " %%G! _< $
(159)
(160) U 3 et al. 1998, 2000). Fusarium circinatum ^
(161) Pinus spp. and Pseudotsuga menziesii 3 % @
(162)
(163)
(164) 4 et al. 2015). E } 4 A J`<<<<<<<< $ J`<&<<<<<< B et al. 2012). The isolate } %GI=q 4 et al. 1996), has a genetic $
(165) 3 `et al. ;<<|
(166) 3 ` et al. ;<&q
(167) K } $ E# } 3 ` et al. ;<&& ` B et al. 2018). E
(168) 'q+ B et al. ;<&|
(169) "
(170)
(171) q&q_ B et al. 2012, De Vos et al. 2014) and this limits its $ E }
(172) %%G! $
(173) E Fusarium verticillioides } && $
(174) (Ma et al. 2010). This F. verticillioides
(175) " "
(176) %%G!E
(177)
(178) ^ %%G!{et al. 1995, Ma et al. ;<&<B et al. ;<&= ` F et al. ;<&q@ } $
(179) $ F. fujikuroi B et al. ;<&= E
(180) %%G! ! them and F. temperatum $ $ } $ B et al. ;<&= 3 ` et al. 2014). This highlights the fact that $ VOLUME 9 · NO. 2. ART I CLE. Assembling pseudomolecules for the pitch canker pathogen, Fusarium circinatum, utilising additional genome sequence data and synteny within the Fusarium fujikuroi complex.
(181) $ %%G! E $ $
(182)
(183) F. circinatum
(184)
(185)
(186) %%G!% K } ^ } B " K %%G! B et al. ;<&= De Vos et al. ;<&q $ @
(187) complement of F. circinatum E $
(188) ^ }
(189) $$ F. circinatum
(190) $
(191)
(192) %%G!
(193) Fusarium.. SEQUENCED STRAIN USA: Californiax > Pinus radiata), 1996, T.R. Gordon, A.J. Storer & D. Okamoto%GI=q>\!|+|< !>B_&|_;I\[>*;&'| . NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE ACCESSION NUMBER E $
(194) Fusarium circinatum,
(195) 33AJ[>A# 4 A J`<<<<<<<< $ J`<;<<<<<<. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fusarium circinatum "
(196) ;< "
(197) $
(198) ;_!
(199) &;< |3F " > et al&''; 3F} F 3 G } F. circinatum %GI=q PG&| q&q_
(200) B et al. ;<&;@ PG&| P. radiata B ! G ;<<_G et al. 2014). The genomes of F. circinatum %GI=q PG&| } ^
(201). &
(202) K
(203) GU# 3 `q A G } D @ +;q_ &_='_ ^
(204) $ I }
(205) ;< =*
(206) $ !#! 4 B
(207) $_& !#!
(208) . 405.
(209) ART I CLE. et al.. Fig. 2. > "
(210) } £^
(211) &^G et al. 2011, De Vos et al;<&qG }
(212) >%%E$ |P ]G ;<&=E > E $;&|4 ] 4 ;<<=3.
(213) et al.;<&;
(214) ^
(215) E@>;@4
(216) . E $ &'+* " ># I>#$=&4 et al;<&<`
(217)
(218) $ ¤+_E F. circinatum%GI=q bold.. GGI![$;<A K et al. ;<&& K ^
(219) %GI=q
(220) 4 A J`<<<<<<<< B et al. 2012), using ^ 3
(221)
(222) ;<<E $ $ # B }
(223) " K E
(224) && &^&& F. verticillioides E
(225) A#GE et al. 1990) against a local
(226) F. verticillioides genome (DDBJ/EMBL/ 4 A
(227) @><<<<<<<<; !#! 4 B
(228) E
(229) &; &;F. fujikuroiB et al. ;<&= F. temperatumB et al. ;<&_
(230)
(231)
(232) $ E
(233)
(234) $ &<< F G
(235) F. verticillioides and F. fujikuroi and the pseudomolecules of F. circinatum >?> $=;;P Ket al. 2004). E
(236) >P[\ ! et al. ;<<+ K 4 [G E ^D$ et al. ;<<+ G ] > ;<<_ GFIP ;<<q> B et al. ;<&; $ F. verticillioides, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and F. graminearum (Ma et al. ;<&< " } [GE $ F. circinatumB et al. ;<&; . 406. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION E $
(237) Fusarum circinatum,
(238) 33AJ [>A#4 A J`<<<<<<<< $ J`<;<<<<<< E F. circinatum
(239) _+_ $ q= '=; '&;
(240) 3F F_< =*= *==
(241) E $ ;|=+;"4! q|q&
(242)
(243) } Fusarium %%G!> et al. ;<&<B et al. 2012, Jeong et al;<&=B et al.;<&=` Nest et al.;<&q! et al;<&_B et al. 2015a,
(244) F et al;<&|
(245) B et al;<&|4 ;<&+G $ $ et al.;<&+` Bet al;<&+B et al. ;<&+ &q ';=
(246) ^ =='*+ .
(247) I } " F. circinatum (Fig. 2). I . && F. verticillioides I &;
(248)
(249) $ &; F. fujikuroi B '*'|caq;*<>
(250) F. circinatum scaffolds to these 12 pseudomolecules. These
(251) ''<' &_ <*< F. circinatum B et al. 2012). Genomic alignments of these 12 pseudomolecules to the . F. verticillioides and F. fujikuroi . % = E ^
(252) $
(253) $
(254) Fusarium FFSC.. IMA FUNGUS.
(255) IMA Genome – F10. ART I CLE. B. A. Fig. 3. B xA. Fusarium verticillioides F. circinatum pseudomolecules. B. F. fujikuroi to F. circinatum @
(256) $
(257) . CONCLUSIONS \ } $ $ $
(258) Fusarium circinatum K
(259) A K %%G! B et al;<&=3 `et al;<&q
(260) &;
(261) E
(262) F. circinatum $
(263)
(264) } . $ of F. circinatum E $
(265) }
(266) $ $
(267)
(268) %%G!@ " . %%G! ^
(269) E
(270) $
(271) $ Authors: ? Y Z7[ \] *;3;; 6^ _Y. `{ *3>;|} ; 6~' ]73 *Contact:
(272) z
(273) K. VOLUME 9 · NO. 2. IMA Genome-F 10C. Draft genome sequence of Quambalaria eucalypti INTRODUCTION The genus Quambalaria (Quambalariaceae, Microstromatales, Exobasidiomycetes, Basidiomycotina
(274) Myrtaceae (De A et al. 2006, Pegg et al. ;<<'E " Q. coyrecup . Corymbia calophylla B I et al. 2008), and Q. cyanescens
(275) P et al. ;<&_ E }
(276)
(277) P R et al. 2006). Of the leaf and shoot pathogens in the genus, Q. pitereka and Q. eucalypti Quambalaria pitereka affects Corymbia (Pegg et al. 2009) and China (Zhou et al. ;<<+ Q. eucalypti causes disease on Eucalyptus G B et al. &''=A K et al. 2001)? (I Ket al. 2008) (Pegg et al. 2008), I A § et al. 2015). \ Quambalariaceae " 3 A et al. ;<<*P ;<&|I et al. 2008), (Pegg et al. ;<<';<&&D $
(278) ^
(279) .
(280) Malasseziales3 A et al. ;<<*B et al. ;<&_
(281) % . 407.
(282) et al.. ART I CLE. ##
(283) ¨
(284) ##
(285)
(286)
(287) . ##
(288) ##
(289)
(290)
(291)
(292). . Q. cyanescens. ##
(293)
(294)
(295) ##
(296) ¨
(297)
(298)
(299)
(300) . .
(301)
(302)
(303) . Q. simpsonii.
