Advies ‘Van detineren naar re-integreren’ 2017
Advies ‘Van detineren naar re-integreren’ (advies van de Raad voor Strafrechtstoepassing en Jeugdbescherming van juli 2017 aan de Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie).
Arai-Takahashi 2002
Y. Arai-Takahashi, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR, Antwerpen: Intersentia 2002.
Beek, van de, NJB 2012/1172
P. van de Beek, ‘De menselijke wil in het recht. Vragen de neurowetenschappen om herbezinning of zingt ieder vogeltje nog steeds zoals het gebekt is?’, NJB 2012/1172, afl. 19, p. 1397-1403.
Bennett 2018
C. Bennett, ‘Intrusive Intervention and Opacity Respect’, in: Birks & Douglas 2018, p. 256-273.
Birks & Douglas 2018
D. Birks & T. Douglas, Treatment for Crime. Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice, New York: Oxford University Press 2018.
Brems & Gerards 2014
E. Brems & J. Gerards, Shaping Rights in the ECHR: the Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights, New York: Cambridge University Press 2014.
Bublitz 2013
J.C. Bublitz, ‘My Mind is Mine!? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept’, in: E. Hildt & A.
Franke, Cognitive Enhancement: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Dordrecht: Springer 2013, p. 233-264.
51
Bublitz, Journal of Applied Philosophy 2016, p. 88-106
J.C. Bublitz, ‘Moral Enhancement and Mental Freedom’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 2016, vol. 33(1), p. 88-106.
Bublitz 2018
J.C. Bublitz, “The Soul is the Prison of the Body’. Mandatory Moral Enhancement, Punishment, and Rights Against Neurorehabilitation’, in: Birks & Douglas 2018, p. 289-320.
Bublitz, Neuroethics 2019, p. 23-34
J.C. Bublitz, ‘Saving the World through Sacrificing Liberties? A Critique of some Normative Arguments in Unfit for the Future’, Neuroethics 2019, vol. 12, p. 23-34.
Bublitz & Merkel, Bioethics 2019, p. 360-374
J.C. Bublitz & R. Merkel, ‘Autonomy and authenticity of enhanced personality traits’, Bioethics 2009, vol. 23(6), p. 360-374.
Chew, Douglas & Faber 2018
C. Chew, T. Douglas & N.S. Faber, ‘Biological Interventions for Crime Prevention’, in: Birks
& Douglas 2018, p. 11-43.
De la Rasilla del Moral, German Law Journal 2006, p. 611-623
I. de la Rasilla del Moral, ‘The Increasingly Marginal Appreciation of the Margin-of-Appreciation Doctrine’, German Law Journal 2006, vol. 7(6), p. 611-623.
Douglas, The Journal of Ethics 2014, p. 101-122
T. Douglas, ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, The Journal of Ethics 2014, vol. 18(2), p. 101-122.
Douglas 2018
T. Douglas, ‘Neural and Environmental Modulation of Motivation. What’s the Moral Difference?’, in: Birks & Douglas 2018, p. 208-223.
Douglas & Birks 2018
T. Douglas & D. Birks, ‘Introduction’, in: Birks & Douglas 2018, p. 1-7.
52 Easton, BBC News 27 november 2009
A. Easton, ‘Polish president signs chemical castration law’, BBC News 27 november 2009.
European Court of Human Rights 2019
European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 2019.
Feldman, European Human Rights Law Review 1997, p. 265-274
D. Feldman, ‘The developing scope of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review 1997, vol. 3, p. 265-274.
Forsberg 2018
L. Forsberg, ‘Crime-Preventing Neurointerventions and the Law. Learning from Anti-Libidinal Interventions’, in: Birks & Douglas 2018, p. 44-70.
Forsberg & Douglas, Medical Law Review 2017, p. 453-473
L. Forsberg & T. Douglas, ‘Anti-libidinal interventions in sex offenders: medical or correctional?’, Medical Law Review 2017, vol. 24(4), p. 453-473.
Fuss e.a., Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience: JPN 2015, p. 429-431
J. Fuss e.a., ‘Deep brain stimulation to reduce sexual drive’, Journal of psychiatry &
neuroscience: JPN 2015, vol. 40(6), p. 429-431.
Gerards 2011
J. Gerards, EVRM – Algemene beginselen, Den Haag: Sdu 2011.
Gilbert & Focquaert, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2015, p. 51-60
F. Gilbert & F. Focquaert, ‘Rethinking responsibility in offenders with acquired paedophilia:
Punishment or treatment?’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2015, vol. 38, p. 51-60.
Harris, O’Boyle & Warbrick 2009
D.J. Harris, M. O’Boyle & C. Warbrick, Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, New York: Oxford University Press 2009.
53 Harrison, Sexual Offender treatment 2008, vol. 3(2)
K. Harrison, ‘Legal and Ethical issues when using Antiandrogenic Pharmacotherapy with Sex Offenders’, Sexual Offender Treatment 2008, vol. 3(2).
Hoekendijk & Kommer, Sancties 2011, p. 212-222
G.P. Hoekendijk & M.M. Kommer, ‘Strafdoelen en tenuitvoerlegging: perspectief op een nieuwe verenigingstheorie?’, Sancties 2011, afl. 4, p. 212-222.
Ienca & Andorno, Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2017, vol. 13(5)
M. Ienca & R. Andorno, ‘Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology’, Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2017, vol. 13(5).
Jacobs, White & Ovey 2010
F.G. Jacobs, R.C.A. White & C. Ovey, The European Convention on Human Rights, New York:
Oxford University Press 2010.
Keulen & Knigge 2010
B.F. Keulen & G. Knigge, Strafprocesrecht, Deventer: Kluwer 2010.
Khan e.a., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, vol. 2
O. Khan e.a., ‘Pharmacological interventions for those who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending (Review)’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, vol. 2.
Kirchmair, Criminal Justice Ethics 2019, p. 19-40
L. Kirchmair, ‘Objections to Coercive Neurocorrectives for Criminal Offenders – Why Offenders’ Human Rights Should Fundamentally Come First’, Criminal Justice Ethics 2019, vol. 38(1), p. 19-40.
Kogel, de, e.a. 2013
K. de Kogel e.a., Neurolaw in Nederland (NJB 2013, afl. 2612, themanummer), p. 3130-3131.
Koi, Uusitalo & Tuominen, Criminal Law and Philosophy 2018, p. 227-244
P. Koi, S. Uusitalo & J. Tuominen, ‘Self-Control in Responsibility Enhancement and Criminal Rehabilitation’, Criminal Law and Philosophy 2018, vol. 12, p. 227-244.
54 Lanotte, vande, & Haeck 2005
J. vande Lanottte & Y. Haeck, Handboek EVRM. Deel 1. Algemene beginselen, Antwerpen:
Intersentia 2005.
Lavazza, Frontiers in Neuroscience 2018, vol. 12(82)
A. Lavazza, ‘Freedom of Thought and Mental Integrity: The Moral Requirements for Any Neural Prosthesis’, Frontiers in Neuroscience 2018, vol. 12(82).
Levy 2007
N. Levy, Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century, New York: Cambridge University Press 2007.
Ligthart, Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2019, p. 289-309
S.L.T.J. Ligthart, ‘Coercive neuroimaging, criminal law, and privacy: a European perspective’, Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2019, vol. 6(1), p. 289-309.
Lippert-Rasmussen 2018
K. Lippert-Rasmussen, ‘The Self-Ownership Trilemma, Extended Minds, and Neurointerventions’, in: Birks & Douglas 2018, p. 140-158.
Lösel & Schmucker, Journal of Experimental Criminology 2005, p. 117-146
F. Lösel & M. Schmucker, ‘The Effectiveness of Treatment for Sexual Offenders: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis’, Journal of Experimental Criminology 2005, vol. 1(1), p. 117-146.
Marshall 2009
J. Marshall, Personal Freedom through Human Rights Law? Autonomy, Identity and Integrity under the European Convention on Human Rights, Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009.
Meynen, UCALL 13 mei 2019
G. Meynen, ‘Neurorecht. Kan toerekeningsvatbaarheid worden vastgesteld met een hersenscan?’, Blog UCALL 13 mei 2019.
55
Müller, Walter & Christen, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2014, p. 295-303 S. Müller, H. Walter & M. Christen, ‘When benefitting a patient increases the risk for harm for third persons – The case of treating pedophilic Parkinsonian patients with deep brain stimulation’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2014, vol. 37, p. 295-303.
Nieuwenhuis, NTM/NJCM-Bulletin 2014, p. 7-23
A. Nieuwenhuis, ‘Pressing social need; op zoek naar het dringende karakter van de maatschappelijke behoefte’, NTM/NJCM-Bulletin 2014, afl. 2, p. 7-23.
Nowlin, Human Rights Quarterly 2002, p. 264-286
C. Nowlin, ‘The Protection of Morals Under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’, Human Rights Quarterly 2002, vol. 24(1), p. 264-286.
Pugh & Douglas, Criminal Justice Ethics 2016, p. 205-229
J. Pugh & T. Douglas, ‘Justifications for Non-Consensual Medical Intervention: From Infectious Disease Control to Criminal Rehabilitation’, Criminal Justice Ethics 2016, vol.
35(3), p. 205-229.
Pugh & Douglas 2017
J. Pugh & T. Douglas, ‘Neuro-interventions as Criminal Rehabilitation: An Ethical Review’, in: J.D. Jacobs & J. Jackson, The Routledge Handbook of Criminal Justice Ethics, London:
Routledge 2017, p. 95-111.
Rusnac, Huffington Post 6 maart 2012
C. Rusnac, ‘Moldova Chemical Castration for Convicted Pedophiles Legalized’, Huffington Post 6 maart 2012.
Ryberg 2020
J. Ryberg, Neurointerventions, Crime, and Punishment. Ethical Considerations, New York:
Oxford University Press 2020.
56 Shaw 2014
E. Shaw, ‘The Use of Brain Interventions in Offender Rehabilitation Programmes: Should It Be Mandatory, Voluntary or Prohibited?’, in: J. Clausen & N. Levy, Handbook of Neuroethics, Dordrecht: Springer 2014, p. 1381-1398.
Shaw 2018
E. Shaw, ‘Against the Mandatory Use of Neurointerventions in Criminal Sentencing’, in: Birks
& Douglas 2018, p. 321-337.
Shaw, Neuroethics 2019, p. 97-106
E. Shaw, ‘The Right to Bodily Integrity and the Rehabilitation of Offenders Through Medical Interventions: A Reply to Thomas Douglas’, Neuroethics 2019, vol. 12, p. 97-106.
Sloot, van der, Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 2015, p. 25-50
B. van der Sloot, ‘Privacy as Personality Right: Why the ECtHR’s Focus on Ulterior Interests Might Prove Indispensable in the Age of “Big Data”’, Utrecht Journal of International and European Law 2015, vol. 31(80), p. 25–50.
Sloot, van der, International Data Privacy Law 2017, p. 190-201
B. van der Sloot, ‘Decisional privacy 2.0: the procedural requirements implicit in Article 8 ECHR and its potential impact on profiling’, International Data Privacy law 2017, vol. 7(3), p.
190-201.
Toor, van, 2017
D.A.G. van Toor, Het schuldige geheugen? Een onderzoek naar het gebruik van hersenonderzoek als opsporingsmethode in het licht van eisen van instrumentaliteit en rechtsbescherming (diss. Nijmegen), Deventer: Kluwer 2017.
Vallentyne, Neuroscience 2018, p. 131-132
P. Vallentyne, ‘Neurointerventions: Punishment, Mental Integrity, and Intentions’, Neuroscience 2018, vol. 9(3), p. 131-132.
57
Vincent, Criminal Law and Philosophy 2014, p. 43-50
N.A. Vincent, ‘Neurolaw and Direct Brain Interventions’, Criminal Law and Philosophy 2014, vol. 8, p. 43-50.
Vries, de, 2018
K. de Vries, ‘Right to Respect for Private and Family Life’, in: P. van Dijk e.a. (red.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Cambridge: Intersentia 2018, p.
667-734.
WODC 2019
Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum, ‘Tweejaarlijkse recidivemeting vaste dadergroepen’, WODC-magazine 2019, afl. 3.
Yukhnenko, Sridhar & Fazel, Welcome Open Research 2019, p. 1-22
D. Yukhnenko, S. Sridhar & S. Fazel, ‘A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: 3-year update’, Welcome Open Research 2019, vol. 4(28), p. 1-22.
58