• No results found

Onset, CoG, offset and Tau values, trial 1 and 2 Black bocks represents missing data.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Onset, CoG, offset and Tau values, trial 1 and 2 Black bocks represents missing data. "

Copied!
1
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Appendix F

Onset, CoG, offset and Tau values, trial 1 and 2 Black bocks represents missing data.

In the first column, each number corresponds to the tube number from the Trikinetics monitor.

Tau calculated on Onset CoG Offset Onset CoG Offset Onset CoG Offset Tau

1 Zygiella x-notata 291 558 816 101 514 1208 -181 501 1122 23,27 all cycles

2 Larinioides sclopetarius 480 588 705 60 394 700 -33 445 799 26,2

3 ? 26 178 784 14 271 784 62 513 1052 29,63

4 Zygiella x-notata 8 466 802 7 508 947 -1 297 783 24

Onset CoG Offset Onset CoG Offset Onset CoG Offset Tau 1 Zygiella x-notata

3 Zygiella x-notata 12 802 332 22 1077 470 23,37 07/02/2020 - 15/02/2020

4 Zygiella x-notata 4 759 379 0 906 319 22,17 07/02/2020 - 15/02/2020 (8 cycles)

5 Zygiella x-notata 20 751 215 7 1041 365 23,5 all cycles

7 Zygiella x-notata 18 725 390 38 773 391 23,67 all cycles

8 Larinioides sclopetarius

10 Larinioides sclopetarius 692 797 745

12 Larinioides sclopetarius

14 Larinioides sclopetarius 26,13 07/02/2020 - 12/2/2020 (5 cycles)

16 Larinioides sclopetarius 105 1529 817 79 1307 737

17 Larinioides sclopetarius 603 1069 853

19 Larinioides sclopetarius

21 Larinioides sclopetarius 750 1280 1059

23 Zygiella x-notata -4 910 270 -103 907 300 31,43 Excluded because based on only one cycle

25 Larinioides sclopetarius

26 Zygiella x-notata -3 844 220 -3 736 356 22,23 All cycles

28 Zygiella x-notata -62 862 394 -1 899 383 22,37 All cycles

30 Zygiella x-notata 14 972 344 -118 947 247 22,97 All cycles

31 Larinioides sclopetarius 32 Larinioides sclopetarius

Trial 2 Trial 1

Cycle 1 Cycle 2

Phase markers

Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Cycle 3

Phase markers

Cycle 3

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

To make inferences from data, an analysis model has to be specified. This can be, for example, a normal linear regression model, a structural equation model, or a multilevel model.

In this work we present a novel method to estimate a Takagi-Sugeno model from data containing missing val- ues, without using any kind of imputation or best guest estimation. For

For each of our evaluation data sets we thus have two versions available: a version with missing values and a version with complete records.. The former version is imputed,

similar to Section 6.2.3, conditional regression models can be specified for the audit values which do not coincide with the book value or previous audit values according to

Item scores are missing completely at random (MCAR; see Little & Rubin, 1987, pp. 14-17) if the cause of missingness is unrelated to the missing values themselves, the scores on

The difference in the number of missing values between the pilot study and the main study suggests that the lack of missing values in the latter may be partly the

Key ingredients are the use of a componentwise Support Vector Machine (cSVM) and an empirical measure of maximal variation of the components to bound the influence of the

The proposed approach is based on a number of insights into the problem, including (i) a global approach for handling missing values which can be reformulated into a