• No results found

Tabel 1: gemiddelden en standaardafwijkingen, tussen haakjes, van alle 18 waarden die gemeten zijn voor de identiteit en de legitimiteit.

Identiteit Legitimiteit Vijandigheid - Behulpzaamheid 1,02 (0,14) 1,00 (0,30) Doelloos – Ambitieus 0,39 (0,53) 0,31 (0,45) Ongehoorzaamheid – Gehoorzaamheid 0 0 Partijdigheid – Eerlijkheid 0,15 (0,46) 0,13 (0,45) Haat – Liefde 0,22 (0,46) 0,18 (0,38) Chaos - Structuur 0,01 (010) 0 Onverschilligheid -Inlevingsvermogen 0,62 (0,53) 0,52 (0,58) Wraakzuchtig - Vergevingsgezindheid 0 0 Onbetrouwbaar - Verantwoordelijkheid 0,03 (0,17) 0 Stompzinnigheid - Intelligentie 0,02 (0,14) 0,01 (0,13) Incompetentie - Deskundigheid 0,35 (0,55) 0,34 (0,57) Ongeordendheid - Netheid 0 0 Onafhankelijkheid - Afhankelijkheid 0 0 Instabiliteit - Zelfbeheersing 0 0 Ongemanierdheid - Beleefdheid 0 0 Bekrompenheid - Ruimdenkendheid 0,30 (0,49) 0,54 (0,54) Lafheid - Moed 0,17 (0,40) 0,17 (0,38) Woede - Blijdschap 0,40 (0,52) 0,43 (0,53)

Literatuurlijst

 Abbratt, R. & Klein, N. (2012). Corporate Identity, corporate branding and corporate reputations. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 1048–1063.

 Albert, S. & Whetten, D.A. (1985). Organizational identity. In L.L. Cummings and M.M. Staw (Eds), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, (7), 95-263.

 Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1996). Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. In J. A. C. Baum & J. E. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic

management, (13), 17-62. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

 Aust, P.J. (2004). Communicated values as indicators of organizational identity: A method for organizational assessment and its application in a case study.

Communication Studies, 55(4), 515-534.

 Balmer, J.M.T., Stuart H. & Greyser, S.A. (2009). Aligning Identity and Strategy: corporate branding at British airways in the late 20th century. California Management

Review, 51(3), 6-23.

 Bortree, D. S., & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317-319.

 Bruce, I. (1995), “Do not-for-profits value their customers and their needs?”,

International Marketing Review, 12(4), 77-84.

Cense, C., Constandse, P., de la Fuente, A., & Klap, P. (2012, april). Goede doelen

rapport 2012. Geraadpleegd op 11 november 2015, van: http://www.cbf.nl/Uploaded_files/Zelf/VFIGoedeDoelenRapport2012.pdf.

 Christensen, L.T., & Cornelissen J. (2011). Bridging corporate and organizational communication: Review, development and a look into the future. Management

Communication Quarterly, 25(3), 383-414.

 DeSanctis, D. & Poole, M.S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.

 Dolnicar, S., & Lavareszki, K. (2009). Marketing in non-profit organizations: an international perspective. International Marketing Review, 26(3), 275–291.

 Dowling, G.R. (2001). Creating corporate reputations: Identity, image, and performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational Legitimicay: Social Values and Organizational Behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122 – 135.

 Elsevier Top 500: de grootste bedrijven van Nederland (2015, november 11).

Geraadpleegd op 12 november 2015, van:

http://www.elsevier.nl/Economie/achtergrond/2015/11/Elseviers-Top-500-de-grootste- bedrijven-van-Nederland-2716441W/

Fournier, S., & Avery, J. (2011). The uninvited brand. Business Horizons, 54(3), 193- 207.

 Gallagher, K. & Weinberg, C.B. (1991). “Coping with success: new challenges for non-profit marketing”, Sloane Management Review, 33(1), 27-42.

 Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

 Giddens (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

 Gitlin, T. (2002). Media sociology: The dominant paradigm. In D, McQuail (Ed.), McQuail's reader in mass communication theory, 25-35. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 Grunig, 1. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2002). The dynamics of organizational identity. Human

relations, 55(8), 989-1018.

