Citation
Meijerman, L. (2006, February 15). Inter- and intra-individual variation in earprints. Barge's Anthropologica, Leiden. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4292
Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)
License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in theInstitutional Repository of the University of Leiden
REFERENCES
Abbas, A. and Rutty, G.N., 2005. Ear piercing affects earprints: The role of ear piercing in human identification. Journal of Forensic Sciences 50(2): 386-392.
Alberink, I.B. and Hoogstrate, A.J., 2002. Some notes on data collection. Internal FearID report, Netherlands Forensic Institute (unpublished).
Alberink, I.B. and Ruifrok, A.C.C., 2004. Validation of the standard operating procedure for earprint collection. Internal FearID report, Netherlands Forensic Institute (submitted for publication).
Asai, K., Yoshimura, M ., Nago, N. and Yamada, T., 1996. Correlation of ear length with age in Japan (Letter to the editor). British M edical Journal 312: 582.
Bertillon, A., 1885. Identification anthropométrique: Instructions signalétiques. Masson, Paris.
Borovanský, L., Žlábek, K., Hromada, J., Zrzavý, J. and Kos, J., 1960. Soustavná anatomie þlovČka. Státní zdravotnické nakladatelství, Praha.
Broeders, A.P.A., 2003. Op zoek naar de bron. Over de grondslagen van de criminalistiek en de waardering van het forensisch bewijs. Kluwer, Deventer.
Champod, C., 2002. Thoughts on statistics and latent prints. The W eekly Detail 22. http://www.clpex.com/Articles/TheDetail/1-99/TheDetail22.htm.
Journal of Forensic Sciences 46(6): 1275-1284.
Cole, S.A., 2004. Fingerprint identification and the criminal justice system: Historical lessons for the DNA debate. In: Lazer, D. (ed.), DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice. Mitt Press, Cambridge, MA. Pp. 63-90. http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/dnabook/ Simon_Cole_(4)_2-24-03.doc.
Conti, de F., Giacon, M., Sholl, S., Meijerman, L. and Maat, G.J.R., 2002. Cross media study report. Internal FearID report, University of Padova (unpublished).
Conti, de F., Giacon, M., Drusini, A., Sholl, S., Vanezis, P., Meijerman, L. and Maat, G.J.R., 2003. Effect of sound file length on the quality of earprint images. Internal FearID report, University of Padova (unpublished).
Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J. and Taylor, C.J., 1998. Active Appearance Models. In: Burkhardt, H. and Neumann, B. (ed), Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2. Springer, Berlin. Pp. 484-498.
Coppock, C., 2004. Differential randomness and individualization. The Weekly Detail 130. http://www.clpex.com/Articles/TheDetail/100-199/TheDetail130.htm.
Crown, 2002. R. v. Mark Anthony Dallagher. In the Supreme Court of Judicature - Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) - No. (2002). EWCA Crim 1903. http://www.austlii.edu.au/~andrew/bailii/Joe/Data/EW_EWCA_Crim_2002_1903.html. Dubois, N., 1988. Oren naar hebben. Technisch Informatie Bulletin 1: 7-22.
European Communities, 2000. Ear-prints in criminal investigation. http://www.cordis.lu/growth/calls/top-4.18.htm.
Ewing, M.R., 1946. Congenital sinuses of external ear. Journal of Laryngology & Otology 61: 18-23.
Facchini, F., 1988. Evoluzione, uomo e ambiente: lineamenti di antropologia. UTET Libreria, Torino.
Farkas, L.G., 1994. Anthropometry of the head and face (second edition). Raven Press New York, NY.
Farkas, L.G. and Munro, I.R., 1987. Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine. C.C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Il.
Farkas, L.G., Posnick, J.C. and Hreczko, T.M., 1992. Anthropometric growth study of the ear. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 24: 324-327.
Feenstra, L. and Van der Lugt, C., 2000. Persoons-identificatie via de oorschelp. Tijdschrift voor KNO-heelkunde 6: 53-55.
