UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
Radiating top quarks
Gosselink, M.Publication date 2010
Link to publication
Citation for published version (APA):
Gosselink, M. (2010). Radiating top quarks.
http://www.nikhef.nl/pub/services/biblio/theses_pdf/thesis_M_Gosselink.pdf
General rights
It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulations
If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
B
Generator comparison
B.1
MC@NLO, Alpgen, and AcerMC
The following figures show comparisons between MC@NLO, Alpgen, and AcerMC of the transverse momentum distributions of top quarks, t¯t pairs, and jets in semi-leptonic
t¯t events at √s = 14 TeV. All distributions are normalised to unity.
[1/0.1 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 [1/0.1 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia (top) ) [GeV] T ( p 10 log -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5 (top) ) [GeV] T ( p 10 log -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia (top) [GeV] T p 0 100 200 300 400 500 ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5 (top) [GeV] T p 0 100 200 300 400 500 ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5
Figure B.1: Transverse momentum of the top quarks.
[1/0.1 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 [1/0.1 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia ) ) [GeV] t (t T ( p 10 log -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 ratio 0.51.0 1.5 ) ) [GeV] t (t T ( p 10 log -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 ratio 0.51.0 1.5 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia ) [GeV] t (t T p 0 100 200 300 400 500 ratio 1.00.5 1.5 ) [GeV] t (t T p 0 100 200 300 400 500 ratio 1.00.5 1.5
Figure B.2: Transverse momentum of the top quark pair.
141
Appendix B. Generator comparison Fraction of events 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 Fraction of events 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 MC@NLO/HerwigAlpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia jets N 0 5 10 15 ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5 jets N 0 5 10 15 ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia [GeV] T jet p 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5 [GeV] T jet p 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5
Figure B.3: Jet spectrum and transverse momentum of all jets (pT > 7 GeV, |η| <5.0).
[1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia [GeV] T leading jet p 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 ratio 1.00.5 1.5 [GeV] T leading jet p 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 ratio 1.00.5 1.5 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia [GeV] T subleading jet p 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 ratio 0.51.0 1.5 [GeV] T subleading jet p 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 ratio 0.51.0 1.5
Figure B.4: Transverse momentum of the leading and subleading jet.
[1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia [GeV] T
leading extra jet p
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
ratio 1.00.5 1.5
[GeV]
T
leading extra jet p
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 ratio 1.00.5 1.5 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 1 [1/25.0 GeV] T /dp σ d × σ 1/ -4 10 -3 10 -2 10 -1 10 1 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia [GeV] T
subleading extra jet p
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
ratio 0 2
[GeV]
T
subleading extra jet p
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
ratio 0 2
Figure B.5: Transverse momentum of the first and second extra jet (not from top de-cay).
B
B.2. AcerMC/Pythia: ISR and FSR variation [1/0.4] η /d σ d × σ 1/ 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 [1/0.4] η /d σ d × σ 1/ 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia η
leading extra jet
-4 -2 0 2 4
ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5
η
leading extra jet
-4 -2 0 2 4 ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5 [1/0.4] η /d σ d × σ 1/ 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 [1/0.4] η /d σ d × σ 1/ 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 MC@NLO/Herwig Alpgen/Herwig AcerMC/Pythia η
subleading extra jet
-4 -2 0 2 4
ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5
η
subleading extra jet
-4 -2 0 2 4
ratio 0.5 1.0 1.5
Figure B.6: Pseudo-rapidity of the first and second extra jet (not from top decay).
B.2
AcerMC/Pythia: ISR and FSR variation
Three different AcerMC/Pythia samples are available for the simulation of t¯t events with full detector simulation (Appendix A). The samples have different settings for the initial state radiation and final state radiation parameters:
‘005205’ with the default ATLAS settings;
‘006250’ with enhanced ISR and reduced FSR;
‘006251’ with reduced ISR and enhanced FSR.
The variation in ISR and FSR parameters leads to either a higher (006250) or a lower (006251) reconstructed hadronic top mass. The impact on the selection, reconstruction, and combined efficiency for the t¯t cross section measurement in Chapter 5 is demon-strated in Table B.1. Note the opposite effects on the selection and reconstruction effi-ciencies, which diminish the effect on the combined efficiency. This is similar to what is observed when varying the jet energy scale (Section 5.6.5).
sample muon channel electron channel
ǫǫǫsel ǫǫǫrec ǫǫǫcomb ǫǫǫsel ǫǫǫrec ǫǫǫcomb
005205 24.67 16.65 4.11 19.16 16.22 3.11
006250 27.45 15.86 4.36 21.27 15.75 3.35
006251 22.45 18.58 4.17 17.61 18.39 3.24
Table B.1: The selection, reconstruction, and combined efficiencies (in %) for t¯t events in the electron and muon channel for various ISR/FSR settings in AcerMC.
143