3.1 Introdu tion
Hierar hi algalaxyformationisanatural onsequen eofthe urrent osmologi al
model. Manyoftheoldeststarsareexpe tedtohaveformedinsmallgalaxies,long
beforetheywereswallowedupintolargerobje ts,andsomeareexpe tedtohave
formedin-situorevaporatedfromearlylow-massglobular lusters. Consequently,
the oldest stars provide a fossil re ord of the beginnings of galaxy formation.
Eventhoughthesestarsonly ompriseatinyfra tionofthemassofpresent-day
galaxies,theirstudyisthereforeworthwhile. TheGalaxyisauniqueenvironment
in whi h to tra e old stars, be ause stellar populations an beisolated
star-by-star,eveninregionswherethesurfa ebrightnessiswellbelowobservationallimits
inexternalgalaxies.
Extensivestudies ofthestardistribution in theGala ti outskirts havebeen
undertaken(mostly in the Northern hemisphere) and have revealed a wealth of
substru tureintheformofstreamsandsatellites leareviden eofpasta retion
andmerger pro esses(York et al.(2000); Ahnet al.(2014) and Skrutskieet al.
(2006)). Also, the overall stru tural parameters of the stellar halo have been
measured, yielding a pi ture of an ellipsoidal distribution with a radial density
proleintheformofabrokenpower law. Asdatahaveimproved,ithasbe ome
possible to probethe halo with fainter, more abundantstars, lose to themain
sequen e turno: a signi ant advan e over older studies based on horizontal
bran horredgiantstars.
In this paper we usedeep photometry from theKilo DegreeSurvey (KiDS)
obtainedwiththeVLTSurveyTeles ope(VST)anditswide-eld amera
Omega-CAMto probemain sequen eturn-o(MSTO)stars outto distan esof60kp .
TheKiDS maindistinguishingattributes arebothitsfootprinton theSouthern
skyanditsoutstanding depth, wi h makeit ompetitivein termsofthedistant
andfaint orthe otherwiseun harted halo. Wesplit the urrentKiDS datainto
tenbroad linesof sightthrough theGala ti halo to onstrainitsgeneralstellar
stru tureandprobepotentialsubstru ture. We ombinethemwithpreviousdata
fromtheCanada-Fran e-HawaiiTeles ope(CFHT)MegaCamandtheWideField
Camera(WFC)attheIsaa NewtonTeles ope(INT)providingeightadditional
linesofsightin orderto in reaseits onstrainingpower(Pila-Díezet al.2015).
Inse tion2wedes ribetheobservationsandthedatapro essingrelevanttoour
stellar atalogues and to ouranalysis. Inse tion 3 we over the star sele tion,
thebuildingofthedensityprolesandthesmoothhalomodelsthatwe onsider.
Finally,in se tion4wedis ussandgive ontexttoourndings,andinse tion5
wesummarizeour on lusions.
of imaging 1500 square degrees of extragala ti sky in four opti al broad-band
lters (
u
,g
,r
andi
). The survey area is split between two elds, one in thenorthernandone inthesouthernGala ti ap. Aimedprimarily at onstraining
thedark matterdistribution in theuniverse through weakgravitationallensing,
KiDS delivers deep and high quality images with typi al image quality (PSF
FWHM) ranging from
0 .7 ′′
inr
to1 .1 ′′
inu
. KiDS limiting magnitudes areapproximately2magnitudesfainterthanthoseofSDSS:
24 .3
inu
,25 .1
ing
,24 .9
in
r
and23 .7
ini
.Theindividualpointingsare1
×
1deg 2
. Theyarebuiltupfromfour(u
)orve(
gri
)ditherstollinter-CCDgaps,withea hpositionvisitedon eforea hlter,yielding the nal survey depth in one go. During the rst years of operation,
the GalaxyAnd Mass Assembly (GAMA, Driver et al. 2011) elds have been
prioritizedtomaximizethesynergywiththesedeepspe tros opi data.
The KiDS data used in this work are from the rst and se ond publi data
releases. Figure3.1 showsthelo ation ofthein ludedelds onthe skyandthe
planned nal overage. A detailed des ription of thedata redu tion isprovided
in therelease notes oron theKiDS website 1
, but here followsa brief summary.
Following ross-talk orre tion, satellite tra k removaland at-elding, an
illu-mination orre tion is appliedin orderto atten the photometryover the
eld-of-view. Thephotometri alibrationisbasedonnightlyzeropoints,after whi h
theoverlapsbetweenCCDsfromthedierentditherpositionsareusedtotieall
CCDsanddither together,resultingin photometry onsistent tothe12% level
overthefulleld-of-view. Smallabsolutezeropointosetsbetweenpointings
per-sistsin ethe pat hy distribution of thein luded surveytiles yet preventsa full
ross- alibration. Aftersolvingfortheastrometri solutionofallditherstogether,
sta ked images are produ ed togetherwith weightmaps, masksfor bright stars
andotherimagedefe ts,andsour e atalogs. Thesta kedimagesprovidedinthe
publi datareleases formtheinputforourfurtheranalysis.
