• No results found

Agyaman, J. & Bullard, R.D. & Evans, B. 2002. Exploring the nexus: Bringing together sustainability, environment justice and equity. Space and Polity, 6(1):77-90. Available:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Agyaman, J. & Bullard, R.D. & Evans, B. 2002. Exploring the nexus: Bringing together sustainability, environment justice and equity. Space and Polity, 6(1):77-90. Available: "

Copied!
26
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

180

8. Bibliography

African Connexion International. 1992. Intermodal Conference. Fourth Quarter.

Agyaman, J. & Bullard, R.D. & Evans, B. 2002. Exploring the nexus: Bringing together sustainability, environment justice and equity. Space and Polity, 6(1):77-90. Available:

Routledge.

Agyaman, J. & Evans, B. 2004. Just sustainability: The emerging discourse of

environmental justice in Britain. The Geographical Journal, 170(2):155-164. Available:

Jstor.

Anon. 2005. Encouraging development of intermodal freight terminals.

http://www.uppermidwestfreight.org/files/Encouraging%20Development%20of%20Inter modal%20Freight%20Facilities_11-11-05.pdf Date of access: 31 Mar. 2012.

Arnaud, R. 2006. Towards a more sustainable modal and spatial split of freight traffic for crossing areas: the case of the transalpine freight traffic.

http://www.strc.ch/conferences/2006/Arnaud_STRC_2006.pdf Date of access: 13 Aug.

2012.

Atiya, S. 2011. Intermodal Mobility.

http://archiv.iaa.de/2011/fileadmin/user_upload/2011/deutsch/downloads/fv/01/08- Intermodal_Mobility-A_Key_to_Efficiency_and_Sustainability.pdf. Date of access: 17 Feb 2012.

BEBR. 2003. Intermodal Transport.

www.bebr.ufl.edu/files/Intermodal_Transportation_0.pdf Date of access: 17 Feb 2012.

Behrends, S. 2011. Urban Freight Transport Sustainability: The interaction of urban freight and intermodal transport.

http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/150735.pdf Date of access: 13 Aug.

2012.

(2)

181

Bertaud, A. 2010. The study of urban spatial structures. http://alain-bertaud.com/

Date of access: 28 Aug. 2012.

Bontekoning, Y.M. & Macharis, C. & Trip, J.J. 2004. Is a new applied transportation research field emerging? A review of intermodal rail-truck freight transport literature.

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(1):1-34. Available: Elsevier.

Carter, C.R. & Rogers, D.S. 2008. A framework of sustainability supply chain

management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(5):360-387. Available: Emerald.

CE Delft. 2008. Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector:

Produced within the study Internalisation Measures and Policies for All external Cost of Transport (IMPACT). DE Delft, Delft.

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/sustainable/doc/2008_costs_handbook.pdf Date of access: 30 Aug. 2012.

CIA. 2007. CIA Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world- factbook/geos/xx.html Date of access: 10 Nov. 2012.

Corporate Planning Unit. 2002. City of Johannesburg: Joburg 2030: Full Report.

Johannesburg, South Africa. 148p.

Crainic, T.G. & RicciardI, N. Storchi, G. 2004. Advanced freight transportation systems for congested urban areas. Transportation Research Part C, 12(2):119-137. Available:

Elsevier.

CSIR. 2008. The Fourth: Annual state logistics survey for South Africa.

http://researchspace.csir.co.za/dspace/bitstream/10204/2346/1/Ittmann1_2008.pdf Date of access: 20 Feb. 2012.

Dablanc, L. 2007. Goods transport in large European cities: Difficult to organize,

difficult to modernize. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(3):280-

285. Available: ScienceDirect.

(3)

182

Daly, H.E. 2007. Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development: Selected Essays of Herman Daly. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

http://books.google.co.za/books?id=EgI30Za9mvcC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_

ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false Date of access: 28 Aug. 2012.

Department of Transport see South Africa.

Dewitt, W. & Clinger, J. 2000. Intermodal freight transportation.

http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/millennium/00061.pdf Date of access: 21 Mar.

2012.

Egger, S. 2006. Determining a Sustainable city model. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21(9):1235-1246. Available: Elsevier.

Elkington, J. 2004. Enter the triple bottom line.

http://kmhassociates.ca/resources/1/Triple%2520Bottom%2520Line%2520a%2520histo ry%25201961-2001.pdf Date of access: 28 Aug. 2012.

EUCAR. & Concawe. & European Commission. 2007. Well-to-Wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context.

http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/media/WTW_Report_010307.pdf Date of access: 30 Aug. 2012.

European Commission. 2006. Keep Europe Moving – sustainable mobility to our continent: mid-term review of the European Commission’s 2001 White Paper on

transport. http://eu.europa.eu/transport/strategies/2006_keep_europe_moving_en.htm Date of access: 5 Sep. 2012.

European Commission. 2011a. EU transport in figures: Statistical pocketbook 2011.

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/publications/statistics/doc/2011/pocketbook2011.pdf Date of access: 28 Aug. 2012. Luxembourg

European International Association (EIA). 2010. Intermodal Freight Transport &

Logistics Best Practices. http://www.eia-ngo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Best-

Practice_Viacombi.pdf Date of access: 10 Sept. 2012.

(4)

183

Faludi, A. 1973. A Reader in Planning Theory. Urban and Regional Planning Series 5.

Pergamon Press. 399p.

Fridell, E. & Ferm, M. & Ekberg, A. 2010. Emissions of particulate matters from

railways – Emission factors and condition monitoring. Transportation Research Part D:

Transport and the Environment, 15(4):240-245. Available: Elsevier.

Grindrod. 2012a. Background: Grindrod Intermodal. http://grindrod-co- za.win24.wadns.net/background.asp Date of access: 12 Sept. 2012.

Grindrod. 2012b. Grindrod Intermodal.

http://www.grindrod.co.za/Company/13/Grindrod-Intermodal- Date of access: 26 Sept.

2012.

Grindrod. 2012c. Grindrod Terminals.

http://www.grindrod.co.za/Company/39/Grindrod-Terminals- Date of access: 26 Sept.

2012.

Grindrod. 2012d. Integrated Solutions.

http://www.grindrod.co.za/Company/47/Integrated-Solutions- Date of access: 26 Sept.

2012.

Grindrod. 2012e. About Grindrod Limited. http://www.grindrod.co.za/Pages/About-Us- Overview Date of access: 26 Sept. 2012.

H&S Group. 2012. Intermodal Solutions. http://www.hs-group.eu/30/intermodal- solutions/ Date of access: 5 Nov. 2012.

Havenga, J.H. & Pienaar, W.J. 2012. The creation and application of a national freight flow model for South Africa. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 54(1):2-13.

Hesse, M. 2010. The city as a Terminal: The Urban Context of Logistics and Freight

Transport. Geographical Research, 48(3):339-340. Available: Wiley.

(5)

184

Hesse, M. & Rodrigue, J.P. 2004. The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(3):171-184. Available: Elsevier.

Holden, E. & Hoyer, K.G. 2005. The ecological footprints of fuels. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 10(5):395-403. Available: ScienceDirect.

Imperial Logistics. 2010. Inter-modal logistics solutions key to driving regional competitiveness. http://www.imperiallogistics.co.za/news/regional-competitiveness/

Date of access: 5 Nov. 2012.

Index Mundi. 2012. South Africa Demographics Profile, 2012.

http://www.indexmundi.com/south_africa/demographics_profile.html Date of access: 20 Sept. 2012.

Invest in Germany. 2005. Europe’s Logistics Hub. Berlin, Gemany.

Jan de Rijk Logistics. 2012a. Freight Management.

http://www.janderiyk.com/freightmanagement Date of access: 5 Nov. 2012.

Jan de Rijk Logistics. 2012b. Intermodal Solutions.

http://www.janderijk.com/intermodalshiftssolutions Date of access: 5 Nov. 2012.

Jan de Rijk LOGISTICS. 2012c. Security Controlled Transportation.

http://www.janderijk.com/securitytransportation Date of access: 5 Nov. 2012.

Jenks, M. & Burgess, R. 2000. Sustainable urban forms for developing countries.

London: SPON Press. 355p.

Jones, W.B. & Cassady, C.R. & Bowden, R.O. 2000. Developing a Standard Definition of Intermodal Transportation. Transportation Law Journal, 27:345-352. Available: High Beam Research.

Jordaan, A.C. 2000. Urban economic development: a conceptual framework. Pretoria:

University of Pretoria. 258p.

(6)

185

Jorgensen, A.A. 2004. The regeneration of railways in South Africa and intermodal opportunities for the road transport sector.

http://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/5698/Jorgensen_Regeneration%28200 4%29.pdf?sequence=1 Date of access: 23 Jul. 2012.

Joubert, J. 1998. A descriptive overview of intermodal transport with reference to South Africa. Published M Econ. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch. 146p.

Konings, J.W. 1996. Integrated centres for the transhipment, storage, collection and distribution of goods: A survey of the possibilities for a high-quality intermodal transport concept. Transport Policy, 3(1-2):3-11. Available: Elsevier.

Lawrence, D. 1994. Intermodalism and ISTEA. Public Roads, 58, 1 – 4. Available:

Federal Highway Administration.

Litman, T. & BurwelL, D. 2006. Issues in sustainable transportation. Int. J Global Environmental Issues, 6(4):331-347.

Lowe, D. 2005. Intermodal freight transport. 1

st

ed. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam, Boston. 301p.

Mabin, A. 2000. Dynamics of urban spatial growth (particularly suburbanisation) and their implications for spatial guidelines. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.

4p.

Mbanjwa, B. 2012. Province to benefit from projects. Daily News. 10 Feb.

http://www.iol.co.za/dailynews/news/province-to-benefit-from-projects-1.1231687 Date of access: 8 Nov. 2012.

Minken, H. & Jonsson, D. & Shepherd, S. et al. 2003. A Methodological Guidebook:

Developing Sustainable Urban Landuse and Transport Strategies.

http://www.infra.kth.se/courses/1H1402/Litteratur/pr_del14mg.pdf Date of access: 28 Aug. 2012.

National Land Transport Act see South Africa

(7)

186

Newman, P. 2000. Sustainability and how it relates to cities. Australia: Murdoch University Perth, Institute for Sustainability and Technology Policy. http://www.istp.mur doch.edu.au/ISTP/casestudies/Case_Studies_Asia/suscit/suscit.html Date of access:

28 Aug. 2012.

Nierat, P. 1997. Market area of rail-truck terminals: Pertinence of the Spatial Theory.

Transport Research, 31(2):109-127. Available: Elsevier.

Nykvist, B. & Whitmarsh, L. 2008. A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility

transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(9):1373-1387. Available: ScienceDirect.

Oertli, J. & Hubner, P. 2008. Noise reduction in rail freight.

http://www.cer.be/media/080723_noise_reduction_in _rail_freight.pdf Date of access: 5 Sep. 2012.

Pedersen, M.B. 2005. Optimizing models and solution methods for intermodal transportation.

http://orbit.dtu.dk/fedora/objects/orbit:86029/datastreams/file_5579143/content Date of access: 13 Aug. 1012.

Pienaar, W.J. 2007. A proposed regulatory framework for road and rail freight transport in South Africa. South African Journal of Science and Technology, 26(4):256-287.

Puscasu, V. 2009. Common, Parallel and Convergent evolutions for spatial planning in Romania and Moldavia. Romanian Review on Political Geography, 11(1):46-57.

Railroad Association. 2012. Intermodalism. www.rra.co.za/?page_id=15747 Date of access: 19 Feb 2012.

Rodrigue, J.P. 2006. Intermodal Transportation and Integrated Transport Systems:

Spaces, Networks and Flows. http://people.hofstra.edu/jean-

paul_rodrigue/downloads/JPR_Intermodal_ITS.pdf Date of access: 6 Sep. 2012.

(8)

187

Rodigue, J.P. & Comtois, C. & Slack, B. 2009. The geography of transport systems.

2

nd

ed. Published by Routledge. http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/ Date of access:

28 Aug. 2012.

Rodrigue, J.P. & Notteboom, T. 2009. Transportation and Economic Development.

http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch7en/conc7en/ch7c1en.html Date of access:

28 Aug. 2012.

Rogerson, J.M. 2006. Reconfiguring South Africa’s hotel industry 1990-2010:

Structure, segmentation, and spatial transformation. http://ac.els-

cdn.com/S0143622812000604/1-s2.0-S0143622812000604-main.pdf?_tid=dd67f7ee- 3326-11e2-b366-

00000aab0f6b&acdnat=1353425459_20b2c2bca2b7611e4bd8833890d5edad Date of access: 12 Nov. 2012.

SA Risk and Vulnerability Atlas. 2009. Socio-economic dynamics and spatial trends influencing social vulnerability and resilience.

http://rava.qsens.net/themes/socioeconomic_template/socio-economic-dynamics-and- trends-maps Date of access: 12 Nov. 2012.

Schneider, T. 1994. Intermodal Africa ’94. South African Transport.

Siemens. 2010. Complete Mobility.

http://www.mobility.siemens.com/mobility/global/Documents/en/complete- mobility/complete-mobility-brochure-en.pdf. Date of access: 15 Feb 2012.

Siemens. 2011. Hubs of the future: An integrated mobility network for passengers and freight.

http://www.mobility.siemens.com/mobility/global/SiteCollectionDocuments/en/complete- mobility/future-of-hubs/IC-MOL_Hubs-of-the-future_2011.pdf Date of access:20 Sep.

2012.

Siemens. 2012. Sustainable development in cities.

http://www.siemens.co.za/sustainable-development/sustainable-

development.html?tab=Green-urban-infrastructure&stc=zaccc020017. Date of access:

22 Jun 2012.

(9)

188

South Africa (SA). 1989. Environment Conservation Act (Act 73 of 1989). Pretoria:

Government Printer.

South Africa (SA). 1995. Development Facilitation Act (Act 67 of 1995). Pretoria:

Government Printer.

South Africa (SA). 1996. White Paper on National Transport Policy. Department of Transport. Pretoria.

South Africa (SA). 1996a. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act (Act 108 of 1996). Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa (SA). 1998. National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998).

Pretoria: Government Printer

South Africa (SA). 2000. Municipal Systems Act (Act 32 of 2000). Pretoria:

Government Printer.

South Africa (SA). Department of Provincial and Local Government. 2001. IDP Guide Pack V: Sectors and Dimensions. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa (SA). 2001a. White paper on spatial planning and land use management:

Wise land use. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Affairs. Foreword by the Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Land Affairs.

South Africa (SA). Office of the Presidency. 2006. National spatial development perspective. Pretoria: Government Printer.

South Africa (SA). 2009. National Land Transport Act (5 of 2009).

South Africa (SA). 2012. International Conference: Living with World Heritage in Africa.

http://www.dac.gov.za/events/2012/Background%20Document%20on%20the%20Intern ationa%20Conference.pdf Date of access: 20 Sept. 2012.

South Africa (SA). Department of Roads and Transport (DR&T). 2011. Integrated

Gauteng Transport Master Plan 2025. Pretoria.

(10)

189

South Africa (SA). Department of Transport (DoT). 2010. National Transport Master Plan 2050 – NATMAP 2050. Pretoria.

South Africa (SA). Department of Transport (DoT). 2008. National Freight Logistics Strategy. Pretoria.

South Africa (SA). Department of Transport (DoT). 2009. National Freight Monitoring Framework. Pretoria.

South African History Online. 2012. Gauteng. www.sahistory.org.za/places/gauteng Date of access: 29 Aug. 2012.

Stock, J.R. & Lambert, D.M. 2001. Strategic Logistics Management. 4

th

ed. Academic Internet Publishers Incorporated. 408p.

Tenekecioglu, G. 2004. Increasing Intermodal Transportation in Europe through Realizing the Value of Short Sea Shipping.

http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/33588/63761852.pdf?sequence=1 Date of access: 20 Sept. 2012.

Thapar, K.L. 2008. Environmental and Social Sustainability of Transport Intermodal choices. www.internationaltransportforum.org/Topics/Workshops/WS4ThaparSlides.pdf Date of access: 25 Jul. 2012.

Thompson, J. 2008. The Road-to-Rail Issue. http://www.mcli.co.za/mcli-

web/events/2008/14aug2008/John-Thompson.pdf Date of access: 11 Oct. 2012.

Transportation Research Board (TRB). 1992. ISTEA and Intermodal Planning.

Washington: National Academy Press. 171p.

Transportation Research Board (TRB). 1995. Intermodal freight transportation.

Landsdowne: Eno Transportation foundation, Inc. 297p.

Transportation Research Board (TRB). 1997. Toward a Sustainable Future, Special Report 251. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/sr/sr251.pdf Date of access: 28 Aug.

2012.

(11)

190

Transportation Research Board (TRB). 2008. Research needs statements.

rns.trb.org/dproject.asp?n=15883 Date of access: 17 Feb. 2012.

US Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Smart Growth: A Guide to Developing and Implementing Greenhouse Gas Reduction Programs.

http://www.epa.gov/statelocalclimate/documents/pdf/smart_growth_guide.pdf Date of access: 10 Nov. 2012.

Van Eeden, J. & Havenga, J. 2010. Identification of key target markets for intermodal freight transport solutions in South Africa. Journal of transport and supply chain management, 4(1): 255-267. Available: SUNScholar.

Van Veenhuizen, R. 2006. Cities farming for the future: urban agriculture for green and productive cities. http://www.idrc.ca/openebooks/216-3/ Date of access: 29 Aug. 2012.

White Paper. 2001. (European Union) European transport policy for 2010: Time to decide Office official publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/strategies/doc/2001_white_paper/lb_com_2001_0 370_en.pdf Date of access: 20 Aug. 2012.

Wilkinson, P. 2006. Transit orientated development: A strategic instrument for spatial restructuring and public transport system enhancement in South African cities.

http://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/6099 Date of access: 14 Nov. 2012.

Wilkinson, P. & Marks, A. 2007. Promoting transit oriented development in the Atlantis corridor, Cape Town: Towards an implementable model.

http://www.gtkp.com/assets/uploads/20091129-212553-2906-Atlantis%20Corridor.pdf Date of access: 14 Nov. 2012.

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). 2002. The sustainable Mobility Project: Progress Report.

http://www.wbcsd.ch/DocRoot/dLiDnKntjgtK9d4Cb8fJ/20020724_mobility.pdf Date of access: 28 Aug. 2012.

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). 1987. Our Common

Future: The Brundtland Report. Oxford University Press.

(12)

191

Woxenius, J. 2007a. Alternative transport network design and their implications for intermodal transhipment technologies. International Journal of Transport Economics, Engineering and Law, (35):27-45. Available: EconPaper.

Woxenius, J. 2007b. Generic framework for transport network designs: Applications

and treatment in intermodal freight transport literature. Transport Reviews, 27(6):733-

749. Available: Routledge.

(13)

192

9. Annexure

(14)

Developmentofatwentyfiveyear

IntegratedTransportMasterPlan

(ITMP25)fortheGautengProvince

25October2011

Transport Planning

Background

• 1970 The Transvaal Provincial Administration embarked on the development of a strategic road network for the Pretoria-Witwatersrand-Vereeniging (PWV) area (which later became Gauteng Province). The aim was to:

•Facilitate approval of land-use applications (+- 3000)

•Steer future land-use development

•Safe guard the strategic road network reserves

•Develop a 1975 base case strategic road network, and a 1985, 2000, 2015 & 2025 strategic road network

Transport Planning

Background (continue)

• A transportation model was develop for the PWV area based on the USA Federal Highway Transportation model and a strategic road network was developed

•The model was recalibrated in 1985 and 1995

•Results:

•A grid of Freeways (PWV roads) and main arterials (K roads) were developed

•Played a major roll in land-use patterns in the area

•Was only a road based transport plan

Transport Planning

Background (continue)

•Results (continue):

•Due to funding constraints only a small % of the PWV roads were actually built (a larger % of K-roads were built)

•Road reserves were protected but of these reserves are being challenged in court

•If the time between planning & implementation is too long the process looses credibility

(15)

Transport Planning

Current Reality

•In developing an integrated transport master plan (ITMP) for Gauteng the following has to be considered:

•The ITMP must focus on a functional transport area (which is the whole of Gauteng – and actually an area much larger than Gauteng)

•It must give priority to public transport

•It must take into account current and future land-use.

Including the two proposed new mega-cities in Gauteng

Transport Planning

The MEC for Roads & Transport, Mr. Ismail Vadi, announced on 6 June 2011, the appointment of a Steering Committee of transport planning experts, academics and specialists to assist in developing a 25 Year Integrated Transport Master Plan for Gauteng

25 Year Integrated Transport Master Plan

Vision

To develop a long term Integrated Transport Master Plan that will underpin Gauteng as the economic powerhouse of Southern Africa, stimulate sustainable long term economic growth, skills development and job creation. The basic aim is to transform society in order to create a better life for all the people of Gauteng.

25 Year Integrated Transport Master Plan

Mission

To enable the Department of Roads and Transport to regulate, plan and develop an efficient and well integrated transport system that serves the public interest by enhancing mobility and delivering safe, secure and environmentally responsible road based public- and private transport and air and rail services.

(16)

25 Year Integrated Transport Master Plan

Brief of Steering Committee (continue)

• Develop an ITMP25, which will enable the GDR&T, in collaboration with other spheres of government, to regulate, plan & develop an efficient & integrated transport system that serves the public interest by enhancing mobility and delivering safe, secure &

environmentally responsible road-based public & private transport and air & rail services.

• The ITMP25 should embody the principles of an efficient , competitive & responsive economic infrastructure network that prioritises public transport

25 Year Integrated Transport Master Plan

Brief of Steering Committee (continue)

• The ITMP25 should assist government at all levels to deliver a world class, sustainable transport system that supports Gauteng’s economic, social, cultural, environmental & developmental goals.

•The Committee must provide technical guidance to &

co-ordinate the research for the ITMP25; determine short, medium & long term targets & deliverables for the project: reporting requirements & timeframes for the completion of the ITMP25; prepare quarterly progress reports for the MEC; and submit the final ITMP25.

25 Year Integrated Transport Master Plan

Brief of Steering Committee (continue)

• The Committee must establish an ITMP25 Consultative Forum

25 Year Integrated Transport Master Plan

Consultative Forum- Composition

• Planning Executive members

• Senior managers DRT

• Representative of the 3 Metropolitan Authorities

•Representative of the District & local Authorities

• Representative of PRASA

• Representative of ACSA

•Representative of the SACAA

• Representative of SANRAL

•Representative of Blue IQ

•Representative of the AA

(17)

25 Year Integrated Transport Master Plan

Consultative Forum- Composition (continue)

•Public Transport modes

• Buses

• BRT

• Mini-bus Taxis

• Metered Taxis

• Metro Rail

• Association of Consulting Engineers

• Federation of Civil Engineering Contractors

• Labour Unions

• Commuter organisations

• NDoT

25 Year Integrated Transport Master Plan

Consultative Forum- Composition (continue)

•Gauteng City Region Observatory

•Gauteng Planning Commission

•Transnet Freight Rail

•Road Freight Association

•National Planning Commission

•Civil society

•SARF

•ATNS

•Gauteng dept of Planning & Local Government &

Environment

25 Year Integrated Transport Master Plan

Brief of Consultative Forum

• Make recommendations to the Steering Committee to enhance their work

•Discuss the quarterly report of the Steering Committee to the MEC

IntegratedTransportMasterPlan

Role Players

Different Modes

SPTN Infrastructure

Land -use Funding

Institutional Structures

Transport Planning

Legislation

Permits Road

Safety Enforcement

Strategic Integration

&

Operational Integration

Non- motorised t

ITP’s &

IDP’s

“Green”

transport Scholar

transport

(18)

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

1 Current reality

Ɣ The current land-use patterns in Gauteng.

Ɣ The current housing backlog in the Province and the pressure on the province to address this backlog.

Ɣ Transport planning is currently fractured and un- coordinated in the Province with only pockets of success.

Ɣ The efficiency and productivity of the Gauteng economy is being hampered by congestion on the road network Ɣ International experience has shown that it is not possible to “build one-self out of congestion” by only focussing on the expansion of the road network

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

1 Current reality (continue)

Ɣ The focus must be on public transport but the Gauteng Public transport system largely still reflects the pre-1994 status, with fragmented and non-integrated services planned by operators, in order to maximise their own market share.

Ɣ Public transport still mostly remains modes of force and only travellers captive to these modes use them.

Ɣ Financial support to public transport is given in an un- coordinated and isolated manner and mostly in “modal silos”.

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

1 Current reality (continue)

Ɣ A large percentage of road fatalities and accidents involve pedestrians and this can in part be attributed to the neglect of non-motorised facilities.

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

2 Points of departure

Ɣ Transport planning must be used as a government intervention to change the status quo? (pro-active) Ɣ The transport plan must be developed to underpin the Global City Region concept.

Ɣ The proposed Transport Plan must be environmentally sound and sustainable.

(19)

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

2 Points of departure (continue)

Ɣ Key recommendations must be made on what mode(s) of public transport is preferable for a specific corridor.

‘Competition for a route not on a route’

Ɣ The transport network and the utilisation of the various modes of transport must be optimised in order to minimise congestion and maximise service delivery to the economy And the people of Gauteng

Ɣ The transport plan must give priority to public transport and the movement of freight in the Province

Ɣ The transport plan must be socially inclusive and transform the Region

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

2 Points of departure (continue)

Ɣ Key freight and logistics nodes and corridors have to be considered.

Ɣ Non-motorised transport facilities need to included in the planning to support public transport services specifically and enhance the quality of the built environment in general Ɣ Financial support to transport and subsidisation have to be used as a lever and catalyst for the development of the desired urban form.

Ɣ The implementation of the plan must lead to significant further economic development and job creation.

