• No results found

Conservation status of the Natura 2000 fish for the Belgian Atlantic region

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Conservation status of the Natura 2000 fish for the Belgian Atlantic region"

Copied!
33
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Report on the main results of the surveillance under article

11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)

SPECIES NAME: Alosa fallax

1. National level

Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL MATL

2. Biogeographical or marine level

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic

Simoens I. & Van Thuyne G. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Twaite Shad (Alosa falax falax) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.).

Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep

2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://vis.milieuinfo.be/ www.inbo.be/natura2000be

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.3.1 Surface range of the species in km2 204.8

2.3.2 Date of range determination 1994-2005

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys

(2)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -

optional 125

2.3.6 Range trend period 1994-2005

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water Quality improvement

Other (specify) Water Quality improvement

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units

4 4 Grids

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1994-2005

2.4.3 Methods used for population

estimation Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling

2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys

2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 0

2.4.7 Population trend period 2001-2005

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

water quality improvement

Other (specify) water quality improvement

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for

trends (optional) N/A

2.4.10 Main pressures 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 504 - port areas

530 Improved access to site 701 - water pollution

802 - reclamation of land from sea, estuary or marsh

803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 830 Canalisation

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 870 Dykes, embankments, artificial beaches, general 871 - sea defense or coast protection works

952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 504 - port areas

530 Improved access to site 701 - water pollution

802 - reclamation of land from sea, estuary or marsh

803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 830 Canalisation

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 870 Dykes, embankments, artificial beaches, general 871 - sea defense or coast protection works

952 - eutrophication

2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.5.1 Habitats for the species Mature adults enter the estuary of the river Scheldt and migrate to the border of fresh-brackish water or into the freshwater tidal area to spawn on sand, or gravel beds.

Juvenile specimen migrate to the brackish water tidal area or to the sea. When they grow older they migrate to the sea.

(3)

2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006

2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement

2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Increasing (+)

2.5.6 Trend period 1994-2005

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

2.6 Future prospects for the species Bad prospects - species likely to be become extinct in the biogeographical region

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range (km2) 400

2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 4

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species

(km2) N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A

Conclusion

Biogeographical or

marine level

Conclusions within

Natura 2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A

(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A

(2.5) Habitat for the species Bad (U2) N/A

(2.6) Future prospects Bad (U2) N/A

(4)

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic ocean

2.2 Published sources and/or websites -

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.3.1 Surface range of the species in km2 3462

2.3.2 Date of range determination 2005

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys

2.3.4 Range trend Stable (=)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -

optional N/A

2.3.6 Range trend period 1995-2006

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased; higher numbers in fresh water

Other (specify) Water quality increased; higher numbers in fresh water

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units

10000 1000000 Number of individuals

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1995-2006

2.4.3 Methods used for population

estimation From comprehensive inventory

2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys

2.4.5 Population trend Increasing (+)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A

2.4.7 Population trend period 1995-2006

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased

Other (specify) Water quality increased

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for

trends (optional) N/A

2.4.10 Main pressures 300 Sand and gravel extraction 504 - port areas

701 - water pollution

802 - reclamation of land from sea, estuary or marsh 852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 870 Dykes, embankments, artificial beaches, general 871 - sea defense or coast protection works

952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 300 Sand and gravel extraction 504 - port areas

701 - water pollution

802 - reclamation of land from sea, estuary or marsh 852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 870 Dykes, embankments, artificial beaches, general 871 - sea defense or coast protection works

952 - eutrophication

(5)

2.5.1 Habitats for the species Demersal; anadromous, freshwater; brackish; marine Juvenile individuals stay in brooks and rivers with silt beds and good water quality. Adult specimens migrate to the coast and stay 2,5 till 3,5 years in coastal water and estuaries. For spawning they migrate to rivers with good water quality. They need clean gravel or sand beds to spawn.

2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A

2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006

2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement

2.5.5 Trend of the habitat N/A

2.5.6 Trend period 2006

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend N/A

Other (specify) N/A

2.6 Future prospects for the species Good prospects - species expected to survive and prosper

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range (km2) 3462

2.7.2 Favourable reference population More than field 2.4.1 10000

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species

(km2) N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A

Conclusion

Biogeographical or marine

level

Conclusions within

Natura 2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A

(2.4) Population Inadequate but improving (U1+) N/A

(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A

(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A

(6)

Report on the main results of the surveillance under article

11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)

SPECIES NAME: Barbus barbus

1. National level

Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON

2. Biogeographical or marine level

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic

Simoens I. & Van Thuyne G. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Barbel (Barbus barbus) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.).

Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep

2.2 Published sources and/or websites PHILIPPART JC. & VRANKEN M (1983). – Atlas des poissons de Wallonie : distribution, écologie, éthologie, pêche, conservation. Cahiers d’Ethologie appliquée – Vol. 3 (supp. 1-2) PHILIPPART JC (2006) – Biodiversité des poissons de Wallonie – Rapport

analytique sur l’Etat de l’Environnement wallon. Edition 2006 (in press). www.inbo.be/natura2000be

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

(7)

km2

2.3.2 Date of range determination 1980-2006

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys

2.3.4 Range trend Increasing (+)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -

optional +400

2.3.6 Range trend period 1974-2006

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units 200 Area covered by population

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1980-2006

2.4.3 Method used for population

estimation Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling

2.4.4 Quality of population data Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation

2.4.5 Population trend Increasing (+)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A

2.4.7 Population trend period 1974-2006

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for

trends (optional) Due to the restoration of longitudinal continuity or water quality, the come back of Barbus barbus has been possible in several water courses (Berwinne). From 1983, a scientific program of Barbel restockings (University of Liège) was managed in several walloon water courses to enhance local populations.

2.4.10 Main pressures 120 Fertilisation 621 - nautical sports 701 - water pollution 830 Canalisation 840 Flooding

850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 853 - management of water levels

870 Dykes, embankments, artificial beaches, general 890 Other human induced changes in hydraulic conditions 910 Silting up

952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 120 Fertilisation 621 - nautical sports 701 - water pollution

790 Other pollution or human impacts/activities 830 Canalisation

840 Flooding

850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 853 - management of water levels

870 Dykes, embankments, artificial beaches, general 890 Other human induced changes in hydraulic conditions 910 Silting up

952 - eutrophication

(8)

2.5.1 Habitats for the species 3260 Barbus barbus is the typical species of the barbel zona ( middle parts of water courses) ; it is naturally not present in other zones. It needs gravel substrates and also oxygenous and fresh waters.

2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A

2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006

2.5.4 Quality of the data Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation

2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Increasing (+)

2.5.6 Trend period 1974-2006

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

2.6 Future prospects for the species Poor prospects - species likely to struggle unless conditions change

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range

(km2) 487.3

2.7.2 Favourable reference population More than field 2.4.1 200

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information No data available for habitats and population

Conclusion

Biogeographical or

marine level

Conclusions within

Natura 2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) Favourable (FV)

(2.4) Population Favourable (FV) Unknown (XX)

(2.5) Habitat for the species Inadequate and deteriorating

(U1-) Inadequate (U1)

(2.6) Future prospects Inadequate (U1) Inadequate (U1)

(9)

Report on the main results of the surveillance under article

11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)

SPECIES NAME: Cobitis taenia

1. National level

Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON

2. Biogeographical or marine level

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic

Simoens I. & Van Thuyne G. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Spined Loach (Cobitis taenia) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep

2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://vis.milieuinfo.be/ www.inbo.be/natura2000be

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.3.1 Surface range of the species in

km2 2335.9

2.3.2 Date of range determination 1995-2006

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys

(10)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -

optional 258

2.3.6 Range trend period 1995-2006

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished

Other (specify) Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units

36 36 Grids

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1995-2006

2.4.3 Method used for population

estimation Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling

2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys

2.4.5 Population trend Increasing (+)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 25

2.4.7 Population trend period 1995-2006

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished

Other (specify) Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for

trends (optional) N/A

2.4.10 Main pressures 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 811 - management of aquatic and bank vegetation for drainage purposes

830 Canalisation

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 870 Dykes, embankments, artificial beaches, general 952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 120 Fertilisation

400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 811 - management of aquatic and bank vegetation for drainage purposes

830 Canalisation

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 870 Dykes, embankments, artificial beaches, general 952 - eutrophication

2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.5.1 Habitats for the species This species is a typical bottom dweller of brooks and rivers (e.g.habitattype 3260) and occur also in ditches and lakes with sandy bottom and good water quality ( habitattypes 3150 en 3140). Sandy or stony substrate are necessary for spawning.

2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A

2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006

2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement

(11)

2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2006

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

2.6 Future prospects for the species Good prospects - species expected to survive and prosper

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range

(km2) 2335.9

2.7.2 Favourable reference population More than field 2.4.1 36

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A

Conclusion

Biogeographical or

marine level

Conclusions within

Natura 2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A

(2.4) Population Inadequate but improving (U1+) N/A

(2.5) Habitat for the species Inadequate but improving (U1+) N/A

(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A

(12)

Report on the main results of the surveillance under article

11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)

SPECIES NAME: Cottus gobio

1. National level

Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON

2. Biogeographical or marine level

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic

Simoens I. & Van Thuyne G. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Bullhead (Cottus gobio) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep

2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://vis.milieuinfo.be/ www.inbo.be/natura2000be

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.3.1 Surface range of the species in

km2 3774.7

2.3.2 Date of range determination 1995-2006

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys

(13)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -

optional 1675

2.3.6 Range trend period 1994-2006

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished

Other (specify) Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units

34 34 Grids

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2006

2.4.3 Method used for population

estimation Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling

2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys

2.4.5 Population trend Increasing (+)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 34

2.4.7 Population trend period 1994-2006

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased, Migration barriers diminished

Other (specify) Water quality increased, Migration barriers diminished

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for

trends (optional) N/A

2.4.10 Main pressures 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 820 Removal of sediments (mud...)

830 Canalisation

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 820 Removal of sediments (mud...)

830 Canalisation

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 952 - eutrophication

2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.5.1 Habitats for the species This species is a typical bottom dweller. It occurs in fast flowing freshwater brooks with shallow water and with sandy, gravel or stony substrates. When the water is clear, rich of oxygen and cold, the species occur also in other rivers and lakes.

2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A

2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006

2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement

2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Increasing (+)

2.5.6 Trend period 1994-2006

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

(14)

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range

(km2) 3774.7

2.7.2 Favourable reference population More than field 2.4.1 34

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A

Conclusion

Biogeographical or

marine level

Conclusions within

Natura 2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A

(2.4) Population Inadequate but improving (U1+) N/A

(2.5) Habitat for the species Inadequate but improving (U1+) N/A

(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A

(15)

Report on the main results of the surveillance under article

11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)

SPECIES NAME: Lampetra fluviatilis

1. National level

Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL MATL

2. Biogeographical or marine level

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic

Simoens I. & Van Thuyne G. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species River lamprey

(Lampetra fluviatilis) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep

2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://vis.milieuinfo.be/ www.inbo.be/natura2000be

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

(16)

km2

2.3.2 Date of range determination 1995-2006

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys

2.3.4 Range trend Increasing (+)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -

optional 683

2.3.6 Range trend period 1995-2006

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Improved knowledge/more accurate data

Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased

Other (specify) Water quality increased

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units

23 23 Grids

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1995-2006

2.4.3 Methods used for population

estimation Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling

2.4.4 Quality of population data Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation

2.4.5 Population trend Increasing (+)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 46

2.4.7 Population trend period 1995-2006

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Improved knowledge/more accurate data

Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

water quality improvement

Other (specify) water quality improvement

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for

trends (optional) N/A

2.4.10 Main pressures 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

801 - polderisation

820 Removal of sediments (mud...) 830 Canalisation

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 870 Dykes, embankments, artificial beaches, general 952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

801 - polderisation

820 Removal of sediments (mud...) 830 Canalisation

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 870 Dykes, embankments, artificial beaches, general 952 - eutrophication

2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

(17)

They need clean gravel or sand beds to spawn.

2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A

2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006

2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement

2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Increasing (+)

2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2006

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished

Other (specify) Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished

2.6 Future prospects for the species Good prospects - species expected to survive and prosper

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range

(km2) 3650

2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 23

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species

(km2) N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A

Conclusion

Biogeographical or

marine level

Conclusions within

Natura 2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A

(2.4) Population Bad but improving (U2+) N/A

(2.5) Habitat for the species Inadequate (U1) N/A

(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A

(18)

Report on the main results of the surveillance under article

11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)

SPECIES NAME: Lampetra planeri

1. National level

Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON

2. Biogeographical or marine level

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic

Simoens I. & Van Thuyne G. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Brook lamprey (Lampetra planeri) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep

2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://vis.milieuinfo.be/ www.inbo.be/natura2000be

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.3.1 Surface range of the species in

km2 1379.3

2.3.2 Date of range determination 1995-2006

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys

(19)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -

optional N/A

2.3.6 Range trend period 1995-2006

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased

Other (specify) Water quality increased

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units

23 23 Grids

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1995-2006

2.4.3 Method used for population

estimation Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling

2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys

2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 0

2.4.7 Population trend period 1995-2006

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

water quality improvement

Other (specify) water quality improvement

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for

trends (optional) N/A

2.4.10 Main pressures 120 Fertilisation

400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 820 Removal of sediments (mud...)

