Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Apium repens
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Van Landuyt W. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Creeping marshwort (Apium repens) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.).
Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://www.inbo.be/natura2000be Ronse A. (2006). Apium repens. In: Van Landuyt, W. et al. (Red). Atlas van de Flora van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Gewest. Instituut voor natuur en bosonderzoek, Nationale Plantentuin van België en Flo.Wer.
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 96
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.4 Range trend Stable (=)
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1994-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
5 6 Number of localities
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1994-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1994-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 141 - abandonment of pastoral systems
810 Drainage 971 - competition
2.4.11 Threats 141 - abandonment of pastoral systems
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species Pioneer or low herbaceous vegetations, on periodically inundated
places, on moderately rich soils. Grazed or very frequently mown (on important site in a lawn park, several along cattle drinking ponds in the coastal dunes).
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.6 Trend period 1994-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Poor prospects - species likely to struggle unless conditions change
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 96
2.7.2 Favourable reference population More than field 2.4.1 6
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A
2.7.4 Other relevant information Due to grazing management in nature reserves of coastal dune
cattle drinking ponds. This creates new oppurtunities for the species but the number of locaties is still very low so conservation status remains critically.
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Inadequate (U1) N/A
(2.4) Population Inadequate but improving (U1+) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Inadequate (U1) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Inadequate (U1) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Cladonia spp. (subgenus Cladina)
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Van Landuyt W. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Reindeer Lichens (Cladonia L. subgenus cladina ) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites - Diederich P. & Serusiaux E. (2000). The Lichens and
Lichenicolous Fungi of Belgium and Luxembourg. An Annotated Checklist. Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle. Luxembourg. - Serusiaux E., P. Diederich & J. Lambinon (2004). Les macrolichens de Belgique, du Luxembourg et du nord de la France. Ferrantia, 40, Trav. Sc. Musée Nat. Hist. Nat. Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 192 pp. - www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 2784
2.3.2 Date of range determination 1994-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.3.4 Range trend Unknown (X)
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1994-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
24 24 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1980-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling
2.4.4 Quality of population data Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation
2.4.5 Population trend Unknown (X)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1980-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 141 - abandonment of pastoral systems
161 - forest planting 702 - air pollution 720 Trampling, overuse 730 Military manouvres 952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification 954 - invasion by a species 971 - competition
2.4.11 Threats 161 - forest planting
702 - air pollution 720 Trampling, overuse 730 Military manouvres 952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification 954 - invasion by a species 971 - competition
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species 2150 Atlantic decalcified fixed dunes (Calluno-Ulicetea), 2310 Dry
sand heaths with Calluna and Genista, 4030 European dry heaths
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) 56
2.5.3 Date of estimation 1994-2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Stable (=)
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction) Indirect anthropo(zoo)genic influence
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Bad prospects - species likely to be become extinct in the biogeographical region
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 2784
2.7.2 Favourable reference population More than field 2.4.1 24
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species 56
2.7.4 Other relevant information Only parts of the habitat is suitable for Cladina species, all location suffer from high atmospheric nitrogen deposition.
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Bad (U2) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Bad (U2) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Drepanocladus vernicosus
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Van Landuyt W. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Slender green feather-moss (Drepanocladus vernicosus) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 16.0
2.3.2 Date of range determination 1994-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1994-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Not applicable
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
1 1 Number of localities
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1994-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation Based on expert opinion
2.4.4 Quality of population data Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation
2.4.5 Population trend Unknown (X)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1994-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 120 Fertilisation
130 Irrigation
190 Agriculture and forestry activities not referred to above 702 - air pollution
810 Drainage
853 - management of water levels 952 - eutrophication
971 - competition
2.4.11 Threats 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification 971 - competition
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species 6410 Molinia meadows on calcareous, peaty or clayey-siltladen
soils (Molinion caeruleae)
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) 0.5
2.5.3 Date of estimation 1994-2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Stable (=)
2.5.6 Trend period 1994-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Bad prospects - species likely to be become extinct in the biogeographical region
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) Much more than field 2.3.1 16.0
2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 1
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A
(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Bad (U2) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Bad (U2) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Leucobryum glaucum
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Van Landuyt W. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species White cushion moss (Leucobryum glaucum) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.).
Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 6576
2.3.2 Date of range determination 1980-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1994-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
151 151 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1980-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation
2.4.5 Population trend Decreasing (-)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1994-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 160 General Forestry management
163 - forest replanting 164 - forestry clearance
251 - pillaging of floristic stations
622 - walking, horseriding and non-motorised vehicles 702 - air pollution
720 Trampling, overuse 952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification 971 - competition
2.4.11 Threats 160 General Forestry management
163 - forest replanting 164 - forestry clearance
251 - pillaging of floristic stations
622 - walking, horseriding and non-motorised vehicles 702 - air pollution
720 Trampling, overuse 952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species 9120 Atlantic acidophilous beech forests with Ilex and sometimes
also Taxus in the shrublayer (Quercinion robori-petraeae or Ilici-Fagenion)
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) 324
2.5.3 Date of estimation 1994-2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Stable (=)
2.5.6 Trend period 1994-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
change
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 6496
2.7.2 Favourable reference population 137
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species 324
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.4) Population Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Inadequate (U1) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Inadequate (U1) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Liparis loeselii
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Van Landuyt W. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Fen orchid (Liparis loeselii) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://www.inbo.be/natura2000be Ronse A. (2006). Liparis loeselli. In: Van Landuyt, W. et al. (Red). Atlas van de Flora van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Gewest. Instituut voor natuur en bosonderzoek, Nationale Plantentuin van België en Flo.Wer.
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 32
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.4 Range trend Stable (=)
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional 0
2.3.6 Range trend period 1994-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
5 8 Number of individuals
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1994-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1994-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 810 Drainage
952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification 971 - competition 2.4.11 Threats 810 Drainage 952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification 971 - competition
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species 2190: Humid dune slacks (disappaered in this habitat type since
1954) 7230: Alkaline fens
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) 0.1
2.5.3 Date of estimation 1997-2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Increasing (+)
2.5.6 Trend period 1994-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Poor prospects - species likely to struggle unless conditions change
(changed after final closing of the database, reported value: Bad prospects - species likely to be become extinct in the
biogeographical region)
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 8
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species 0.1
2.7.4 Other relevant information Coastal dunes slacks form a potential habitat where the species eventually can expand its current range but the distance to nearby populations (the Netherlands and the North of France) is big so the change for natural (re-)colonisation of this area is small.
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A
(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Bad (U2) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Bad (U2) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Luronium natans
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Van Landuyt W. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Floating Water Plantain (Luronium natans) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.).
Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://www.inbo.be/natura2000be Ronse A. (2006). Luronium natans. In: Van Landuyt, W. et al. (Red). Atlas van de Flora van Vlaanderen en het Brussels Gewest. Instituut voor natuur en bosonderzoek, Nationale Plantentuin van België en Flo.Wer.
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 3409
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.4 Range trend Decreasing (-)
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1994-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Indirect anthropo(zoo)genic influence
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
39 39 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1994-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Unknown (X)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1994-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 120 Fertilisation
200 Fish and Shellfish Aquaculture 402 - discontinuous urbanisation 430 Agricultural structures 701 - water pollution 810 Drainage
952 - eutrophication
2.4.11 Threats 110 Use of pesticides
120 Fertilisation
200 Fish and Shellfish Aquaculture 402 - discontinuous urbanisation 430 Agricultural structures 701 - water pollution
803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 853 - management of water levels
952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification 971 - competition
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species 3130 Oligotrophic to mesotrophic standing waters with vegetation
of the Littorelletea uniflorae and/or Isoeto-Nanojuncetea 3260 Water courses of plain to montane levels with the Ranunculion fluitantis and Callitricho-Batrachion vegetation
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) 5
2.5.3 Date of estimation 1997-2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Stable (=)
2.5.6 Trend period 1994-2006
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Bad prospects - species likely to be become extinct in the biogeographical region
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 3409
2.7.2 Favourable reference population 39
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species 5
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Bad (U2) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Bad but improving (U2+) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Lycopodium spp.
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Van Landuyt W. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Clubmosses (Lycopodium spp.) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 4156
2.3.2 Date of range determination 1994-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1994-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
100 100 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1994-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Decreasing (-)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1994-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction) Indirect anthropo(zoo)genic influence
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 120 Fertilisation
141 - abandonment of pastoral systems 160 General Forestry management 161 - forest planting
251 - pillaging of floristic stations
622 - walking, horseriding and non-motorised vehicles 702 - air pollution 720 Trampling, overuse 730 Military manouvres 952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification 971 - competition
2.4.11 Threats 160 General Forestry management
622 - walking, horseriding and non-motorised vehicles 702 - air pollution 720 Trampling, overuse 730 Military manouvres 952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification 971 - competition
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species 2310 Dry sand heaths with Calluna and Genista, 4030 European
dry heaths, 7150 Depressions on peat substrates of the Rhynchosporion
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) 45
2.5.3 Date of estimation 1994-2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Stable (=)
2.5.6 Trend period 1994-2006
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Poor prospects - species likely to struggle unless conditions change
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 4156
2.7.2 Favourable reference population 100
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species 45
2.7.4 Other relevant information Most species of Lycopodium sensu lato are critically endangered in the Atlantic part of Belgium and have very small and scattered population. Only Lycopodiella inundata is not yet threatened at the moment.
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.4) Population Inadequate (U1) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Bad (U2) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Inadequate (U1) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Sphagnum spp.
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Van Landuyt W. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Peat Mosses (Sphagnum spp.) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 8624
2.3.2 Date of range determination 1972-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1994-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
328 328 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1972-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation Based on expert opinion
2.4.4 Quality of population data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.4.5 Population trend Unknown (X)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1994-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 120 Fertilisation
161 - forest planting 162 - artificial planting 403 - dispersed habitation 701 - water pollution 702 - air pollution 703 - soil pollution 720 Trampling, overuse 730 Military manouvres 810 Drainage 920 Drying out 930 Submersion 952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification 2.4.11 Threats 120 Fertilisation 161 - forest planting 162 - artificial planting 403 - dispersed habitation 701 - water pollution 702 - air pollution 703 - soil pollution 720 Trampling, overuse 730 Military manouvres 810 Drainage 920 Drying out 930 Submersion 952 - eutrophication 953 - acidification
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species 4010 Northern Atlantic wet heaths with Erica tetralix, ,6410
the Rhynchosporion, 7230 Alkaline fens, 91D0 Bog woodland, 91E0 (partial) Alluvial forests with Alnus glutinosa and Fraxinus excelsior (Alno-Pandion, Alnion incanae, Salicion albae)
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) 25
2.5.3 Date of estimation 1997-2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Decreasing (-)
2.5.6 Trend period 1994-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction) Indirect anthropo(zoo)genic influence
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Bad prospects - species likely to be become extinct in the biogeographical region
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 4960
2.7.2 Favourable reference population 312
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species 25
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.4) Population Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Bad and deteriorating (U2-) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Bad (U2) N/A
