• No results found

Cover Page The handle

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Cover Page The handle"

Copied!
7
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Cover Page

The handle

http://hdl.handle.net/1887/67090

holds various files of this Leiden University

dissertation.

Author: Houwelingen, M.J. van

Title: Measurement numeracy education for prospective elementary school teachers :

effects of inductive and deductive teaching on classroom interaction and student

performance

(2)

Measurement Numeracy Education for Prospective

Elementary School Teachers

Effects of inductive and deductive teaching on classroom interaction and student

performance

(3)

Houwelingen, Mark J. van

Measurement Numeracy Education for Prospective Elementary School Teachers:

Effects of inductive and deductive teaching on classroom interaction and student performance

Copyright © 2018 Mark van Houwelingen

Printed by Hogeschool Rotterdam Uitgeverij

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or

transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopy, by

recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the author.

(4)

Measurement Numeracy Education for Prospective Elementary School Teachers:

Effects of inductive and deductive teaching on classroom interaction and student performance

PROEFSCHRIFT

Ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Leiden,

op gezag van de Rector Magnificus prof. mr. C.J.J.M. Stolker,

volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties

te verdedigen op dinsdag 27 november 2018

klokke 11:15 uur

door Mark Jan van Houwelingen

(5)

Promotor:

prof. dr. W. J. Heiser

Copromotores:

dr. C. M. van Putten

dr. E. J. van Schooten

(Hogeschool Rotterdam)

Leden van de promotiecommissie:

prof. dr. P.H. Vedder

prof. dr. F.J.J.M. Janssen

dr. R. Keijzer

(Hogeschool iPabo Amsterdam/Alkmaar)

dr. M. Hickendorff

Acknowledgement:

(6)

v

Table of contents

1 General introduction ... 1

1.1 Measurement numeracy ... 2

1.2 Instructional practices ... 4

1.3 The didactic factor: deductive versus inductive teaching ... 7

1.4 The factor classroom interaction ... 8

1.5 Contents of this dissertation ... 11

2 Research participants ... 13

2.1 Introduction ... 13

2.2 Sample characteristics... 13

2.3 Participation in pretest and posttest, and lesson attendance ... 14

2.4 Student characteristics ... 16

2.5 Correspondences and differences between student characteristics ... 18

2.6 Conclusion ... 26

3 Dimensionality of measurement numeracy ... 27

3.1 Introduction ... 27

3.2 Method ... 28

3.2.1 Research groups ... 29

3.2.2 Instruments and procedures ... 29

3.2.3 Data analyses ... 32

3.3 Results ... 33

3.3.1 Results of the pilot study ... 33

3.3.2 Results of the main study ... 34

3.4 Conclusion ... 38

3.5 Discussion ... 38

4 Development of the lesson series ... 41

4.1 Introduction ... 41

4.1.1 Background on classroom interaction ... 42

4.1.2 Background on measurement ... 43

4.2 Method ... 45

4.3 Results ... 47

4.3.1 Interviews ... 47

4.3.2 Results of the focus group meetings ... 48

4.3.3 Results of the final revision ... 53

4.4 Discussion ... 55

5 Effects on classroom interaction ... 59

5.1 Introduction ... 59

(7)

vi

5.2.1 Sample ... 60 5.2.2 Materials ... 61 5.2.3 Data analyses ... 64 5.3 Results ... 65 5.3.1 Between-groups effects ... 65 5.3.2 Within-groups effects ... 71

5.4 Conclusion and discussion ... 76

6 Effects on student performance ... 79

6.1 Introduction ... 79

6.2 Method ... 80

6.2.1 Sample ... 80

6.2.2 Materials ... 80

6.2.3 Design and procedure ... 81

6.2.4 Statistical analyses ... 82

6.3 Results ... 89

6.4 Conclusion and discussion ... 94

7 General discussion ... 97

7.1 Conclusions ... 97

7.1.1 Test construction and measurement of numeracy sub-skills ... 97

7.1.2 Development of the lesson series ... 98

7.1.3 Effects on classroom interaction ... 100

7.1.4 Effects on student performance ... 100

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Stap 5: Bespreek met de bewoner en/of familie de mogelijkheden om meer goede dagen en minder slechte dagen te realiseren..  Wat moet er geregeld worden zodat de bewoner meer

in the regression analysis was: 1) Self-efficacy; 2) Learning experience; 3) Programme satisfaction; 4) Significant others; 5) School conditions; 6) Per- sonal environment;

The first attempts to compare side-view face images were based on comparing profile curves, where fiducial points or features describing the profile were used for recognition.. One

The research of this thesis examines what the effects are of the delisting of an ADR on the stock in the home market, since the introduction of rule 12h-6.. As described in

For administration 2, which came after the verbal teaching phase in Grade 4, the difference between the condi- tions was caused by doubly taught pupils in Condition 1 who

In the case of teachers without previous experience of context-based education, two crucial factors for implementation as intended by designers are, first, the

Assessment of asthma control and future risk in children <5 years of age (evidence level B)*. Symptom control Well controlled Partly controlled

The strongest CharGen attack we performed had a strength of 7.5 Gbps, whereas the DNS amplification attacks varied in strength between 0.4 and 1.6 Gbps (Figure 1). Since CharGen