The role of the ubiquitin system in human cytomegalovirus-mediated
degradation of MHC class I heavy chains
Hassink, G.C.
Citation
Hassink, G. C. (2006, May 22). The role of the ubiquitin system in human
cytomegalovirus-mediated degradation of MHC class I heavy chains. Retrieved from
https://hdl.handle.net/1887/4414
Version:
Corrected Publisher’s Version
CHAPTER
1
I
NTRODUCTI
ON
VIRAL IMMUNE EVASION AND QUALITY CONTROL
OF THE ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM
Protein degradation and MHC class I-restricted antigen
presentation
Duri
ng
t
hei
r
l
i
fecycl
e,
prot
ei
ns
are
prone
t
o
agi
ng
as
a
resul
t
of
di
fferent
cel
l
ul
ar
st
resses
and
prot
ei
n
oxi
dat
i
on.
Cel
l
s
renew
t
hei
r
prot
ei
n
popul
at
i
on
by
means
of
const
ant
prot
ei
n
synt
hesi
s
and
degradat
i
on
1.
Al
t
hough
many
cel
l
ul
ar
organel
l
es
have
t
he
means
of
prot
ei
n
degradat
i
on,
t
he
prot
easome
pl
ays
a
domi
nant
rol
e
i
n
t
hi
s
process
2.
The
prot
easome
i
s
formed
by
a
l
arge
barrel
-shaped
20S
prot
ei
n
compl
ex
consi
st
i
ng
of
four
ri
ngs
of
t
wo
t
i
mes
seven
al
pha
and
t
wo
t
i
mes
seven
bet
a
subuni
t
s
resi
di
ng
i
n
t
he
cyt
osol
and
nucl
eus
3.
The
prot
easome
can
ei
t
her
be
i
n
compl
ex
wi
t
h
t
wo
11S
caps,
whi
ch
faci
l
i
t
at
es
t
he
accel
erat
ed
degradat
i
on
of
l
arge
pept
i
de
fragment
s
4,5,
or
i
n
compl
ex
wi
t
h
t
wo
19S
caps
on
bot
h
si
des,
whi
ch
faci
l
i
t
at
es
t
he
degradat
i
on
of
whol
e
prot
ei
ns
6-8.
Bot
h
t
he
19S
and
t
he
11S
caps
have
ATPase
act
i
vi
t
y.
The
19S
cap
t
oget
her
wi
t
h
t
he
20S
prot
easome
core
forms
a
26S
compl
ex.
Thi
s
compl
ex
recogni
zes
pol
y-ubi
qui
t
i
n
t
rees
t
hat
are
at
t
ached
t
o
prot
ei
n
subst
rat
es
(
see
l
at
er
on
i
n
t
hi
s
i
nt
roduct
i
on)
and
removes
t
hem
9-11.
At
t
he
same
t
i
me,
t
he
19S
cap
unfol
ds
t
he
subst
rat
e
and
aqui
res
access
t
o
t
he
port
s
of
t
he
out
er
ri
ng
of
t
he
prot
easome
12-14.
In
t
he
core
of
t
he
prot
easome,
a
set
of
t
rypsi
n-,
chemot
rypsi
n-
and
post
-gl
ut
amyl
pept
i
dyl
hydrol
yt
i
c-l
i
ke
prot
eases
cl
eave
t
he
unfol
ded
prot
ei
ns
i
nt
o
ol
i
gopept
i
des
wi
t
h
an
average
l
engt
h
of
4
t
o
20
ami
no
aci
ds
1,15.
These
short
pept
i
de
fragment
s
l
eave
t
he
prot
easome
and
are
furt
her
processed
by
endopept
i
dase
t
o
ret
ri
eve
t
he
ori
gi
nal
ami
no
aci
ds
16.
A
smal
l
number
of
pept
i
de
fragment
s,
however,
are
used
for
an
i
mport
ant
defense
syst
em
of
t
he
organi
sm.
solubilize the unfolded proteins, attract and coordinate the binding of
additional chaperones, and form disulfide bridges, respectively (figure 1).
Shortly after this process has been completed, the specialized
chaperone tapasin mediates the binding of the newly synthesized MHC class I
complexes to the transporter associated with antigen presentation (TAP). In
addition, the luminal lectin calreticulin
18and Ƣ2m bind the heavy chain,
together forming the MHC class I peptide-loading complex
19. The
proteasome-derived peptides are transported into the ER via the TAP
complex
20. In the ER, the N-terminal ends of the peptides are trimmed to
8-10 residues
21-23, in order to fit into the newly synthesized MHC class I
molecules
24,25. Recently the ER localized exopeptidase ERAAP was found to
be required for this trimming
26. Only high affinity binding peptides allow
further maturation and transport of MHC class I molecules to the cell surface
27-30.
At the cell surface, the protein complex is screened by another
specialized polymorphic molecule, the T-cell receptor, which is present on
cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, among others. The polymorphic TCRs are required
to recognize all the possible peptides presented by the MHC class I molecules.
A process of clonal selection ensures that only T-cells that fail to recognize
peptides derived from “self-proteins” are able to survive their maturation into
T-cells. W hen in addition to the MHC class I-peptide-TCR interaction, the
appropriate co-stimulatory signals are present, a signaling cascade is induced
in the T-cell resulting in the release of cytotoxic granules, which will ultimately
result in the death of the target cell in a process called apoptosis. Viruses have,
however, developed counter measures against this immune strategy.
Figure 1. M odel for translocation and formation of the M H C class I complex.
Life-long CMV infection and its risks
Human cytomegalovirus belongs to the herpes viridae, which are
common among all vertebrates. Cytomegaloviruses have a very large double
stranded DNA genome of 125-235 kbp. An important feature of these viruses
is that they are able to produce a life-long infection. The infection is usually
without symptoms as a long co-evolution of host and virus has resulted in a
delicate balance;
the host’
s immune system constantly represses upsurges of
viral expansion, while the virus continuously avoids detection by the host.
Yet CMV is a well-known pathogen. It is associated with acute and
chronic rejection of transplanted organs
31-33and has also been implicated as a
causative agent of atherosclerosis
34,35. Furthermore, it is known to cause
congenital defects in fetuses of pregnant women who have had a primary
CMV infection
36-38. Finally, CMV frequently causes serious disease in
immuno-compromised individuals. When the immune system of the host is
suppressed in periods of stress or fatigue, the virus may activate and use the
metabolism of the cells to proliferate. During sustained immuno-suppression,
e.g. in HIV-infected individuals or individuals using immuno-suppressive
agents to prevent rejection of transplanted tissue, CMV can cause hepatitis,
encephalitis, or pneumonia, all of which may be fatal
39,40.
To study the mechanisms of the HCMV-induced pathology, rat and
mouse CMV are often used as models. Mouse CMV (MCMV) is used to study
retinitis
41, vasculitis
42, pneumonitis
43, and the role of the immune system in
the pathogenesis of human CMV in general
44. Rat CMV (RCMV), on the
other hand, is used particularly in models of hart transplant-induced vascular
scleroses
45-47, lung transplant-induced obliterative bronchiolitis
48, and in the
study of diabetes
49.
Viral immune escape by targeting of MHC class I molecules is not
restricted to human CMV; cytomegaloviruses infecting other mammalians
also interfere with MHC class I expression. Mouse CMV encodes three
proteins affecting MHC class I expression at the cell surface. The m152 gene
product prevents export of class I complexes from the post-ER/early Golgi
66,67. A second protein, the m06 gene product, induces lysosomal degradation
of the MHC complex after a transient interaction in the ER
68. A third gene
product, the m04-encoded gp34, associates with properly folded MHC class I
molecules in the ER. The resulting complex is transported to the cell
membrane where it may modulate the function of NK cells
69,70. Together,
these MCMV-encoded immune evasion genes appear to counteract MHC
class I restricted T cell activation
71,72. Although RCMV also establishes life
long infection, the genes facilitating this persistence are yet to be identified.
HCMV, MCMV and RCMV all encode homologues of MHC class I heavy
chains
73-75, which may deviate NK cell
74,76, and B-Cell- and
macrophage-responses
77. Although RCMV has been found to downregulate MHC class I
expression
78, the viral genes underlying this phenotype remain to be
identified.
ER protein quality control and degradation of ER proteins
HCMV US2 and US11-mediated dislocation of MHC class I molecules to the cytosolThe discovery that US2 and US11-dependent degradation of MHC
class I heavy chains takes place at the level of the ER, suggested that US2 and
US11 used a pre-existing ER degradation pathway to downregulate MHC
class I molecules at the cell’s surface
54,55. This pathway was shown to dispose
of misfolded ER proteins like CFTR
79,80, CPY*
81, and ste6
82. Since the
discovery that ER proteins can in fact be retro-translocated into the cytosol
where they are degraded by the proteasome, substantial effort has been made
to elucidate the precise mechanism behind this process.
in the nucleus
83. Therefore, protein expression is tightly controlled in
eukaryotic cells. Prolonged production of misfolded proteins in the ER will
induce the translation of chaperones
84, reduce translation of mRNA’s to
relieve protein folding machineries
85, and may eventually even induce
apoptosis
86. This process has been called the unfolded protein response
(UPR).
Amino acid chains produced by the ribosome are recognized as
nascent ER proteins when they contain either one or more transmembrane
domains, a signal sequence, or a signal anchor. As soon as the ribosome
recognizes one of those domains in the newly synthesized amino acid chain,
further translation is halted until the ribosome has bound to the signal
recognition particle adjacent to a conduit for translocation in the ER which is
called the translocon (figure 2) (reviewed in
87,88). The core of the translocon
consists of a complex of the subunits Sec61ơ, Ƣ, and ƣ, which together form a
50 Ångström pore. The translocon can be equipped with a translocation-
associated membrane protein (TRAM), which is thought to facilitate a lateral
opening in the wall of this pore through which newly-translated
transmembrane-regions (TM) can move laterally into the lipid bi-layer
89-91.
Domain structure and polartity of TM-adjacent residues ultimately determine
the orientation of TM regions in the membrane
92-96. Adjacent to the cytosolic
side of the complex is the oligosaccharyltransferase (OST), which provides the
core glycan to be attached to asparagine residues present in NXT/S motifs
(where X is any amino acid except proline). Besides these complexes, a fourth
comlex, the translocon-associated complex (TRAP) can be found in complex
with the translocon and enhances translocation of proteins that have
prolonged acces to the cytoplasm
97. Recently, a closer analysis using electron
micrograph analysis (EMAN), shows that the ribosome actually binds four
Sec61 complexes and two TRAP complexes at the same time
98. Only one of
the Sec61 complexes, however, seems to be active in translocation
98.
In the ER, the N-linked glycans play an important role in protein
folding and quality control, as has been shown for yeast alpha1-antitrypsin
and mammalian IgM heavy chains, and many others
113,114. Glucosidases I and
II remove glucose moieties from GlcNAc2Man9Glc3-containing
glycoproteins to form GlcNAc2Man9 proteins. The membrane-bound
calnexin and soluble calreticulin recognize GlcNAc2Man9Glc1 sugar moieties
on the unfolded proteins and allow protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) ERP57
to bind these complexes. The PDI can now establish disulfide bridges within
the newly synthesized molecule and between subunits of protein complexes
115,116. When all the glucose residues have been removed and the protein has
folded correctly, it is promoted further into the secretion pathway, the Golgi
network, where the N-linked glycans are processed to larger structures. If the
complex has not acquired the correct conformation, however, it is recognized
by UDP-glucose:
glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (UGTR) which reattaches a
glucose residue to the N-linked glycan, thus enhancing the affinity for
calnexin and calreticulin to allow another round of folding
113,117. At the same
time, there is a chance that ER manosidase I will remove a mannose residue,
forming GlcNAc2Man8Glc1
113. The GlcNAc2Man8Glc1 glycan is a poor
substrate for glucosidase II. Therefore, it does not remove the last glucose
residue, and the protein is not released to the Golgi
118,119. Prolonged ER
retention eventually leads to the degradation of ER proteins.
This mannose clock is just one of the many checkpoints in the
maturation of proteins. A variety of specialized ER-associated compartments
are implied in quality control
120,121. Furthermore, en route to the cell surface,
misfolded or mal-complexed proteins are degraded in a pathway involving
lysomes
122,123, the membrane-enveloped organelles responsible for
Figure 2. Model of the ribosome channel complex in a sheet of ER membrane.degradation of the bulk of endocytosed material.
Retro-translocation of proteins from the ER to the cytosol (‘Dislocation’)
ER-resident proteins that do not pass the ER quality control are
destined for degradation by the proteasome which resides in the cytosol. How
exactly proteins are transported from the ER to the cytosol, a mechanism
termed retro-translocation or dislocation, is an intriguing question which is
not well understood (figure 3). The first step for ER proteins destined for
degradation, is the transport of these substrates through a conduit which may
be formed by components of the Sec61 complex
54,124-126. Once in the cytosol,
any N-linked glycans are removed by a recently identified N-glycanase
127,128.
Ultimately, the dislocated substrates are provided with polyubiquitin chains
and degraded by the proteasome. The energy that drives dislocation may
come from several sides. The translocon itself is a passive conduit.
Dislocation, however, involves ER luminal ATP
129and several cytolic factors,
namely the proteasome, the p97-ufd-npl4 AAA ATPase complex, and the
ubiquitin system.
Figure 3. Translocation of a protein from the ER into the cytosol.
The role of the proteasome in dislocation of proteins from the ER
A proportion of the 20S and 26S proteasomes have been found to be
associated with the ER membrane
130-132. Involvement of the proteasome in
the extraction of proteins from the ER membrane is suggested because the
ER-to-cytosol dislocation of many ER substrates can be prevented by the
removal or inhibition of proteasomes
126,133-136. On the other hand, US2 and
US11-dependent dislocation of MHC class I heavy chains
54,55, and the
dislocation of TCR-ơ
133, have been clearly shown to occur in spite of
proteasomal inhibition.
The Role of the p97 complex
The AAA ATPases form an abundant family, of which the members
are involved in various cellular functions, such as membrane trafficking,
proteasome function, organelle biogenesis, and microtubule regulation
(reviewed in
137,138). Their modes of action are not well understood
139, but one
of their functions is the ability to unfold molecules. For example, a ring of six
AAA ATPases comprise the regulatory lid in of the 20S proteasome in
eukaryotes
140where they might drive unfolding of substrates before entrance
of the proteolitic core
12-14. Two other AAA ATPase rings, N-ethylmaleimide
sensitive factor (NSF) and the p97-p47 complex, drive vesicle fusion and
transport by dissociating soluble NSF attachment protein receptor (SNARE)
complexes which are otherwise stable up to temperatures of 90 ºC
141. Yet
another function may be that they act as microtubule-based motors
142.
A role for AAA ATPase p97 in the degradadation of ER proteins was
established when Ye et al. discovered that MHC class I heavy chain
dislocation in yeast and US11-dependent dislocation of MHC class I heavy
chains was dependent on the vasolin-containing protein(VCP)/p97 in
complex with Ufd1 and Npl4
143. The P97 protein constitutes 1% of the
cytosol and it is, therefore, one of the most abundant proteins in the cell
144.
Every p97 molecule harbors two ATPase domains which form two hexameric
rings stacked on top of one another
145,146. Exactly how p97-Ufd1-Npl4
extracts the polypeptides from the ER membrane during dislocation is unclear
147.
has remained unclear, however, whether the actual dislocation from the ER is
also dependent on ubiquitination
148.
Attaching ubiquitin to a protein involves three steps, each providing
the versatility required to regulate the cellular process in question (Figure 4).
The first step is to activate the ubiquitin itself in order to prepare it for
attachment. This is accomplished by the E1 ubiquitin activating enzyme. The
amount of activated ubiquitin that is present in the cell ultimately limits the
many processes that depend on ubiquitination. E2 conjugating enzymes
subsequently bind the activated ubiquitin on a conserved cysteine residue in
the second step. It is thought that an E2 enzyme, probably in association with
an E3 enzyme, determines how the ubiquitin molecules will be attached to
one another and the substrate. A single, mono-ubiquitin attachment, or a
poly-ubiquitin chain linked at a certain lysine in the ubiquitin molecule is thus
formed on the target protein. Ubiquitin molecules can form isopeptide
linkages between the C-terminal glycine residue and one of the lysines at
positions 6, 11, 29, 48 or 63 on the next ubiquitin molecule. K63-based
ubiquitin linkages have been associated with DNA repair, INB kinase
activation and endocytosis, whereas K48 is mostly involved in proteasomal
degradation. K11 and K29 have also been associated with protein degradation
by the proteasome (reviewed in
149,150). The E3 ubiquitin protein ligase
enzymes accomplish the third step in the process. They bind the substrate and
facilitate the actual transfer of one or more ubiquitin molecules from the E2
enzyme to a lysine or the N-terminus of the selected protein.
Ubiquitin does not only have a role in proteasomal degradation but
also in a large number of other cellular functions. DNA repair in the nucleus,
regulation of translation, activation of transcription factors and kinases, and
proteasomal degradation all require ubiquitination. Protein sorting and
trafficking within the secretory system of the cell is also regulated by
Moreover, it has become clear in the past few years that ubiquitin also
plays a role in the degradation of ER proteins (See also chapter 3). Hrd1p of
S. cerevisiae was the first ER-resident E3 ubiquitin ligase to be identified as
having a direct role in the degradation of ER proteins
158,159. Hrd1p/Der3p of
S. cerevisiae was identified independently by Hampton and co-workers
160and
by Wolf and co-workers
161. Hrd1p/Der3p functions as a ubiquitin ligase in
the degradation of S. cerevisiae Hmg2p, one of the yeast isozymes of
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGR)
158,160.
Hrd1p/Der3p is also involved in degradation of other ER proteins,
including CPY* and sec61-2p
162,163. Hrd1p/Der3p is a multispanning
membrane protein with six transmembrane domains, and its C-terminal
RING-H2 domain is located in the cytosol
159. In yeast, Hrd1p is found in a
stoichiometric complex with Hrd3p, a lumen-oriented ER membrane protein
that stabilizes Hrd1p and modulates its ligase activity
164. Hrd3p is, therefore,
essential for a functional Hrd1p E3 ligase in yeast. Hrd1p acts with the E2
enzymes Ubc1p and Ubc7p, of which Ubc7p is more important in the
degradation of ER proteins
158. Initially, it was thought that Hrd1p might be
the central E3 ligase that served the degradation of yeast ER proteins in
general, together with Hrd1 associates Hrd3p and Der1p, and the E2’s Ubc1p
and Ubc7p
158. However, while a number of substrates depend on Hrd1p for
their degradation from the ER, a number of others do not
165,166.
Besides Hrd1p, two other E3 ligases dedicated to degradation of ER
Figure 4. Ubiquitin cascade.proteins have been identified in yeast to date, Rsp5p and Doa10. Human
CFTR degradation has recently been shown to depend on Hrd1p in yeast, as
well as on Doa10, illustrating that the different E3 ligases active in
degradation of ER proteins, may cooperate to create a versatile degradation
machinery
167. In mammalians, two homologues of Hrd1p have been
identified: AMFR/gp78
168and HRD1
169. AMFR facilitates the degradation
of apoliprotein B100, whereas HRD1 facilitates the degradation of TCR-ơ
168,169. Additionally, HRD1 and AMFR both facilitate the degradation of
CD3-Ƥ
168,169, stressing the versatility of the system.
Outline of this thesis
It is clear from the above that the degradation of ER (glyco-)proteins is
a tightly regulated and complicated process involving a diversity of players not
necessarily dedicated to ER-associated degradation alone. The discovery that
viruses may co-opt this process to evade detection by the immune system has
significantly boosted research in this direction and forms the basis for this
thesis.
In this thesis we explored the mechanism by which the
HCMV-encoded proteins US2 and US11 alter the expression of MHC class I
molecules in order to evade MHC class I-dependent recognition by T-cells. In
the second chapter it was investigated whether, like human CMV and mouse
CMV, rat CMV also evades the host’s immune system using cell surface
downregulation of the MHC class I molecules.
In the third chapter we studied the role of the ubiquitin system in the
CMV US11-dependent dislocation of the MHC class I heavy chains. As
US11-mediated dislocation was indeed found to depend on a functional
ubiquitin system, a number of E3 ligases potentially involved in the
degradation of ER proteins were characterized. One of these potential E3
ligases is HRD1, a yet uncharacterized human homologue of the yeast Hrd1p.
In chapter four we characterized this homologue as an ER-resident ubiquitin
ligase involved in the degradation of TCR-ơ and CD3-Ƥ. Another potential E3
ligase is TEB4, a yet uncharacterized human homologue of the yeast Doa10.
This E3 was characterized in chapter five as an ER-resident ubiquitin ligase.
The crucial role of the ubiquitin system in protein dislocation suggested
that ubiquitination of lysines within the target proteins would be required to
facilitate dislocation. In chapter six we investigated whether lysines in the
MHC class I molecules themselves were indeed required for the dislocation of
these proteins in the presence of US2 and US11. Interestingly, this was not
the case. Nevertheless, a functional ubiquitin system was required for
on the role of the ubiquitin system in the dislocation process.
In chapter seven, we investigated whether Ƣ2m association and folding
of MHC class I heavy chains influenced US2 and US11-dependent
dislocation. Finally, in chapter eight we studied the class I dislocation process
in more detail. In particular, we investigated the order in which the amino acid
chains of MHC class I molecules were transported through the dislocon,
another important but hitherto unexplored aspect of the dislocation pathway.
References
1 Yewdell, J., Reits, E. and Neefjes, J. (2003) Making sense of mass destruction: quantitating MHC class I antigen presentation. Nat.Rev.Immunol. 3, 952-961
2 Fenteany, G., Standaert, R., Lane, W., Choi, S., Corey, E. and Schreiber, S. (1995) Inhibition of proteasome activities and subunit-specific amino-terminal threonine modification by lactacystin. Science 268, 726-731
3 Groll, M., Ditzel, L., Lowe, J., Stock, D., Bochtler, M., Bartunik, H. and Huber, R. (1997) Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 386, 463-471
4 Dubiel, W., Pratt, G., Ferrell, K. and Rechsteiner, M. (1992) Purification of an 11 S regulator of the multicatalytic protease. J.Biol.Chem. 267, 22369-22377
5 Ma, C., Willy, P., Slaughter, C. and DeMartino, G. (1993) PA28, an activator of the 20 S proteasome, is inactivated by proteolytic modification at its carboxyl terminus. J.Biol.Chem. 268, 22514-22519
6 Orlowski, M. (1990) The multicatalytic proteinase complex, a major extralysosomal proteolytic system. Biochemistry 29, 10289-10297
7 Rechsteiner, M., Hoffman, L. and Dubiel, W. (1993) The multicatalytic and 26 S proteases. J.Biol.Chem. 268, 6065-6068
8 Hilt, W. and Wolf, D. (1996) Proteasomes: destruction as a programme. Trends Biochem.Sci. 21, 96-102
9 Eytan, E., Armon, T., Heller, H., Beck, S. and Hershko, A. (1993) Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase activity associated with the 26 S protease complex. J.Biol.Chem. 268, 4668-4674
10 Glickman, M., Rubin, D., Coux, O., Wefes, I., Pfeifer, G., Cjeka, Z., Baumeister, W., Fried, V. and Finley, D. (1998) A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell 94, 615-623 11 Guterman, A. and Glickman, M. (2004) Complementary roles for Rpn11 and Ubp6 in
deubiquitination and proteolysis by the proteasome. J.Biol.Chem. 279, 1729-1738
12 Benaroudj, N., Zwickl, P., Seemuller, E., Baumeister, W. and Goldberg, A. (2003) ATP hydrolysis by the proteasome regulatory complex PAN serves multiple functions in protein degradation. Mol.Cell 11, 69-78
13 Navon, A. and Goldberg, A. (2001) Proteins are unfolded on the surface of the ATPase ring before transport into the proteasome. Mol.Cell 8, 1339-1349
15 Ciechanover, A. (1998) The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: on protein death and cell life. EMBO J. 17, 7151-7160
16 Reits, E., Griekspoor, A., Neijssen, J., Groothuis, T., Jalink, K., van Veelen, P., Janssen, H., Calafat, J., Drijfhout, J. and Neefjes, J. (2003) Peptide diffusion, protection, and degradation in nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments before antigen presentation by MHC class I. Immunity. 18, 97-108 17 Zinkernagel, R. (1974) Restriction by H-2 gene complex of transfer of cell-mediated immunity to
Listeria monocytogenes. Nature 251, 230-233
18 Gao, B., Adhikari, R., Howarth, M., Nakamura, K., Gold, M., Hill, A., Knee, R., Michalak, M. and Elliott, T. (2002) Assembly and antigen-presenting function of MHC class I molecules in cells lacking the ER chaperone calreticulin. Immunity. 16, 99-109
19 Cresswell, P. (2000) Intracellular surveillance: controlling the assembly of MHC class I-peptide complexes. Traffic. 1, 301-305
20 Rudd, P., Elliott, T., Cresswell, P., Wilson, I. and Dwek, R. (2001) Glycosylation and the immune system. Science 291, 2370-2376
21 Serwold, T., Gaw, S. and Shastri, N. (2001) ER aminopeptidases generate a unique pool of peptides for MHC class I molecules. Nat.Immunol. 2, 644-651
22 Brouwenstijn, N., Serwold, T. and Shastri, N. (2001) MHC class I molecules can direct proteolytic cleavage of antigenic precursors in the endoplasmic reticulum. Immunity. 15, 95-104
23 Fruci, D., Niedermann, G., Butler, R. and van Endert, P. (2001) Efficient MHC class I-independent amino-terminal trimming of epitope precursor peptides in the endoplasmic reticulum. Immunity. 15, 467-476
24 Van Bleek, G. and Nathenson, S. (1990) Isolation of an endogenously processed immunodominant viral peptide from the class I H-2Kb molecule. Nature 348, 213-216
25 Yewdell, J. and Bennink, J. (1992) Cell biology of antigen processing and presentation to major histocompatibility complex class I molecule-restricted T lymphocytes. Adv.Immunol. 52, 1-123 26 Serwold, T., Gonzalez, F., Kim, J., Jacob, R. and Shastri, N. (2002) ERAAP customizes peptides
for MHC class I molecules in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 419, 480-483
27 Townsend, A., Ohlen, C., Bastin, J., Ljunggren, H., Foster, L. and Karre, K. (1989) Association of class I major histocompatibility heavy and light chains induced by viral peptides. Nature 340 , 443-448
28 Townsend, A., Elliott, T., Cerundolo, V., Foster, L., Barber, B. and Tse, A. (1990) Assembly of MHC class I molecules analyzed in vitro. Cell 62, 285-295
29 Paulsson, K., Wang, P., Anderson, P., Chen, S., Pettersson, R. and Li, S. (2001) Distinct differences in association of MHC class I with endoplasmic reticulum proteins in wild-type, and beta 2-microglobulin- and TAP-deficient cell lines. Int.Immunol. 13, 1063-1073
30 Williams, A., Peh, C., Purcell, A., McCluskey, J. and Elliott, T. (2002) Optimization of the MHC class I peptide cargo is dependent on tapasin. Immunity. 16, 509-520
31 Almond, P., Matas, A., Gillingham, K., Dunn, D., Payne, W., Gores, P., Gruessner, R. and Najarian, J. (1993) Predictors of chronic rejection in renal transplant recipients. Transplant.Proc. 25 , 936-
33 McLaughlin, K., Wu, C., Fick, G., Muirhead, N., Hollomby, D. and Jevnikar, A. (2002) Cytomegalovirus seromismatching increases the risk of acute renal allograft rejection. Transplantation 74, 813-816
34 Epstein, S., Speir, E., Zhou, Y., Guetta, E., Leon, M. and Finkel, T. (1996) The role of infection in restenosis and atherosclerosis: focus on cytomegalovirus. Lancet 348 Suppl 1, s13-s17
35 Grahame-Clarke, C., Chan, N., Andrew, D., Ridgway, G., Betteridge, D., Emery, V., Colhoun, H. and Vallance, P. (2003) Human cytomegalovirus seropositivity is associated with impaired vascular function. Circulation 108, 678-683
36 Altshuler, G. (1974) Pathogenesis of congenital herpesvirus infection. Case report including a description of the placenta. Am.J.Dis.Child 127, 427-429
37 Pass, R., Stagno, S., Myers, G. and Alford, C. (1980) Outcome of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: results of long-term longitudinal follow-up. Pediatrics 66, 758-762 38 Gaytant, M., Steegers, E., Semmekrot, B., Merkus, H. and Galama, J. (2002) Congenital
cytomegalovirus infection: review of the epidemiology and outcome. Obstet.Gynecol.Surv. 57, 245-256
39 Ljungman, P. (1996) Cytomegalovirus infections in transplant patients. Scand.J.Infect.Dis.Suppl 100, 59-63
40 Ramsay, M., Miller, E. and Peckham, C. (1991) Outcome of confirmed symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Arch.Dis.Child 66, 1068-1069
41 Atherton, S., Newell, C., Kanter, M. and Cousins, S. (1991) Retinitis in euthymic mice following inoculation of murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) via the supraciliary route. Curr.Eye Res. 10, 667-677
42 Hamamdzic, D., Harley, R., Hazen-Martin, D. and LeRoy, E. (2001) MCMV induces neointima in IFN-gammaR-/- mice: intimal cell apoptosis and persistent proliferation of myofibroblasts. BMC.Musculoskelet.Disord. 2, 3
43 Tanaka, K., Noda, S., Sawamura, S., Kabir, A. and Koga, Y. (2001) Nitric oxide targets bronchiolar epithelial cells in murine cytomegalovirus-associated disease in lungs that are free of the virus. Arch.Virol. 146, 1499-1515
44 Hengel, H., Reusch, U., Gutermann, A., Ziegler, H., Jonjic, S., Lucin, P. and Koszinowski, U. (1999) Cytomegaloviral control of MHC class I function in the mouse. Immunol.Rev. 168, 167-176 45 Streblow, D., Kreklywich, C., Smith, P., Soule, J., Meyer, C., Yin, M., Beisser, P., Vink, C., Nelson,
J. and Orloff, S. (2005) Rat cytomegalovirus-accelerated transplant vascular sclerosis is reduced with mutation of the chemokine-receptor R33. Am.J.Transplant. 5, 436-442
46 Zhou, Y., Leon, M., Waclawiw, M., Popma, J., Yu, Z., Finkel, T. and Epstein, S. (1996) Association between prior cytomegalovirus infection and the risk of restenosis after coronary atherectomy. N.Engl.J.Med. 335, 624-630
47 Zhou, Y., Shou, M., Harrell, R., Yu, Z., Unger, E. and Epstein, S. (2000) Chronic non-vascular cytomegalovirus infection: effects on the neointimal response to experimental vascular injury. Cardiovasc.Res. 45, 1019-1025
48 Tikkanen, J., Krebs, R., Bruggeman, C., Lemstrom, K. and Koskinen, P. (2004) Platelet-derived growth factor regulates cytomegalovirus infection-enhanced obliterative bronchiolitis in rat tracheal allografts. Transplantation 77, 655-658
49 van der, Werf, Hillebrands, J., Klatter, F., Bos, I., Bruggeman, C. and Rozing, J. (2003)
50 Beersma, M., Bijlmakers, M. and Ploegh, H. (1993) Human cytomegalovirus down-regulates HLA class I expression by reducing the stability of class I H chains. J.Immunol. 151, 4455-4464 51 Warren, A., Ducroq, D., Lehner, P. and Borysiewicz, L. (1994) Human cytomegalovirus-infected
cells have unstable assembly of major histocompatibility complex class I complexes and are resistant to lysis by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J.Virol. 68, 2822-2829
52 Jones, T., Hanson, L., Sun, L., Slater, J., Stenberg, R. and Campbell, A. (1995) Multiple independent loci within the human cytomegalovirus unique short region down-regulate expression of major histocompatibility complex class I heavy chains. J.Virol. 69, 4830-4841
53 Jones, T. and Sun, L. (1997) Human cytomegalovirus US2 destabilizes major histocompatibility complex class I heavy chains. J.Virol. 71, 2970-2979
54 Wiertz, E., Tortorella, D., Bogyo, M., Yu, J., Mothes, W., Jones, T., Rapoport, T. and Ploegh, H. (1996) Sec61-mediated transfer of a membrane protein from the endoplasmic reticulum to the proteasome for destruction. Nature 384, 432-438
55 Wiertz, E., Jones, T., Sun, L., Bogyo, M., Geuze, H. and Ploegh, H. (1996) The human cytomegalovirus US11 gene product dislocates MHC class I heavy chains from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol. Cell 84, 769-779
56 Jun, Y., Kim, E., Jin, M., Sung, H., Han, H., Geraghty, D. and Ahn, K. (2000) Human cytomegalovirus gene products US3 and US6 down-regulate trophoblast class I MHC molecules. J.Immunol. 164, 805-811
57 Ahn, K., Angulo, A., Ghazal, P., Peterson, P., Yang, Y. and Fruh, K. (1996) Human cytomegalovirus inhibits antigen presentation by a sequential multistep process. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A 93, 10990-10995
58 Park, B., Kim, Y., Shin, J., Lee, S., Cho, K., Fruh, K., Lee, S. and Ahn, K. (2004) Human cytomegalovirus inhibits tapasin-dependent peptide loading and optimization of the MHC class I peptide cargo for immune evasion. Immunity. 20, 71-85
59 Jones, T., Wiertz, E., Sun, L., Fish, K., Nelson, J. and Ploegh, H. (1996) Human cytomegalovirus US3 impairs transport and maturation of major histocompatibility complex class I heavy chains. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A 93, 11327-11333
60 Lee, S., Yoon, J., Park, B., Jun, Y., Jin, M., Sung, H., Kim, I., Kang, S., Choi, E., Ahn, B. and Ahn, K. (2000) Structural and functional dissection of human cytomegalovirus US3 in binding major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. J.Virol. 74, 11262-11269
61 Ahn, K., Gruhler, A., Galocha, B., Jones, T., Wiertz, E., Ploegh, H., Peterson, P., Yang, Y. and Fruh, K. (1997) The ER-luminal domain of the HCMV glycoprotein US6 inhibits peptide translocation by TAP. Immunity. 6, 613-621
62 Hengel, H., Koopmann, J., Flohr, T., Muranyi, W., Goulmy, E., Hammerling, G., Koszinowski, U. and Momburg, F. (1997) A viral ER-resident glycoprotein inactivates the MHC-encoded peptide transporter. Immunity. 6, 623-632
63 Hewitt, E., Gupta, S. and Lehner, P. (2001) The human cytomegalovirus gene product US6 inhibits ATP binding by TAP. EMBO J. 20, 387-396
64 Kyritsis, C., Gorbulev, S., Hutschenreiter, S., Pawlitschko, K., Abele, R. and Tampe, R. (2001) Molecular mechanism and structural aspects of transporter associated with antigen processing inhibition by the cytomegalovirus protein US6. J.Biol.Chem. 276, 48031-48039
65 Lehner, P., Karttunen, J., Wilkinson, G. and Cresswell, P. (1997) The human cytomegalovirus US6 glycoprotein inhibits transporter associated with antigen processing-dependent peptide
66 Ziegler, H., Muranyi, W., Burgert, H., Kremmer, E. and Koszinowski, U. (2000) The luminal part of the murine cytomegalovirus glycoprotein gp40 catalyzes the retention of MHC class I molecules. EMBO J. 19, 870-881
67 Ziegler, H., Thale, R., Lucin, P., Muranyi, W., Flohr, T., Hengel, H., Farrell, H., Rawlinson, W. and Koszinowski, U. (1997) A mouse cytomegalovirus glycoprotein retains MHC class I complexes in the ERGIC/cis-Golgi compartments. Immunity. 6, 57-66
68 Reusch, U., Muranyi, W., Lucin, P., Burgert, H., Hengel, H. and Koszinowski, U. (1999) A cytomegalovirus glycoprotein re-routes MHC class I complexes to lysosomes for degradation. EMBO J. 18, 1081-1091
69 Kavanagh, D., Koszinowski, U. and Hill, A. (2001) The murine cytomegalovirus immune evasion protein m4/gp34 forms biochemically distinct complexes with class I MHC at the cell surface and in a pre-Golgi compartment. J.Immunol. 167, 3894-3902
70 Kleijnen, M., Huppa, J., Lucin, P., Mukherjee, S., Farrell, H., Campbell, A., Koszinowski, U., Hill, A. and Ploegh, H. (1997) A mouse cytomegalovirus glycoprotein, gp34, forms a complex with folded class I MHC molecules in the ER which is not retained but is transported to the cell surface. EMBO J. 16, 685-694
71 Kavanagh, D., Gold, M., Wagner, M., Koszinowski, U. and Hill, A. (2001) The multiple immune-evasion genes of murine cytomegalovirus are not redundant: m4 and m152 inhibit antigen presentation in a complementary and cooperative fashion. J.Exp.Med. 194, 967-978
72 LoPiccolo, D., Gold, M., Kavanagh, D., Wagner, M., Koszinowski, U. and Hill, A. (2003) Effective inhibition of K(b)- and D(b)-restricted antigen presentation in primary macrophages by murine cytomegalovirus. J.Virol. 77, 301-308
73 Beck, S. and Barrell, B. (1988) Human cytomegalovirus encodes a glycoprotein homologous to MHC class-I antigens. Nature 331, 269-272
74 Farrell, H., Vally, H., Lynch, D., Fleming, P., Shellam, G., Scalzo, A. and Davis-Poynter, N. (1997) Inhibition of natural killer cells by a cytomegalovirus MHC class I homologue in vivo. Nature 386, 510-514
75 Beisser, P., Kloover, J., Grauls, G., Blok, M., Bruggeman, C. and Vink, C. (2000) The r144 major histocompatibility complex class I-like gene of rat cytomegalovirus is dispensable for both acute and long-term infection in the immunocompromised host. J.Virol. 74, 1045-1050
76 Cretney, E., Degli-Esposti, M., Densley, E., Farrell, H., Davis-Poynter, N. and Smyth, M. (1999) m144, a murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV)-encoded major histocompatibility complex class I homologue, confers tumor resistance to natural killer cell-mediated rejection. J.Exp.Med. 190, 435-444
77 Cosman, D., Fanger, N., Borges, L., Kubin, M., Chin, W., Peterson, L. and Hsu, M. (1997) A novel immunoglobulin superfamily receptor for cellular and viral MHC class I molecules. Immunity. 7, 273-282
78 Hassink, G., Duijvestijn-van Dam, J., Koppers-Lalic, D., Gaans-van den Brink, J., van Leeuwen, D., Vink, C., Bruggeman, C. and Wiertz, E. (2005) Rat cytomegalovirus induces a temporal downregulation of major histocompatibility complex class I cell surface expression. Viral Immunol. 18, 607-615
79 Jensen, T., Loo, M., Pind, S., Williams, D., Goldberg, A. and Riordan, J. (1995) Multiple proteolytic systems, including the proteasome, contribute to CFTR processing. Cell 83, 129-135
81 Biederer, T., Volkwein, C. and Sommer, T. (1997) Role of Cue1p in ubiquitination and degradation at the ER surface. Science 278, 1806-1809
82 Kolling, R. and Hollenberg, C. (1994) The ABC-transporter Ste6 accumulates in the plasma membrane in a ubiquitinated form in endocytosis mutants. EMBO J. 13, 3261-3271
83 Menendez-Benito, V., Verhoef, L., Masucci, M. and Dantuma, N. (2005) Endoplasmic reticulum stress compromises the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Hum.Mol.Genet. 14, 2787-2799 84 Schroder, M. and Kaufman, R. (2005) The mammalian unfolded protein response.
Annu.Rev.Biochem. 74, 739-789
85 Brewer, J. and Hendershot, L. (2005) Building an antibody factory: a job for the unfolded protein response. Nat.Immunol. 6, 23-29
86 Zhang, C., Cai, Y., Adachi, M., Oshiro, S., Aso, T., Kaufman, R. and Kitajima, S. (2001) Homocysteine induces programmed cell death in human vascular endothelial cells through activation of the unfolded protein response. J.Biol.Chem. 276, 35867-35874
87 Johnson, A. and van Waes, M. (1999) The translocon: a dynamic gateway at the ER membrane. Annu.Rev.Cell Dev.Biol. 15, 799-842
88 Higy, M., Junne, T. and Spiess, M. (2004) Topogenesis of membrane proteins at the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochemistry 43, 12716-12722
89 Martoglio, B., Hofmann, M., Brunner, J. and Dobberstein, B. (1995) The protein-conducting channel in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum is open laterally toward the lipid bilayer. Cell 81, 207-214
90 Hegde, R., Voigt, S., Rapoport, T. and Lingappa, V. (1998) TRAM regulates the exposure of nascent secretory proteins to the cytosol during translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 92 , 621-631
91 Meacock, S., Lecomte, F., Crawshaw, S. and High, S. (2002) Different transmembrane domains associate with distinct endoplasmic reticulum components during membrane integration of a polytopic protein. Mol.Biol.Cell 13, 4114-4129
92 von Heijne, G. (1994) Signals for protein targeting into and across membranes. Subcell.Biochem. 22, 1-19
93 Denzer, A., Nabholz, C. and Spiess, M. (1995) Transmembrane orientation of signal-anchor proteins is affected by the folding state but not the size of the N-terminal domain. EMBO J. 14, 6311-6317
94 Wahlberg, J. and Spiess, M. (1997) Multiple determinants direct the orientation of signal-anchor proteins: the topogenic role of the hydrophobic signal domain. J.Cell Biol. 137, 555-562
95 Moss, K., Helm, A., Lu, Y., Bragin, A. and Skach, W. (1998) Coupled translocation events generate topological heterogeneity at the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Mol.Biol.Cell 9, 2681-2697 96 Harley, C., Holt, J., Turner, R. and Tipper, D. (1998) Transmembrane protein insertion orientation
in yeast depends on the charge difference across transmembrane segments, their total hydrophobicity, and its distribution. J.Biol.Chem. 273, 24963-24971
97 Fons, R. and Bogert, B. (2003) Substrate-specific function of the translocon-associated protein complex during translocation across the ER membrane. 160, 529-539
99 Farmery, M., Allen, S., Allen, A. and Bulleid, N. (2000) The role of ERp57 in disulfide bond formation during the assembly of major histocompatibility complex class I in a synchronized semipermeabilized cell translation system. J.Biol.Chem. 275, 14933-14938
100 High, S., Lecomte, F., Russell, S., Abell, B. and Oliver, J. (2000) Glycoprotein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum: a tale of three chaperones? FEBS Lett. 476, 38-41
101 Haas, I. and Wabl, M. (1983) Immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein. Nature 306, 387-389 102 Bole, D., Hendershot, L. and Kearney, J. (1986) Posttranslational association of immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein with nascent heavy chains in nonsecreting and secreting hybridomas. J.Cell Biol. 102, 1558-1566
103 Liebermeister, W., Rapoport, T. and Heinrich, R. (2001) Ratcheting in post-translational protein translocation: a mathematical model. J.Mol.Biol. 305, 643-656
104 Rapoport, T., Matlack, K., Plath, K., Misselwitz, B. and Staeck, O. (1999) Posttranslational protein translocation across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. Biol.Chem. 380, 1143-1150 105 Matlack, K., Misselwitz, B., Plath, K. and Rapoport, T. (1999) BiP acts as a molecular ratchet during
posttranslational transport of prepro-alpha factor across the ER membrane. Cell 97, 553-564 106 Lee, A., Wells, S., Kim, K. and Scheffler, I. (1986) Enhanced synthesis of the
glucose/calcium-regulated proteins in a hamster cell mutant deficient in transfer of oligosaccharide core to polypeptides. J.Cell Physiol 129, 277-282
107 Hamman, B., Hendershot, L. and Johnson, A. (1998) BiP maintains the permeability barrier of the ER membrane by sealing the lumenal end of the translocon pore before and early in translocation. Cell 92, 747-758
108 Haigh, N. and Johnson, A. (2002) A new role for BiP: closing the aqueous translocon pore during protein integration into the ER membrane. J.Cell Biol. 156, 261-270
109 van Laar, T., van der Eb, A. and Terleth, C. (2001) Mif1: a missing link between the unfolded protein response pathway and ER-associated protein degradation? Curr.Protein Pept.Sci. 2, 169-190 110 Sommer, T. and Wolf, D. (1997) Endoplasmic reticulum degradation: reverse protein flow of no
return. FASEB J. 11, 1227-1233
111 Sommer, T. and Jarosch, E. (2002) BiP binding keeps ATF6 at bay. Dev.Cell 3, 1-2
112 Shen, X., Ellis, R., Lee, K., Liu, C., Yang, K., Solomon, A., Yoshida, H., Morimoto, R., Kurnit, D., Mori, K. and Kaufman, R. (2001) Complementary signaling pathways regulate the unfolded protein response and are required for C. elegans development. Cell 107, 893-903
113 Liu, Y., Choudhury, P., Cabral, C. and Sifers, R. (1999) Oligosaccharide modification in the early secretory pathway directs the selection of a misfolded glycoprotein for degradation by the proteasome. J.Biol.Chem. 274, 5861-5867
114 Fagioli, C., Mezghrani, A. and Sitia, R. (2001) Reduction of interchain disulfide bonds precedes the dislocation of Ig-mu chains from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol for proteasomal degradation. J.Biol.Chem. 276, 40962-40967
115 Oliver, J., van der Wal, F., Bulleid, N. and High, S. (1997) Interaction of the thiol-dependent reductase ERp57 with nascent glycoproteins. Science 275, 86-88
116 Oliver, J., Roderick, H., Llewellyn, D. and High, S. (1999) ERp57 functions as a subunit of specific complexes formed with the ER lectins calreticulin and calnexin. Mol.Biol.Cell 10, 2573-2582 117 Parodi, A. (1999) Reglucosylation of glycoproteins and quality control of glycoprotein folding in the
118 Wilson, C., Farmery, M. and Bulleid, N. (2000) Pivotal role of calnexin and mannose trimming in regulating the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of major histocompatibility complex class I heavy chain. J.Biol.Chem. 275, 21224-21232
119 Fagioli, C. and Sitia, R. (2001) Glycoprotein quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mannose trimming by endoplasmic reticulum mannosidase I times the proteasomal degradation of unassembled immunoglobulin subunits. J.Biol.Chem. 276, 12885-12892
120 Vashist, S., Kim, W., Belden, W., Spear, E., Barlowe, C. and Ng, D. (2001) Distinct retrieval and retention mechanisms are required for the quality control of endoplasmic reticulum protein folding. J.Cell Biol. 155, 355-368
121 Huyer, G., Longsworth, G., Mason, D., Mallampalli, M., McCaffery, J., Wright, R. and Michaelis, S. (2003) A striking quality control subcompartment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The endoplasmic reticulum-associated compartment (ERAC). Mol.Biol.Cell
122 Fayadat, L. and Kopito, R. (2003) Recognition of a single transmembrane degron by sequential quality control checkpoints. Mol.Biol.Cell 14, 1268-1278
123 Reggiori, F., Black, M. and Pelham, H. (2000) Polar transmembrane domains target proteins to the interior of the yeast vacuole. Mol.Biol.Cell 11, 3737-3749
124 Bebok, Z., Mazzochi, C., King, S., Hong, J. and Sorscher, E. (1998) The mechanism underlying cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the proteasome includes Sec61beta and a cytosolic, deglycosylated intermediary. J.Biol.Chem. 273, 29873-29878
125 Plemper, R., Bohmler, S., Bordallo, J., Sommer, T. and Wolf, D. (1997) Mutant analysis links the translocon and BiP to retrograde protein transport for ER degradation. Nature 388, 891-895 126 Plemper, R., Egner, R., Kuchler, K. and Wolf, D. (1998) Endoplasmic reticulum degradation of a
mutated ATP-binding cassette transporter Pdr5 proceeds in a concerted action of Sec61 and the proteasome. J.Biol.Chem. 273, 32848-32856
127 Hirsch, C., Blom, D. and Ploegh, H. (2003) A role for N-glycanase in the cytosolic turnover of glycoproteins. EMBO J. 22, 1036-1046
128 Suzuki, T., Kwofie, M. and Lennarz, W. (2003) Ngly1, a mouse gene encoding a deglycosylating enzyme implicated in proteasomal degradation: expression, genomic organization, and chromosomal mapping. Biochem.Biophys.Res.Commun. 304, 326-332
129 Albring, J., Koopmann, J., Hammerling, G. and Momburg, F. (2004) Retrotranslocation of MHC class I heavy chain from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol is dependent on ATP supply to the ER lumen. Mol.Immunol. 40, 733-741
130 Rivett, A., Palmer, A. and Knecht, E. (1992) Electron microscopic localization of the multicatalytic proteinase complex in rat liver and in cultured cells. J.Histochem.Cytochem. 40, 1165-1172 131 Palmer, A., Rivett, A., Thomson, S., Hendil, K., Butcher, G., Fuertes, G. and Knecht, E. (1996)
Subpopulations of proteasomes in rat liver nuclei, microsomes and cytosol. Biochem.J. 316 ( Pt 2), 401-407
132 Brooks, P., Fuertes, G., Murray, R., Bose, S., Knecht, E., Rechsteiner, M., Hendil, K., Tanaka, K., Dyson, J. and Rivett, J. (2000) Subcellular localization of proteasomes and their regulatory complexes in mammalian cells. Biochem.J. 346 Pt 1, 155-161
133 Yang, M., Omura, S., Bonifacino, J. and Weissman, A. (1998) Novel aspects of degradation of T cell receptor subunits from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in T cells: importance of
134 Xiong, X., Chong, E. and Skach, W. (1999) Evidence that endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator is linked to retrograde translocation from the ER membrane. J.Biol.Chem. 274, 2616-2624
135 Mayer, T., Braun, T. and Jentsch, S. (1998) Role of the proteasome in membrane extraction of a short-lived ER-transmembrane protein. EMBO J. 17, 3251-3257
136 Elkabetz, Y., Shapira, I., Rabinovich, E. and Bar-Nun, S. (2004) Distinct steps in dislocation of luminal endoplasmic associated degradation substrates: roles of endoplamic reticulum-bound p97/Cdc48p and proteasome. J.Biol.Chem. 279, 3980-3989
137 Confalonieri, F. and Duguet, M. (1995) A 200-amino acid ATPase module in search of a basic function. Bioessays 17, 639-650
138 Patel, S. and Latterich, M. (1998) The AAA team: related ATPases with diverse functions. Trends Cell Biol. 8, 65-71
139 Vale, R. (2000) AAA proteins. Lords of the ring. J.Cell Biol. 150, F13-F19
140 Baumeister, W., Walz, J., Zuhl, F. and Seemuller, E. (1998) The proteasome: paradigm of a self-compartmentalizing protease. Cell 92, 367-380
141 Fasshauer, D., Otto, H., Eliason, W., Jahn, R. and Brunger, A. (1997) Structural changes are associated with soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptor complex formation. J.Biol.Chem. 272, 28036-28041
142 Neuwald, A., Aravind, L., Spouge, J. and Koonin, E. (1999) AAA+: A class of chaperone-like ATPases associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. Genome Res. 9 , 27-43
143 Ye, Y., Meyer, H. and Rapoport, T. (2001) The AAA ATPase Cdc48/p97 and its partners transport proteins from the ER into the cytosol. Nature 414, 652-656
144 Rabouille, C., Levine, T., Peters, J. and Warren, G. (1995) An NSF-like ATPase, p97, and NSF mediate cisternal regrowth from mitotic Golgi fragments. Cell 82, 905-914
145 Rouiller, I., Butel, V., Latterich, M., Milligan, R. and Wilson-Kubalek, E. (2000) A major conformational change in p97 AAA ATPase upon ATP binding. Mol.Cell 6, 1485-1490 146 Zhang, X., Shaw, A., Bates, P., Newman, R., Gowen, B., Orlova, E., Gorman, M., Kondo, H.,
Dokurno, P., Lally, J., Leonard, G., Meyer, H., van Heel, M. and Freemont, P. (2000) Structure of the AAA ATPase p97. Mol.Cell 6, 1473-1484
147 Ye, Y., Meyer, H. and Rapoport, T. (2003) Function of the p97-Ufd1-Npl4 complex in retrotranslocation from the ER to the cytosol: dual recognition of nonubiquitinated polypeptide segments and polyubiquitin chains. J.Cell Biol. 162, 71-84
148 Shamu, C., Story, C., Rapoport, T. and Ploegh, H. (1999) The pathway of US11-dependent degradation of MHC class I heavy chains involves a ubiquitin-conjugated intermediate. J.Cell Biol. 147, 45-58
149 Fang, S. and Weissmann, A. (2004) Ubiquitin-proteasome systemA field guide to ubiquitylation. Cell Mol.Life Sci. 61, 1546-1561
150 Varadan, R., Assfalg, M., Haririnia, A., Raasi, S., Pickart, C. and Fushman, D. (2004) Solution conformation of Lys63-linked di-ubiquitin chain provides clues to functional diversity of polyubiquitin signaling. J.Biol.Chem. 279, 7055-7063
152 Hicke, L. and Dunn, R. (2003) Regulation of membrane protein transport by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-binding proteins. Annu.Rev.Cell Dev.Biol. 19, 141-172
153 Marmor, M. and Yarden, Y. (2004) Role of protein ubiquitylation in regulating endocytosis of receptor tyrosine kinases. Oncogene 23, 2057-2070
154 Stahl, P. and Barbieri, M. (2002) Multivesicular bodies and multivesicular endosomes: the "ins and outs" of endosomal traffic. Sci.STKE. 2002, E32
155 Strous, G. and van Kerkhof, P. (2002) The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and the regulation of growth hormone receptor availability. Mol.Cell Endocrinol. 197, 143-151
156 Sigismund, S., Polo, S. and Di Fiore, P. (2004) Signaling through monoubiquitination. Curr.Top.Microbiol.Immunol. 286, 149-185
157 Shcherbik, N. and Haines, D. (2004) Ub on the move. J.Cell Biochem. 93, 11-19 158 Bays, N., Gardner, R., Seelig, L., Joazeiro, C. and Hampton, R. (2001) Hrd1p/Der3p is a
membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase required for ER-associated degradation. Nat.Cell Biol. 3, 24-29
159 Deak, P. and Wolf, D. (2001) Membrane topology and function of Der3/Hrd1p as a ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3) involved in endoplasmic reticulum degradation. J.Biol.Chem. 276, 10663-10669 160 Hampton, R., Gardner, R. and Rine, J. (1996) Role of 26S proteasome and HRD genes in the
degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, an integral endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein. Mol.Biol.Cell 7, 2029-2044
161 Knop, M., Finger, A., Braun, T., Hellmuth, K. and Wolf, D. (1996) Der1, a novel protein specifically required for endoplasmic reticulum degradation in yeast. EMBO J. 15, 753-763 162 Bordallo, J., Plemper, R., Finger, A. and Wolf, D. (1998) Der3p/Hrd1p is required for endoplasmic
reticulum-associated degradation of misfolded lumenal and integral membrane proteins. Mol.Biol.Cell 9, 209-222
163 Bordallo, J. and Wolf, D. (1999) A RING-H2 finger motif is essential for the function of Der3/Hrd1 in endoplasmic reticulum associated protein degradation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 448, 244-248
164 Gardner, R., Swarbrick, G., Bays, N., Cronin, S., Wilhovsky, S., Seelig, L., Kim, C. and Hampton, R. (2000) Endoplasmic reticulum degradation requires lumen to cytosol signaling. Transmembrane control of Hrd1p by Hrd3p. J.Cell Biol. 151, 69-82
165 Hill, K. and Cooper, A. (2000) Degradation of unassembled Vph1p reveals novel aspects of the yeast ER quality control system. EMBO J. 19, 550-561
166 Wilhovsky, S., Gardner, R. and Hampton, R. (2000) HRD gene dependence of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. Mol.Biol.Cell 11, 1697-1708
167 Gnann, A., Riordan, J. and Wolf, D. (2004) CFTR Degradation Depends on the Lectins Htm1p/EDEM and the Cdc48 Protein Complex in Yeast. Mol.Biol.Cell 15, 4125-4135
168 Fang, S., Ferrone, M., Yang, C., Jensen, J., Tiwari, S. and Weissman, A. (2001) The tumor autocrine motility factor receptor, gp78, is a ubiquitin protein ligase implicated in degradation from the endoplasmic reticulum. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A 98, 14422-14427