Market research Turkey:
Assessing market attractiveness for Mueller
Y. van der Ploeg
Market Research Turkey:
Assessing market attractiveness for Mueller
Assen, July 2010
Thesis for the Master program of International Business and Management (IB&M) Faculty of Economics and Business
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Author
Y. van der Ploeg S1830848
Supervisors
First Supervisor: Dr. S. Stakhovych Second Supervisor: Mr. H. A. Ritsema Company Supervisor: S. I. Bijma
Executive summary
(Not available)
Acknowledgements
The past period has been a great experience to me. I had the opportunity to write my master thesis for a company, Mueller. Therefore, in writing the thesis, it was a great challenge to create a balance between the academic and the business world. Combining the thesis with this internship has broadened my knowledge in the international business.
I would like to thank my supervisors from the university of Groningen, Dr. Stanislav Stakhovych and Mr. Henk Ritsema for the advices, encouragements and helpful visits.
I was very pleased that the management of Mueller allowed me to perform a market research for Turkey. Moreover, I appreciate that they allowed me to work at their office in Assen a few days a week on a flexible basis. Therefore I would like to thank Mr. Tjepkema and Mr. Bijma for giving me the opportunity and helping to perform a research at Mueller and to have a critical view at the research. My special thanks go to the sales managers Mr.
Mulder and Mr. Van Wijk and to the marketing manager P. Fopma for their help and participation in an interview and trips to getting to know the company better. I would also like to thank the vice president of IMIGroup, N. Gozen, for her participation in an interview, her advice and help for examining best practices for entry to Turkey. Furthermore, I would like to thank all the colleagues at Mueller for their inspiration and for being very interested in my thesis during the writing process.
Table of Contents
Executive summary...1
Acknowledgements...2
List of figures...5
Introduction ...8
1 The Company...8
1.1 General company description ...8
1.2 Customers ...9
1.3 Company structure Mueller ...9
1.4 Organizational chart...9
1.5 Internationalization strategy ... 10
1.6 International activities... 10
2 Research Design... 11
2.1 Problem statement ... 11
2.2 Main research question... 11
2.3 Management objective... 11
2.4 Subquestions... 12
2.4.1 Organization Mueller ... 12
2.4.2 The Turkish market... 13
2.4.3 Entry mode strategies ... 13
2.5 Demarcation of the research ... 14
2.6 Data methods ... 14
2.6.1 Desk research... 14
2.6.2 Field research... 15
2.7 Data collection... 15
2.8 Validity... 16
3 Literature review... 17
3.1 Internationalization approach... 17
3.2 Internal analysis ... 18
3.2.1 Porter’s value chain... 19
3.2.2 Resource‐Based View of the firm ... 19
3.3 International market theory ... 20
3.4 Entry mode strategies... 21
4 Internal analysis ... 22
4.1 Porters’ Value Chain ... 22
4.1.1 Primary activities ... 23
4.1.2 Support activities... 24
4.1.3 Conclusion ... 24
4.2 Resource Based view of the firm ... 25
4.2.1 Valuable ... 25
4.2.2 Rare resources... 26
4.2.3 Imitable resources ... 26
4.2.4 Organization ... 26
4.2.5 Conclusion ... 26
5 The Turkish Market ... 27
5.1 Development of Turkey... 27
5.2 Turkey and the European Union ... 28
5.3 EU accession ... 28
5.4 Turkish dairy sector... 29
5.5 PESTEL analysis ... 30
5.5.1 Political factors... 30
5.5.2 Economic factors ... 30
5.5.3 Socio‐cultural factors... 31
5.5.4 Technological factors... 31
5.5.5 Environmental factors... 32
5.5.6 Legal factors... 32
5.5.7 Conclusion ... 32
5.6 Ghemawat’s Distance ... 33
5.6.1 Conclusion ... 35
5.7 Porter’s five forces ... 35
5.7.1 Conclusion ... 37
5.8 Strengths and challenges Turkish dairy sector... 37
6 Entry strategies ... 39
6.1 Types of entry mode strategies ... 39
6.2 Entry mode strategies to Turkey... 39
6.3 Best practices... 40
6.4 Conclusion... 42
7 Conclusion and Recommendations ... 42
7.1 Limitations and Recommendations for further research... 42
References... 43
Appendix A: Agricultural sector Turkey... 49
Appendix B: CAGEDistance Framework ... 50
Appendix C: Main Dairies EU and Turkey... 51
Appendix D: Competition... 52
Appendix E: Export Turkey to the EU... 52
List of figures
Figure 1: Organizational chart Mueller... 10
Figure 2: Porter’s Value Chain... 22
Figure 3: Porter’s Five Forces... 36
Introduction
Mueller is specialized in the design and manufacture of stainless steel tanks, processing systems and equipment for the food, dairy, beverage, chemical, biofuels, pharmaceutical, biotechnical, and pure water industries. The company is active in North America, South America, South Africa, Asia, Oceania, and Europe. The demand for cooling systems is not only related to the Dutch economy, but also much more abroad. Expanding abroad is therefore a great opportunity to grow and enlarge business further. Therefore, more countries should be analyzed to enter the market.
(Not available)
Looking at Europe, many countries show economic developments lately. One of the largest emerging markets considering Europe is Turkey. Since 2002, the economy has steadily increased and this trend in forecasted to hold on (Ismihan and Metin‐Ozcan, 2009). However the economy in Turkey is forecasted to recover, the economy remains fragile to 2010.
Turkey is also one of the most important dairy countries (Scheepstra, 2010). At Mueller, there is already an assumption that Turkey would be a potential market for doing business.
As Turkey will be a new market outside Europe, Mueller has to know more about this country and its cultural aspects.
(Not available)
Large players already try to enter the market and for a production company like Mueller, there might be opportunities to perform successful in the Turkish market. If these opportunities exist at the moment, if the Turkish market is really a potential market for the company and how this market can be best entered should be examined, considering entry mode strategies and cultural differences.
To examine whether Mueller could expand to the emerging market Turkey, the main research question for this study is: How attractive is the Turkish market for the production company Mueller and what would be the best way to enter this market?
In the field of international marketing and the resource based view theory, it is emphasized that before internationalizing its business operations, a company should first look at the internal capabilities. The choice of internationalization should further depend on the internal
capabilities. This research attempts to determine the attractiveness of Turkish market based on Mueller’s own capabilities.
From this, analyzing the Turkish market and its dairy sector as well as examining the best entry mode strategy to enter this market, the structure of this thesis is as follows. The thesis starts with a description of the organization and its activities in chapter one, because it is wise to have a good understanding of the organization first in order to read the rest of the paper. In chapter two the methodology used in this research is outlined. Important issues on the problem definition, research question and subquestions will be discussed in this chapter.
Chapter three discusses the most relevant literature for this research to provide a clear foundation for the evaluation of the results. Chapter four looks at Mueller’s internal capabilities and resources, based on an internal analysis using the theories of Porter’s value chain and the resource based view of the firm. Thereafter the Turkish market will be examined in chapter five. In this part some attention will be given to the relation between Turkey and the EU, the developments of the dairy sector in particular and the market. To analyze the market three theories are used. These are a PESTEL analysis, Ghemawat’s CAGE framework and Porter’s five forces. In chapter six the best choice for entry mode strategy will be analyzed as well as best practices on how to enter the Turkish market. The thesis ends with an answer to the research question and some recommendations for further research.
1 The Company
In this first chapter, the company for which the research is carried out will be introduced.
Therefore first an overall company description will be given. Then, the company structure will be explained. It is important to highlight this aspect of the company at this point in time, because the company was recently taken over and this determines many of its actions today. Subsequently the activities of the company will be described. The chapter ends by indicting the general internationalization strategy of the company.
