• No results found

The dark side of subtle discrimination : how targets respond to different forms of discrimination

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "The dark side of subtle discrimination : how targets respond to different forms of discrimination"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

The dark side of subtle discrimination : how targets respond to different forms of discrimination

Cihangir, S.

Citation

Cihangir, S. (2008, June 17). The dark side of subtle discrimination : how targets respond to different forms of discrimination. Kurt Lewin Institute Dissertation Series. Kurt Lewin Instituut, Amsterdam. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13066

Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown)

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13066

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

1

Stellingen

behorend bij het proefschrift

The Dark Side of Subtle Discrimination:

How targets respond to different forms of discrimination

door Sezgin Cihangir

1. The dark side of subtle discrimination is a result of the ambiguity that is inherent in this phenomenon (this dissertation).

2. Because subtle discrimination is more ambiguous than blatant discrimination, targets need additional cues to be able to respond in self-protective ways to this type of group based unfair treatment (this dissertation).

3. Individuals with low self-esteem are better off when they are being blatantly discriminated than when discrimination is subtle. (this dissertation).

4. While reactions to blatant discrimination will remain unaffected by situational cues that indicate (in)tolerant social norms, reactions to subtle discrimination are expected to be moderated by such cues (this dissertation).

5. Social norms that sanction erroneous attributions lead to a focus on prevention, which potentially undermines actual task performance.

Social norms that tolerate attributional errors however, lead to a focus on the achievement of success which may result in improved task performance (this dissertation).

(3)

2

6. Women need men (more than they need other women) as allies in their fight against sexism (this dissertation).

7. The weakness of blatant discrimination is in its clarity and

simplicity. The strength of subtle discrimination is in its ambiguity and complexity. (this dissertation).

8. Denying that subtle discrimination exists is a strong indication of being a modern racist.

9. Investigating the dark side of social phenomena makes us appreciate the bright side of life.

10. Practice is the key to success.

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

In hoofdstuk twee is het gekruist met zelfwaardering (laag vs. In Studie 1 hebben wij gekeken naar de effecten van zelfwaardering in termen van zelfgerichte emoties op de

I think it is almost redundant to mention the role of nice friends in an important period of my life, which my PhD training has been. It is self-evident that

This research resulted in a Master Thesis titled: “The effects of social identity salience on social influence”, with which he received his Master’s degree in Social

2008-2: Marjolein Maas: Experiential Social Justice Judgment Processes 2008-3: Lonneke de Meijer: Ethnicity effects in police officer selection: Applicant,. assessor,

By also varying the nature of individual level outcomes (success versus failure, Study 2.1), the present research has the advantage of allowing us to focus on the interplay

The research conducted in this dissertation was made possible by grant 016-025-021 awarded by the Dutch National Science Foundation (NWO). Cover painting:

C Chapter 3: To what extent does the nature of personal outcomes (individual level focus) versus the fate of one’s group (group level focus) determine attributions to

Considering the effects of searching for information that contains evidence of gender discrimination on well-being we found that knowledge about group level discriminatory