• No results found

Cover Page

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cover Page"

Copied!
2
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Cover Page

The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/58101 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Author: Fink, Melanie

Title: Frontex and human rights : responsibility in 'multi-actor situations' under the ECHR and EU public liability law

Date: 2017-12-13

(2)

MI 294

This thesis examines the legal responsibility for human rights violations that may occur in the context of border control or return operations coordinated by the EU agency Frontex. It does so using two legal frameworks, responsibility under the ECHR on the one hand and non-contractual liability under EU law on the other.

Imagine, for example, that during a border control operation at sea, a vessel forces a boat carrying migrants back to its place of origin, which may be in violation of the rights of persons on that boat. The operation is hosted by State A, coordinated and financed by Frontex, but the vessel in question is from State B. The contributions by State A, B, and by Frontex to the violation vary in nature and degree. But which contribution leads to legal responsibility? In other words, who has to bear the consequences for and remedy the unlawful conduct?

The thesis concludes that direct responsibility for most human rights violations lies with the host state. In addition, participating states who contribute large assets and Frontex will often incur responsibility together with the host state, predominantly on the basis of their obligations to protect or supervise. However, the study also exposes just how difficult it may be for individuals to find a place for bringing complaints against violations of their human rights suffered at the EU’s external borders. This casts doubts on whether the current legal framework offers them an effective remedy.

This is a volume in the series of the Meijers Research Institute and Graduate School of the Leiden Law School. This study is part of the Law School’s research programme ‘The progression of EU law: accommodating change and upholding values’.

M. Fink

Frontex and Human Rights

Responsibility in ‘Multi-Actor Situations’ under the ECHR and EU Public Liability Law

E.M.

MEIJERS INSTITUUT

INSTITUUT VOOR RECHTSWETENSCHAPPELIJK

ONDERZOEK

E.M.

MEIJERS INSTITUUT

INSTITUUT VOOR RECHTSWETENSCHAPPELIJK

ONDERZOEK

Frontex and Human Rights

M. FINK

Cover_Frontex and Human Rights_rug25mm_def.indd 1

Cover_Frontex and Human Rights_rug25mm_def.indd 1 19-10-17 11:4019-10-17 11:40

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In general, it should not be forgotten that civil remedies in a number of countries may be the only option available to plaintiffs because criminal liability of legal persons

A legal-theory paradigm for scientifically approaching any legal issue is understood to be a shared, coherent collection of scientific theories that serves comprehension of the law

This chapter demonstrates how existing norms of international law can be employed to establish State responsibility for acts and omissions that lead to

The article further reveals two conditions that foster the development of pluralist accountability, namely the competition among third parties and the degree of vulnerability of

As a matter of legal principle, restitution is the primary remedy for violations of international law.80 Restitution is required where (a) it is not materially im- possible; and (b)

With regards to the first sub-question, “how is the right to asylum implemented in the EU’s legal framework and policy approach concerning border management?” chapter three

Regulation 1049/2001/EC, regarding the public access to the documents of European Parliament, Council and Commission, is another important legal source of the principle

Specialized Conference on Human Rights, San Josi, Costa Rica, 22 November 1969 Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador.. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime