Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Alytes obstetricans
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Bauwens D. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Midwife Toad (Alytes obstetricans) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in km2 3875
2.3.2 Date of range determination 2000-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) - optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1970-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
83 83 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2000-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1970-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for trends
(optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 160 General Forestry management
800 Landfill, land reclamation and drying out, general
2.4.11 Threats 160 General Forestry management
800 Landfill, land reclamation and drying out, general
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species N/A
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.6 Trend period 2000-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Good prospects - species expected to survive and prosper
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range (km2) 3875
2.7.2 Favourable reference population 83
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within Natura
2000 sites (optional)
(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.4) Population Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Bufo calamita
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Bauwens D. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Bufo calamita (Bufo calamita) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 6025
2.3.2 Date of range determination 2000-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1970-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
94 94 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2000-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1970-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification
2.4.11 Threats 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species N/A
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.6 Trend period 2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Good prospects - species expected to survive and prosper
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 6025
2.7.2 Favourable reference population 94
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
marine level
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.4) Population Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Hyla arborea
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Bauwens D. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species European Tree Frog (Hyla arborea) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 875
2.3.2 Date of range determination 2000-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1970-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
9 9 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2000-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Decreasing (-)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 60
2.4.7 Population trend period 1970-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 150 Restructuring agricultural land holding
151 - removal of hedges and copses 701 - water pollution
803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 853 - management of water levels
990 Other natural processes
2.4.11 Threats 150 Restructuring agricultural land holding
151 - removal of hedges and copses 701 - water pollution
803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 853 - management of water levels
990 Other natural processes
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species N/A
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.6 Trend period 2000-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Bad prospects - species likely to be become extinct in the biogeographical region
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 875
2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 9
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A
(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Bad (U2) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Pelobates fuscus
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Bauwens D. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Common Spadefoot (Pelobates
fuscus) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 400
2.3.2 Date of range determination 2000-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1970-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)
habitat destruction
Other (specify) habitat destruction
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
6 6 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2000-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Decreasing (-)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 5
2.4.7 Population trend period 1970-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)
habitat destruction
Other (specify) habitat destruction
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 150 Restructuring agricultural land holding
151 - removal of hedges and copses 701 - water pollution
803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 853 - management of water levels
990 Other natural processes
2.4.11 Threats 150 Restructuring agricultural land holding
151 - removal of hedges and copses 701 - water pollution
803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 853 - management of water levels
990 Other natural processes
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species Migrates between aquatic habitats where it reproduces in early
spring, and terrestrial biotopes where it spends the rest of the year. It inhabits areas where mesotrophic waters are found close (distance typically < 500 m) to terrains with a loose, sandy substrate. Aquatic habitats are meadow ponds, old meanders, small lakes and enriched fens, containing water with a pH > 6. The main terrestrial habitats are land dunes, sandy hills and sandy agricultural fields, where it spends the daytime buried in the soil.
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2006
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Bad prospects - species likely to be become extinct in the biogeographical region
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 400
2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 6
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A
(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Bad (U2) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Rana arvalis
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Bauwens D. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Moor Frog (Rana arvalis) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 1700
2.3.2 Date of range determination 2000-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional 0
2.3.6 Range trend period 1970-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
34 34 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2000-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 0
2.4.7 Population trend period 1970-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification
2.4.11 Threats 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species In Belgium, this species is strictly confined to wet heathlands and moors. It breeds in shallow parts of (enriched) fens. The
terrestrial habitats are heathlands and forest edges. Migrates between aquatic habitats where it reproduces during spring, and terrestrial biotopes where it spends summer and winter. Distances between both habitat types are typically < 1 km.
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Good prospects - species expected to survive and prosper
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 1700
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.4) Population Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Rana esculenta
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Bauwens D. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Edible Frog - Green frog - Common water frog (Rana esculenta) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 18829
2.3.2 Date of range determination 2000-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional 0
2.3.6 Range trend period 1970-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
585 585 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2000-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 0
2.4.7 Population trend period 1970-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 – acidification
2.4.11 Threats 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species Spends the entire activity season in or in the immediate
neighbourhood of its aquatic habitat. It is found in a large variety of waters including ditches, canals, ponds, lakes, sand and clay quarries, old meanders, fens, etc.
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Good prospects - species expected to survive and prosper
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 18829
2.7.2 Favourable reference population 585
2.7.4 Other relevant information Given the practical difficulties to distinguishR.esculenta from R.lessonae and R. ridibunda, these three species by external characteristics, they are treated here as a single species “synklepton”
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.4) Population Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Rana lessonae
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Bauwens D. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Pool frog (Rana lessonae) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest, INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites Jacob et al. 2007. Les batraciens et reptiles de Wallonie.
Raînne (Aves) & CRNFB, série Faune-Flore-Habitats n°2, Gembloux, 350 pp.
Parent G-H., 1984. Atlas des Batraciens et Reptiles de la Belgique et des Régions limitrophes. Cahiers d'Ethologie appliquée, 4: 1-198.
Parent G-H., 1983. Animaux menacés en Wallonie: protégeons nos batraciens et reptiles. Duculot, Gembloux: 172 pp.
amprep/grenouilles_vertes.html www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in km2 4207
2.3.2 Date of range determination 2000-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some
extrapolation
2.3.4 Range trend Unknown (X)
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) - optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1970-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
62 62 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2000-2006
2.4.3 Methods used for population estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Moderate e.g. based on partial data with some
extrapolation
2.4.5 Population trend Unknown (X)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1970-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for trends
(optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification
2.4.11 Threats 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species Spends the entire activity season in or in the immediate
neighbourhood of its aquatic habitat. In the Atlantic region of Belgium, this species shows a clear preference for ponds and fens in or near to heathlands and moors.
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert
judgement
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Unknown
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range (km2) More than field 2.3.1 4207
2.7.2 Favourable reference population N/A
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species (km2) N/A
2.7.4 Other relevant information data are likely to be incomplete, given the practical
difficulties to distinguish this species by external characteristics from Rana esculenta
Conclusion
Biogeographical
or marine level
Conclusions within Natura
2000 sites (optional)
(2.3) Range Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.4) Population Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Unknown (XX) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Rana ridibunda
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Bauwens D. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Marsh Frog (Rana ridibunda) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 0
2.3.2 Date of range determination 2000-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1970-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
0 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2000-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation Based on expert opinion
2.4.4 Quality of population data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.4.5 Population trend Unknown (X)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude N/A
2.4.7 Population trend period 1970-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification
2.4.11 Threats 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 852 - modifying structures of inland water courses 853 - management of water levels
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species Spends the entire activity season in or in the immediate
neighbourhood of its aquatic habitat. It is found in a large variety of waters including ditches, canals, ponds, lakes, sand and clay quarries, old meanders, fens, etc.
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the species Unknown
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) Much more than field 2.3.1 0
2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 0
2.7.4 Other relevant information Given the practical difficulties to distinguish this species from Rana esculenta by external characteristics data are inadequate
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.4) Population Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Unknown (XX) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Rana temporaria
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Bauwens D. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Common frog (Rana temporaria) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites
Jacob et al. 2007. Les batraciens et reptiles de Wallonie. Raînne (Aves) & CRNFB, série Faune-Flore-Habitats n°2, Gembloux, 350 pp. Parent G-H., 1984. Atlas des Batraciens et Reptiles de la Belgique et des Régions limitrophes. Cahiers d'Ethologie appliquée, 4: 1-198. Parent G-H., 1983. Animaux menacés en Wallonie: protégeons nos batraciens et reptiles. Duculot, Gembloux: 172 pp.
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species
in km2 18829
2.3.2 Date of range determination 2000-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning
range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.4 Range trend Stable (=)
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude
(km2) - optional 0
2.3.6 Range trend period 1970-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
713 713 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2000-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Stable (=)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 0
2.4.7 Population trend period 1970-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds
for trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification
2.4.11 Threats 701 - water pollution
810 Drainage
850 Modification of hydrographic functioning, general 952 - eutrophication
953 - acidification
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species Migrates between aquatic habitats where it reproduces during early spring, and terrestrial biotopes where it spends the rest of the year. Distances between both habitat types are typically < 1 km. Aquatic habitats are very diverse and include permanent ponds, lakes, ditches, fens, as well as temporarily inundated grasslands. The species lays its eggs in shallow sites that are well lit by the sun. Terrestrial habitats are also highly diverse: grasslands, wet
heathlands, marshes, scrubland, different types of woodland, parks and gardens in residential areas.
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.6 Future prospects for the
species Good prospects - species expected to survive and prosper
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 18829
2.7.2 Favourable reference
population 713
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the
species N/A
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within Natura
2000 sites (optional)
(2.3) Range Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.4) Population Favourable (FV) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Favourable (FV) N/A
Report on the main results of the surveillance under article
11 for annex II, IV and V species (Annex B)
SPECIES NAME: Triturus cristatus
1. National level
Biogeographic regions and/or marine regions concerned in the MS: ATL CON
2. Biogeographical or marine level
2.1 Biogeographical region or marine region: Atlantic
Bauwens D. (2008) Conservation status of the Natura 2000 species Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus) for the Belgian Atlantic region, In: Paelinckx D., Van Landuyt W. & De Bruyn L. (ed.). Conservation status of the Natura 2000 habitats and species. Report of the Research Institute for Nature and Forest,
INBO.R.2008.15. Brussels. In prep
2.2 Published sources and/or websites www.inbo.be/natura2000be
2.3 Range of species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.3.1 Surface range of the species in
km2 11852
2.3.2 Date of range determination 2000-2006
2.3.3 Quality of data concerning range Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.3.5 Range trend magnitude (km2) -
optional N/A
2.3.6 Range trend period 1970-2006
2.3.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
Other (specify) N/A
2.4 Population of the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.4.1 Population size estimation
Minimum population Maximum population Population units
157 157 Grids
2.4.2 Date of population estimation 2000-2006
2.4.3 Method used for population
estimation From comprehensive inventory
2.4.4 Quality of population data Good e.g based on extensive surveys
2.4.5 Population trend Decreasing (-)
2.4.6 Population trend magnitude 78
2.4.7 Population trend period 1970-2006
2.4.8 Reasons for reported trend Direct human influence (restoration, deterioration, destruction)
Other (specify) N/A
2.4.9 Justification of % thresholds for
trends (optional) N/A
2.4.10 Main pressures 150 Restructuring agricultural land holding
151 - removal of hedges and copses 701 - water pollution
803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 853 - management of water levels
990 Other natural processes
2.4.11 Threats 150 Restructuring agricultural land holding
151 - removal of hedges and copses 701 - water pollution
803 - infilling of ditches, dykes, ponds, pools, marshes or pits 853 - management of water levels
990 Other natural processes
2.5 Habitat for the species in the biogeographic region or marine region
2.5.1 Habitats for the species Migrates between aquatic habitats where it reproduces during
spring and early summer, and terrestrial biotopes where it spends summer and winter. Distances between both habitat types are typically < 1 km. Aquatic habitats are typically small to medium-sized ponds in agricultural landscapes, they are used as breeding sites by adults and are the critical habitat for eggs and larvae. Main requirements are that water level is high throughout summer, neutral pH, exposed to sunshine. The species has a preference for clusters of small ponds. Terrestrial habitats include a wide variety of woods, scrubland, heathlands, marshes and small-scaled farmland with abundant hedges and hedgerows.
2.5.2 Area estimation (km2) N/A
2.5.3 Date of estimation 2006
2.5.4 Quality of the data Poor e.g. based on very incomplete data or on expert judgement
2.5.5 Trend of the habitat Unknown (X)
2.5.6 Trend period 1995-2006
2.5.7 Reasons for reported trend Unknown
2.6 Future prospects for the species Bad prospects - species likely to be become extinct in the biogeographical region
2.7 Complementary information
2.7.1 Favourable reference range
(km2) 16848
2.7.2 Favourable reference population Much more than field 2.4.1 157
2.7.3 Suitable habitat for the species N/A
2.7.4 Other relevant information N/A
Conclusion
Biogeographical or
marine level
Conclusions within
Natura 2000 sites
(optional)
(2.3) Range Bad (U2) N/A
(2.4) Population Bad (U2) N/A
(2.5) Habitat for the species Unknown (XX) N/A
(2.6) Future prospects Bad (U2) N/A