On the second epistle of St. Peter. Had the author read Josephus? ~

BIBLIOGRAFIE

ABBOTT, E.A. 1882.

The Expositor, 3:49-63.

On the second epistle of St. Peter. Had the author read Josephus? ~

ALAND, K., BLACK, M., MARTINI, C.M., METZGER, B.M. & WIKGREN, A. 1975.

The Greek New Testament. Munster: United Bible Societies. 934 p.

AUNE, D.E. 1987. The New Testament and its literary environment. Philadelphia : Westminster Press. 260 p.

ALEXANDER, T.D. 1985. Lot's hospitality: a clue to his righteousness. Journal of Biblical Literature, 104(2):289-300.

BACON, B.W. 1924. An introduction to the New Testament. London :Macmillan. 285 p.

BALJON, J.M.S.

Boekhoven. 270 p.

1904. Commentaar op de katholieke brieven. Utrecht Van

BALJON, J.M.S. 1901. Geschiedenis van de boeken des Nieuwen Verbonds. Groningen:

Wolters. 624 p.

BALTENSWEILER, H. 1959. Die verkUirung Jesu: Historisches Ereignis und synoptische Berichte. Zurich: Herbst. 150 p.

BALTZER

K. 1971. The covenant formulary in Old Testament, Jewish, and early Christian writings. Philadelphia : Fortress Press. 221 p.

1992. Die Abschiedsrede des Johannesevangeliums und ihr Jiidischer

v

BAMMEL, E.

Hintergrund.

26(1):1-12.

Neo Testamentica. Journal of the New Testament Society of South Africa, V

BARNABAS. 1977. Bupvupa £mcrrcoA-f1. (In Goold, G.P., ed. 1977. Apostolic Fathers I. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p.335-409.)

BARNARD, L.W. 1956-1957. The judgment in 2 Peter 3: The Expository Times, 68:302,

· Oct. 1956-Sep.

BARR, J. 1961. The semantics of Biblical language. Oxford : University Press. 313 p.

364

BARTH, D.F. 1921. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Giitersloh: Bertelsmann. 494 p.

BAUCKHAM, R.J. 1980. The delay of the parousia. Tyndale Bulletin, 31:3-36. rJ

BAUCKHAM, R.J. 1983. Jude, 2 Peter. Texas : Waco. 357 p. (Word biblical commentary, vol. 50.)

BAUCKHAM, R.J. 1982. 2 Peter: a supplementary bibliography. Evangelical Theological ~

Society, 25(1):91-3.

BEASLEY-MURRAY, G.R. 1965. The general epistles James, 1 Peter, Jude, 2 Peter.

London: Lutterworth Press. (Bible Guides.) 96 p.

BENGEL, J.A. 1971. New Testament word studies. Vol. 2. Romans - Revelation.

Grand Rapids: Kregel Publications. 980 p.

BEUKEN, W.A.M. 1979. Jesaja: deel II A. Nijkerk : Callenbach. 335 p. (De Prediking van het Oude Testament.)

BIGG, C. 1969. A critical and exegetical commentary on tl1e epistles of st. Peter and st.

Jude. Edenburgh : Clark. 353 p.

BLEEK, F. 1870. An introduction to the New Testament. Vol. 2. Edinburgh : T. & T.

Clark. 426 p. (Clark's foreign theological library.)

BOEHMER, J. 1923. Tag und Morgenstern? Zu 2 Petr. l. Zeitschrift fiir die Neutestamentltche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der alteren Kirche, 22:228-233. V

De boeken genoemd Apocriefe, door last van de hoog-mog. heeren staten-generaal der vereenigde Nederlanden, en volgens het besluit van de synode nationaal. 1916. Kampen : Kok. 253 p.

BOLKESTEIN, M.H. 1977. De brieven van Petrus en Judas. Nijkerk: Callenbach. 306 p.

BOOBYER, G.H. 1959. The indebtedness of 2 Peter tot 1 Peter. (In Higgins, A.J.B.

ed. New Testament essays : studies in memory of T.W. Manson. University Press :

Manchester. p. 34-53.).

365

BORGEN, P. 1965. Bread from heaven: an exegetical study of the concept of manna in the gospel of John and the writings of Philo. Leiden : Brill. 217 p. · (Supplements to Novum Testamentum, 10.)

BORGEN, P. 1970. Observations on the Targumic character of the prologue of John.

New Testament Studies, 16:288-295.

BOTHA, J. 1989i. Die Louw & Nida-Woordeboek: 'n kragtige nuwe hulpmiddel vir die eksegeet, prediker en Bybelvertaler. In die Skrijlig, 23(92):1-23, Des. V

BOTHA, J. 1989ii. 'n Praktiese riglyn vir die gebruik van die Louw & Nida-Woordeboek:

geillustreer aan die hand van die betekenis Katp6s in Galasiers 6:9-10. In die Skriflig,~

23(92):24-39, Des.

BOTHA, J. 1992. The lexical sense of tl;oucri q., in Romans 13:1. (In Barkhuizen, J.H., Stander, H.F. & Swart, G.J., reds. Hupomnema: feesbundel opgedra aan prof. J.P. Louw.

Pretoria : Universiteit van Pretoria. p. 33-43.)

BOWKER, J.W. 1968. Speeches in Acts: a study in Proem and Yelammedenu form. New

Testament Studies, 14:96-111. IV

BOWMAN, J.W. 1962. Hebrews. James. I & II Peter. London: SCM Press. 176 p.

~ (The layman's Bible commentary.)

BREED, D.G. 198~. Vanaf eksegese tot reeksprediking: 'n Nuwe-Testamentiese studie aan die hand van die brief van Judas. Potchefstroom : PU vir CHO. (Verhandeling- Th.M.) 155 p.

BRUCE, F .F,. 1977ii. The epistle to the Hebrews. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans. 447 p.

(The New International Commentary on the New Testament.)

BRUCE F.F. 1977i. Commentary on the book of the Acts. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans.

(The New International Commentary on the New Testament.) 555 p.

BROWN, J. 1980. Parting counsels: an exposition of 2 Peter 1. Edinburg : The Banner of Truth Trust. 329 p. (A Geneva series Commentary.)

.

· BROWN R.E., DONFRIED, K.P. & REDMANN, J. 1973. Peter in the New Testament.

New York: Paulist Press. 181 p.

366 ~ BULTMANN, R. 1976. rt.vroo"Kro, yv&crtc;, f:mywrocrKro, f:ntyvrocrtc;. (In Theological

dictionary of the New Testament, 1:689-719.)

BYBEL. 1933. Die Bybel : dit is die ganse Heilige Skrif wat al die kanonieke boeke van die Ou en die Nuwe Testament bevat. Kaapstad : Britse en Buitelandse Bybelgenootskap.

BYBEL. 1983. Die Bybel: nuwe vertaling. Kaapstad: Bybelgenootskap van Suid-Afrika.

CALVYN, J. 1976. The epistle of Paul the apostle to the Hebrews and the first and second epistle of St. Peter. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans. 378 p. (Calvin's Commentaries.)

CARTLEDGE, S.A. 1938. A conservative introduction to the New Testament. Michigan : Zondervan. 238 p.

CAVALLIN, H.C.C. 1979. The false teachers of 2 Pt. as pseudo-profets. Novum -YJ

Testamentum, 21(3):263-270.

CHANG, A.D. 1985.

Sacra, 142(565):53-63.

Second Peter 2: 1 and the extent of the atonement. Biliotheca V

CHARLES, J.D. The use of tradition-material in the epistle of Jude. (Unpublished paper read at the 1992 annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature in San Francisco.)

CHARLES, R.H. 1970. The Book of Enoch. London : S.P.C.K. 154 p.

CHILDS, B.S. 1984. The New Testament as canon: an introduction. Philadelphia Fortress Press. 572 p.

COETZEE, J.C~ 1984. Die kanon van die Ou en die Nuwe Testament. Potchefstroom : Wesvalia Boekhandel. 90 p.

COETZEE, J.C. 1988. Gedagtestruktuurontleding en die eksegese van die Heilige Skrifte.

(In Coetzee, J.C., red. Koninkryk, Gees en Woord. Huldigingsbundel aangebied aan prof dr Lambertus Floor by sy emeritaat as professor in die Nuwe Testament aan die teologiese skool, Potchefstroom en die Fakulteit Teologie van die Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir Christelike Hoer Onderwys. Pretoria: N.G. Kerkboekhandel. p. 19-37.)

COLLINS, J.J. 1984i. The apocalyptic imagination: an introduction to the Jewish matrix of

Christianity. New York. 280 p.

367

COLLINS, J.J. 1984ii. Testaments. (In Stone, M.E., red. Jewish writings of the second temple period: apocrypha, pseudepigrapha, Qumran sectarian writings, Philo, Josephus.

Philadelphia : Fortress Press. p. 325-355.)

COLLINS, J.J. 1986. The testamentary literature in recent scholarship. (In Kraft, A. &

Nickelsburg, G. W .E., eds. Early Judaism and its modem interpreters. Atlanta : Scholars Press. p. 268-285.)

CONZELMANN, H. & LINDEMANN, A. 1976. Arbeitsbuch zum Neuen Testament.

Tiibingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck). 440 p.

COX, S. 1875. From starlight to sunlight. 2 Peter 1:16-20. The Expositor, 1:169-185. v

COX, S. 1876. On the epistles of st. Peter. The second epistle. The Expositor, 4:445-469. /

CONNICK, C.M. 1972. The New Testament: an introduction to its history, literature, and thought. Belmont: Dickenson. 444 p.

CRISWELL, W.A. 1976. Expository sermons on the epistles of Peter. Grand Rapids :The Zondervan. 160 p.

CROWNFIELD, F .R. . 1960. A historical approach to the New

" Testament. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers. 420 p.

CULLMANN, 0. 1972. Neues Testament und Geschichte: historisches Geschehen und Deutung im Neuen Testament. Ti.ibingen: Theologischer verlag Ziirich. 344 p.

CULLMANN, 0. 1969. Des sources de l'Evangile a la formation de la theologie chretienne. ~euchatel : Delachaux et Niestle. 188 p.

CULLMANN, 0. 1968. The New Testament. An introduction for the general reader.

London : SCM Press. 125 p.

DAHL, N.A. 1976. Letter. (In The interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible. Supplementary vol. Nashville : Abingdon. p. 538-541.)

DALTON, W.J. 1979. An interpretation of 1 Peter 3:19 and 4:6: light from 2 Peter.

· Biblica, 60:547-555.

v

368 DANKER, F.W.

40:64-82.

1978. 2 Peter: A solemn decree. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, ,

v

DANKER, F.W. 1962. 2 Peter 3:10 and Psalm of Solomon 17:10. Zeitscrift ji1r die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der iilteren Kirche, 53:82-86. /

DANKER, F.W. 1977. The second letter of Peter. (In Fuller, R. H., ed. Hebrews, James, 1 and 2 Peter, Jude, Revelation. Philadelphia :Fortress Press. p. 81-91.)

DE JONGE, M. 1956-1957. Vreemdelingen en bijwoners: enige opmerkingen naar aanleiding van 1 Petr. 2:11 en verwante teksten. Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift, 11:18- V

36.

DEJONGE, M. 1978. The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs. Leiden : E.J. Brill.

251 p.

DEJONGE, M. 1991. Jewish eschatology, early Christian christology and the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs. Leiden : E.J. Brill. 342 p. (Supplements to Novum Testamentum vol. 63)

DE RU, G. 1969-70. De authenticiteit van II Petrus. Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift, J

24:1-12.

DE KLERK, P.J.S. 1951. Die brief aan die Hebreers. Pretoria : Van Schaik. 272 p.

(Kommentaar op die Bybel.)

DESJARDIN~, M. 1987. The portrayal of the dissidents in 2 Peter and Jude: does it tell us more about the "godly" than the "ungodly"?

30:89-102, Jun.,

Journal for the Study of the New Testament, V

DODS, M. 1893. An introduction to the New Testament. London :Hodder & Stoughton.

247p.

DONFRIED, K.P. 1974. The setting of second Clement in early Christianity. Leiden : Brill. 240 p. (Supplements to Novum Testamentum, 33:41-48.) .

'!

DOTY, W.G. 1983. Letters in primitive Christianity. Philadelphia : Fortress Press. 81

p.84

DSCHULNIGG, VON PETER. 1989.

Biblische Zeitschrift, 33(1):161-177.

369

Der Theologische Ort des zweiten Petrusbrie/

DUPLESSIS, M.J. 1989. Die gemeenskap van die heiliges in die inleiding van Filemon, Filippense en Galasiers: 'n ondersoek na die funksie van die struktuurmerkers in die inleidings van die briewe. (Ongepubliseerde maniskrip.)

DUPLESSIS, P.J. & LATEGAN, B.C. 1983. Agtergrond en geskiedenis van die Nuwe Testament. Pretoria: Academica. 237 p.

DU TOIT, A.B. 1984. Orienterende opmerkings oor die Pauliniese briefliteratuur. (In Handleiding by die Nuwe Testament. Deel5. Pretoria: NG Kerkboekhandel. p. 1-13.)

DUNHAM, D.A. 1983. An exegetical study of 2 Peter 2:18-22. Bibliotheca Sacra,

140(557):40-54, Jan.-Mar. V

DUNN, D.G. 1977. Unity and diversity in the New Testament. An inquiry into the character of earliest christianity.' London : SCM Press. 439 p.

DUPONT, J. 1949. Gnosis. La connaissance religieuse dans les epitres de saint Paul.

Louvain : Nauwelaerts. 475 p.

~ DUVENAGE, S. 1976. Die dekor van die Nuwe Testament: 'n kultuur-historiese agtergrondstudie. Potchefstroom: Pro Rege. 484 p.

DUVEKOT, W.S. 1984. De laat-apostolische tijd. (In Baarlink, H., Duvekot, W.S. &

Geense, A,_., reds. Vervulling en voleinding: de toekomstverwachting in het Nieuwe Testament. Kampen: Kok. 486 p.)

EASTON, B.S.

12.

1932. New Testament ethical lists. Journal of Biblical Literature, 51:1-

~

ELLIOTT, J.H. 1969. A catholic gospel: reflections on "early catholisism" in the New Testament. The Catholic Biblical Quarterley, 31:213-223. V

ELLIOTT, J.H. 1982. I-II Peter/Jude. (In Martin, R.A. & Elliott, J.H. Augsburg

Commentary on the New Testament. James. 1-11 Peter/Jude. Minnesota : Augsburg

Publishing House. 185 p.)

370

ELLIOTT, J.H. 1981. A home for the homeless: a sociological exegesis of 1 Peter, its situation and strategy. Philadelphia :Fortress Press. 306 p.

ELLIS, E.E. 1991. The Old Testament in early Christianity: canon and interpretation in the light of modern research. Tiibingen : J.C.B. Mohr. 188 p. (Wissenschaftliche

Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 54.)

4ESRA.

kyk

De boeken genoemd Apocriefe.

EXLER, F.X.J.

epistolography.

140 p.

1923. The form of the ancient Greek letter. A study in Greek Washington : Catholic University of America. (Dissertation - D.Phil.)

J

FARRAR, F.W. 1882.

Times, 2(3)401-423.

Dr. Abbott on the second epistle of St. Peter. The Expository

\ )

FARRAR, F.W. 1888. The second epistle of St. Peter and Josephus.

Times, 3(8)58-69.

The Expository

PEINE, D.P. 1950. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Heidelberg : QueUe & Meyer.

378 p.

FISHEL, H.A. 1973. The uses of sorites (climax, gradatio) in the Tannaitic period. (In Blank, S.H. & Weisberg, D.B., eds. 1973. Hebrew Union College annual. New York : Dworkin. p .. 119-151.)

