Acculturation, adaptation and multiculturalism among immigrant adolescents in junior vocational education
Hele tekst
(2) 25.
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8) .
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30) .
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41) .
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56) ! "#$
(57)
(58)
(59) . %
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65) .
(66)
(67)
(68) &
(69)
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75) & .
(76) '
(77)
(78)
(79) & .
(80)
(81) (
(82)
(83)
(84)
(85)
(86) )*+, .
(87)
(88) .
(89)
(90)
(91) -
(92) .
(93) .
(94)
(95)
(96)
(97)
(98)
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)
(110)
(111)
(112)
(113) .
(114) 26 .
(115)
(116)
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120)
(121)
(122)
(123) .
(124)
(125)
(126)
(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
(131)
(132) /0 1 2 3. 4567 8
(133)
(134) /9 456 7 :
(135)
(136)
(137) 3 ; ! . <" /455= #$$>7 % . &
(138) "
(139)
(140)
(141) ?@A
(142) BC @A BC
(143) 4.
(144)
(145)
(146)
(147)
(148) D
(149)
(150) ;
(151)
(152)
(153)
(154)
(155) /
(156) <455=8<! ' 2E#$$68(#$$#7 9 /455#7
(157)
(158) ) '
(159) '
(160)
(161)
(162) . 1 In reality these are not “yes” or “no” matters but matters that are evaluated as interrelated issues. Questionnaires exploring these issues mostly use continuous rating scales, either enquiring the issues independently or using questions that combine the two issues. Both approaches result in continuous scores for either each of the issues or for each of the acculturation types. Cut off scores can be used to create a categorization. Critics consider both approaches reductionist, conceptually as well as statistically and therefore suboptimal (Rudmin, 2003)..
(163) 27 9
(164)
(165) 8
(166)
(167)
(168) A
(169)
(170)
(171)
(172)
(173)
(174)
(175) 3
(176)
(177)
(178)
(179)
(180)
(181)
(182) /!2F 4558 0 455 8 F 455=7
(183) % /' E 1 ( 2 E #$$G7
(184) %
(185)
(186)
(187) %
(188)
(189) /H * 0;
(190) 2 ' #$$ 71
(191)
(192)
(193) /! 2 F 4558 F 455=7
(194) %
(195) )' /< . 1. 92:"A#$$48I + .2H ;0#$$#8:
(196) 0.
(197) 2A #$$$8!20 #$$47 + %/' #$$G7
(198) + % D ( ( !
(199) ' % %
(200)
(201)
(202) ' D ( %
(203) <"
(204)
(205) . ; : 9 " /455#7
(206) ! F/4557 ; & 0 /#$$7
(207) ' /02! #$$$8<' 23;.#$$7
(208) J
(209) .
(210) 28
(211)
(212)
(213) % < . E ./#$$#7 . /
(214)
(215) %7
(216) ( * ;
(217)
(218) .
(219)
(220) % A %
(221)
(222)
(223)
(224)
(225)
(226) D
(227)
(228)
(229) .
(230)
(231) /3 ; 2 A . 45558 F 455=7 ( ?
(232)
(233)
(234) .
(235)
(236)
(237) A /& < ' #$$G7 +
(238)
(239) ) (
(240) . (
(241) A
(242) ( /& < ' #$$=8 ' < 9 ! #$$57 D
(243)
(244)
(245) .
(246)
(247) &
(248)
(249) /& < ' #$$G7 %
(250) ( % ( . & ' +& , / &'+,8 < ! ' 2 E #$$67 K
(251) . .
(252) 29
(253)
(254)
(255)
(256) % %
(257) !
(258)
(259) *
(260)
(261)
(262)
(263) . +
(264)
(265) % /E2E #$$>7(
(266)
(267) /9 2E
(268) 45567
(269) /< .2E .#$$#8E#$$>7 /E
(270) 455>7 1
(271)
(272)
(273) D
(274) / 45> 8 !
(275) 455G8 !
(276) 2 #$$67 D
(277) %
(278) /H . 1 1 . H .. 20#$$67 .
(279) .
(280)
(281) %
(282)
(283)
(284)
(285) /< #$$68 < * ! 2 ' 455=8 ! .. 0 2 D . #$$#7 * ' % J
(286)
(287) /< #$$67! ;
(288) % ;
(289) /H . 1 2 1 . #$$48 1 . H . 1 2 ' #$$ 8 ! #$$68 '& ' .&2F #$$8J
(290) +2' #$$7 .
(291) .
(292) &'+, /< #$$67
(293)
(294)
(295)
(296)
(297) D
(298)
(299) /< #$$67
(300) ; .
(301) 30
(302)
(303)
(304) ;
(305)
(306)
(307) ;
(308)
(309)
(310) ;
(311)
(312)
(313) &
(314)
(315)
(316)
(317) J
(318)
(319)
(320)
(321)
(322) )
(323)
(324)
(325) < /#$$67
(326)
(327) 0
(328)
(329) ; < /#$$67 D
(330)
(331)
(332) % . ;
(333)
(334)
(335) %
(336) "
(337) ? 4 &
(338)
(339) B # A
(340) "
(341) %B B B . ;
(342)
(343)
(344)
(345)
(346)
(347) * ;
(348)
(349)
(350) ;
(351) < /#$$67?
(352) D
(353)
(354) ; /.
(355) 31
(356) 7
(357) 9 %
(358) %
(359)
(360)
(361) %/
(362)
(363)
(364)
(365)
(366) 7 D % %
(367) * * !
(368) ; ( '
(369) #6 G6
(370)
(371) 4=6
(372)
(373) 4#G
(374)
(375)
(376)
(377) ( ( ( :
(378)
(379) 5 =
(380)
(381) 5 G
(382) 6> 6
(383)
(384)
(385) 4=5/*-L4$67
(386) 46 /*- L 4$>7 46 /*- L 6 7
(387) . /$ 7 ' /4G> 7 * /46> 7 /4G 7 :
(388) #$G
(389) ' ( ' J %
(390) !
(391) " '
(392) !
(393)
(394)
(395) .
(396) 32
(397) .
(398)
(399)
(400)
(401)
(402)
(403)
(404) "
(405)
(406) "
(407)
(408)
(409) 4 M
(410) " > M " ' D ' /& +2! 455=7 M3 "'
(411) & " D ' " /< & 2 F #$$67 J 0
(412) " /456>7
(413)
(414) M
(415) " M
(416) " M: "& " =>
(417) . &'+,/< #$$67 4>
(418)
(419) M" M " & " G5 M " :" /< % 2 : 45558 : 45G5 455 7
(420)
(421)
(422) M"
(423) 4# ?M
(424) "& " G$
(425)
(426) &'+,/< #$$67
(427) .
(428)
(429) & " G
(430)
(431)
(432)
(433)
(434) . A& " G# . . &'+, 0 . & " G6 <' 3;. /#$$7
(435) 0
(436)
(437)
(438) M
(439) " M
(440) " MA
(441) .
(442) 33 A & " 65
(443) =6 =4 3
(444) .
(445) A
(446) M"M " 0 ;
(447) %
(448) D
(449) 4 #
(450)
(451)
(452)
(453)
(454)
(455)
(456)
(457) 4
(458)
(459)
(460)
(461)
(462) .
(463) /&01 . * . ' . #G. 4. 6$. =5.
(464) . 65. 5 .
(465) . 4. =#. ' . 4G. G#. . # $. 66. 6=. 6. +
(466)
(467) . >5. 55. ! . 45#. 55. < . 4G$. =#. ' . 54. 6#. !
(468) . #$6. 65. ( + . (
(469)
(470) . .
(471) 34. #. . )
(472) .
(473)
(474)
(475)
(476) +. . !. . . . . + . $>=. . . . . . . . . . .
(477) . #44NN. 6 NN. . . . . . . . . . $>4. $4G. $=#. . . . . . . . .
(478) . 6>NN. $#. $#4. 445. . . . . . . . ' . $ NN. $4NN. $4=. 4G=NN. #GGNN. . . . . . . . >GNN. $55. 4> N. $=$. GNN. 4 N. . . . . . (
(479)
(480) . $ >. $66. 4$. $G. $> . $ >. $44. . . . . +
(481)
(482) . $6G. 44 . $# . 4$N. $ . #GNN. $#G. $#. . . . < . $$5. $6. 44#. #>>NN. 4 5N. # 6NN. $=G. $G. $>6. . . ' . $$G. $=4. $5. 4#$. $= . $44. 4= N. 4 5N. $4#. 44>. . !
(483) . $$5. $G . 44. 45NN. $$G. $46. 465NN. 45N. 446. #>GNN. =NN. . ( . ! . NL
(484) $>8NNL
(485) $4.
(486) . ' . . ( . +. <. 1
(487) . 1
(488) . . '.
(489) 35.
(490)
(491)
(492) ; > ; !
(493)
(494)
(495)
(496)
(497) ?
(498)
(499)
(500)
(501)
(502)
(503)
(504)
(505)
(506) 3
(507)
(508)
(509)
(510)
(511)
(512)
(513)
(514)
(515)
(516)
(517)
(518)
(519) . %
(520) %
(521) (
(522) . ?
(523)
(524)
(525)
(526)
(527)
(528) J < /#$$67 : ?
(529)
(530)
(531)
(532)
(533)
(534) ?
(535)
(536)
(537)
(538) ?
(539) . .
(540)
(541) ?
(542)
(543)
(544)
(545) .
(546)
(547) ;
(548) D ; ; D
(549) 4 : >$K
(550) ; 56K #4 K #K
(551) .
(552) 36 2
(553)
(554)
(555) . ȕ. ' . . ( . $==. $ $. $ . + . $6=. $6. 4.
(556) . $#=. $> . =4$.
(557) . $ 5. $=. >4#. ' . $>#. $64. 65. . #. $=5. $$#. ! . #$$. $ >. $$#. (
(558)
(559) . 464. $56. $44. +
(560)
(561) . 4#$. $ 6. $66. ȕ. ' . . ( . $G$. $>. #5#. + . $6. $>6. 644.
(562) . $# . $ G. = $.
(563) . 4=$. $6>. $#>. ' . $64. $>>. $4. . #GG. $=4. $$$. ! . 4#5. $ $. $ =. (
(564)
(565) . 4 $. $G>. $#G. +
(566)
(567) . $45. $ 4. ==6. ȕ. ' . . ( . $ 4. $ 4. $5. + . $4. $6 . 64.
(568) . $6>. $>>. #=.
(569) . $G>. $= . #> . . #44. $6#. $$4. . $4$. $G4. 5$ . ! . 4>. $ 6. $$4. (
(570)
(571) . 44>. $5G. # $. +
(572)
(573) . $G#. $ 6. $==. 2OL43/4$##57L48P$$4 . 2
(574)
(575)
(576) & . . OL443/4$##57L#G4>8P$4. > 2
(577)
(578)
(579) . OL4 3/4$##57L65$8P$$4.
(580) 37 integration. ethnic national friends. 1,5. 1,5. 1. 1. 0,5. 0,5. 0. 0. -0,5. -0,5. -1. -1. -1,5. -1,5. -2. -2. ethnic friends. immigrant friends. discrimination. national language. diffuse. national 1,5. 1,5. 1. 1. 0,5. 0,5. 0. 0. -0,5. -0,5. -1. -1. -1,5. -1,5. -2. -2. ethnic language. integration. separation. assimilation. D
(581) 4
(582) 4
(583)
(584)
(585) . J
(586) (:E
(587) '+'/3/#67L #G5P$> ȘO L$>7 (:E
(588)
(589)
(590) /3/#>7L#=$Q$>ȘOL$$7)
(591)
(592)
(593)
(594)
(595) < .
(596) .
(597) /Ȥ5/L# $7 L ==5= P $>7 D
(598)
(599) .
(600)
(601)
(602) .
(603) /Ȥ5/ L # $7 L =5 4 P $>7
(604)
(605)
(606)
(607)
(608)
(609)
(610) .
(611) ;
(612) .
(613) ;
(614) /Ȥ5/6L# $7L #46G>P$>7J .
