• No results found

Supplementary Information

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Supplementary Information"

Copied!
105
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

(PRE-OPERATIONAL PHASE) Issued: 21 May 2019 Target Season: June-July-August2019

Supplementary Information

(2)

APPENDIX - Prediction...5 2.1 Surface Temperature...6

2.1.1 Individual GPC ensemble mean forecasts of 2m temperature anomalies relative to 1993-2009...6 2.1.3 Forecast consistency map (13 GPCs): 2m Temperature...9 2.1.4 DMME (13GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993- 2009): 2m temperature...9 2.1.5 DMME (13GPCs), for each model using its own baseline: 2m temperature...10 2.1.6 PMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993- 2009): 2m temperature...10 2.1.7 Verification of GPC ensemble mean 2m temperature anomaly forecasts, 1993-2009...11 2.1.8 Verification of GPC 2m temperature probabilistic forecasts, 1993- 2009...13 2.1.9 Verification of GPC 2m temperature probabilistic forecasts, 1993- 2009...21 2.1.10 Verification of GPC 2m temperature probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009...24 2.2 Precipitation...27

2.2.1 Individual GPC ensemble mean forecasts of precipitation

anomalies relative to 1993-2009...27 2.2.4 DMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993- 2009): precipitation...30 2.2.5 DMME (13 GPCs), for each model using its own baseline:

precipitation...31 2.2.6 PMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993- 2009): precipitation...32 2.2.7 Verification of GPC ensemble mean precipitation anomaly

forecasts, 1993-2009...32 2.2.8 Verification of GPC precipitation probabilistic forecasts, 1993- 2009...35 2.2.9 Verification of GPC precipitation probabilistic forecasts, 1993- 2009...41 2.2.10 Verification of GPC precipitation probabilistic forecasts, 1993- 2009...44 2.3 Sea Surface Temperature (SST)...47

2.3.1 Individual GPC ensemble mean forecasts of SST anomalies

relative to 1993-2009...47

(3)

2.3.3 Forecast consistency map (12 GPCs): SST...50 2.3.5 DMME (12 GPCs), for each model using its own baseline: SST. .51 2.3.6 Verification of GPC ensemble mean SST anomaly forecasts, 1993-2009...51 2.4 500 hPa Geopotential Height...54

2.4.1 Individual GPC ensemble mean forecasts of 500hPa height

anomalies relative to 1993-2009...54 2.4.3 Forecast consistency map (13 GPCs): 500hPa height...57 2.4.4 DMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993- 2009): 500hPa height...58 2.4.5 DMME (13 GPCs), for each model using its own baseline: 500hPa height...58 2.4.6 PMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993- 2009): 500hPa height...60 2.4.7 Verification of GPC ensemble mean 500hPa height anomaly forecasts, 1993-2009...61 2.4.8 Verification of GPC 500hPa height probabilistic forecasts, 1993- 2009...64 2.4.9 Verification of GPC 500hPa height probabilistic forecasts, 1993- 2009...71 2.4.10 Verification of GPC 500hPa height probabilistic forecasts, 1993- 2009...74 2.5 Mean Sea Level Pressure...77

2.5.1 Individual GPC ensemble mean forecasts of MSLP anomalies

relative to 1993-2009...77

2.5.3 Forecast consistency map (13 GPCs): MSLP...81

2.5.4 DMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-

2009): MSLP...82

2.5.5 DMME (13 GPCs), for each model using its own baseline: MSLP 82

2.5.6 PMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-

2009): MSLP...83

2.5.7 Verification of GPC ensemble mean MSLP anomaly forecasts,

1993-2009...84

2.5.8 Verification of GPC MSLP probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009...87

2.5.9 Verification of GPC MSLP probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009...94

2.5.10 Verification of GPC MSLP probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009...97

2.6 Ensemble mean predictions of global mean seasonal temperature

(4)

2.7 Predictions of monthly SST indices: each model with its own baseline

...101

2.8 Further information on GPC hindcasts and forecasts...105

(5)

APPENDIX - Prediction

This appendix contains supporting material for the probabilistic forecast maps and SST indices described in the main part of this Update. The same sequence of global maps is shown for each of the five variables in the following order:

i. Surface air temperature;

ii. Precipitation;

iii. Sea Surface Temperature (except for 6, 8, 9 and 10 below);

iv. 500 hPa Geopotential Height; and v. Mean sea-level pressure

For each of these variables the following sequence of maps/charts is shown:

1. Ensemble mean anomalies for individual GPCs relative to the common baseline of 1993-2009;

2. Ensemble mean anomalies for those GPCs for which forecast anomalies relative to 1993-2009 are not available;

3. Forecast consistency map showing the number of GPCs (out of 13) with positive/negative ensemble mean anomalies (relative to their own baseline period);

4. Deterministic Multi-Model Ensemble (DMME) forecast constructed using 13 GPCs and the common baseline (1993-2009). The same 13 GPCs used for the Probabilistic Multi-Model Ensemble (PMME) forecasts (those supplying hindcast data for 1993-2009) are used for consistency;

5. DMME forecast constructed using 13 GPCs and each model’s own baseline;

6. PMME forecast constructed using 13 GPCs (see 4 above) and the 1993-2009 common baseline;

7. Anomaly Correlation Coefficient (ACC) verification for the 13 GPC DMME (top left) and each GPC (as available) over the period 1993-2009; or over the GPCs own hindcast period if hindcasts are provided and do not encompass the 1993-2009 period.

8. ROC map verification for the 13 GPC PMME (top left) and each GPC (as available) over the period 1993-2009; or over the GPCs own hindcast period if hindcasts are provided and do not encompass the 1993-2009 period.

9. ROC Curve and Score verification for the 13 GPC PMME (top left) and each GPC (as available) over the period 1993-2009; or over the GPCs own hindcast period if hindcasts are provided and do not encompass the 1993-2009 period.

10. Reliability Diagram verification for the 13 GPC PMME (top left) and each GPC (as available) over the period 1993-2009; or over the GPCs own hindcast period if hindcasts are provided and do not encompass the 1993-2009 period.

In addition, predictions of the following derived parameters are also provided:

vi. Global seasonal mean temperature vii. SST indices

 Nino1.2

 Nino3

(6)

 Nino3.4

 Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD)

 North Tropical Atlantic (NTA)

 South Tropical Atlantic (STA)

Finally, some information is also included on the forecast and hindcast data provided by the GPCs.

2.1 Surface Temperature

2.1.1 Individual GPC ensemble mean forecasts of 2m temperature anomalies relative to 1993-2009

Beijing CPTEC

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

ECMWF Exeter Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

(7)

Melbourne Montreal Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Moscow Offenbach Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Pretoria Seoul

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

(8)

Tokyo Toulouse Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Washington Baseline:1993-2009

(9)

2.1.3 Forecast consistency map (13 GPCs): 2m Temperature

Number of GPCs with positive/negative ensemble mean anomalies – relative to own baseline

(10)

2.1.4 DMME (13GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-2009): 2m temperature

Ensemble mean anomaly

2.1.5 DMME (13GPCs), for each model using its own baseline: 2m temperature Ensemble mean anomaly

2.1.6 PMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-2009): 2m temperature

Probability of most likely tercile category

(11)

2.1.7 Verification of GPC ensemble mean 2m temperature anomaly forecasts, 1993-2009

Verification measure: Anomaly Correlation Coefficient (ACC) Verification dataset: ERA-interim

DMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

(12)

Exeter Melbourne

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

(13)

Seoul Tokyo

Toulouse Washington

(14)

2.1.8 Verification of GPC 2m temperature probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Relative Operating Characteristics (ROC) score for tercile forecast

Verification dataset: ERA-interim

PMME Beijing

(15)

CPTEC ECMWF

(16)

Exeter Melbourne

(17)

Montreal Moscow

(18)

Offenbach Pretoria

(19)

Seoul Tokyo

(20)

Toulouse Washington

(21)
(22)

2.1.9 Verification of GPC 2m temperature probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Relative Operation Characteristics (ROC) Curve and Score over globe Verification dataset: ERA-interim

PMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(23)

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

(24)

Toulouse Washington

(25)

2.1.10 Verification of GPC 2m temperature probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Reliability Diagram over globe

Verification dataset: ERA-interim

PMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(26)

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

Seoul Tokyo

(27)

Toulouse Washington

(28)

2.2 Precipitation

2.2.1 Individual GPC ensemble mean forecasts of precipitation anomalies relative to 1993-2009

Beijing CPTEC

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

ECMWF Exeter

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Melbourne Montreal Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

(29)

Moscow Offenbach Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Pretoria Seoul

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

(30)

Tokyo Toulouse

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Washington Baseline:1993-2009

(31)

2.2.3 Forecast consistency map (13 GPCs): precipitation

(number of GPCs with positive/negative ensemble mean anomalies – relative to own baseline)

2.2.4 DMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-2009):

precipitation

Ensemble mean anomaly

(32)

2.2.5 DMME (13 GPCs), for each model using its own baseline: precipitation Ensemble mean anomaly

(33)

2.2.6 PMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-2009):

precipitation

2.2.7 Verification of GPC ensemble mean precipitation anomaly forecasts, 1993-2009

Verification measure: Anomaly Correlation Coefficient (ACC) Verification dataset: GPCP

DMME Beijing

(34)

Exeter Melbourne

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

(35)

Seoul Tokyo

Toulouse Washington

(36)

2.2.8 Verification of GPC precipitation probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Relative Operating Characteristics (ROC) score for tercile forecast Verification dataset: GPCP

PMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

(37)

Exeter Melbourne

(38)

Montreal Moscow

(39)

Offenbach Pretoria

(40)

Seoul Tokyo

(41)

Toulouse Washington

(42)

2.2.9 Verification of GPC precipitation probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Relative Operating Characteristics (ROC) Curve and Score over globe Verification dataset: GPCP

PMME Beijing

(43)

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(44)

Offenbach Pretoria

Seoul Tokyo

Toulouse Washington

(45)

2.2.10 Verification of GPC precipitation probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Reliability Diagram over globe

Verification dataset: GPCP

PMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

(46)

Exeter Melbourne

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

(47)

Seoul Tokyo

Toulouse Washington

(48)

2.3 Sea Surface Temperature (SST)

2.3.1 Individual GPC ensemble mean forecasts of SST anomalies relative to 1993-2009

Beijing ECMWF Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Exeter Melbourne Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Montreal Moscow Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

(49)

Offenbach Pretoria Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Seoul Tokyo

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

(50)

Toulouse Washington Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

(51)

2.3.3 Forecast consistency map (12 GPCs): SST

(number of GPCs with positive/negative ensemble mean anomalies – relative to own baseline)

2.3.4 DMME (12 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-2009): SST

Ensemble mean anomaly

(52)

2.3.5 DMME (12 GPCs), for each model using its own baseline: SST

Ensemble mean anomaly

2.3.6 Verification of GPC ensemble mean SST anomaly forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Anomaly Correlation Coefficient (ACC)

Verification dataset: Reynolds SST

DMME Beijing

ECMWF Exeter

(53)

Melbourne Montreal

Moscow Offenbach

Pretoria Seoul

(54)

Tokyo Toulouse

Washington

(55)

2.4 500 hPa Geopotential Height

2.4.1 Individual GPC ensemble mean forecasts of 500hPa height anomalies relative to 1993-2009

Beijing CPTEC

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

ECMWF Exeter

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Melbourne Montreal Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

(56)

Moscow Offenbach Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Pretoria Seoul

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Tokyo Toulouse

(57)

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Washington Baseline:1993-2009

(58)

2.4.3 Forecast consistency map (13 GPCs): 500hPa height

(number of GPCs with positive/negative ensemble mean anomalies – relative to own baseline)

(59)

2.4.4 DMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-2009):

500hPa height

Ensemble mean anomaly

2.4.5 DMME (13 GPCs), for each model using its own baseline: 500hPa height Ensemble mean anomaly

(60)
(61)

2.4.6 PMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-2009):

500hPa height

Probability of most likely tercile category

(62)

2.4.7 Verification of GPC ensemble mean 500hPa height anomaly forecasts, 1993-2009

Verification measure: Anomaly Correlation Coefficient (ACC) Verification dataset: ERA-Interim

DMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(63)

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

(64)

Toulouse Washington

(65)

2.4.8 Verification of GPC 500hPa height probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Relative Operating Characteristics (ROC) score for tercile forecast Verification dataset: ERA-Interim

PMME Beijing

(66)

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(67)

Montreal Moscow

(68)

Offenbach Pretoria

(69)

Seoul Tokyo

(70)

Toulouse Washington

(71)
(72)

2.4.9 Verification of GPC 500hPa height probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Relative Operating Characteristics Curve (ROC) and Score over globe Verification dataset: ERA-interim

PMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(73)

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

(74)

Toulouse Washington

(75)

2.4.10 Verification of GPC 500hPa height probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Reliability Diagram over globe

Verification dataset: ERA-interim

PMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(76)

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

Seoul Tokyo

(77)

Toulouse Washington

(78)

2.5 Mean Sea Level Pressure

2.5.1 Individual GPC ensemble mean forecasts of MSLP anomalies relative to 1993-2009

Beijing CPTEC

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

ECMWF Exeter

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Melbourne Montreal

(79)

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Moscow Offenbach Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Pretoria Seoul

(80)

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Tokyo Toulouse

Baseline:1993-2009 Baseline:1993-2009

Washington Baseline:1993-2009

(81)
(82)

2.5.3 Forecast consistency map (13 GPCs): MSLP

(number of GPCs with positive/negative ensemble mean anomalies – relative to own baseline)

(83)

2.5.4 DMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-2009):

MSLP

Ensemble mean anomaly

2.5.5 DMME (13 GPCs), for each model using its own baseline: MSLP Ensemble mean anomaly

(84)

2.5.6 PMME (13 GPCs), using the same baseline for all models (1993-2009):

MSLP

Probability of most likely tercile category

(85)

2.5.7 Verification of GPC ensemble mean MSLP anomaly forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Anomaly Correlation Coefficient (ACC)

Verification dataset: ERA-interim

DMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(86)

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

Seoul Tokyo

(87)

Toulouse Washington

(88)

2.5.8 Verification of GPC MSLP probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Relative Operating Characteristics (ROC) score for tercile forecast Verification dataset: ERA-interim

PMME Beijing

(89)

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(90)

Montreal Moscow

(91)

Offenbach Pretoria

(92)

Seoul Tokyo

(93)

Toulouse Washington

(94)
(95)

2.5.9 Verification of GPC MSLP probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009

Verification measure: Relative Operating Characteristics (ROC) Curve and Score over globe Verification dataset: ERA-interim

PMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(96)

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

Seoul Tokyo

(97)

Toulouse Washington

(98)

2.5.10 Verification of GPC MSLP probabilistic forecasts, 1993-2009 Verification measure: Reliability Diagram over globe

Verification dataset: ERA-interim

PMME Beijing

CPTEC ECMWF

Exeter Melbourne

(99)

Montreal Moscow

Offenbach Pretoria

(100)

Toulouse Washington

(101)

2.6 Ensemble mean predictions of global mean seasonal temperature anomaly for 1993-2009

GPC Global average Temp.(K)

(baseline of 1993-2009)

Global average Temp.(K) (with models own baseline)

Beijing 0.46 0.47

CPTEC 0.59 0.64

ECMWF 0.45 0.42

Exeter 0.51 0.43

Melbourne 0.08 0.14

Montreal 0.41 0.44

Moscow 0.09 0.1

Offenbach 0.52 0.47

Pretoria 0.46 0.47

Seoul 0.67 0.67

Tokyo 0.37 0.43

Toulouse 0.57 0.51

Washington 0.48 0.56

MME(13 GPCs) N/A 0.44

MME(12 GPCs) 0.44 0.44

2.7 Predictions of monthly SST indices: each model with its own baseline

Nino 1+2

(102)

Nino 3

SSTA[150°W-90°W, 5°S-5°N]

(103)

Nino 4

SSTA[160°E-150°W, 5°S-5°N]

Nino 3.4

SSTA[170°W-120°W, 5°S-5°N]

(104)

IOD

SSTA[50°E-70°E, 10°S -10°N]-SSTA[90°E-110°E, 10°S -0°]

North Tropical Atlantic (NTA) SSTA[60°W-30°W, 5°N-20°N]

(105)

Southern Tropical Atlantic (STA) SSTA[30°W-10°E, 20°S-0°]

(106)

2.8 Further information on GPC hindcasts and forecasts

The probabilistic multi-model ensemble (PMME) prediction maps are generated from 12 GPCs operating models with hindcast periods that include the 1993-2009 (17 year) period, which is used as a common baseline in the multi-model products. The following table summarizes the information on the hindcast period, number of hindcast members and number of forecast members supplied by each of the 13 GPCs. An “X” indicates that hindcast data is not currently available from the corresponding GPC.

GPC Hosting

Agency

Hindcast Period

Hindcast Data

Hindcast Members

Forecast Members

Beijing BCC 1991-2010 O 24 24

CPTEC CPTEC 1979-2010 O 10 15

ECMWF ECMWF 1993-2016 O 25 51

Exeter UKMO 1993-2016 O 28 42

Melbourne BoM 1980-2011 O 99 33

Montreal CMC 1981-2010 O 20 20

Moscow HMC 1986-2010 O 10 20

Offenbach DWD 1990-2017 O 30 50

Pretoria SAWS 1982-2009 O 10 40

Seoul KMA 1991-2010 O 12 42

Tokyo JMA 1979-2014 O 10 51

Toulouse Meteo-France 1993-2016 O 25 51

Washington NCEP 1982-2010 O 20 40

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

To create a dataset with a continuous follow-up where couples were either receiving treatment or not, we considered date of starting ovarian stimulation as

freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching,

The main reason why the analysis technique is fast is that it ignores the resource dependences that are created when actors from different applications share a resource. This

“An analysis of employee characteristics” 23 H3c: When employees have high levels of knowledge and share this knowledge with the customer, it will have a positive influence

In opdracht van het fiscaal kantoor Vanhootegem heeft BAAC Vlaanderen een archeologische prospectie met ingreep in de bodem uitgevoerd op het terrein gelegen aan

To destroy any true correlation of the gene expression profiles with the ALL-AML class distinction, we randomly and independently permuted the components of each gene expression

Thus the primary objective of this study is to make recommendations based on the literature and empirical study, towards the development of a general framework to