• No results found

University of Groningen Feature selection and intelligent livestock management Alsahaf, Ahmad

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "University of Groningen Feature selection and intelligent livestock management Alsahaf, Ahmad"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

University of Groningen

Feature selection and intelligent livestock management

Alsahaf, Ahmad

DOI:

10.33612/diss.145238079

IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below.

Document Version

Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

Publication date: 2020

Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database

Citation for published version (APA):

Alsahaf, A. (2020). Feature selection and intelligent livestock management. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.145238079

Copyright

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Take-down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum.

(2)

Summary

Computational animal breeding relies on genetic-statistical models that are aimed at estimating breeding values, which in turn are used to rank animals based on their genetic potential. Modern livestock production systems, however, collect large amounts of data throughout the life of an animal that are not directly suited for those statistical models, such as periodic phenotype and environmental observa-tions. In this thesis, we explore the potential of exploiting that additional data to improve future phenotype prediction in livestock using machine learning methods. To that effect, we provide two examples. In chapter 2, we show that random forest regression outperforms linear models in predicting slaughter age in pigs based on a mix of phenotypic, genetic, and pedigree information. The predictions are made before the start of the fattening phase of the pigs and could therefore be used to assign them to uniform groups based on their forecasted growth rates. In the same application, we additionally demonstrate that machine learning-derived feature im-portance analysis can give a breakdown of the components responsible for the ob-served phenotypic performance, thereby providing an alternative to model-based fixed and random effect estimation.

In chapter 3, we use a combination of RGB-D computer vision and supervised learning to estimate the muscularity of live pigs. The objective of that application is to replace the subjective assessments given by a human operator at the farm, and consequently reduce stress on the animals. Results show that the proposed system can accurately mimic the assessment patterns of the human operator. In short, the two proposed examples provide more evidence - in accordance with recent findings in literature - that livestock breeding and management practices could be improved through data-driven modelling.

In chapter 4 of the thesis, we propose a novel wrapper feature selection algo-rithm based on tree ensembles and boosting. Feature selection is a sub-discipline of

(3)

104 Summary machine learning concerned with discriminating relevant input features from irrel-evant and redundant ones. With the increase of dataset dimensions, and a rising in-terest in model transparency, reliable feature selection becomes increasingly useful. Datasets in the omics fields in particular, like those used in molecular breeding and in personalized medicine, can benefit significantly from feature selection. In those fields of study, datasets often contain large numbers of features and small numbers of samples, which poses a challenge to machine learning methods that require large numbers of samples to learn their parameters, like deep neural networks.

The proposed algorithm, which we call FeatBoost, uses an iterative process of boosting, or sample re-weighting, and model evaluations to select features that are relevant and not redundant to each other. We evaluate the performance of the al-gorithm against a number of benchmarks, including ReliefF, a filter-based selection method, and two alternative tree ensemble based methods, Boruta and XGBoost-derived feature ranking. FeatBoost outperforms the competing methods on most of the tested datasets.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

Another common taxonomy of feature selection methods pertains to how the se- lection procedure and the associated supervised learning task are connected. Meth- ods that rank

For classification, a discretized version of Y is created by labelling the lowest third of the pigs with respect to the value of Y (128 to 174 days) as ”fast growers”, i.e.. Table 2.5

We used morphological features extracted from depth images of pigs to train a classifier that esti- mates the muscle scores that are likely to be given by a human assessor.. The

and Burghardt, T.: 2017, Visual localisation and indi- vidual identification of holstein friesian cattle via deep learning, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on

Assigning pigs to uniform target weight groups using machine learning. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock

In die studiegebieden bevatten datasets vaak een groot aantal kenmerken en een klein aantal samples, wat een uitdaging vormt voor machine learning methoden die grote aantallen

The scientific literature of technological innovations related to livestock of- ten makes mention of the role of livestock in solving the world’s food secu- rity problems, and

Hypothalamus Amygdala (bMic emotions) Entorhinal Cortex (memory) Hippocampus (memory) LIMBIC SYSTEM BACK PAR I ETAL -.- -.;:---- LOBE (movement) OCCIPITAL LOBE (vision)