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

3 Legislative & Policy Framework

Ɣ National Land Transport Act (Act 5 of 2009)

- Provincial sphere of government is inter alia responsible for provincial transport policy formulation, planning of the land transport functions and ensuring implementation of the provincial integrated development and public transport strategy (Section 11(b)).

- Provincial and municipal regulatory entities.

- Devolution of the Public Transport Operations Grant (PTOG).

- Devolution of the rail function.

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

3 Legislative & Policy Framework (continue)

Ɣ Draft National Non-motorised Transport Policy Ɣ Scholar Transport Policy

Ɣ Planning Legislation Ɣ GTIA

Ɣ National White Paper on Transport Policy, 1996 Ɣ Gauteng Provincial White Paper on Transport Policy

(20)

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

4 Develop a vision for transport for the Gauteng City Region

Ɣ Where we want to go, how do we want our Gauteng City region to “look and work” and how do we get there Ɣ “Big bang” vs. focus on key areas

Ɣ Extrapolate trends vs. interventions using available levers Ɣ Long-term vision as a focus, with shorter-term

steps/projects

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

5 Existing planning and available data for the Province Ɣ Gauteng City Region Growth & Development Strategy Ɣ Metropolitan Planning

Ɣ Strategic freight network (work done by Blue IQ / DRT) Ɣ Gauteng Toll Road Strategy

Ɣ National Rail Network

Ɣ Subsidised Bus contracts (routes & subsidies) Ɣ Gauteng Strategic Road Network, 2010

Ɣ Gauteng Transport Model (updated in part for the Department in 2010)

Ɣ Gauteng Strategic Public Transport Network (2009) Ɣ Gauteng Spatial Development Framework and continued land-use modelling

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

6 New data that will be required

Ɣ Travel demand model for people (commuters) based on household travel surveys

Ɣ Utilisation of current public transport modes on priority public transport corridors (CPTR)

Ɣ Update the PWV Transportation Model

Ɣ Update the various Metropolitan transport models Ɣ Cross boundary travel (DoT Master Plan data)

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

7 Governance structures & planning institutions Ɣ NLTA requirements

Ɣ Role of the Gauteng Transport Management Authority (GTMA) –old or a new structure

Ɣ Lessons learned from other Metro’s

(21)

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

8 Use of Technology

Ɣ Develop a GIS model for Gauteng with different layers for different sets of information

- Land-use and transport infrastructure (existing) - Future planned infrastructure

-CPTR information

-Ɣ Standard for future data & information -Ɣ will maintain the data?

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

9 Key focus areas

Ɣ Priority public transport corridors

Ɣ Development of strategic modal transfer nodes and interchanges

Ɣ Freight routes and logistics centres Ɣ Protection of future priority corridors Ɣ Future toll road network

Ɣ Provincial road network

Ɣ Rail network – Passenger & freight Ɣ Airports

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

10 Focus on the road network

Ɣ Road statistics (all three spheres of Government) Ɣ Road classification

Ɣ Re design the provincial road cross-section:

- Width

- make provision for HOV / public transport lanes and facilities

- make provision for non-motorised transport Ɣ Draw up standard plans for modal transfer nodes and interchanges

Ɣ Road signage & way finding Ɣ Road Safety

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

11 Optimisation of the current network

Ɣ ITS

Ɣ Public transport priority measures (i.e. exclusive lanes where road-reserves allows for this)

Ɣ Travel Demand Management (TDM) Ɣ For Roads, rail & freight

Ɣ Taking into consideration future direction & planning

(22)

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

12 Maintenance of the existing infrastructure

Ɣ Develop a pro-active maintenance plan for the Provincial network

Ɣ Develop a comprehensive road-condition monitoring system

Ɣ including PT infrastructure Ɣ Including Freight

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

13 Land-use

Ɣ Develop a comprehensive model on all trip origin and destinations in the province (existing and future population) Ɣ Develop a model to predict current and future land use in the Province ( especially residential growth and future job- opportunities)

Ɣ Including two new mega Cities in Gauteng

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

14 Public Transport Regulatory framework

Ɣ What are the regulatory requirements and where is there a need to amend or expand these regulations

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

15 Mode specific

Ɣ Safety & security on public transport modes and facilities Ɣ Develop common information, time tables and trip planning tools (call centres?)