830 Canalisation

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 120 Fertilisation

400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 830 Canalisation

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 952 - eutrophication

2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.5.1 Habitats for the species Lampetra planeri lives in middle and small streams, and rivers with good water quality. They need clean sunny gravel or sand beds to spawn in and silt or sand for the larvae.

2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A

2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006

2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement

2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Stable (=)

2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2006

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

(20)

Other (specify) Water quality increased

2.6 Future prospects for the species Poor prospects - species likely to struggle unless conditions change

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range

(km2) 2375

2.7.2 Favourable reference population More than field 2.4.1 23

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A

Conclusion

Biogeographical or

marine level

Conclusions within

Natura 2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A

(2.4) Population Inadequate (U1) N/A

(2.5) Habitat for the species Bad (U2) N/A

(2.6) Future prospects Inadequate (U1) N/A

(21)

Report on the main results of the surveillance under article

11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)

SPECIES NAME: Misgurnus fossilis

1. National level

Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL

2. Biogeographical or marine level

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic

Simoens I. & Van Thuyne G. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Weather Loach (Misgurnus fossilis) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep

2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://vis.milieuinfo.be/ www.inbo.be/natura2000be

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.3.1 Surface range of the species in

km2 700

2.3.2 Date of range determination 1995-2006

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys

(22)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -

optional 0

2.3.6 Range trend period 1995-2006

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units

12 12 Grids

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1995-2006

2.4.3 Method used for population estimation

Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling

2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys

2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 0

2.4.7 Population trend period 1996-2006

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased, Migration barriers diminished

Other (specify) Water quality increased, Migration barriers diminished

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for

trends (optional) N/A

2.4.10 Main pressures 120 Fertilisation

400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 810 Drainage

811 - management of aquatic and bank vegetation for drainage purposes

820 Removal of sediments (mud...) 952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 120 Fertilisation

400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 810 Drainage

811 - management of aquatic and bank vegetation for drainage purposes

820 Removal of sediments (mud...) 952 - eutrophication

2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.5.1 Habitats for the species N/A

2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A

2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006

2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement

2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Stable (=)

2.5.6 Trend period 1996-2006

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

(23)

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range

(km2) 2225

2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 12

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A

Conclusion

Biogeographical or

marine level

Conclusions within

Natura 2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A

(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A

(2.5) Habitat for the species Bad (U2) N/A

(2.6) Future prospects Inadequate (U1) N/A

(24)

Report on the main results of the surveillance under article

11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)

SPECIES NAME: Petromyzon marinus

1. National level

Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL

2. Biogeographical or marine level

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic

Haelters J. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Sea Lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,

INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep

2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://vis.milieuinfo.be/

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.3.1 Surface range of the species in

km2 150

2.3.2 Date of range determination 2002-2005

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys

(25)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -

optional 150

2.3.6 Range trend period 1995-2005

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Improved knowledge/more accurate data

Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality improved

Other (specify) Water quality improved

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units

2 2 Number of individuals

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2002-2005

2.4.3 Methods used for population

estimation Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling

2.4.4 Quality of population data Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation

2.4.5 Population trend Increasing (+)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 2

2.4.7 Population trend period 1995-2005

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Improved knowledge/more accurate data

Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

water quality improvement

Other (specify) water quality improvement

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for

trends (optional) N/A

2.4.10 Main pressures 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

820 Removal of sediments (mud...)

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

820 Removal of sediments (mud...)

852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 952 - eutrophication

2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.5.1 Habitats for the species demersal; anadromous, freshwater; brackish; marine Breeds in high quality, deep, fast flowing rivers with clean gravel in which to spawn and a sandy substrate for the larvae to burrow into. The adults migrate out to sea.

2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A

2.5.3 Date of estimation 1995-2005

2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement

2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Increasing (+)

2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2005

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished

(26)

2.6 Future prospects for the species Poor prospects - species likely to struggle unless conditions change

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range

(km2) 1225

2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 2

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species

(km2) N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A

Conclusion

Biogeographical or

marine level

Conclusions within

Natura 2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A

(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A

(2.5) Habitat for the species Bad (U2) N/A

(2.6) Future prospects Inadequate (U1) N/A

(27)

Report on the main results of the surveillance under article

11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)

SPECIES NAME: Rhodeus sericeus amarus

1. National level

Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON

2. Biogeographical or marine level

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic

Simoens I. & Van Thuyne G. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus amarus) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep

2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://vis.milieuinfo.be/ www.inbo.be/natura2000be

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.3.1 Surface range of the species in

km2 7551.5

2.3.2 Date of range determination 1995-2006

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation

(28)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -

optional 0

2.3.6 Range trend period 1996-2006

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units

102 102 Grids

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 1995-2006

2.4.3 Method used for population estimation

Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling

2.4.4 Quality of population data Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation

2.4.5 Population trend Increasing (+)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 51

2.4.7 Population trend period 1996-2006

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for

trends (optional) N/A

2.4.10 Main pressures 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

811 - management of aquatic and bank vegetation for drainage purposes

820 Removal of sediments (mud...) 853 - management of water levels 952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation 701 - water pollution

811 - management of aquatic and bank vegetation for drainage purposes

820 Removal of sediments (mud...) 853 - management of water levels 952 - eutrophication

2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.5.1 Habitats for the species Its occurrence is related to those of the bivalve Anodonta cygnea and other freshwater mussels . Known for its habit of laying its eggs in the mantle cavity of freshwater mussels. Occurs in ponds, lakes, polder drainage systems, and oxbow lakes with a water vegetation (habitat type 3150) and in riverbanks of slow running brooks and rivers with good or very good water quality (habitat type 3260).

2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A

2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006

2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement

2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Increasing (+)

2.5.6 Trend period 1996-2006

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Other (specify) N/A

(29)

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range

(km2) 7551.5

2.7.2 Favourable reference population 102

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A

Conclusion

Biogeographical or

marine level

Conclusions within

Natura 2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A

(2.4) Population Favourable (FV) N/A

(2.5) Habitat for the species Favourable (FV) N/A

(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A

(30)

Report on the main results of the surveillance under

article 11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)

SPECIES NAME: Salmo salar

1. National level

Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL

Distribution map (map-distribution-spec-salmo-salar.gml)

(31)

Favourable range map (map-favourable-range-spec-salmo-salar.gml)

2. Biogeographical or marine level

2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic

2.2 Published sources and/or websites http://vis.milieuinfo.be/

2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region

2.3.1 Surface range of the species in km2 50

2.3.2 Date of range determination 2002-2005

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys

2.3.4 Range trend Stable (=)

2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) - optional 0

2.3.6 Range trend period 1995-2005

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Improved knowledge/more accurate data

Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality improved

Other (specify) Water quality improved

2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine

region

2.4.1 Population size estimation

Minimum population Maximum population Population units

2 2 Grids

2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2002-2005

2.4.3 Methods used for population estimation Extrapolation from surveys of part of the population or from sampling

(32)

with some extrapolation

2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)

2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 0

2.4.7 Population trend period 1995-2005

2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Improved knowledge/more accurate data

Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

water quality improvement

Other (specify) water quality improvement

2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for trends

(optional) N/A

2.4.10 Main pressures 400 Urbanised areas, human habitation

701 - water pollution

820 Removal of sediments (mud...) 852 - modifying structures of inland water courses

952 - eutrophication

2.4.11 Threats 400 Urbanised areas, human

habitation

701 - water pollution

820 Removal of sediments (mud...) 852 - modifying structures of inland water courses

952 - eutrophication

2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine

region

2.5.1 Habitats for the species anadromous, freshwater; brackish; marine they undergo their greatest feeding and growth in salt water, but return to spawn in native, fast flowing well-oxygenated freshwater rivers with clean gravel and a sandy substrate for the larvae to burrow into. These spawning places for the population in the Meuse are in Wallonia

2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A

2.5.3 Date of estimation 1995-2005

2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement

2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)

2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2005

2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)

Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished

(33)

barriers diminished

2.6 Future prospects for the species Good prospects - species expected to survive and prosper

2.7 Complementary information

2.7.1 Favourable reference range (km2) 2925

2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 2

2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species (km2) N/A

2.7.4 Other relevant information Due to the rehabilitation program of Atlantic salmon in Belgium (Wallonia) and the plans to solve the migration barrier on the Meuse (border

Belgium-the Netherlands) the future prospects are positive for the

population on the Meuse. For the population in the Scheldt basin the future prospects are inadequate.

Conclusion

Biogeographical

or marine level

Conclusions

within

Natura

2000 sites

(optional)

(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A

(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A

(2.5) Habitat for the species Inadequate (U1) N/A

(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys. 2.3.4 Range trend

2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 2 2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species (km2) N/A. 2.7.4 Other relevant information Due to the

(2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Weather Loach (Misgurnus fossilis) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W.. Conservation status of

Other (specify) Water quality increased; Migration barriers diminished. 2.4.9 Justification of %

Other (specify) Water quality increased, Migration barriers diminished. 2.4.9 Justification of %

(2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W.. Conservation status of

(2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Midwife Toad (Alytes obstetricans) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. Conservation status of

2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction).