• No results found

University of Groningen New rules, new tools Niessen, Anna Susanna Maria

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen New rules, new tools Niessen, Anna Susanna Maria"

Copied!
6
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

New rules, new tools

Niessen, Anna Susanna Maria

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2018

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Niessen, A. S. M. (2018). New rules, new tools: Predicting academic achievement in college admissions. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen Processed on: 5-1-2018 Processed on: 5-1-2018 Processed on: 5-1-2018

Processed on: 5-1-2018 PDF page: 1PDF page: 1PDF page: 1PDF page: 1

New Rules, New Tools:

Predicting Academic Achievement in

College Admissions

(3)

515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen Processed on: 5-1-2018 Processed on: 5-1-2018 Processed on: 5-1-2018

Processed on: 5-1-2018 PDF page: 2PDF page: 2PDF page: 2PDF page: 2

© 2018 New rules, new tools: Predicting academic achievement in college admissions. A. Susan M. Niessen, University of Groningen

ISBN: 978-94-034-0385-4 (print version) ISBN: 978-94-034-0384-7 (electronic version) Cover design: Ilse Niessen, Ipskamp Printing Printed by: Ipskamp Printing

The research presented in this thesis was funded by the innovation budget of the Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences and the Faculty of Law of the University of Groningen.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, without permission of the author.

New Rules, New Tools

Predicting Academic Achievement in

College Admissions

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan

de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

op gezag van de

rector magnificus prof. dr. E. Sterken

en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties.

De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op

donderdag 15 februari 2018 om 16.15 uur

door

Anna Susanna Maria Niessen

geboren op 27 juli 1990

(4)

515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen Processed on: 5-1-2018 Processed on: 5-1-2018 Processed on: 5-1-2018

Processed on: 5-1-2018 PDF page: 3PDF page: 3PDF page: 3PDF page: 3

© 2018 New rules, new tools: Predicting academic achievement in college admissions. A. Susan M. Niessen, University of Groningen

ISBN: 978-94-034-0385-4 (print version) ISBN: 978-94-034-0384-7 (electronic version) Cover design: Ilse Niessen, Ipskamp Printing Printed by: Ipskamp Printing

The research presented in this thesis was funded by the innovation budget of the Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences and the Faculty of Law of the University of Groningen.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, without permission of the author.

New Rules, New Tools

Predicting Academic Achievement in

College Admissions

Proefschrift

ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan

de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

op gezag van de

rector magnificus prof. dr. E. Sterken

en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties.

De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op

donderdag 15 februari 2018 om 16.15 uur

door

Anna Susanna Maria Niessen

geboren op 27 juli 1990

(5)

515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen Processed on: 5-1-2018 Processed on: 5-1-2018 Processed on: 5-1-2018

Processed on: 5-1-2018 PDF page: 4PDF page: 4PDF page: 4PDF page: 4

Promotor

Prof. dr. R.R Meijer

Copromotores

Dr. J.N. Tendeiro

Mr. dr. J.J. Dijkstra

Beoordelingscommissie

Prof. dr. M.Ph. Born

Prof. dr. J. Cohen-Schotanus

Prof. dr. B.A. Nijstad

Contents

Chapter 1 Introduction 7

Chapter 2 Predicting performance in higher education using

content-matched predictors 19

Chapter 3 A multi-cohort study on the predictive validity and construct saturation of high-fidelity curriculum-sampling tests

39

Chapter 4 Curriculum-sampling and differential prediction by

gender 65

Chapter 5 Measuring noncognitive predictors in high-stakes contexts: The effect of self-presentation on self-report instruments used in admission to higher education

87

Chapter 6 Applying organizational justice theory to admission into

higher education: Admission from a student perspective 105 Chapter 7 The utility of selective admission in Dutch higher

education 127

Chapter 8 Selection of medical students on the basis of

nonacademic skills: Is it worth the trouble? 139 Chapter 9 On the use of broadened admission criteria in higher

education 149

Chapter 10 Discussion 175

References 189

Appendices 215

Samenvatting (in Dutch) 226

Dankwoord 233

Curriculum Vitae 235

(6)

515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen 515949-L-bw-niessen Processed on: 5-1-2018 Processed on: 5-1-2018 Processed on: 5-1-2018

Processed on: 5-1-2018 PDF page: 5PDF page: 5PDF page: 5PDF page: 5

Promotor

Prof. dr. R.R Meijer

Copromotores

Dr. J.N. Tendeiro

Mr. dr. J.J. Dijkstra

Beoordelingscommissie

Prof. dr. M.Ph. Born

Prof. dr. J. Cohen-Schotanus

Prof. dr. B.A. Nijstad

Contents

Chapter 1 Introduction 7

Chapter 2 Predicting performance in higher education using

content-matched predictors 19

Chapter 3 A multi-cohort study on the predictive validity and construct saturation of high-fidelity curriculum-sampling tests

39

Chapter 4 Curriculum-sampling and differential prediction by

gender 65

Chapter 5 Measuring noncognitive predictors in high-stakes contexts: The effect of self-presentation on self-report instruments used in admission to higher education

87

Chapter 6 Applying organizational justice theory to admission into

higher education: Admission from a student perspective 105 Chapter 7 The utility of selective admission in Dutch higher

education 127

Chapter 8 Selection of medical students on the basis of

nonacademic skills: Is it worth the trouble? 139 Chapter 9 On the use of broadened admission criteria in higher

education 149

Chapter 10 Discussion 175

References 189

Appendices 215

Samenvatting (in Dutch) 226

Dankwoord 233

Curriculum Vitae 235

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In addition, we studied (1) the incremental validity of the curriculum-sampling scores over high school GPA, (2) the predictive validity of curriculum-sampling tests for

For intercept differences, differential prediction with score differences in the dependent variable but not in the independent variable (as was the case for the

We examined (1) to what extent self-presentation behavior occurred, (2) the effect of self-presentation on the predictive validity of the self-reported noncognitive predictors,

We hypothesized that interviews and high-fidelity methods like curriculum-sampling tests and skills tests would be perceived as most favorable, followed by cognitive ability

In the Naylor-Shine model, utility is not defined in terms of the increase in the success ratio, but in terms of the increase in mean criterion performance (for example, final GPA),

The central idea of using these measures on top of academic measures like high school grade point average (GPA) and standardized test scores (e.g., MCAT scores) is that these

To guide our discussion, we distinguish the following topics: (a) the types of outcomes that are predicted, (b) broader admission criteria as predictors, (c) adverse impact and

Differential prediction and bias of high school GPA was not studied in this thesis, but previous research found that high school grades showed some underprediction of female