(615) 38
(616)
(617) . * '
(618) + '
(619) ;
(620)
(621) /Ȥ5/5L4547L45554P$>7 ; D
(622) # D
(623)
(624) % 4#G G6 4=6
(625)
(626) %
(627)
(628)
(629)
(630) /J ." 3R6 ==$S L 5>> P $48 Ș# L $7 ' (:E /D/#G=7LG#65P$$4Ș#L$ 7
(631) /D/#G=7L=$6 P$4Ș#L$ 7 /3/#G=7L6 GQ$>ȘOL$$7 D
(632) ;
(633)
(634) ;
(635)
(636) /
(637) 7
(638) gender. generational status. 45 40 35 30 25. boys. 20. girls. pe rce ntag e of subje cts. p ercen ta ge of su bjects. 50. 40 35 30 25. first generation second generation. 20 15. 15. 10 10. 5. 5 0. Ethnic. National. Diffuse. 0. Integrated. Ethnic. National. Diffuse. Integrated. ethnicity. 50 45 40. mainly nationals. 35 30. mix of nationals and immigrants mainly immigrants. 25 20 15. percentage of subjects. percentage of subjects. ethnic composition of neighborhood 70. 60. 50. Turks 40. Moroccans Surinamese. 30. Antilleans. 20. 10 10. 5 0. 0. Ethnic. National. Diffuse. Integrated. Ethnic. National. Diffuse. Integrated. D
(639) #-
(640)
(641)
(642)
(643)
(644)
(645)
(646)
(647)
(648)
(649) .
(650) 39 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1. 1st generation. 0. 2nd generation. -0,1. nationals. -0,2 -0,3 -0,4 s elf-es teem. behavioral problems. ps ychological problem s. . D
(651) *
(652) 4
(653)
(654)
(655)
(656)
(657)
(658)
(659)
(660)
(661)
(662)
(663) & .
(664) . *(:E
(665) *(:E
(666) J ." /3/5 >=$7 L #>GG P $> ȘO L$7
(667) (:E
(668)
(669) /3/ #67 L #5 P$> ȘO L$ 7 /3/ #67L =#5P$>ȘOL$67 /3/#67L4$5Q$>ȘOL$47 6
(670)
(671)
(672)
(673)
(674)
(675)
(676) 6
(677)
(678)
(679)
(680) . .
(681) 6 1
(682)
(683) & . . !
(684) . < . . .
(685) . 45>/647. 46>/6$7. 5 /6G7. + . 455/=67. 4G$/= 7. 56/>57. ( . #5/657. 46>/667. =/6#7. A . #4G/=47. #4$/G47. G/>67. . ' .
(686) 40 A
(687) (
(688) J
(689)
(690) :
(691) ? !
GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN
Waar respondenten aangeven de hoogte van de afvalstoffenheffing van belang te vinden en melden graag meer mogelijkheden tot subsidie hierop te zien, vormt dit voor de
The results on simulated data show that the MR3 outperforms permutation tests on Hotelling’s T 2 test (pHT2) in the detection of difference of mean in small sample sizes, since the
Reflectie op praktijk-dilemma’s kan worden ondersteund door reflectie op de achterliggende medisch-ethische principes. Deze medisch-ethische principes zijn breed
staatsrechtelijke verhouding: een verkenning voor de constitutionele agenda van de 21ste eeuw.. Retrieved
Deze scriptie onderscheidt zich van eerdere werken omdat het specifiek voor de Nederlandse situatie onderzoekt hoe geldovermakingen van migranten en dus hun economische banden met
Dit laat de potentiële universaliteit zien van de daling in relatietevredenheid tijdens de transitie naar ouderschap en impliceert dat dezelfde interventies gericht op
Deze begrippen zijn, waaronder GDA, open geformuleerd en kunnen hierdoor verschillend worden geïnterpreteerd door de AIVD, haar toezichthouders en de politiek.. Deze begrippen
In 2015 startte Mi-lan als promovenda bij het instituut Pedagogische Wetenschappen op een internationaal longitudinaal onderzoeksproject naar de overgang van zwangerschap