We arry outa point-spread fun tion(PSF)homegenization a ross ea h
im-age.Thishomogenizationprovidesimprovedxedaperturephotometry, orre ted
shape measurements and, indire tly, rened olours and enhan ed star-galaxy
separation. The odeforthePSFhomogenizationdes ribedin(Pila-Díezetal.
2014) measures the shapes of the bright stars a ross a given image, maps the
varying PSF and nally onvolves the map with a spatially variable kernel in
ordertoreturngaussianPSFs.
Fromtheseimages,photometri "GaussianApertureandPSF(GAaP)"
ata-loguesareprodu edusingGaussianapertureweightfun tions
ω 2 ·exp[−r 2 /2(ω 2 − p 2 )] /(ω 2 −p 2 )
atthepositionsofSExtra tor-dete tedsour es. Aslongasthe aper-tureradiusω
islargerthantheGaussianPSFdispersionp
,thisaperturefun tionyields the orre t total ux for isolated point sour es (irrespe tive of
ω
). Forextendedsour es,however,these apertureuxesin reasewith
ω
.1
http://kids.strw.leidenuniv.nl/DR2
Figure 3.1: Equatorial map showing the position of all theKiDS elds used in
this work (Data Releases 1 and 2). The dierent olours indi ate the lines of
sight in whi h the elds have been grouped to al ulate the dierent density
proles. The ba kground image is the SDSS-DR8 density map from Koposov
etal.(2012),whi hshowsthefootprintoftheSagittariusstreamandthelo ation
fotheSagittariusdwarfgalaxy. Theredlinedenotestheexpe tedKiDSfootprint
upon ompletion ofthesurvey.
3.2.2 Catalogues
Starsandgalaxiesareseparatedbymeasuringtheiruxat
ω = 0.5”
and0 .7”
aper-turesintherband,andkeepingonlythosesour eswith
F 0.5 /F 0.7 ∈ [0.975, 1.025]
,that aredete ted at
> 5σ
signi an e. A stellar ompleteness limitofr = 23.2
magisimposedtoavoid ontaminationbythesmall,round,faintergalaxies. And
dupli ateobje tsonoverlappingtilesareremoved.
The apparent magnitudes are dereddened using the interstellar extin tion
maps from S hlegel et al. (1998), and the GAaP photometry is orre ted for
a tile-based seeing dependen y dete ted on the KiDS-to-SDSS osets (see
Fig-ure 3.2). This dependen y, a sign of residual ux at large radii after the PSF
Gaussianization, is orre ted through dire t measurements (if the tile overlaps
with SDSS data) or through a lter-spe i interpolation. On e orre ted for
theseosets,GAaPprovidesamu hsmootherandatterphotometryona
star-by-star a ountthanother photometrymeasuringtools,sin eit orre tsforthe
PSFvariationa rossea heldofview. LastwetransformtheKiDSmagnitudes
totheSDSSsystembyappyingthe olourterms:
u SDSS = u KiDS + 0 .053 · (u KiDS − g KiDS ) − 0.0028 · (g KiDS − r KiDS ) g SDSS = g KiDS + 0 .053 · (g KiDS − r KiDS )
r SDSS = r KiDS + 0 .336 · (g KiDS − r KiDS )
i SDSS = i KiDS − 0.012 · (r KiDS − i KiDS ) − 0.0004 · (g KiDS − r KiDS )
Table3.1: GroupsofpointingsofKiDSasshowninFigures3.1,3.4,3.5aand3.6a.
Thetableshowsthe entral oordinatesforea hgroup,thenumberofindividual
eldsof view ontributingto it, itstotalarea andthestellar ompletenesslimit
intherband.
GroupKiDS- RA(deg) De (deg)
l
(deg)b
(deg)n fields Σ
(deg2
) maglim,r,∗
North220W 233.395758 0.12301 4.996485 42.63794 5 5.55 23.2
North220E 218.282384 -0.30425 348.794941 53.26131 24 24.45 23.2
North180W 183.806111 -0.02812 283.687780 61.48308 18 18.23 23.2
North180E 176.151782 -0.38023 269.928812 58.14329 19 18.29 23.2
North135W 138.175020 0.10505 230.730761 31.01870 17 18.49 23.2
North135E 131.554071 0.76375 226.214265 25.68091 20 19.78 23.2
South45W 46.602118 -32.24177 231.091424 -60.36720 8 9.68 23.2
South45E 35.744934 -31.99697 232.203287 -69.55028 6 5.52 23.2
South-15W 351.902387 -31.61901 14.081849 -71.22605 4 4.93 23.2
South-15E 342.302882 -31.81892 15.507201 -63.07876 12 13.29 23.2
Thenalphotometryfollowstheexpe ted olour- olourstellarlo ifromCovey
etal.(2007)(seeFigure3.3).
FinallytheKiDS eldsaresplitintenbroadlinesofsightbasedontheirsky
distribution (seeFigure 3.1). Thenumber ofelds per line of sight, the entral
oordinatesoftheselinesofsightandtheirae tiveareaarere ordedinTable3.1.
Theee tive areas havebeen al ulated basedon a nely spatially binned grid
wherewe ountthenumber ofstarsper binas awayto determinethe ombined
ee tofmasksandweightsandtilesedgesoverthenal atalogue ofstars.