Ferrario, V.F., Sforza, S., Ciusa, V., Serrao, G. and Tartaglia, G.M., 1999. Morphometry of the normal human ear: A cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. Journal of Cranofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology 19: 226-233.
Fisher, R.A., 1925. Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh. Gerasimov, M.M., 1940. Osnovy Vosstanovleniya Litsa po Cherepu. Sovetskaya Nauka,
Moskva.
PhD Thesis, University of Vienna.
Geyer, E., 1928. Vererbung der bandförmigen Helix. Mitteilungen der Anthropologischen Gesellschaft in Wien 58: 17.
Geyer, E., 1936. Studien am menschlichen Ohr: Stellung und Faltung der Ohrmuschel. Anthropologischer Anzeiger 13: 101-111.
Giacon, M., De Conti, F., Meijerman, L. and Sholl, S., 2005. Instructions for earprint analysis: superhelix, transitions between feature zones, minutiae and landmarks. Internal FearID report (unpublished).
Gualdi-Russo, E., 1998. Longitudinal study of anthropometric changes with aging in an urban Italian population. Homo 49: 241-259.
Hajniš, K., 1969. Die Veränderungen der Ohrmuscheln beim Erwachsenen. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 61: 42-56.
Hammer, H.J., 1986. The identification of earprints secured at the scene of the crime. Fingerprint Whorld 12: 49-51.
Hammer, H.J. and Neubert, F., 1989. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Auswertung von Ohrabdrückspuren. Kriminalistik und Forensische Wissenschaften 73-74: 136-139. Händel, K., 1983. Streiflichter. Kriminalistik 1: 53-56.
Hardisty, R.M., 1996. Lifelong follow up study of young people is needed (Letter to the editor). British Medical Journal 312: 582.
Hildén, K., 1922. Über die Form des Ohrläppchens beim Menschen und ihre Abhängigkeit von Erbanlagen. Hereditas 3: 351.
Hildén, K., 1929. Studien über das Vorkommen der darwinschen Ohrspitze in der Bevölkerung Finnlands. Fennia 52: 3-39.
Hirschi, F., 1970a. Cambrioleurs internationaux convaincus à l’aide de preuves peu communes. Revue Internationale de Police Criminelle 239: 184-193.
Hirschi, F., 1970b. Identifizierung von Ohrabdrücken. Kriminalistik 24: 75-79.
Hoogstrate, A.J., Van den Heuvel, H. and Huyben, E., 2001. Ear identification based on surveillance camera’s images. Science and Justice 41: 167-172.
Hrdlicka, A., 1920. Anthropometry. The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, Philadelphia, PA.
Huber, R.A., 1959-1960. Expert Witnesses. Criminal Law Quarterly 2: 276-296.
Hunger, H. and Hammer, H.J., 1987. Zu Fragen der Identification durch Ohrmerkmale. Kriminalistik und Forensische Wissenschaften 65-66: 75-79.
Hunger, H. and Leopold, D., 1978. Merkmale der Ohren. In: Identifikation. Johann Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig. Pp. 391-405.
Iannarelli, A.V., 1964. The Iannarelli system of ear identifikation. Foundation Press, Brooklyn, NY.
Imhofer, R., 1906. Die Bedeutung der Ohrmuschel für die Feststellung der Identität. Archiv für Kriminologie 26: 150-163.
Ingleby, M., Mason, J., Turner, D. and Langdell, S., 2000. Ear-prints: a neglected forensic resource? University of Huddersfield (unpublished).
Ito, I., Imada, M., Ikeda, M., Sueno, K., Arikuni, T. and Kida, A.A., 2001. Morphological study of age changes in adult human cartilage with special emphasis on elastic fibers. The Laryngoscope 111: 881-886.
Jung, W., 1984. Über das Ohr zum Täter – Identifizierung durch Ohrabdrücke. Kriminalistik 38: 482-483.
Jürgens, H.W., 1961. Nasenmerkmale; Ohrmerkmale. In: Gedda, L. (ed.), De genetica medica (2). Genetica Humana Normalis. Istituto Gregorio Mendel, Roma. Pp. 245-254.
Keith, A., 1901. The significance of certain features and types of the external ear. Nature 65: 16-21.
Kennerley, J., 1998a. Ear print identification. Paper presented on the National Conference on Craniofacial Identification, September 4-6 1998, Windsor, UK.
Kennerley, J., 1998b. Ear prints – a progress report. Fingerprint Whorld 24: 69-71.
Khaw, K.T., 1996. Why do old men have big ears? (Letter to the editor). British Medical Journal 312: 582.
features. Internal FearID report, University of Huddersfield (unpublished).
Kieckhoefer, H., Ingleby, M. and Lucas, G., 2005. Monitoring the physical formation of earprints: optical and pressure mapping evidence. Internal FearID report, University of Huddersfield (accepted for publication in Measurement, December 2005).
Lange, G., 1966. Familienuntersuchungen über die Erblichkeit metrischer und morphologischer Merkmale des äuȕeren Ohres. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 57: 111-167.
Leicher, H., 1928. Die Vererbung anatomischer Variationen des Gehörorgans (ausschließlich der Pneumatisation). Die Ohrenheilkunde der Gegenwart und ihrer Grenzgebiete 12: 130-148.
Loeffler, L., 1940. Anwendung der menschlichen Erbbiologie. In: Just, G. (ed.), Handbuch der Erbbiologie des Menschen (2). Springer, Berlin.
Lowe, D., 2004a. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60(2): 91-110.
Lowe, D., 2004b. Demo Software, SIFT Keypoint Detector (version 3). http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~lowe/keypoints.
Lugt, van der C., 1997. Earprints, another way to identify. Presentation at the 82nd IAI Annual Education Seminar, July 27-August 2 1997, Danvers, MA (unpublished).
Lugt, van der C., 1998. Ear Identification - State of the Art. Information Bulletin for Shoeprint/Toolmark Examiners 4: 69-81.
Maat, G.J.R., 1999. Ear Print Project - Brief report on the pilot study period September-November 1999. Barge’s Anthropologica, Leiden University Medical Center (unpublished).
Maat, G.J.R., 2003. Male Stature: A parameter of health and wealth in the low countries, 50-1997 AD: Wealth, health and human remains in archaeology. Vijfentwintigste Kroon-voordracht, Stichting Nederlands Museum voor Anthropologie en Praehistorie, Amsterdam. Pp. 57-88.
Martin, R., 1928. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie (second edition). Verlag Gustav Fischer, Jena. Meadows, L. and Jantz, R.L., 1995. Allometric secular change in the long bones from the
1800s to the present. Journal of Forensic Sciences 40: 762-767.
Meijerman, L., 2002. Appendix to cross media study report. Internal FearID report, Leiden University Medical Center (unpublished).
Meijerman, L., Maat, G.J.R., De Conti, F., Giacon, M. and Sholl, S., 2002. FearID WP3 report: literature research. Internal FearID report, Leiden University Medical Center (unpublished).
Meijerman, L., Van Antwerpen, G., Van Munster, R.J. and Maat, G.J.R., 2004a. Exploring the effect of duration of listening on earprints. Internal FearID report, Leiden University Medical Center (chapter 6 of this volume).
Meijerman, L., Van der Lugt, C. and Maat, G. J. R., 2004b. Cross-sectional anthropometric study of the external ear. Internal FearID report, Leiden University Medical Center (submitted for publication; chapter 5 of this volume).
earprints. Forensic Science International 140: 91-99 (chapter 2 of this volume).
Meijerman, L., Van der Lugt, C., Van Antwerpen, G., Van Munster, R.J. and Maat, G.J.R., 2005a. Preliminary comparison of earprints that were made before and after cleaning the ear. Internal FearID report, Leiden University Medical Center (chapter 7 of this volume).
Meijerman, L., Nagelkerke, N., Van Basten, R., Van der Lugt, C., De Conti, F., Drusini, A., Giacon, M., Sholl, S., Vanezis, P. and Maat, G.J.R., 2005b. Inter- and intra-individual variation in applied force when listening at a surface, and resulting variation in earprints. Medicine, Science and the Law, accepted for publication September 2005 (chapter 3 of this volume).
Meijerman, L., Nagelkerke, N., Brand, R., Van der Lugt, C., Van Basten, R., De Conti, F., Giacon, M. and Maat, G., 2005c. Exploring the effect of occurrence of sound on force applied by the ear when listening at a surface. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 1(3): 187-192 (chapter 4 of this volume).
Meijerman, L., Thean, A., Van der Lugt, C., Van Munster, R.J., Van Antwerpen, G. and Maat, G.J.R., 2006. Individualization of earprints: Variation in earprints of monozygotic twins. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 2(1), in press (chapter 9 of this volume).
Moenssens, A.A., 1995. Identification by ear impressions. In: Moenssens, A.A., Starrs, J.E., Henderson, C.E. and Inbau, F.E. (eds), Scientific Evidence in Civil and Criminal Cases. Foundation Press, Westbury, NY. Pp. 612-614.
Moenssens, A.A., 1999a Ear identification research. Forensic-Evidence.com/UMKC School of Law. http://forensic-evidence.com/site/ID/ID00004_4.html.
process reliable enough to justify expert opinion of identity in court? Proceedings of the First International Conference on Forensic Human Identification in the Next Millennium, Oct. 24-26 1999. www.forensic.gov.uk.
Moenssens, A.A., 2000. Ear Identification In The News Again… This time it is ear photographs! Forensic-Evidence.com/UMKC School of Law. http://www.forensic-evidence.com/site/ID/IDearNews.html.
Moenssens, A.A., 2004a. Another Ear Print Conviction Reversed! Forensic-Evidence.com/UMKC School of Law. http://www.forensic-evidence.com/site/ID/dallangher_UK.html.
Moenssens, A.A., 2004b. DNA evidence proves ear ID wrong. Forensic-Evidence.com/UMKC School of Law. http://www.forensic-evidence.com/site/ID/DNAdisputesEarlID.html.
Mollison, T.H., 1938. Spezielle Methoden anthropologischer Messungen. In: Aberhalden, E. (ed.), Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Wien. Morgan, J., 2000. Court holds earprint identification not generally accepted in scientific
community. Forensic-Evidence.com/UMKC School of Law. http://www.forensic-evidence.com/site/ID/ID_Kunze.html.
Munster, van R.J., Van Antwerpen, G. and Thean, A., 2005. FearID image processing for earprint analysis: Final report TNO contribution to WP5. Internal FearID report, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (unpublished).
Kriminal. 11, Wiss.- techn. Beilage 5/75: 11-15.
Oepen, I., 1970. Über die Häufigkeit einiger morphologischer Besonderheiten im Kopfbereich. Anthropologischer Anzeiger 32, 141-156.
Oepen, I., 1976. Der Identifizierungswert des menschliches Ohres. Protokoll zur Arbeitstagung an der PFA Münster. Polizei-Führungsakademie, Münster. Pp. 39-54. Olivier, G., 1969. The ear. In: Practical Anthropology. C.C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Il.
Pp. 56-58.
Osterburg, J.W., 1982. The Crime laboratory: case studies of scientific criminal investigations (second edition). Clark Boardman Company Ltd., New York, NY. Pp. 34- 35.
Pasescu, G. and Tanislav, E., 1997. Person identification on the basis of earprints in the activity of Bucharest Police Department. Information Bulletin for Shoeprint/Toolmark Examiners 3: 10-14.
Pellnitz, D., 1958. Über das Wachstum der menschlichen Ohrmuschel. Archiv für Ohren- Nasen- und Kehlkopfheilkunde 171: 334-340.
Pelz, L. and Stein, B., 1990. Zur klinischen Beurteilung der Ohrgröße bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Pädiatrie und Grenzgebiete 29: 229-235.
Putz, R. and Pabst, R. (eds.), 2000. Sobotta, Atlas van de menselijke anatomie (1): Hoofd, hals, bovenste extremiteit (second edition). Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, Houten.
Quelprud, T., 1934. Familienforschungen über Merkmale des äußeren Ohres. Zeitschrift für Induktive Abstammung- und Vererbungslehre 67: 296-299.
Abstammungsprüfung. Der Erbarzt 8: 121-125.
Quelprud, T., 1936. Zur Erblichkeit des darwinschen Höckerchens. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 34: 343-363.
Rutty, G.N., Abbas, A. and Crossling, D., 2005. Could earprint identification be computerised? An illustrated proof of concept paper. International Journal of Legal Medicine Online first. http://www.springerlink.com/app/home/contribution.asp?wasp=1 4fcb8175d0447428bf5d37823263bfe&referrer=parent&backto=searcharticlesresults,1,6. Saddler, K., 1996. The establishment and evaluation of an ear-print database at the National Training Centre for Scientific Support to Crime Investigation. M.Sc. Thesis. University
of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
Sadler, T.W., 2003. Langman’s Medical Embryology (ninth edition). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
Scaillet, M., 1971. Une identification originale. Revue Internationale de Police Criminelle 245: 41-43.
Schade, H., 1954. Vaterschaftsbegutachtung: Grundlagen und Methoden der anthropologischer-erbbiologischen Vaterschaftfeststellung. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.
Schäffer, O., 1892-1893. Über die fötale Ohrentwickelung, die Häufigkeit fötaler Ohrformen bei Erwachsenen und die Erblichkeitsverhältnisse derselben. Archiv für Anthropologie 21: 77-132, 215-245.
Scottish Criminal Record Office, 2002. History of Fingerprints – A Time Line. http://www.scro.police.uk/fingerprint_history.htm.
Sholl, S.A., De Conti, F., Drusini, A., Giacon, M., Maat, G.J.R., Meijerman, L. and Vanezis, P., 2004. The stability of anthropometric measurements in functional earprint identification. Internal FearID report, University of Glasgow (submitted for publication).
Södermann, H. and O’Connell, J.J., 1962. Modern criminal investigations (fifth edition). Funk and Wagnalls, New York, NY. Pp. 46-50.
Stoney, D.A., 1991. What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics? Journal of the Forensic Science Society 31(2): 197-199.
Susanne, C., 1977. Individual age changes of the morphological characteristics. Journal of Human Evolution 6: 181-189.
Swift, B. and Rutty, G.N., 2003. The human ear: Its role in forensic practice. Journal of Forensic Sciences 48: 153-160.
Thornton, J.I., 1986. The snowflake paradigm (letter to the editor). Journal of Forensic Sciences 31: 399.
Tillner, I., 1963. Seltene morphologische Merkmale an der menschlichen Ohrmuschel und ihr praktischer Wert für die Vaterschaftsbegutachtung. Anthropologische Anzeiger 26: 294-307.
Topinard, P., 1885. Eléments d’Anthropologie Générale. Delahaye et Lecrosnier, Paris.
Würzburg, Germany.
Tsuchiya, H. and Nagashima, K., 1998. Congenital sinuses: Clinical study and application of microsurgery. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 33(5): 722-724.
Tuthill, H., 1994. Individualization: Principles and procedures in criminalistics. Lightning Powder Company, Salem, Or.
Valvoda, J.T., 1999. Otolobe – earprint recognition. Ecole poytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL). Semester project report (unpublished).
Vandenbroucke, J.P. and Van den Broeck, J., 1998. Evidence for a secular trend in linear proportions. Research communications, Leiden University Medical Center, (unpublished).
Vermaas, P., 2003. "Concentreer je op DNA en dacty": Plaatsvervangend korpschef Hans Visser wil een omslag in het werk van de TR. Algemeen Politieblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 152: 12-13.
Von Verschuer, O., 1927. Die vererbungsbiologische Zwillingsforschung: Ihre biologischen Grundlagen: Studien an 102 eineiigen und 45 gleichgeschlechtlichen zweieiigen Zwillings- und an 2 Drillingspaaren. Ergebnisse der Inneren Medizin und Kinderheilkunde 31: 35-120.
