H. Heitmann
Alignment: Virgo+ changes
Alignment: Virgo+ changes
• Fast quadrant centering system Fast quadrant centering system
• New Alignment electronics New Alignment electronics
• Anderson technique? Anderson technique?
Topics
Topics
H. Heitmann
Fast Quadrant Centering System
Fast Quadrant Centering System
Present centering system Present centering system
Translation stage centering < 0.3 Hz Q1p
Q51 Q22
Q21
Q72
Q71 Q81
WSR10
H. Heitmann
Requirements for centering Requirements for centering
With the present centering configuration (activates every few minutes)
RMS change of a factor of 4 Extrapolating from these measurements…
Taking a reasonable range around the “minimum”, the maximum DC asymmetry must be less than 0.1
Even with the best centering rate now possible (every 4-5 seconds) we can’t reach this precision.
G. Vajente
Test of GEO system on NE bench Test of GEO system on NE bench
QD
B7_q2
H. Heitmann
Galvo feedback on NE bench (07/2006) Galvo feedback on NE bench (07/2006)
Quadrant
Electronics ADC
DC Signals
Asymmetry
computing DAC
Galvo Driver
Filter
Qr Server
Tilting Mirrors
DOL (DAQ)
• Digital feedback
• Used existing Qr server
(slightly modified)• 30 Hz bandwidth
• Commercial galvo driver tested at EGO: OK
Galvo system performance I Galvo system performance I
Centering is given in normalized asymmetry
T-stage centering
Galvo centering
H. Heitmann
Galvo system performance II Galvo system performance II
Error signals
Correction signals
Galvo on
Beam position fluctuations become visible in the correction signal
Galvo of Galvo on
Fast galvo centering: cost Fast galvo centering: cost
Estimate; to be updated with recent information
H. Heitmann
Possible work plan Possible work plan
Suggestion: we should start preparing the system now
Last tests finished successfully (galvo drivers)
Procurement of material (2 months)
Delivery time of galvos, drivers, mirrors, mirror holders Realization of mechanics
Check space constraints on benches
Make new optics layout
Prepare new version of Gc
Reading galvo voltages instead of QD DC signals
Implementation (2 shifts per bench)
Rearrangement of mirrors Cabling
Reconfiguration of Qr server, connection to Gc Adaptations in Alp
=> Could be implemented after science run, or for Virgo+
Possible planninng Possible planninng
Implementation Plan
M1 M2 M3
Tasks and Deliverables W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4
Tasks
1: Order galvos, …
2: New bench designs
3: Modify mechanical drawings
4: Production of mechanics
5: Adapt global control
6: Install new centering system
Deliverables
1: Mechanics
2: Galvo assemblies
3: New centering system
H. Heitmann
New Alignment Electronics
New Alignment Electronics
New alignment electronics New alignment electronics
Demodulation board
Spares with slight improvements – Higher LF cut-of
– 4 gain settings (instead of 2) – …
QD front-ends
Improved version, but fully compatible (mechanical, connectors,…) – Higher light power
– Lower electronics noise – Lower ofsets
– Better geometrical configuration – Changeable gain
– …
See Virgo CHRQ 008/2006
H. Heitmann
LA electronics status LA electronics status
Demodulator
2 prototype boards received and tested - OK
One of these boards is now used for Q22 (8 MHz) 3 more (final) boards under production as spares
Front-end electronics
Large delay due to manpower problems
Tentative planning (CHRQ) was: delivery ~ Feb. 2007 Present plans:
1. Produce some spares (for run?) 2. Produce enhanced version
Design review needed before production of final FE’s CHRQ contains some big changes
Planning/status: See talk by Jo
=> Wait for discussions with Nikhef before making planning
But possible scenario:
– Spares for science run
– Enhanced version for IInd commissioning period or Virgo+
Anderson technique
Anderson technique
H. Heitmann
Anderson:
Anderson: fundamental mode fundamental mode resonance resonance
Carrier
Upper Sideband Lower Sideband
TEM
00TEM
01Anderson:
Anderson: 1 1
ststorder order resonance resonance
Carrier
Upper Sideband
Lower Sideband
L
MC= 143.5722 m
f
mod= 6264287 Hz
H. Heitmann
Anderson: optical scheme Anderson: optical scheme
Get two more output
Get two more output
ports for alignment
ports for alignment
(4 quadrant diodes)
(4 quadrant diodes)
What we should think about What we should think about
Necessity of end quadrants not clear
Present Virgo might function without them Virgo+ ?
Efects of Anderson frequency
Anderson ofset (during CITF): made locking more difficult Still an issue?
Stronger mixing of alignment error signals
Without Anderson frequency, maybe no need of 2nd modulation Simulations to be done
Efort needed for abandoning Anderson frequency
Shift MC length (5 cm for 2 kHz freq. shift) Other?
No investigations started yet
If you have an opinion, please give your arguments
End
Fast galvo centering: cost Fast galvo centering: cost
ITF quadrant diodes + MC quadrant diodes
(caution: IMC QD’s have integrated demodulator!)