University of Groningen
Synergetic tourism-landscape interactions
Heslinga, Jasper
IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Publication date: 2018
Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database
Citation for published version (APA):
Heslinga, J. (2018). Synergetic tourism-landscape interactions: Policy, public discourse and partnerships. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Copyright
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Take-down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.
Propositions belonging to the PhD thesis
Synergetic tourism-landscape interactions: policy, public discourse and partnerships
Jasper H. Heslinga
1. The current institutional context is a product of past policy which could potentially hinder other development trajectories such as synergetic interactions. Despite a recent increase in the attention for synergies, in the past the emphasis of policy was either on socio-economic development or nature protection (This thesis).
2. Economic motivations can be problematic for acquiring sustainable tourism development. Consequently the principles regarding Maslow’s hierarchy of needs remain valid (This thesis). 3. For balancing the needs of social-economic development and nature protection, tourism
destinations require clarity in rules and regulations, but also flexibility for adaptation and innovation when coping with future social and ecological changes (This thesis).
4. Opportunities for synergy lie at the local level. Regulations from higher governmental levels already constrain the possibilities for synergies on the local level. Nevertheless, how these regulations are implemented at the local level enables opportunities for synergy (This thesis). 5. In tourism destinations, synergies can be stimulated by policy, but eventually the opportunities
for synergies strongly relate to whether stakeholders find common ground on shared values and whether they are willing to collaborate (This thesis).
6. Tourism puts pressure on nature areas, but tourism can also assist in the protection of nature areas by helping it to become an important societal issue and consequently to be positioned on the political agenda (This thesis).
7. “People protect what they love” (Jacques-Yves Cousteau, 1910-1997).
8. To help us detect social and ecological future developments , we can use islands as our 'canaries in a coalmine'.
9. “Natuur is mooi, maar je moet er wel wat te drinken bij hebben” (Willem Kloos, 1859 – 1938).
10. Doing a PhD trajectory requires resilience; it is a matter of constantly going through the adaptive cycle along the phases of destruction and recovery to adapt to changing circumstances.