1.1 General company description
In general, the Paul Mueller Company was established in 1940. Its headquarters are situated in Springfield, Missouri. The Paul Mueller Company is a global solutions provider and has been active in the international market for over 45 years. The company is specialized in the design and manufacture of processing systems, stainless steel tanks and equipment for several industries, such as the food, dairy, beverage, chemical, biofuels, pharmaceutical, biotechnical and pure water industries.
The Paul Mueller Company bought its products at Meko Holland BV for many years. In 1970, Meko Holland BV was founded. The company provides milk cooling tanks, which are sold worldwide. Business takes place from The Netherlands. The production plant for the tanks, as well as the marketing and sales office are both positioned in The Netherlands. After great development, The Mueller Company decided together with Meko Holland BV to take over this company in 2007. From that point in time, Mueller BV was established. Mueller BV is a subsidiary of the Paul Mueller Company and is situated in the Netherlands. Mueller BV still designs and manufactures stainless steel tanks, processing systems and other equipment.
Currently, the products are being used in over 100 countries worldwide in a wide variety of applications.
As a guideline for the organization, the company has formulated the following quality policy:
‘Paul Mueller Company is committed to providing solutions for our customers by continuously improving our processes to produce valued products and services, when promised and as promised.’ (www.muel.com)
1.2 Customers
The customers of the company vary considering the industry. The customers that buy the product can vary mostly between cultivators or companies and multinationals that need cooling tanks to store milk. Also companies dealing with cruise ships are customers of Mueller. For this research the focus will be on the agricultural sector, as this is one of the most important industries for the company, where they already have many years of experience in.
1.3 Company structure Mueller
The areas the company is already active in are North America, South America, South Africa, Asia, Oceania, and Europe. The products are produced in The Netherlands and are then distributed among the countries. The marketing department of Mueller’s marketing and sales division develops promotion materials for all export countries in order to make sure that Mueller’s corporation style is distributed in an equal way among the countries. In this thesis, the marketing and sales division of the company will extensively be analyzed. The subsidiary can be split up in four parts, as is visualized in figure 1. Meko Holland BV is responsible for the marketing and sales activities. This company division is therefore most important for this research. Meko Services BV is an organization that provides services considering the products. Meko milk tanks BV is a rental division and Meko Asia is a trading company (Mueller Business sales plan, 2010).
1.4 Organizational chart
In this part the overall chart of the Muller Company is visualized. As explained earlier, Mueller operates under the influence of the Paul Mueller Company. This influence is reflected in the organizational chart.
1.5 Internationalization strategy
(Not available)
1.6 International activities
(Not available)
PMC
Mueller BV
Paltrok Beheer BV
Mueller Sales BV
Mueller
Lichtenvoorde BV MCS UK Meko
Holland BV Meko
Services BV Meko
Milktanks BV Meko
Asia Ltd
DEG Germany
Figure 1: Organizational chart Mueller
2 Research Design
In this second chapter, the management problem will be described. The research question and objective will be explained as well as the subquestions. The data analysis will be explained and attention will be paid to the limitations that might emerge during the research.
2.1 Problem statement
At the moment the focus of Mueller is now more on emerging markets as the company
captures already several regions and countries in the world. Despite the financial crisis, many countries have shown economic developments lately. At Mueller, there is already an assumption that Turkey would be a potential market for doing business. At the moment this market is still a blind spot for the management of the company and therefore, the management of the company would like to gain more knowledge about the opportunities for the company in Turkey.
2.2 Main research question
The main purpose of this research is whether Turkey would be a potential market for a production company, like Mueller, and how this market can be best entered considering entry strategies and cultural differences. Moreover, it is important here to analyze how the company and its management should adapt to enter the market successfully.
The research question of this thesis will be the following. How attractive is the Turkish market for the production company Mueller and what would be the best way to enter this market?
2.3 Management objective
The objective of this research is to provide Mueller with sufficient knowledge about whether there will be a market for the company and its products in Turkey and how this market should be best entered. To gain knowledge on this issue, it should be analyzed first if Turkey, as a market, could be really beneficial for the company. Furthermore, it should be analyzed how this market should be entered in the first place. Moreover, recommendations will be given on how the company should adapt to perform successfully in that market. This should
be done in a way that the management of Mueller will be able to make a well‐founded decision about their focus in this country.
2.4 Subquestions
Because several aspects play a particular role in this research, the subquestions will be divided over three chapters in order to come to a structured investigation. The chapters are about the company Mueller, the country market assessment and a section about entry mode strategies.
2.4.1 Organization Mueller
The subquestions that will be answered in chapter four about the internal analysis of Mueller are:
‐ What are the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of Mueller, looking at the organization?
To get to know the company and to get more information on the organization and its members it is necessary to find out where the organization has its strengths and weaknesses, looking at for example the general internationalization strategies. In that way a good indication of the organization and its management can be outlined.
‐ What are the goals of Mueller?
What does the organization want to achieve from now until the next two, five or then years is important to gain information on. What goals do they have to expand further and what are the exact objectives to grow more internationally at the moment.
‐ Why do they want to enter the Turkish market?
This subquestion is very important, as it should be clear what the main reasons are to expand to a new market. Also, why the management thinks it would be relevant for the company in this case to expand to Turkey, is important to know.
‐ How does Mueller normally expand internationally?
It might be wise to look at the international expansion strategies of the company first, before analyzing how to expand to the new market, Turkey. Finding the strengths of the company on this aspect could in the end be beneficial to find out which entry strategies would be best for Mueller to enter the Turkish market.
2.4.2 The Turkish market
The subquestions that will be answered in this chapter five are:
‐ What does the Turkish market look like for Mueller?
Since the market is new for the company it should be made clear how the market looks like for a production company like Mueller.
‐ Is the Turkish market potential for the company?
A market analysis should be done to find out whether Turkey is a potential market for Mueller.
‐ Which competitors are there?
Competitors are an important aspect to look at. It should be analyzed if there are already similar companies that are operating in Turkey or whether there are threats for the organization in Turkey.
2.4.3 Entry mode strategies
Finally the following subquestions that will be answered in chapter six are:
‐ Which entry strategies are there?
With the knowledge of the previous parts, on the organization Mueller itself, the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats and the market analyses, a suitable entry strategy can be defined for Mueller to enter the Turkish market successfully. Therefore some knowledge of several entry strategies should be obtained and analyzed first.
‐ Are there best practices of other companies that entered the Turkish market?
To find out how other companies entered the Turkish market, some information can be gathered from these companies on this issue. Also, companies from Turkey itself could be analyzed to find out what their opinion on entering their market is.
‐ What experiences with entry strategies does the organization have?
It is worth noting what experiences the company itself already has when expanding internationally. This information will be taken into account when giving recommendations on the best entry mode strategies for the company.
‐ What are common entry strategies for Mueller when entering the Turkish market?
In the end the question should be answered on which entry strategy would be most suitable for Mueller to enter the Turkish market.
2.5 Demarcation of the research
This research is cross‐sectional research, because data is collected by a single respondent in a single period of time due to limited time to conduct the research. In longitudinal research conclusions are based on information gathered from multiple periods of time (Malter, Ganesan and Moorman, 2008). Because the Turkish market remains fragile through to 2010, conclusions about the opportunities and threats could be altered after a short period time (Lopez, 2009).
2.6 Data methods
How to conduct this research will depend on the methodology used as this is an important way of how to structure actions on research (Blumberg, 2008). The problem field in which this research is conducted is the field of management research (Thomas, 2004). As the research will be done for a company and its management, a good balance should be made between the business world and the scientific world of research. To do this, what concepts, and how these will be identified should be described and why certain things happen will be explained (Whetten, 1989). Therefore there are three aspects that are important to analyze in this research which are divided into three chapters about the company Mueller, a country market assessment and a chapter about entry mode strategies. The way on how to investigate this research is mainly by desk research and field research. This is done by data construction, by using documents and records in desk research and interviews for field research (Thomas, 2004).