(304) . #
(305)
(306) . #
(307)
(308)
(309). Q. eucalypti. #
(310) ¨ #
(311)
(312)
(313) ##
(314)
(315)
(316) ##
(317)
(318)
(319)
(320) ##
(321)
(322)
(323) . Q. pitereka. ##
(324)
(325)
(326) ##
(327)
(328)
(329) . #
(330)
(331)
(332)
(333) #
(334)
(335)
(336)
(337). . #
(338)
(339)
(340). Q. coyrecup. #
(341)
(342)
(343)
(344)
(345) . .
(346)
(347) . 0.005. Fig. 4 I ># \ ">#
(348) @EG } } species of QuambalariaE 3F "
(349) E "^ vFEF E. vFGBF GB vBB v #3 G $
(350) &<<<
(351) $
(352) $ |_ . " Quambalariaceae $
(353) " \ ^
(354) " Ustilaginomycotina species in Microstromatales $ $ Quambalariaceae P et al. ;<&+ B } $
(355)
(356) " $
(357) et al. 2014), the Malasseziales{et al. ;<<| Polyporales (James et al. ;<&= E } Q. eucalyptiE } " $ $$ D } !>B&&<& I\[> _&<+' Q. eucalypti.. 408. SEQUENCED STRAIN South Africa: KwaZulu Natalx P
(358)
(359) Eucalyptus grandis E4&; > &'+| - /012345 !>B&&<&!AG&&++qq "^ v I\[> _&<+' . NUCLEOTIDE ACCESSION NUMBER E } Quambalaria eucalypti
(360) 4 A I\\!<<<<<<<< E $ \\!<&<<<<<<.. MATERIALS AND METHODS 4 3F " > ;> " <_ " v; IMA FUNGUS.
(361) IMA Genome – F10. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION E } $ =&
(362) '**
(363) ;;__+=
(364)
(365) qq'
(366) $ K ;q=+q
(367) F_<$ *;*<<
(368) E K ;=_ >
(369) K 4! *<E K K Exobasidiomycetes &|>
(370) &'>
(371) " Tilletia caries K ;'_>
(372) P ;<&=G et al. 2014, Toome et al. ;<&qB et al. ;<&_ P et al. 2018). BUSCO
(373) +q_E
(374) &&;+ A?G!U &<'= ^A?G!U=_ A?G!U &;' A?G!U |+ A?G!U &==_ A?G!U ?4?GE?G |;q& $ I } } " Q. eucalypti (Fig. 4).E $
(375) Q. eucalypti
(376) . $ Quambalariaceae $
(377) Exobasidiomycetes. G $$ $ Authors: S.W. Morgan, T. A. Duong, M. Coetzee, M.J. ; Y _/* *Contact:
(378) z
(379) K.
(380) I et al. ;<<< ! et al. 2009, D et al. 2011)E $ T. destructans @ &''* B et al. 1996)
(381) E ` [ E # ! G (Old et al. ;<<= A et al. ;<<* A
(382) et al. ;<&; 4 et al. 2016)@
(383)
(384) ^ ^ ^ Eucalyptus camaldulensis, E. grandis and E. urophylla
(385) species B et al. 1996, Old et al. ;<<=A
(386) ;<<q. E T. destructans $
(387)
(388) $
(389) Eucalyptus et al. 2011). E $ T. destructans on clonal E. grandis × E. urophylla G . et al. ;<&& 4 et al. 2016). G
(390) $ . of T. destructans $ Eucalyptus species $ $ (Old et al. ;<<=@ } G T. destructans is. . E $
(391) } T. destructans $
(392) $$ $ " . G
(393) $ $ $ . ART I CLE. A
(394) > G
(395)
(396) Duong et al. ;<&=E 3F > GP ^
(397). _<<
(398) K } @ D };_<< ;_<
(399) ^ &<<{$ E } !#! 4 B
(400) $|_&!#!
(401)
(402) } de novo
(403) . E
(404) $ A ? $ G ^! U A?G!U $ &&
(405) & Basidiomycota dataset (Simao et al. ;<&_E
(406) $==;G et al. 2008) using ^ Ustilago maydis.. SEQUENCED STRAIN South Africa: Kwa-Zulu Natalx P
(407)
(408) Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla, ;<&_ I. Greyling !>Bqq'*;I\[>*;;<| . NUCLEOTIDE ACCESSION NUMBER The Teratosphaeria destructans B 4 G
(409) 33AJ[F4 A \@A<<<<<<<<E $
(410) $ \@A<&<<<<<<. MATERIALS AND METHODS IMA Genome-F 10D. Draft genome sequence of the Eucalyptus pathogen Teratosphaeria destructans INTRODUCTION The genus Teratosphaeria VOLUME 9 · NO. 2. Teratosphaeria destructans !>B qq'*;
(411) !>B % A @ %A@ ? $ I ^ 4 et al. 2016) >[ " vA
(412) G v <= " v U" A
(413) ;_ ! K ^ 3F " " =< K ^ _ . 409.
(414) et al.. ART I CLE.
(415)
(416)
(417)
(418)
(419)
(420)
(421) . Fig. 5. > " # Teratosphaeria } Teratosphaeria destructans. E £^
(422) [%&^
(423) $ $ et al. ;<&q et al. 2018)..
(424) &= $ . I`I G Steinheim " % I %I&;< K
(425) !
(426) !G
(427) } *_<!EA "
(428) &<<>E ^D!D+v;_ >[3Ev;>F !v=_!EAv;G3G;_<< # G Steinheim q_$$ £^
(429) *<! ;< &_ $ x ;qx& " &_ +&<< g E ^ " &_ $ x ;qx& &_ &*=<<gE
(430) &_ >
(431) =< ;<!&_$
(432) =<
(433) ;q!E ;< &*=<<g to collect 3F |< E 3F $ _<E[E ^[3E
(434) E % G B NC). E 3F
(435) ! % !% G
(436) ? $ G
(437) G } @4 G G_F "^4 G } @_=< &; *<<
(438) . E
(439) GI $ =&;< F et al. ;<&= ^$ ;&==__||'' &;|E . 410.
(440) $ A ? $ G ^!U A?G!U$;<& (Simão et al. 2015)A ;$&&; G>$&_ $
(441) $
(442)
(443)
(444) (Li et al. ;<<' # ] G K
(445) ;<&; ?GE $ _<&> et al. ;<&+ genome statistics. E £^
(446) &^ [%&^ Teratosphaeria $ et al. 2014) " the T. destructans } E } $
(447) } $ et al. ;<&q et al. 2018) F!A@
(448) x
(449) $
(450) I 3 et al. 2008, 2010) E included a MUSCLE alignment [ ;<<q 4
(451) ! ;<<<
(452) I># 4 ] 4 ;<<= $ ]4 ;<<*.. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION E
(453) =;=&*&;<
(454)
(455) q&=; U &+=| _<<
(456) =&*&>
(457) E 4! _&+= F_< $ &<= &&'
(458) IMA FUNGUS.
(459) IMA Genome – F10. Authors: F.A. Lane*, C.T. Tatham, J. Aylward, M. Havenga, P.M. Wilken, T.A. Duong, M.A. van der Nest, ; _Y *Contact% # z%A@ K.
(460)
(461)
(462)
(463) Xyleborini, Corthylini and Xyloterini $ > et al. ;<&_E "
(464) Chalaropsis
(465) genus Huntiella
(466)
(467) 3 A et al. 2014). The genus Davidsoniella D.eucalypti, D. neocaledoniae and D. australis D. virescens
(468)
(469) F 3 A et al. 2014). @
(470) Davidsoniella eucalypti $ Eucalyptus P et al. 1996).
(471) K pathogenic (Kile et al. &''* @ D. virescens, D. australis, and D. neocaledoniae ^ Acer spp.), Nothofagus cunninghamii P &''= Coffea robusta 3 &'_< $ Davidsoniella eucalypti and D. virescens " 3 A et al. ;<&q $
(472) D. virescens D. eucalypti D. et al. &''+ B } D. virescens
(473) B et al. ;<&_
(474) D. eucalypti
(475)
(476) Davidsoniella } E
(477)
(478) $ . ART I CLE. ='+ |_|
(479) K #_< $ 'q E $ $
(480) &|<"E
(481) A?G!U '_+* ;|+ $ $ A?G!U ;'< E } Teratosphaeria destructans.
(482) }
(483) % _ ! et al. ;<&& 4 et al. ;<&* A ] B ;<&| $
(484) } $
(485) E $
(486) Teratosphaeria
(487) Eucalyptus D et al. 2011)G $ $ of fungal species P et al. 2011, Condon et al. ;<&= O et al. ;<&= 3 et al. 2017) E $
(488) } $ $ ^ (Gnocato et al. ;<&| \ et al. 2018)
(489) $ $ $ . IMA Genome-F 10E. Draft nuclear genome assembly for Davidsoniella eucalypti. SEQUENCED STRAIN Australia: Victoria: !
(490)
(491) E ! Eucalyptus sieberi,&'+'M.J. Dudzinski!>B=;_q !*='3\|<;<_ . INTRODUCTION E Ceratocystidaceae $
(492) . && 3 A et al. ;<&q;<&|> et al. 2015, Nel et al. ;<&+E
(493) ^ Ceratocystis, a genus the mango and Acacia mangium pathogen C. manginecans et al. ;<&= E et al. 2011) and the causal C. cacaofunesta A [
(494) ] D. ;<<_ G Endoconidiophora and Thielaviopsis $ >
(495) et al. ;<&qB et al. ;<&=E Bretziella and Berkeleyomyces . ^ Br. fagacearum $ Ceratocystis fagacearumv3 A et al. ;<&| ^ Be. basiola Thielaviopsis basicolav Nel et al. ;<&+ > Ceratocystidaceae
(496)
(497)
(498) ` B et al. ;<&=@ Ambrosiella, Meredithiella, and Phialophoropsis VOLUME 9 · NO. 2. NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE ACCESSION NUMBER E B 4 G Davidsoniella eucalypti !>B =;_q
(499) 33AJ [F4 A \>AB<<<<<<<< E $
(500) $ \>AB<&<<<<<<. MATERIALS AND METHODS Davidsoniella eucalypti !>B =;_q
(501) % A @ %A@ ; " >[x;$A
(502) G ;_!&q^ 3F " $
(503) ^ \" et al. ;<<qE 3F
(504) > G P ^ } I A G G ^ G>\E . 411.
(505) ART I CLE. et al.. I A } E
(506) } @ D G } ;_<< > %
(507). __<
(508) K ^ ;_<
GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN
And on the next page, a map of Pakistan shows how the country is embedded in a security complex marked by hostile perceived powers (India and Afghanistan), a distrustful perceived
Phenotypes, genotypes and disease susceptibility associated with gene copy number variations: complement C4 CNVs in European American healthy subjects and those with systemic
Annotated elements were divided over six annotation tracks: (i) genes (includes pseudogenes, shown in grey), (ii) putative operons, (iii) TSSs and terminators, (iv) predicted
When participants are experiencing positive emotion and the spatial hypothesis is true, we should expect to see a flattening of the slope representing the relation between amount
Daarnaast wordt verwacht dat een hogere score op angst leidt tot een hogere score op collectieve actie wanneer sprake is van een hoge score op efficacy.. Als laatste wordt verwacht
209 Parties engaged in the process of collective bargaining, especially the trade unions, tend to abuse the right to strike by threatening to or out rightly
Question ten, in your opinion do you think the management and governing structures of schools in general do enough to ensure the safe participation of sport organiser
More recently, tumour metabolism was linked to C/EBPβ-mediated cytokine production in triple negative breast cancer tumour development, where data show that the high glycolytic