FLOOR, L. 1?79. Het gericht van God volgens het Nieuwe Testament. Amsterdam : Buijten & Schipperheijn. 159 p.

FLOOR, L. 1981. Die evangelie van die koninkryk: 5 aspekte. Pretoria N.G.

· Kerkboekhandel. 109 p.

FLOOR, L. 1983. Die heilige doop in die Nuwe Testament. Potchefstroom

Potchefstroom Teologiese Publikasies. 131 p.

\ l

FLOOR, L. 1986. Stilistiese analise van Nuwe-Testamentiese tekste. Koers, 51(3): 369- J

400.

\_/

371

FLOOR, L. 1992. Jakobus: brief van een broeder. Kampen Kok. 214 p.

(Commentaar op het Nieuwe Testament.)

FORNBERG, T. 1977. An early church in a pluralistic society: a study of 2 Peter. Lund : Carl Bloms Boktryckeri. 175 p.

FRANKEMOLLE, H. 1990. 1. Petrusbrief. 2 Petrusbrief. Judasbrief. Wiirzburg : Echter. 149 p.

GOPPELT, L. 1982. Typos: the typological interpretation of the Old Testament in the New. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. 364 p.

GRANT, R.M. 1963. A historical introduction to the New Testament. New York :Harper

& Row Publishers. 447 p.

GREEN, E.M.B. 1961. 2 Peter reconsiderd. London: The Tyndale Press. 37 p.

GREEN, M. 1977. The second epistle general of Peter and the general epistle of Jude. An introduction and commentary. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans. 192 p. (The Tyndale New Testam.ent Commentaries.)

GREIJDANUS, S. 1929. ·De brieven van de apostelen Petrus en Johannes, en de brief van - Judas. Amsterdam: Van Bottenburg. 652 p. (Kommentaar op het Nieuwe Testament.)

GROENEWALD, E.P. 1977. Die briewe van Petrus. Die brief van Judas. Pretoria : N.G. Kerk-Uitgewers. 178 p.

GROSHEIDE, F.W. 1983. Het heilige Evangelie volgens Mattheus. Amsterdam Bottenburg. 389 p. (Kommentaar op het Nieuwe Testament.)

GROVe, A.H. 1992. Die selfidentifikasie van Christus in Openbaring 2 en 3.

Potchefstroom: PU vir CHO. (Proefskrif- Th.D.) 316 p.

GRUNDMANN, W. 1974 .. Der Brief des Judas und der zweite Brief des Petrus. Berlin : Evangelische Verlagsanstalt. (Theo1ogischer Handkommentar zum Neuen Testament.) 123 p.

GUNDRY, R.H. 1970. A survey of the New Testament. Grand Rapids : Zondervan

Publishing House. 400 p.

372

GUTHRIE, D. 1990. New Testament introduction. Leicester: Apollos. 1161 p.

Die Handelinge van Johannes.

kyk

MUller, J.J.

Die Handelinge van Petrus.

kyk

MUller, J.J.

HARNISCH, W. 1973. Eschatologische Existenz: ein exegetischer Beitrag zum Sachanliegen von 1. Thessalonicher 4,13-5,11. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 187 p.

HARRISON, E.F. 1964. Introduction to the New Testament. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans.

280 p.

HARRINGTON, W.J. 1968. Record of the fulfilment: the New Testament. London : Geoffrey Chapman. 533 p.

HEARD, R. 1950. An introduction to the New Testament. London : Adam and Charles Black. 261 p.

HEINEMANN, J. 1971. Preaching. (In Encyclopedia Judaica 13, P-Rec., 994-1007.)

HELBERG, J.L. 1976i. Openbaringsgeskiedenis van die Ou Testament. Deel I.

Potchefstroom: Pro Rege. 409 p.

HELBERG, J.~. 1976ii. Openbaringsgeskiedenis van die Ou Testament. Deel 2.

Potchefstroom: Pro Rege. 259 p.

HEMER, C.J. 1978. The address of 1 Peter. The Expository Times, 89:239-243.

HENDRIKSEN, W. 1976. The gospel of John. London: Banner of Truth Trust. 507 p.

(New Testament Commentary.)

Henog kyk

Charles, R.H.

373

HEYNS, J.A. 1978. Dogmatiek. Pretoria: N.G. Kerkboekhandel. 426 p.

HIEBERT, D.E. 1980. Designation of the readers in 1 Peter 1:1-2. Bibliotheca Sacra, 137:64-75, Jan.-Mar.

HIEBERT, D.E. 1984. A portrayal of false teachers: an exposition of 2 Peter 2:1-3.

Bibliotheca Sacra, 141(563)255-265, Jul.-Sep. V

HIEBERT, D.E. 1984. Directives for living in dangerous days: an exposition of 2 Peter 3:14-18a. Bibliotheca Sacra, 141(564):330-340, Oct.-Dec. v

HIEBERT, D.E. 1984. The necessary growth in the Christian life: an exposition of 2 Peter

1:5-11. Bibliotheca Sacra, 141(561):43-54, Jan.-Mar. J

HIEBERT, D.E. 1984. The prophetic foundation for the christian life: an exposition of 2 Peter 1:19-21. Bibliotheca Sacra, 141(562):158-168, Apr.-Jun. V

HIEBERT, D.E. 1989. Second Peter and Jude: an expositional commentary. Greenville : Unusual publications. 324 p.

RUTHER, J.E. 1867. Kritisch exegetisches handbuch iiber den 1.Brief des Petrus, den Brief des Judas und den 2. Brief des Petrus. Gottingen : Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht's :-_Verlag. 404p:_ ___ _

. IGNATIUS. 1977. The epistle of Ignatius (!n Goold, G.P., ed. 1977. Apostolic Fathers Vol.l. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p.165-278.)

- - - . - - - - - - - · --

JOHNSON, S.E. 1958. Early christianity in Asia Minor. Journal of Biblical Literature,

77:1-17. v

JONKER, W.D. 1976. Die brief aan die Romeine. Kaapstad : N.G. Kerk-Uitgewers.

207p.

JORDAAN, G.J.C. 1978. Die beoordeling van woordorde-variante in die manuskripte van- die Griekse Nuwe Testament met besondere aandag aan die evangelie volgens Lukas: 'n metodologiese studie. Potchefstroom : PU vir CHO. (Proefskrif- D. Litt.) 233 p.

JORDAAN, G.J.C. 1988. 2 Petrus 1:19, 21 in die lig van gedagtestruktuuranalise. (In Coetzee, J.C., red. Koninkryk, Gees en Woord. Huldigingsbundel aangebied aan prof .dr.

Lambertus Floor by sy emeritaat as professor in die Nuwe Testament aan die teologiese skool,

374

Potchefstroom en die Fakulteit Teologie van die Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir Christelik:e Hoer Onderwys. Pretoria : N .G. Kerkboekhandel. p. 70-80.)

JULICHER, A. 1931. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Tiibingen Mohr (Paul Siebeck). 629 p.

KAHMANN, J.J.A. 1983. De tweede brief van Petrus. Vertaald en toegelicht door prof.

dr. J.J.A. Kahmann. (In Kahmann, J.J.A. & Dehandschutter, B. De tweede brief van Petrus. Vertaald en toegelicht door prof. dr. J.J.A. Kahmann. De brief van Judas.

Vertaald en toegelicht door dr. B. Dehandschutter. Boxtel : Katholieke Bijbelstichting. p.

11-112.)

KAHMANN, J.J.A. 1980. Schrift en traditie in de tweede brief van Petrus. (In Henau, E., Hustinx, A., Menken, M., Munier, W. & Tercic, F., Reds. Schrift in veelvoud. Boxtel

: Katholieke Bijbelstichting. 94 p.)

KaSEMANN, E. 1964. Essays on New Testament themes. London : SCM Press.

(Studies in Biblical Theology 41.) 200 p.

KEIL, C.F. & DELITZSCH, F. 1976. Commentary on the Old Testament: the Pentateuch.

Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. 486 p.

KELLY, J.N.D. 1969. A commentary on the epistles of Peter and of Jude. London : Adam & Charles Black. 387 p.

~~~~

- - - -

KENNY, A. 1986. A stylometric study of the New Testament. Oxford: Clarendon 125 p.

KEULERS, J. }956. De katholieke brieven en het boek der Openbaring. Roermond : J.J.

Romen & Zonen. 407 p.

KIM, C. 1972. Form and structure of the familiar Greek letter of recommendation.

·Montana : University of Montana. 244 p. (SBL dissertation series 4.)

KNOCH, 0. 1990. Der erste und zweite Petrusbrief. Der Judasbrief. Regensburg : Friedrich Pustet. 333 p. (Regensburger Neues Testament.) ·r

KLEMENS. KA.ru.tEV'tO<; npo<; Kopl.v8tot><; A. (In Goold, G.P., ed. 1977. Apostolic Fathers I. Loeb Classical Liorary. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p.3-121.)

: .·1

375

KOLENKOW, A.B. 1975. The genre testament and forecasts of the future in the Hellenistic Jewish milieu. Journal for the study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic a n v Roman period, 6(1):57-71.

KOLENKOW, A.B. 1986. The literary genre "Testament". (In Kraft, A. & Nickelsburg, G.W.E., eds. Early Judaism and its modem interpreters. Georgia : Scholars Press. p.

259-267.

KOSKENNIEMI, H. 1956. Studien zur Idee und Phfaseologie des Griechischen Briefes his 400 n. Chr. Helsinki : Suomalaisen Kirjapaino. (Suomalaisen Tiedeakatemian Toimituksia annales academiae scientiarum fennicae, Sarfa-ser. B Nide-tom. 102,2.)

KRUGER, M.A. 1993. 'n Weg uit die oorheersing van die histories-kritiese metode, fundamentalisme en genitiefteologiee. In die Skrijlig, 27(4):583-602, Des.

KiiMMEL, W.G. 1972. Introduction to the New Testament. London: SCM Press. 444 p.

KURZ, W.S. 1985. Luke 22:14-38 and Greco-Roman and Biblical farewell addresses.

Journal of Biblical Literature, 104(2):251-268. v/

'KURZ, W.S. 1990. Farewell addresses in the New Testament. Collegeville The

~. Liturgical Press. 133 p.

LADD, G.E. 1974. A theology of the New Testament. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans. 661 p.

LANE, W.L. 1975. The Gospel according to Mark. Grand Rapids : W.B. Eerdmans.

652 p. (The,New International Commentary on the New Testament.)

LAWRENCE, W. 1984. The form of the sermon in hellenistic judaism and early ( christianity. Harvard Theological review, 77:277-299.

LEANEY, A.R.C. 1972. The New Testament. London :Hodder and Stoughton. 255p.

LENSKI, R.C.H. 1966. The interpretation of the epistles of St. Peter, St. John en St. Jude.

Minneapolis : Augsburg Publishing House. 358 p.

LINDARS, B. 1961. New Testament apologetic. · The doctrinal significance of the Old

Testament quotations. London: SCM Press. 301 p.

376

LOMBARD, H.A. 1983. Tendense en aksente in die geskiedenis van navorsing oor 2

Petrus en Judas. Theologia Evangelica, 16(1):74-82, Mrt. ~

LOMBARD, H.A. 1991. Teo1ogie en 1ewenspraktyk: die appel van indikatiewe en imperatiewe in 2 Petrus (In Roberts & J.H., Vorster, W.S. reds. Teologie in konteks, 494- 513. Halfway House: Orion.).

LOUW, J. 1965. Wat wordt in ii Petrus 1:20 gesteld? Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift, /

19:202-212. ~

LOUW, J.P. & NIDA, E.A. 1988i. Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament based on semantic domains. (Vols. 1.) New York : United Bible Societies.

LOUW, J.P. & NIDA, E.A. 1988ii. Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament based on semantic domains. (Vols. 2.) New York: United Bible Societies.

LUMBY, J.R.

4:446-469.

/

1876. On the epistles of St. Peter. The second epistle. The Expositor, ~

LYONS, J. 1978. Semantics. Vol.l. Cambridge: University Press. 356 p.

MALHERBE, J. 1977. Ancient epistolary theorists. Ohio journal ofrelikgious studies, 5:3-77. Atlanta: Scholars Press.

MALHERBE, A.J. 1983. Social aspects of early christianity. Philadelphia : Fortress Press. 131 p.

MATTER, H.M~ 1980. Wederkomst en wereldeinde: de zin van de "parousia" in het Nieuwe Testament. Kampen: Kok. 157 p.

MAYOR, J.B. 1965. The epistle of St. Jude and the second epistle of St. Peter. Grand Rapids : Baker Book House. 239 p.

McNEILE, A.H. 1965. An introduction to the study of the New Testament. Oxford :

Clarendon Press. 486 p.

MEADE, D.G. 1986. Pseudonymity and canon: an investigation into the relationship of authorship and authority in Jewish and earliest Christian tradition. Tiibingen : Mohr. 257 p.

(Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament.)

377

MEIER, S. 1988. 2 Peter 3:3-7- An early Jewish and C~istian response to eschatologic~

skepticism. Biblische Zeitscri.ft, 32:255-257. .

METZGER, B.M. 1965. The New Testament. Its background, growth, and content. New York: Abingdon Press. 284 p.

METZGER, B.M. 1971. A textual commentary on the Greek New Testament. London : United Bible Societies. 775 p.

MICHL, J. 1968. Die Katholischen Briefe. Regensburg Friedrich Pustet.

(Regensburger Neues Testament.) 334 p.

MOLLAND, E. 1955. La these "La prophetie n'est jamais venue de la volonte de

l'homme" (2 Pierre 1,21) et les Pseudo-Clementines. Studia Theologica, 9:67-85. ~

MOORE, A.L. 1966. The parousia in the New Testament. Leiden: E.J. Brill. 248 p.

MORRIS, C.L. 1975. The gospel according to St. Luke. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans.

350 p.,. (The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries.)

MORRIS L. 1975. The gospel according to John. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans. 936 p.

" (The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries.)

MOUNCE, R.H. 1982. A living hope. A commentary on 1 and 2 Peter. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans. 157 p.

MUILENBURG, J. 1969.

88:1-18.

Form criticism and beyond. Journal of Biblical Literature, V

MULLER, J.J. 1974. Nuwe-Testamentiese apokriewe. Pretoria : N.G. Kerk-uitgewers.

131 p.

NEYREY, J.H. 1980i. The apologetic use of the transfiguration in 2 Peter 1:16-21. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 42:504-519.

NEYREY, J.H. 1980ii. The form and background of the polemic in 2 Peter. Journal of V

, Biblical Literature, 99(1):407-431.

378

NIDA, E.A., LOUW, J.P., SNYMAN, A.H. & CRONJE, J.v.W. 1983. Style and discourse. Cape Town :Bible Society. 199 p.

NIDA, E.A. 1972. Implications of contemporary linguistics for biblical scholarship.

Journal of Biblical Literature, 91:73-89. ~

NIDA, E.A. & LOUW, J.P. 1992. Lexical semantics of the Greek New Testament: a supplement to the Greek-English lexicon of the New Testament based on semantic domains.

Atlanta : Scholars Press. 155 p. (Society of Biblical Literature.)

OTTO, K. 1967. Der zweite Petrusbrief. Dusseldorf: Patmos-Verlag. 170 p.

OVERSTREET, R.L. 1980. A study of 2 Peter 3:10-13. Bibliotheca Sacra, 137(545):355- / 371.

PAULSEN, H. 1992. Der zweite Petrusbrief und der Judasbrief. Gottingen : Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Testament.)

188 p. (Kritisch-exegetischer Kommentar tiber das Neue

PICIRELLI, R.E. 1975. The meaning of "Epignosis". The Evangelical Quarterly, 47:85~

93.

PlCIRILLI, R.E. 1963. An exegesis of the Greek text of second Peter, chapters one and two. Greenville: Bob Jones University. (Thesis- D.Phil.) 319 p.

PICIRILLI, R.E. 1988. Allusions to 2 Peter in.the Apostolic Fathers. Journal for the Study / of the New Te~tament, 33:57-83.

PLINIUS. 1969. Fifty letters of Pliny. Selected & edited by A. N. Sherwin-White.

Oxford: Oxford University Press. 207 p.

RABALI, T.C. 1992. The motif of hastening the Lord's coming: 2 Peter 3:1-13 and its alleged parallels and backround. Pretoria : UNISA. (Proefskrif- D.Th.) 294 p.

REICKE, B. 1968. The New Testament era: the world of the Bible from 500 B.C. to A.D.

100. Philidelphia :Fortress Press. 336 p. (The Anchor Bible.)

REICKE, B. 1982. The epistle of James, Peter, and Jude. Garden City : Doubleday &

Company. 221 p.

379

RIDDERBOS, H. 1959. Aan de Romeinen. Kampen: J.H. Kok. 364 p. (Commentaar op bet Nieuwe Testament.)

RIDDERBOS, H. 1978. The coming of the kingdom. Ontario : Paideia Press. 556 p.

ROWSTON, D.J. 1971. The setting of the letter of Jude. Michigan : Xerox University Microfilms. 182 p.

RIFE, J.M. 1975. The nature and origin of the New Testament. New York Philosophical Library. 158 p.

SCHELKLE, K.H. 1988. Die Petrusbriefe. Der Judasbrief. Freiburg : Herder. 260 p.

(Herders Theologischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament.)

SCHLATTER, D.U. 1964. Die Briefe des Petrus, Judas, Jakobus, der Brief an die Hebdier. Stuttgart: Kalwer Verlag. 429 p.

SCHLOSSER, J. 1973. Les jours de Noe et de Lot: a propos de Luc, xvii. Revue V

Biblique, 80:26-30.

SCHWANK, B., STaGER, A. & THi.iSING, W. 1978. The epistles of St. Peter, St. John and St. Jude. London: Sbeed and Ward. 348 p.

SCHWEIZER, E. 1975. l:apl;, crapKuc6c;, crapKtvoc;. (In Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. 7:98-151.)

SELWYN, E.G. 1947. The first epistle of St. Peter. London: Macmillan. 489 p.

THE SEPTUAGINT VERSION OF THE OLD TESTAMENT AND APOCRYPHA. 1976.

Norfolk: Lowe & Brydone. 248 p.

SILVA, M. 1983. Biblical words and their meaning: an introduction to lexical semantics.

Grand Rapids: Zondervan. 201 p.

SMITH, T.V. 1985. Petrine controversies in early Christianity: attitudes towards Peter in Christian writings of the first two centuries. Tiibingen: Mohr. 236 p.

SMYTH, H.W. 1971. Greek Grammer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 784 p.

SNYDER, G.F.

23:117-120.

1977.

380

The Tobspruch in the New Testament. New Testament Studies, /

SPICQ, C. 1966. Les epitres de saint Pierre. Paris : Librairie lecoffre. 269 p. (Sources Bibliques.)

STAMBAUGH, J.E. & BALCH, D.L. 1986. The New Testament in its social environment. Philadelphia : The Westminster Press. 194 p.

STAUFFER, E. 1948. Die Theologie des Neuen Testaments. Giitersloh : Bertelsmann.

RAC 1 (1950) Sp29-35; Die Theologie des Neuen Testaments (Stuttgart 1940), S 327-30.

361 p.

STIBBS, A.M. 1978. The first epistle general of Peter. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans. 192 p. (The Tyndale New Testament commentaries.)

STOWERS, K.S. 1986. Letter writing in Greco-Roman antiquity. Philadelphia : The Westminster Press. 188 p.

STROBEL, A. 1961. Untersuchungen zum eschatologischen Verzogerungsproblem: auf grund der spaijiidisch-urchristlichen geschichte von Habakuk 2,2 ff. 305 p. (Supplements to Novum Testamentum.)

TALBERT, C.H. 1966.

20:137-145.

II Peter and the delay of the parousia. Vigiliae Christianae,

TASKER, R.V.G. 1946. The Old Testament in the New Testament. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans. 159 p.

TASKER, R.V.G. 1977. The gospel according to St. John. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans.

237 p. (The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries.)

THIEDE, C.P. 1986. A pagan reader of 2 Peter: Cosmic conflagration in 2 Peter 3 and the octavius of Minucius Felix. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 26:79-96. V

THIESSEN, H.C. 1955. Introduction to the New Testament. Grand Rapids : Eerdmans.

347 p.

. 381

THISELTON, A.C. 1979. Semantics and New Testament interpretation. (In Marshall, I.H, ed. New Testament interpretation: essays on principles and methods. Cape Town : Oxford University Press. p. 75-104.)

THOMSON, P. 1896-1897. "Interpretation" or "Revealment".

8:331-2, Oct.-Sep.

The Expository ~'

VAN AARDE, A.G. 1982. God met ons: die teologiese perspektief van die Matteusevangelie. Pretoria : Universiteit van Pretoria. (Proefskrif- Th.D.) 217 p.

VAN DEN BROEK, R. 1983. The present state of gnostic studies. Vigiliae Christianae,

37:41-71. ~

VAN DEN REEVER, G. 1993. In purifying fire: world view and 2 Peter 3:10.

Neotestamentica. Journal of the New Testament Society of South Africa, 27 ( 1) 107-118. L/

VAN GORP, H. 1984. Lexikon van litaire termen. Leuven: Wolters. 211 p.

VAN HOUWELING, P.H.R. 1988. De tweede trompet: de authenticiteit van de tweede brief van Petrus. Kampen Kok. (Proefschrift - Theologische Universiteit van de Gereformeerde Kerken in Nederland te Kampen.) 318 p.

- VAN HOUWELING, P.H.R. 1991. 1 Petrus: rondzendbrief uit Babylon. Kampen : Kok.

205p.

VAN HOUWELING, P.H.R. 1993. 2 Petrus en Judas: testament in tweevoud. Kampen : Kok. 176_p. (Commentaar op het Nieuwe Testament)

VAN RENS~URG, J.J.J. 1986 rpaJ.LJ.La'ttKoc;: 'n handleiding by grammatiese eksegese van die Griekse Nuwe Testament. Potchefstroom: Wesvalia Boekhandel. 67 p.

VAN RENSBURG, J.J.J. 1992. Vreemdelingskap in 1 Petrus: Voorlopige definiering van die betekenis van die betrokke Griekse woorde. (In Barkhuizen, J.H., Stander, H.F., Swart, G.J. reds. Hupomnema. Feesbundel opgedra aan prof. J.P. Louw. Pretoria : Universiteit van Pretoria. p. 283-306.)

VAN UNNIK, W.C. 1980. Corpus Hellenisticum Novi Testamenti. (In Barret, C.K., ed.

Sparsa collecta: the collected essays of W.C. van Unnik. Leiden: Brill. p. 194-203.

382

VoGTLE, A. 1970. Das Neue Testament und die Zukunft des Kosmos. Dusseldorf : Patmos-Verlag. 364 p.

VoGTLE, A. 1972. Die Schriftwerdung der apostolischen Paradosis nach 2. Petr 1,12-15.

(In Neues Testament und Geschichte: historisches Geschehen und Deutung im Neuen Testament. Tiibingen : Mohr. p. 297-305.)

VON HELLMUT, L. 1961. Ein Beitrag zur iibersetzung von II Ptr. 3:10d. Zeitschrift.fUr die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der iilteren Kirche, 52:128-129. ,

/

VON SPEYR, A. 1961. Die Katholischen Briefe. 1. Der Jakobusbrief. Die Petrusbriefe. Einsiedeln :Johannes Verlag. 488 p.

WAND, J.W.C. 1934. The general epistels of St. Peter and St. Jude. London: Methuen.

(Westminster Commentaries.) 234 p.

WATSON, D.P. 1988. Invention, arrangement and style: rhetorical criticism of Jude and 2 Peter. Atlanta : Scholars Press. 214 p. (Dissertation Series.)

WEISIGER, C.N. 1962. The epistles of Peter. Proclaiming the New Testament. London : Oliphants. 127 p.

WENHAM, D. 1987. Being "found" on the last day: New light on 2 Peter 3:10 and 2 Corinthians 5:3. New Testament Studies, 33: 477-479.

WHITE, J.L. 1972. The form and function of the body of the Greek letter: a study of the letter-body in. the non-literary papyri and in Paul the apostle. Missoula : Scholars Press.

(SBL dissertation series) 131 p.

WIBBING, S. 1959. Die Tugend- und Lasterkataloge im Neuen Testament. Berlyn : Topelmann. 127 p. (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fiir die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft no.

25.)

WIKENHAUSER, A. & SCHMID, J. 1973. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. Freiburg :Herder. 677 p.

WILLEMZE, J. 1919. De tweede brief van Petrus. De briefen van Johannes. De brief

van Judas. Den Haag :Wolters. (Teks en uitleg.) 144 p.

383

WILSON, F.B.A. 1977-78. Slippery words. Gnosis, gnostic, gnosticism. The Exposito~

Times, 89:296-300, Oct. 1977- Sep.1978.

WILLS, L. 1984. The form of the sermon in Hellenistic Judaism and early Christianity.

Harvard Theological Review, 77(3-4):277-299. t/'

WOHLENBERG, G. 1915. Der erste und zweite Petrusbrief und der Judasbrief ausgelegt.

Leipzig: A. Deichert'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Werner Scholl. 344 p.

WOLTERS, A. 1990. "Partners of the deity": a covenantal reading of 2 Peter 1:4. Calvin

Theological Journal, 25(1)28-44, Apr. V

WOLTERS, A. 1987. Worldview and textual critisism in 2 Peter 3:10. The Westminister / Theological J oumal, 49(2) :405-13.

WUEST, K.S. 1960. In these last days: II Peter, 1,11,111 John, and Jude in the Greek New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. 263 p.

YOUNG, E.J. 1977. The book of Isaiah. Grand Rapids : W.B. Eerdmans. (The New International Commentary on the Old Testament.)

YOUNG, R.G. 1987. Was there a Petrine community? An examination of first and second ' century documents ascribed to Simon Peter. Michigan : The Southern Baptist Theological

Seminary (Dissertation - D. Phil.) 262 p ..

ZMIJEWSKI, J 1979. Apostolische Paradosis und Pseudepigraphie im Neuen Testament.

"Durch Erinnerung wachhalten" (2 Petr 1,13; 3:1.) Biblische Zeitschrift, 23:161-171. V