2.6.1 Desk research
To investigate whether Turkey would be an opportunity for production companies like Mueller, first an internal analysis on the company Mueller will be done. What are the strengths of the company and where to find the threats when expanding abroad. What kind of company is Mueller and what goals are important to achieve when expanding internationally. The value chain of Porter will be used here as well as the resource‐based view of the firm. The internal context according to Boddy (2005) will be taken into account.
To analyze whether Turkey would be a potential market for the company, a country analyses will be done. To analyze this, macro and micro economic aspects will be taken into account (PESTEL). Therefore mainly the country’s characteristics will be analyzed and described as criteria to criticize the country. Criteria that will be used to analyze whether the Turkish
market would be potential for Mueller are for example: the political system and legal system of the countries, economic development, international relations and cultural differences.
Several theories will be used to analyze the characteristics of the countries as well as documents or reports on the economic development of the countries. Also more literature will be used here to evaluate global opportunities such as Ghemawat (2001) to diagnose strategic capabilities. When looking at the situation in Turkey, Porter’s five forces model for industry analyses (threat of new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers, threat of substitutes, bargaining power of buyers and intensity of rivalry) will be used. Moreover, some attention will be paid to what changes will emerge when Turkey would or would not join the EU, when looking at entry strategies.
After these analyses, a study will be done on which entry strategy to chose to enter the Turkish market and perform successfully. This will be done by looking at theory and what has been written about this issue so far. Also information will tried to be gained from the Dutch and Turkish Embassies to gain more knowledge on the cultural differences, especially looking at entering the Turkish market.
2.6.2 Field research
Furthermore information will be obtained from desk research as well as by interviewing managers at companies that entered the Turkish market. With this method, qualitative data will be obtained. The interviews will be semi‐structured, as it is important to compare the results. The goal of face‐to‐face interviewing is to obtain useful information on how other companies entered the market in the past (Blumberg, 2008). The results of the survey or interviews will be compared to what is written by the literature on entry modes. Moreover, several case studies could be done to gain knowledge about how other companies entered the Turkish market. This will be done by investigating how other production companies entered the market and who are already operating in the market. What entry strategies did similar production companies use to enter the Turkish market? To do this investigation, first similar companies have to be chosen that are active in the market in Turkey.
Recommendations will be based on the results derived from the research to come to reliable conclusions.
2.7 Data collection
The data that is used for this research consists of primary and secondary data. To obtain relevant information considering the desk research in the first part, company information is needed such as reports, or other useful documents. In the case of primary data, several
interviews with managers in different functions are done to get more knowledge of the organization from several perspectives. All interviews are semi structured. The data that is used for the market assessment part of the research will be secondary, quantitative data.
The data is selected based on the criteria, that it should be reliable and as recent as possible with respect to the emerging market Turkey, as this information can possibly change over time. Several articles, journals and books will be used as well as websites and other reports, to be able to base the results and conclusions. Because the Turkish dairy sector is very specific, several reports are collected from other universities who did research in that area.
Furthermore, case studies from companies that expanded to Turkey are done and an interview with a Turkish company to get knowledge on best practices to enter the market from another perspective.
2.8 Validity
The concept validity is a desirable and essential property of research and functions as a boundary maker by dividing approved research from disapproved (Thomas, 2006). There exist two key dimensions of validity, which are internal and external validity. Internal validity refers to the ability of a researcher to argue that observed correlations are casual. It is about the internal coherence obtained in the study. External validity can be defined as generalizing the relationships that are found in a study to other times and settings (Roe and Just, 2009).
Because this research continues to dominate the discussion and critique of empirical work based on naturally occurring market and field data, the internal validity is sufficient. By examining theories as well as scientific articles in relation to the three sections, the company, the market and entry mode strategies as well as making use of the information gathered from semi‐structured interviews, an extended and valid analysis can be provided.
In that way a comprehensive and coherent market analysis can be provided to the company, which shows a balance between the business world as well as the scientific world.