 Kaplan, A.M. & Haenlein, M. (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68.

 Kelleher, T. (2009). Conversational Voice, Communicated Commitment, and Public Relations Outcomes in Interactive Online Communication. Journal of

Communication, 59(1), 172-188.

 Kent, M. (2010). Directions in social media for professionals and scholars. In R. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relations, 447-460. Sage, New York.

 Kietzmann, J.H., Herkens, K., McCarthy, I.P. & Silvestre, B. (2011) Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business

 Lauzen, M. M., & Dozier, D. M. (1994). Issues management mediation of linkages between environmental complexity and management of the public relations function.

Journal of Public Relations Research, 6, 163-184.

 Lovejoy, K. & Saxton, G.D. (2012). Information, Community, and Action: How Non- profit Organisations Use Social Media. Journal of Computer Mediated

Communication, 17(3), 337-353.

 Luoma-aho, V., & Vos, M. (2010). Towards a more dynamic stakeholder model: acknowledging multiple issue arenas. Corporate Communications: an International

Journal, 15(3), 315-331.

 Macnamara, J. (2010). ‘Emergent’ media and public communication: understanding the changing mediascape. Public Communication Review, 1(2), 3-17.

 Macnamara, J. & Zerfass, A. (2012). Social media communication in Organisations: The challenges of balancing openness, strategy and management, International

Journal of Strategic Communication, 6, 287–308.

 Murphy, P. (2011). Contextual distortion: Strategic communication vs. the networked nature of everything. Paper presented at the International Communication Association 2011 preconference, “Strategic communication – A concept at the center of applied communications,” Boston, MA.

 Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organisations. Organisation Science, 3(2), 398 - 412.

 Parsons, T. (1960) Structure and Process in Modern Societies. New York: Free Press.

 Patriotta, G., Gond, J. P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804-1836.

 Perrow, C. (1970). Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View. Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth.

 Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

 Phillips, N., & Malhotra, N. (2008). ‘Taking social construction seriously: extending the discursive approach in institutional theory’. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, 602–720.

 Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). ‘Discourse and institutions’. Academy of Management Review, 29, 635–52.

 Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

Servaes, J. (1999). Communication for development: One world, multiple cultures. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

 Top 24 goede doelen scoort gemiddeld beter; grote individuele verschillen (2014, juni 25). Geraadpleegd op 11 november 2015, van: http://www.filanthropium.nl/achtergrond/top-24-goede-doelen-scoort-gemiddeld- beter-grote-individuele-verschillen/

Van Belleghem, S. (2012). The story of the conversation company. E-paper.

 Van Noort, G., Willemsen, L. M., Kerkhof, P., & Verhoeven, J.W.M. (2014). Webcare as an integrative tool for customer care, reputation management, and online marketing: A literature review. In P. J. Kitchen and E. Uzunoglu (Eds.), Integrated

Communications in the Post-Modern Era.

 Van Ruler, B., & Verčič, D. (Eds.). (2004). Public relations and communication management in Europe: A nation-by-nation introduction into public relations theory and practice. New York: Mouton DeGruyter.

 Van Ruler, B., & Verčič, D. (2005). Reflective communication management: Future ways for public relations research. Communication Yearbook, 29, 239-273.

 Van Ruler, B., Vercic, D., Bütschi, G., & Flodin, B. (2000). European body of knowledge on public relations/communication management. Report of the Delphi project 2000, Gent, Ljubljana: EUPRERA.

 Van Ruler, B., Vercic, D., Bütschi, G., & Flodin, B. (2001). Public relations in Europe: A kaleidoscopic picture. Journal of Communication Management, 6, 166– 175.

 Waters, R. D. (2009). The use of social media by nonprofit organizations: An examination from the diffusion of innovations perspective. In press in: Dumova, T., & Fiordo, R. (Eds.), Handbook of research on social interaction technologies and collaboration software: Concepts and trends. IGI Publishing: Hershey, PA.

 Waters, R., D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public

Relations Review, 35, 102 – 106.

 Young, L.E. & Leonardi, P.M. (2012). Social issue emergence on the web: A dual structurational model. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 17(2), 231- 246.