The impact of status hierarchy on individual behavior and team processes
Doornenbal, B.M.
2021
document version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Link to publication in VU Research Portal
citation for published version (APA)
Doornenbal, B. M. (2021). The impact of status hierarchy on individual behavior and team processes.
General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ?
Take down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
E-mail address:
REFERENCES
Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K. J. (2014). Best practice recommendations for designing and implementing experimental vignette methodology studies.
Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 351–371.
Aguinis, H., Edwards, J. R., & Bradley, K. J. (2016). Improving our understanding of moderation and mediation in strategic management research.
Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 665-685.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
Alexander, L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2014). Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 423–438.
Allison, P. D. (1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 43, 865–880.
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. A. N. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265–1281. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’
learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267.
Anderson, C., & Brion, S. (2014). Perspectives on Power in Organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 67– 97.
Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E. (2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 55–89.
Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601.
Anderson, C., & Kennedy, J. A. (2012). Research on managing groups and teams. In Micropolitics: A new model of status hierarchies in teams (Vol. 15, pp. 49– 80). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). The pursuit of status in social groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 295–298.
Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J. S., Spataro, S. E., & Chatman, J. A. (2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1094–1110.
Anderson, C., & Willer, R. (2014). Do status hierarchies benefit groups? A bounded functionalist account of status. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The Psychology of Social Status (pp. 47–70). Springer New York. Anderson, C., Willer, R., Kilduff, G. J., & Brown, C. E. (2012). The origins of
deference: When do people prefer lower status? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1077–1088.
Anicich, E. M., Fast, N. J., Halevy, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). When the bases of social hierarchy collide: Power without status drives interpersonal conflict. Organization Science, 27(1), 123–140.
Azzalini, A. (1985). A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 2(12), 171–178.
Azzalini, A. (2013). The skew-normal and related families (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.
Bales, R. F., Strodtbeck, F. L., Mills, T. M., & Roseborough, M. E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups. American Sociological Review, 16, 461–468. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 5(1), 307-337.
Barnes, C. M., Dang, C. T., Leavitt, K., Guarana, C. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2015). Archival data in micro-organizational research: A toolkit for moving to a broader set of topics. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1453-1478. Barnes, C. M., Dang, C. T., Leavitt, K., Guarana, C. L., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2018).
Archival data in micro-organizational research: A toolkit for moving to a broader set of topics. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1453–1478. Barton, M. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2014). Assessing member expertise in groups:
An expertise dependence perspective. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(3), 228–257.
Bendersky, C., & Shah, N. P. (2013). The downfall of extraverts and rise of
neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 387–406.
Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch Jr, M. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255.
Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. Elsevier Press.
Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch Jr, M. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6(1), 479–508.
Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2015). A critical review and best-practice
recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229-283.
Bettencourt, B. A., Charlton, K., Dorr, N., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 520–542.
Biemann, T., & Kearney, E. (2010). Size does matter: How varying group sizes in a sample affect the most common measures of group diversity. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 582–599.
Bigley, G. A., & Roberts, K. H. (2001). The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1281–1299.
Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y.-R. (2012). Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 994–1014.
Blader, S. L., Shirako, A., & Chen, Y.-R. (2016). Looking out from the top differential effects of status and power on perspective taking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(6), 723–737.
Blader, S. L., & Yu, S. (2017). Are status and respect different or two sides of the same coin? Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 800–824.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J.
Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass. Bloom, M. (1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and
organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 25–40. Boone, C., & Hendriks, W. (2009). Top management team diversity and firm
performance: Moderators of functional-background and locus-of-control diversity. Management Science, 55(2), 165–180.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071.
Bottero, W., & Prandy, K. (2003). Social interaction distance and stratification. The British Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 177–197.
Brusso, R. C., Orvis, K. A., Bauer, K. N., & Tekleab, A. G. (2012). Interaction among self-efficacy, goal orientation, and unrealistic goal-setting on videogame-based training performance. Military Psychology, 24(1), 1–18.
Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 557–591.
Bunderson, J. S., & Boumgarden, P. (2010). Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21(3), 609–624.
Bunderson, J. S., & Reagans, R. E. (2011). Power, status, and learning in organizations. Organization Science, 22(5), 1182–1194.
Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing Alternative
Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance Effects. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875– 893.
Bunderson, J. S., Van der Vegt, G. S., Cantimur, Y., & Rink, F. (2016). Different views of hierarchy and why they matter: Hierarchy as inequality or as cascading influence. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1265–1289.
Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26–48. Buzaglo, G., & Wheelan, S. A. (1999). Facilitating work team effectiveness case
studies from Central America. Small Group Research, 30(1), 108–129. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by
the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. Cantimur, Y., Rink, F., & van der Vegt, G. S. (2016). When and why hierarchy
steepness is related to team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(5), 1–16.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766.
Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). The Guilford Press.
Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125.
Cheng, J. T., Weidman, A. C., & Tracy, J. L. (2014). The assessment of social status: A review of measures and experimental manipulations. In The Psychology of Social Status (pp. 347–362). Springer.
Christie, A. M., & Barling, J. (2010). Beyond status: Relating status inequality to performance and health in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 920-934.
Colburn, B. (2011). Autonomy and adaptive preferences. Utilitas, 23(1), 52–71. Cooper, W. H., & Withey, M. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality
and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 62–72.
Correll, S. J., & Ridgeway, C. L. (2006). Expectation states theory. In Handbook of social psychology (pp. 29–51). Springer.
Coutinho, S. A., & Neuman, G. (2008). A model of metacognition, achievement goal orientation, learning style and self-efficacy. Learning Environments Research, 11(2), 131–151.
Cudd, A. E. (2006). Analyzing oppression. Oxford University Press.
Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(3), 187–206.
Dalal, D. K., & Zickar, M. J. (2012). Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. Organizational Research Methods, 15(3), 339–362.
Darnon, C., Harackiewicz, J. M., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Quiamzade, A. (2007). Performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals: When uncertainty makes a difference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 813–827.
Dawson, J. (2011). Measurement of work group diversity [Aston University]. http://eprints.aston.ac.uk/16437
De Jong, B. A., & Dirks, K. T. (2012). Beyond shared perceptions of trust and monitoring in teams: Implications of asymmetry and dissensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 391–406.
De Kwaadsteniet, E. W., & Van Dijk, E. (2010). Social status as a cue for tacit coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(3), 515–524. DeRue, D. S., Hollenbeck, J., Ilgen, D., & Feltz, D. (2010). Efficacy dispersion in
teams: Moving beyond agreement and aggregation. Personnel Psychology, 63(1), 1–40.
Dierdorff, E. C., Surface, E. A., & Brown, K. G. (2010). Frame-of-reference training effectiveness: Effects of goal orientation and self-efficacy on affective, cognitive, skill-based, and transfer outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1181–1191.
Diseth, Å. (2011). Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(2), 191–195.
DiTomaso, N., Post, C., & Parks-Yancy, R. (2007). Workforce diversity and inequality: Power, status, and numbers. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 473–501.
Doornenbal, B. M., De Jong, B. A., Nederveen Pieterse, A., & Jansen, P. G. W. (2015). Status hierarchies in teams: The interaction between status hierarchy steepness and hierarchy shape. Academy of Management Proceedings, Vancouver, Canada.
Dragoni, L. (2005). Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: The role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1084–1095.
Dragoni, L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Better understanding work unit goal orientation: Its emergence and impact under different types of work unit structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1032–1048.
Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (1991). Group decision making under stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 473–478.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
Edmondson, A. C. (2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13(2), 128– 146.
Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461–475.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 x 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.
Everett, M. G., & Krackhardt, D. (2012). A second look at Krackhardt’s graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. Social Networks, 34(2), 159–163.
Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2019). Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable
Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hs7wm
Flake, J. K., Pek, J., & Hehman, E. (2017). Construct validation in social and personality research: Current practice and recommendations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 370–378.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382.
Ford, J. K., Smith, E. M., Weissbein, D. A., Gully, S. M., & Salas, E. (1998). Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 218–233.
Fragale, A. R. (2006). The power of powerless speech: The effects of speech style and task interdependence on status conferral. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(2), 243–261.
Fragale, A. R., Sumanth, J. J., Tiedens, L. Z., & Northcraft, G. B. (2012). Appeasing equals lateral deference in organizational communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(3), 373–406.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies of social power (pp. 150–176). Institute for Social Research. Fried, E. I., & Flake, J. K. (2018). Measurement Matters. APS Observer, 31(30/3). Gajendran, R. S. (2009). Leveraging diversity and technology for team performance:
The role of variety, disparity, virtuality and knowledge sharing [Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University].
https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/paper/9823/5458
González-Romá, V., & Hernández, A. (2014). Climate uniformity: Its influence on team communication quality, task conflict, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1042–1058.
Greer, L. L., De Jong, B. A., Schouten, M. E., & Dannals, J. (2018). Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6(103), 591–613.
Groysberg, B., Polzer, J. T., & Elfenbein, H. A. (2011). Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high-status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organization Science, 22(3), 722–737.
Hageman, A. M. (2008). A review of the strengths and weaknesses of archival, behavioral, and qualitative research methods: Recognizing the potential benefits of triangulation. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 11, 1–30.
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(1), 32–52.
Halevy, N., Chou, E. Y., Galinsky, A. D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2012). When hierarchy wins evidence from the national basketball association. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(4), 398–406.
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as seperation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.
Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.
Hays, N. A., & Bendersky, C. (2015). Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 867–882.
He, J., & Huang, Z. (2011). Board informal hierarchy and firm financial
performance: Exploring a tacit structure guiding boardroom interactions. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1119–1139.
Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449.
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332–1356.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98.
Joshi, A., & Knight, A. (2015). Who defers to whom and why? Dual pathways linking demographic differences and dyadic deference to team effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 59–84.
Kalkhoff, W., & Barnum, C. (2000). The effects of status-organizing and social identity processes on patterns of social influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(2), 95–115.
Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation and individual differences in learning: An integration of developmental, differential and cognitive perspectives. Learning and Individual Differences, 2(2), 221–239.
Kennedy, J. A., & Anderson, C. (2017). Hierarchical rank and principled dissent: How holding higher rank suppresses objection to unethical practices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 30-49. Kilduff, G. J., Willer, R., & Anderson, C. (2016). Hierarchy and its discontents: Status
disagreement leads to withdrawal of contribution and lower group performance. Organization Science, 27(2), 373–390.
Kozlowski, S. W., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science, 7(3), 77–124.
Krackhardt, D. (1994). Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. In K. M. Carley & M. J. Prietula (Eds.), Computational Organization Theory (pp. 89–111). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273–307.
Li, A. N., & Liao, H. (2014). How do leader–member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 847.
Li, H. J., Chen, Y.-R., & Blader, S. L. (2016). Where is context? Advancing status research with a contextual value perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 185–198.
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006). Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and task interdependence: Implications for individual and group performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(6), 723.
Lindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. (2000). Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 331–348.
Locke, K. D. (2003). Status and solidarity in social comparison: Agentic and communal values and vertical and horizontal directions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 619–631.
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40.
Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351–398. Marilyn E. Gist, & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its
determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183– 211.
Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130–160.
Mattan, B. D., Kubota, J. T., & Cloutier, J. (2017). How Social Status Shapes Person Perception and Evaluation: A Social Neuroscience Perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(3), 468–507.
Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514–523.
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535– 546.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77-86.
Nederveen Pieterse, A., van Knippenberg, D., & van Dierendonck, D. (2013). Cultural diversity and team performance: The role of team member goal orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 782–804.
Neeley, T., & Dumas, T. L. (2015). Unearned status gain: Evidence from a global language mandate. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 14-43. Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic
examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128–150.
Peer, E., Brandimarte, L., Samat, S., & Acquisti, A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153–163.
Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 382–407. Poortvliet, P. M. (2013). Harming others’ task-related efforts: The distinct
competitive effects of ranking information on performance and mastery goal individuals. Social Psychology, 44(6), 373.
Poortvliet, P. M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2007). Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1435–1447.
Poortvliet, P. M., Janssen, O., Van Yperen, N. W., & Van de Vliert, E. (2009). Low ranks make the difference: How achievement goals and ranking information affect cooperation intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1144–1147.
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437– 448.
Reagans, R., Miron-Spektor, E., & Argote, L. (2016). Knowledge utilization, coordination, and team performance. Organization Science, 27(5), 1108– 1124.
Resick, C. J., Murase, T., Randall, K. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2014). Information elaboration and team performance: Examining the psychological origins and environmental contingencies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 165–176.
Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 163–184.
Ronay, R., Greenaway, K., Anicich, E. M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The path to glory is paved with hierarchy when hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psychological Science, 23(6), 669–677.
Rousseau, V., Aubé, C., & Savoie, A. (2006). Teamwork behaviors a review and an integration of frameworks. Small Group Research, 37(5), 540–570.
Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 730–738. Sanner, B., & Bunderson, J. S. (2018). The truth about hierarchy. MIT Sloan
Management Review; Cambridge, 59(2), 49–52.
Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26–47.
Shaw, J. D. (2014). Pay dispersion. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 521–544.
Singh-Manoux, A., Adler, N. E., & Marmot, M. G. (2003). Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Social Science & Medicine, 56(6), 1321–1333.
Sinha, R., Janardhanan, N. S., Greer, L. L., Conlon, D. E., & Edwards, J. R. (2016). Skewed task conflicts in teams: What happens when a few members see more conflict than the rest? Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7), 1045-1055.
Sins, P. H., van Joolingen, W. R., Savelsbergh, E. R., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students’ achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 58–77.
Sleebos, E., Ellemers, N., & de Gilder, D. (2006). The carrot and the stick: Affective commitment and acceptance anxiety as motives for discretionary group efforts by respected and disrespected group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 244–255.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240–261.
Stevens, C. K., & Gist, M. E. (1997). Effects of self-efficacy and goal-orientation training on negotiation skill maintenance: What are the mechanisms? Personnel Psychology, 50(4), 955–978.
Stewart, P. A., & Moore Jr, J. C. (1992). Wage disparities and performance expectations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 78–85.
Suddably, R. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346–357.
Swaab, R. I., Schaerer, M., Anicich, E. M., Ronay, R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). The too-much-talent effect team interdependence determines when more talent is too much or not enough. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1581–1591. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation.
Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
Van Dick, R., van Knippenberg, D., Hägele, S., Guillaume, Y. R. F., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2008). Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations, 61(10), 1463–1492.
Van Dijk, H., & van Engen, M. L. (2013). A status perspective on the consequences of work group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86(2), 223–241.
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022.
Van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., & Giessner, S. R. (2014). Raw data. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995–1015.
Von Hippel, P. T. (2005). Mean, median, and skew: Correcting a textbook rule. Journal of Statistics Education, 13(2).
Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1982). Paths of relevance and the induction of status-task expectancies: A research note. Social Forces, 61, 575–586.
Walter, S., Seibert, S., Goering, D. D., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2016). An examination of the convergence of online panel data and conventionally sourced data. Academy of Management Proceedings. Academy of Management Conference, Anaheim, CA.
Webster Jr, M., & Driskell Jr, J. E. (1978). Status generalization: A review and some new data. American Sociological Review, 43(2), 220–236.
Wei, X., Allen, N. J., & Liu, Y. (2016). Disparity in organizational research: How should we measure it? Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 72–90.
Wellman, N., Applegate, J. M., Harlow, J., & Johnston, E. W. (2020). Beyond the Pyramid: Alternative formal hierarchical structures and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4), 997-1027.
Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 23–43. Wittenbaum, G. M., & Bowman, J. M. (2005). Member status and information
exchange in decision-making groups. In Status and Groups (Vol. 7, pp. 143– Woolley, A. W., Gerbasi, M. E., Chabris, C. F., Kosslyn, S. M., & Hackman, J. R.
(2008). Bringing in the experts how team composition and collaborative planning jointly shape analytic effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39(3), 352–371.
Yu, S., Greer, L. L., Halevy, N., & van Bunderen, L. (2019). On ladders and pyramids: Hierarchy’s shape determines relationships and performance in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(12), 1717–1733.