3 Literature review
In order to provide a clear foundation for the evaluation of the results of this research, the most relevant literature, for this research, that is used in the international marketing field to assess a new market will be discussed. This literature review can therefore be seen as a framework in which the following chapters should be interpreted. Several aspects will be discussed that are related to the area regarding issues in the international marketing field.
Therefore an indication will be given first on the essence of internationalization in today’s global world. The need and benefit of an internal analysis will be discussed as well as the reasons for performing an internal analysis. The variables and characteristics that should be taken into account when assessing a market will be outlined to assess a country’s market attractiveness. Last an indication of the most relevant entry mode strategies that would be needed when expanding to new markets will be discussed.
3.1 Internationalization approach
In the face of globalization, as well as an increasingly interconnected world, many firms attempt to expand their business abroad. The main reasons for this are because international expansion provides new and potentially more profitable markets. Moreover, it can be helpful to sustain competitiveness and it might facilitate access to manufacturing innovations, new product ideas and the latest technology (Hollensen, 2008). There are several theories that explain for a part, or parts, the firms’ internationalization activities.
Some theories however seem to be more relevant for Mueller than other theories based on the information obtained at Mueller. Knight and Cavusgil (2000) state that internationalization of the firm is to expand into foreign markets and exhibit international business powers and superior performance, from or near their founding. Approaches used in explaining internationalization of firms are often classified into three groups, which are the process of stages‐models of internationalization, the network approach, the foreign direct investment approach and internalization/transaction cost theories. Analyses on internationalization of firms have used different explaining factors such as a demographic approach, or a resource based view, when looking closer at the firm’s resources. This is necessary to understand the company’s strengths and objectives. (Tuppura et al.).
Internationalization can be very successful when the company prepares in advance. Planning is very important to the success of international new ventures. To achieve objectives on
expanding abroad, planning is essential as this raises new workflow and logistical challenges (Boddy, 2005). The form of the firm’s response to global market opportunities depends on the assumptions and beliefs that managers have about the nature of doing business around the world. The view of the business activities of the firm can be described by means of four orientations. These lead to the EPRG framework, existing of the Ethnocentric, Polycentric, Regiocentric and Geocentric orientation (EPRG) (Perlmutter, 2001). The ethnocentric orientation views the home country as superior and its needs are most relevant. Therefore controls are highly centralized in the organization and technology, which leads to implementation that will be the same as in the home country. A Polycentric, or multidomestic approach, views each country as unique and therefore targets each country in a different way and control is decentralized. Conditions on production, marketing and sales should be adapted. The regiocentric approach divides the world in regions because the firm should try to integrate and coordinate its marketing program in regions. The geocentric approach views the world as getting smaller and therefore the firm should offer global product concepts (Perlmutter, 2001). Mueller has its total production and technology based in The Netherlands. Therefore Mueller rather leans to the ethnocentric approach. However, management views all countries as unique and therefore the multidomestic orientation is also valuable at Mueller.
3.2 Internal analysis
Many different authors stress the importance of looking at the internal capabilities of the company in order to increase performance success. Strategic success depends on two parts.
On the one hand there is the external environment, which can be uncertain, globalizing, complex and competitive. Looking at the external environment where the company operates in, success depends on the opportunities and threats the external environment has. (Johnson and Scholes, 2002) However, strategic management is said to make a significant difference in the external environment, but this is more difficult (Miller, 2003).
Besides the understanding of this environment, it also requires the more subtle management of unique competences of the firms. Therefore, on the other hand, success depends to a great extent on the company itself and so the internal capabilities of the company. Finding a match, between the internal strengths of the company and the opportunities and threats that the external environment offers, will increase the company’s success (Johnson and Scholes, 2002).
Looking at the long‐term perspective, managers are mostly concerned with the way their companies are doing. To be able to answer this question, several tools are available, such as the Value Chain of Porter (Porter, 1985) and the resource based view of the firm (Wernerfelt, 1984). Most processes that aim to formulate a strategy start with an assessment of the company itself, both from the internal and from the external perspective.
Strengths and weaknesses of the company are most important looking at an internal analysis (Quezada et al. 2002). An internal analysis is seen as at least as important as an external analysis and is capable of providing a more stable basis to future strategy (Macmillan and Tampoe, 2001). To obtain an internal analysis, several theories can be effective to use. The value chain will be analyzed to describe the activities within the organization, which will also refer to the firm’s strength and weaknesses. Moreover, for this research the resource‐based view of the firm is seen as essential to understand the firms’
main resources considering the strengths and weaknesses.
3.2.1 Porter’s value chain
The value chain describes the activities around and within an organization. The underlying principle of the value chain of Porter is that all strategic business activities of the business unit can be classified into several categories, which are then divided into primary and support activities to make a clear distinction between the activities within the company (Hollensen, 2008). According to Porter (1985) the value chain defines two types of different interrelationships that may create synergy. These are the ability of the company to transfer expertise or skills between similar value chains and the ability of sharing activities.
Moreover, value and competitive advantage can be enhanced through a low‐cost, high differentiation or a hybrid strategy. Supply chain activities are therefore important sources of value adders of strategy (Patterson, 1995).
3.2.2 Resource‐Based View of the firm
Next to internationalization capabilities, available resources also determine the strengths and weaknesses of the company. In this case resources play an important role when internationalizing. In the field of strategic management, researchers have long understood that competitive advantage depends on the match between external environmental circumstances that can change over time and internal organizational capabilities, which are distinctive. The resource‐based view of the firm represents the relationships among firm resources, capabilities and competitive advantage (Barney, 1991). Over the last years, more emphasize has been on the significance of resources, capabilities and competences as a basis for making strategy. This resource‐based view of strategy is important because of two
reasons. First of all, the external world is unpredictable and therefore there are limitations to the value of studying its present in detail. Secondly, the business might have success due to certain qualities from within the firm, and these can only be understood by looking inwards (Macmillan and Tampoe, 2001).
3.3 International market theory
A good market assessment starts by looking at the overall strategy as well as the business environment the company operates in. It builds on the strengths and weaknesses to work out what the exact strategy will be. Such a plan sets out clear objectives and how these will be achieved (Payne, 2005). As well as the internal environment, forces in the wider world also shape management policies (Boddy, 2005). It is important to generate a good analysis of the general environment when examining whether a certain market would be potential for a foreign investor to invest in. Lasserre (2007) makes clear that a country will be attractive for a company when investing in that country, the return will be at least equal or higher than the company’s cost of capital. At this point of research, macroeconomic factors have to be taken into consideration to be able to examine whether a certain market would be attractive in a specific industry. Country risk analysis is in this case a very important aspect. The purpose of a country risk analysis is to assess the probability that adverse circumstances could affect business performance negatively. Country risks can be categorized into four groups, which are political risks, economic risks, competitive risks and operational risks (Lasserre, 2007). Thomas (2002) states that the environment of international management concerns three specific environments. These consist of the economic, legal, political and cultural environment. Understanding the economic strategies of a country is important when making managerial strategic decisions on a global basis.
From the variety of laws and regulations that exist throughout the world, some complexity of international management arises. Political systems are processes and structures by which a nation integrates the parts of society into a unit that is functioning. There exist a number of varieties of political systems. However, there are two extremes, which are the pure democracy on the one hand and totalitarianism on the other hand. Moreover, it is necessary to get an insight in the cultural environment, as norms values and customs differ across the world (Thomas, 2002) To examine the external environment that is relevant to an organization, a PESTEL analysis is essential. This is a technique to identify and list the political, economical, social, technical, environmental en legal factors. These factors are important because they all contribute to the external environment and whether this environment is potential for a company (Boddy, 2005). Therefore, in this research a PESTEL
analysis is necessary to be done to examine whether the Turkish market will be a potential market for a production company like Mueller. Moreover, the impact of distance also plays a crucial role when investing in a foreign country. Distance in the sense of cultural, administrative or political and economical dimensions can explain whether a certain market will be more or less attractive (Ghemawat, 2001). Therefore, this aspect of country risk analysis will also be important to take into account. The five forces model of Porter (1979) has been used as a strategy management tool for many years and helped many businesses to understand where they are in a difficult marketplace and helped to plot strategy to gain greater profitability (Oliva, 2002). Porter (1979) states that the nature of competition in an industry hinge on five forces, the threat of new entrants, the bargaining power of customers and suppliers, the threat of substitute products or services and established rivals. To examine how these eventual competitors in the Turkish dairy sector work and how they could affect the company, Porter’s five forces will be used. Together with the results of the internal analysis, these are all important aspects to take into account when analyzing which entry strategy would be best to enter the Turkish market.
3.4 Entry mode strategies
How to exactly enter a new market has to be determined by looking at the several entry mode strategies that might be available to the firm to invest in an international country. The timing of entry, the magnitude of investment and the area of competitive emphasis at entry affect the long‐term performance in the marketplace (Green, Barclay and Ryans, 1995). For each different market entry mode, there are different degrees of control, risk and flexibility associated (Kalliny and Lemaster, 2005). Looking at the assortment of entry mode strategies, three broad groupings emerge. The use of hierarchical modes, or investment modes, give the firm ownership and high control. However, committing heavy resources to foreign markets also lead to a higher potential risk. Simultaneously, heavy resource commitment creates exit barriers, which reduces the ability to change the entry mode strategy quickly.
Intermediate modes, or contractual modes, give the firm shared control and risk, as ownership here is split up. Export modes concern the last category, which give the firm low control, low risk but high flexibility. There exist several factors that influence the choice of entry mode. Four factors are believed to influence this decision. These factors include, internal and external factors, as well as desired mode characteristics and transaction‐specific behavior (Hollensen, 2008). It is important to examine these factors to make a reliable decision on the entry mode choice when expanding to a particular country such as Turkey.
4 Internal analysis
To be able to decide whether the Turkish market will be a potential market Mueller should focus on at this point in time, a comparison should be made between the capabilities and resources a company needs to operate successful in a new market. Therefore an internal analysis is necessary to take into account the capabilities of the company. To examine the internal capabilities and resources of the company Mueller, two theories will be used. In this case the value chain within the organization and the resource‐based view of the firm will be discussed.
4.1 Porters’ Value Chain
If an organization wants to achieve competitive advantage by delivering value to customers, an understanding of the activities which create value and which activities do not, is essential (Patterson, 1995). Porter (1985) classifies all strategic business units into nine categories, which can be split in two parts, primary activities and support activities. Primary activities include: inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales and service.
Support activities are human resource management, firm infrastructure, technology development and procurement (Hollensen, 2008). The activities of the value chain are visualized in figure 2. In order to have a clear idea of the internal capabilities of the organization, all these characteristics should be analyzed.
Figure 2: Porter’s Value Chain, 1985
Information for the internal analysis on Mueller is obtained through internal interviews with several export and marketing managers and meetings with managers at Mueller Services and Mueller Lichtenvoorde.
4.1.1 Primary activities
The product of the company is a full range of tanks/vessels and process solutions. The company offers its customers in the dairy sector integrated systems, field construction, plant maintenance, repair and complete turnkey project execution.
Inbound logistics
Activities in this area are dealing with receiving, storing and distributing inputs to the product or service. These include several aspects such as materials, transport and stock control (Porter, 1985).
(Not available)
Operations
Operations transform the inputs that are distributed during the previous activity, into the final product or service. Activities are machining, assembling and testing (Porter, 1985).
(Not available)
Outbound logistics
After the product is generated and when value is added the product will be collected, stored and distributed to the customer.
(Not available)
Marketing and Sales
Activities include administration, advertising and selling to make the customer aware of the products and service (Porter, 1985).
(Not available)
Services
These activities have to do with enhancing value of a product of service such as installation, training and repair (Patterson, 1995).
(Not available)