Ɣ Focus on business tourism Ɣ Challenges facing the industries

Ɣ Scholar Transport & people with special needs Ɣ Minimum requirements

(23)

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

16 Possible Funding Solutions

Ɣ MTEF funding

Ɣ Current & future public transport subsidies Ɣ Income from Toll Road Strategy

Ɣ Funding through PPP’s Ɣ DBSA / IDC funding

Ɣ Bulk Services Contributions from Developers Ɣ Others

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

17 Communication & marketing plan

Ɣ Branding

Ɣ Identification of all role players & stakeholders Ɣ Constant Feedback

Ɣ Consultative forums

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

18 Public participation process

Ɣ Identification of all role players & stakeholders (Interested and affected parties)

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

19 Recommendations

Ɣ Development of supporting policies and regulations Ɣ Capacity requirements at Provincial & Local level Ɣ 5 year & 25 year plan

(24)

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

20 Final brief for Integrated Transport Master Plan Ɣ Develop a final Brief for the ITMP

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

21 Composition and requirements of pre-qualified consortiums

Ɣ Skills-mix required in the Consortium Ɣ BBBEE / SMME requirements Ɣ Experience & exposure

Ɣ Selection criteria for selecting the pre-qualified Consortiums

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

22 Requests for Proposal

Ɣ What are the essential minimum requirements Ɣ Content, costing, phasing & timeframes

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

23 Tender process & RFP evaluation

Ɣ Logistics & administration

(25)

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

24 Time lines & phases of the study

Ɣ Reporting criteria

Ɣ Deliverables for each phase

* Short term 5 Year implementation plan : 31 January 1012

* Long term 25 Year ITMP : 31 March 2013

Content of Integrated Transport Master Plan

Thank You

Developmentofatwentyfiveyear

IntegratedTransportMasterPlan

(ITMP25)fortheGautengProvince

26August2011

ITMP25Progress

• FinalisedTORfortheappointmentofproject

team

• SCMprocessunderway– willgotothemarket

withintwoweeks

• ITMP25yearpresentationtoLocalAuthorities – Completed

• Sedibeng

• WestRand

• Tshwane

(26)

ITMP25Progress(Continue)

• ITMP25yearpresentationtoLocalAuthorities – Completed

• Sedibeng

• WestRand

• Tshwane

– Infollowingweeks

• Ekurhuleni

• Johannesburg

• IndividualLocalauthorities?

ITMP25Progress(Continue)

• FeedbackfrominteractionwithLocal

Authorities

– Verypositive&supportive

– LocalAuthorityOfficialsmustplayanactiverolein

rollingouttheITMP25– createstructures

– Localauthoritiesarecurrentlybusywiththeirown

IDP’sandIDP’stheseprocessescannotbedelayed – ConditionofProvincialroadsinthearea

– DotheycontinuetoprotectPWVroadcorridors

MEC / MMC FORUM

HoD / Senior M FORUM

ITMP25 STEERING COMMITTEE

ITMP25 CONSULTATIVE

FORUM MAYORAL

COMMITTEE’s

? MEC T&R

Planning &

Land-use

MEC / MMC FORUM

HoD / Senior M FORUM

ITMP25 STEERING COMMITTEE

ITMP25 CONSULTATIVE

FORUM MAYORAL

COMMITTEE’s

?

MEC T&R

Planning &

Land-use BRT

Political Steering C

BRT Technical

Team

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Vermoedelijk kan het aantal slachtoffers onder weggebruikers door een botsing tegen een geopende laadklep, worden gereduceerd als de. veiligheidsaspecten beter in acht

rijbevoegdheid tijdelijk zou worden ontzegd wanneer een bestuurder binnen twee jaar drie keer wordt staande gehouden voor een grovere overtreding (bijvoorbeeld 20 tot 30 km/uur

Deze prospectie met ingreep in de bodem werd uitgevoerd door middel van continue proefsleuven van 21 november tot en met 25 november.. De archeologische inventarisatie

The proposed method for sample excitation confocal signal collection opens possibilities for on-chip spectroscopic measurements without the need for external

Thereafter anxiety-like behaviour was evaluated in the social interaction test (SIT - acute) and elevated plus maze (EPM - acute and chronic). The current study also compared

In 1952 the British Broadcasting Corporation became the arena for one such dispute when the renowned English historian of civilisations, Arnold Toynbee, seeking to help his

To illustrate the performance of the bicycle–train system, we measured (a) effective total travel speed and (b) effective access station choice from any of the above 148 possible

Unfortunately up till now we have to accept the fact that the perception, information assimilation and decision making process of the mostly concerned people: