• No results found

Sandbar and shoreline behaviour along a man-made curved coast

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Sandbar and shoreline behaviour along a man-made curved coast"

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Department of Physical Geography

-3000 -2000

-1000 0

1000 20000

50 100

28-Nov 03-Dec 08-Dec 13-Dec 18-Dec 23-Dec 28-Dec 02-Jan 07-Jan 12-Jan 17-Jan 22-Jan 27-Jan 01-Feb

Sandbar and shoreline behaviour along a man-made curved coast

j.rutten@uu.nl Jantien Rutten, Timothy Price and Gerben Ruessink

Data and methods

• 2.4-year data set of daily low-tide Argus video images from Sand Engine mega-nourishment (21.5 Mm3 or >8900 olympic swimming pools)

• Detection of sandbar and shoreline in images (Fig. 1c) and computation of morphometric parameters at North and South side:

-Mean position Xmn [m] (Cross-shore migration)

-Distance between sandbar and shoreline ΔXmn [m]

-Standard deviation Std [m] (2D versus 3D)

-Cross-correlation R2 (Morphological coupling)

Sandbar and shoreline behaviour

Conclusions

The sandbar and shoreline along the curved Sand Engine coast show:

• a seasonal on- and offshore migration and post-storm 3D morphology, both typical at the Holland coast

• a timing difference in response (offshore migration, decay and growth of 3D morphology) with the same imposed offsshore wave forcing, and a preference side of morphologic coupling

Compared to straight coasts*

• Similar seasonal cycle of on- and offshore migration, but at Sand Engine no net offshore migration at interannual timescales that dominates

elsewhere

• Similar post-storm 3D morphology, but at Sand Engine more pronounced (amplitudes of 10-50 m vs. 5-40 m, wavelengths of 350-800 m vs. 250-

3000 m)

Introduction

Sandbars, submerged ridges parallel to the shoreline, are found along many wave-dominated beaches throughout the world. Sandbar and shoreline are known to move in the cross-shore direction, to vary in planshape from linear, two-dimensional (2D) to undulating, three-dimensional (3D), and to couple their 3D shapes (Fig 1). This natural behaviour gets disturbed when man nourishes the beach or shoreface with sand, a common-practice measure against coastal erosion.

Recently, a large, concentrated nourishment (Sand Engine) was constructed

with a strongly curved coast that protruded 1 km into the sea (Fig 1). How such a nourishment affects sandbar and shoreline behaviour is unknown. Here the objective is to describe the spatio-temporal variability in sandbar and

shoreline behaviour along a man-made, curved coastline.

Figure 3(right). The full 2.4-year timeseries of four morphometric parameters showing bar and shoreline behaviour at the northern and southern side.

Similarities

• Sandbar migrates rapidly offshore in winter, and gradually onshore in summer (gray lines (a))

• No net migration of sandbar (a)

• Linear retreat of shoreline (gray lines (a))

• Mean distance between sandbar and shoreline increases (arrow (b))

• 3D morphology increases during winter after storms (arrows (c,d))

• 3D morphology more pronounced in sandbar than in shoreline (c,d)

• Planshape of sandbar varies more (2D to 3D to 2D) than planshape of shoreline (c,d) Differences

• Timing of offshore migration, decay and growth of 3D morphology (c,d)

• Coupling predominantly at southern side, when 3D morphology is pronounced (blue crosses dominate (e))

Figure 2(left).

Example of

temporal change of undulations in the sandbar. Note that the undulations

grow at southern side, whereas

they are absent at the northern side. Amplitudes of 10-50 m, and wavelengths of 350-800 m are found.

Figure 1. Planview 10-min time-averaged images wherein white lines of preferential wave breaking indicate sandbar (outer) and shoreline (inner). Sandbar and shoreline morphology vary alongshore and in time.

A

A

B

B

C

C

3D

2D

S 3D N

2D 3D

3D coupling

*Van Enckevort & Ruessink, 2003a. Cont. Shelf Res. 23; Van Enckevort & Ruessink, 2003b. Cont. Shelf Res. 23; Ojeda et al., 2008. Coast. Eng. 55; Ruessink & Kroon, 1994. Mar. Geol. 121.

-100 0 100 200

X

mn

[m]

0 100 200

∆ X

mn

[m]

0 20 40

0 20 40

0 0.5

1

R [m]

Apr-13 Jul-13 Oct-13 Jan-14 Apr-14 Jul-14 Oct-14 Jan-15 Apr-15 Jul-15 0

50 100

P [kW]

ΔX mn [m] X mn [m] Std(x) [m]Std(x) [m]R2 [-]P [kW]

X[m]

Longshore position0 -1000 [m] -2000 -3000

1000 2000

28-Nov 03-Dec 08-Dec 13-Dec 18-Dec 23-Dec 28-Dec 02-Jan 07-Jan 12-Jan 17-Jan 22-Jan 27-Jan 01-Feb

Time

a) Mean position

b) Distance bar-shoreline

c) 3D sandbar

d) 3D shoreline

e) Coupling

f) Wave power

Sandbar Shoreline

S N

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Deze duiding sluit aan bij de feitelijke situatie waarbij de radioloog de foto beoordeelt en interpreteert, en lost een aantal praktische knelpunten op.. Omdat de

Wordt bovenstaande informatie vertaald naar ontwikkelingen van opbrengsten, toegerekende kosten en saldo voor een melkveebedrijf van 70 koeien met een melkproductie van circa

Buiten deze gesloten gebieden is visserij op litorale banken tegenwoordig alleen toegestaan onder strikte voorwaarden; Het meest recente beleid biedt twee mogelijkheden voor

Partner preferences seem to be in line with research; the Attractiveness Halo Effect occurred; participants were not accurate in guessing if they were liked by their partner;

The results confirmed that second language learners generally did better regarding core syntactic constraints as the word order of the BA sentence then they were in

To what extent do valence of online product reviews influence consumers’ purchase intention, depending on the evaluative cues (instrumental vs. affective) used on the purchase

Bij kinderen met een ASS én een verstandelijke beperking worden discrepanties verwacht tussen de scores op de Vineland-II, Vineland Screener en PEP-3, aangezien