• No results found

University of Groningen A computational cognitive modeling approach to the development of second-order theory of mind Arslan, Burcu

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen A computational cognitive modeling approach to the development of second-order theory of mind Arslan, Burcu"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

A computational cognitive modeling approach to the development of second-order theory of

mind

Arslan, Burcu

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2017

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Arslan, B. (2017). A computational cognitive modeling approach to the development of second-order theory of mind. University of Groningen.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Publication List Publication List 218 217

Publication List

Journal Articles

Arslan, B., Taatgen, N., & Verbrugge, R. (2017). Five-year-olds’ systematic errors

in second-order false belief tasks are due to first-order theory of mind strat-egy selection: A computational modeling study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00275

Arslan, B., Hohenberger, A., & Verbrugge, R. (2017). Syntactic recursion

fa-cilitates and working memory predicts recursive theory of mind. PLOS ONE 12(1): e0169510.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169510

Arslan, B., Verbrugge, R., & Taatgen, N. (2017). Cognitive control explains the

mutual transfer between dimensional change card sorting and first- order false belief understanding: A computational modeling study on transfer of skills. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bica.2017.03.001

Arslan, B., Verbrugge, R., Taatgen, N., Hollebrandse, B. (in preparation).

Five-year-old children’s development of second-order false belief reasoning can be accelerated: An evaluation of different feedback methods.

Peer-reviewed Conference Papers

Arslan, B., Verbrugge, R., Taatgen, N., & Hollebrandse, B. (2015). Teaching

children to attribute second-order false beliefs: A training study with feed-back. In D. Noelle et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 108-113). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Arslan, B., Wierda, S., Taatgen, N., & Verbrugge, R. (2015). The role of simple

and complex working memory strategies in the development of first-or-der false belief reasoning: A computational model of transfer of skills. In N. A. Taatgen, M. K. van Vugt, J. P. Borst, & K. Mehlhorn (Eds.), Proceed-ings of the 13th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 100-105). Groningen: University of Groningen.

Arslan, B., Taatgen, N., & Verbrugge, R. (2013). Modeling developmental

tran-sitions in reasoning about false beliefs of others. In R. West & T.  Stewart (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 77–82). Ottawa: Carleton University.

Arslan, B., Hohenberger, A., & Verbrugge, R. (2012). The development of

second- order social cognition and its relation with complex language understanding and working memory. In N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp., 1290-1295). Sapporo: Japan.

Gokcay, D., Cakir, M., Gozenman, F., Arslan, B., Ciftcioglu, M., Taskin, & K., Ayaz, H. (2011). Changing pattern search component during probability learning: a study using fNIR neuroimaging. 17th Annual Meeting of the Human Brain Mapping (pp., 26-30). Quebec: Canada.

Extended Abstracts

Arslan, B., Verbrugge, R., Taatgen, N. & Hollebrandse, B. (2014).

Teach-ing children to attribute second-order false belief: A trainTeach-ing study. In J.  Szymanik & R. Verbrugge (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Workshop Reasoning About Other Minds: Logical and Cognitive Perspectives (Vol. 1208, pp. 1–5). Groningen: CEUR Workshops Proceedings.

Wierda, S. & Arslan, B. (2014). Modeling theory of mind in ACTransfer. In J. Szymanik & R. Verbrugge (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Workshop Rea-soning About Other Minds: Logical and Cognitive Perspectives (pp., 40-44). Groningen: CEUR Workshops Proceedings.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In contrast, de  Villiers et al.’s (2014) preliminary results showed that 60% of five- to six-year-olds’ answers were based on the zero-order ToM strategy, and only around 20%

Figure 3.5 shows (a) proportion of correct answers to the second-order false belief questions at pre-test, post-test and follow-up sessions and (b) the difference in

It is as if one piece of the hierarchy is flattened, or skipped over in parsing.” (p. We may generalize children’s failures at first-order and second-order false belief

Chapter 5: The Role of Simple and Complex Working Memory Strategies in the Development of First-order False Belief Reasoning: A Computational Model of Transfer of Skills..

data were calculated based on the proportions under the assumption that there was no missing data. The number of repetitions of the DCCS and FB models at pre-test, training and

Based on our computational modeling approach that we presented in Chap- ter 2, we propose that even if children go through another conceptual change after they pass the

Het doel van deze modelleeraanpak was, naast het doen van exacte voorspellingen die empirisch getest kunnen worden, om een procedurele verklaring te geven voor

Five-year-olds’ systematic errors in second-order false belief tasks are due to first-order theory of mind strategy selection: A computational modeling study.. Frontiers