• No results found

Authorial or Scribal? : spelling variation in the Hengwrt and Ellesmere manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Authorial or Scribal? : spelling variation in the Hengwrt and Ellesmere manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales"

Copied!
3
0
0

Bezig met laden.... (Bekijk nu de volledige tekst)

Hele tekst

(1)

Authorial or Scribal? : spelling variation in the Hengwrt and Ellesmere manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales

Caon, L.M.D.

Citation

Caon, L. M. D. (2009, January 14). Authorial or Scribal? : spelling variation in the Hengwrt and Ellesmere manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales. LOT, Utrecht. Retrieved from

https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13402

Version: Corrected Publisher’s Version

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden

Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/13402

Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable).

(2)

Curriculum Vitae

Luisella Caon was born in Turin, Italy, in 1963. In Italy she completed her nursing training in 1982 and, while working as a registered nurse, she attended and successfully completed a teacher training course in 1986. From 1993 to 1997 she studied English Language and Literature at the University of Leiden, and in 1997–

98 she spent a year at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. After obtaining a cum laude Master’s Degree from the University of Leiden in June 1999, she was a research assistant in the English Department of the same university for six months.

In October 2000 she started work on the research project that has resulted in this dissertation, which she carried out as a PhD student of the Leiden University Centre for Linguistics.

From September 2005 she has been working as a junior lecturer in Philology at the English Department of the University of Leiden.

(3)

Referenties

GERELATEERDE DOCUMENTEN

‘more closely followed Chaucer’s own practice’ in Hg than in El, where he consistently used his own orthography. It is possible that when Scribe B copied El he

The presence of sweete in the same lines of Hg, El and Ps could thus be evidence of a link between Ps and Hg or El, possibly of a direct line of descent from O for

By contrast, the variant doun is used five times in WBT in Hg: four of these occurrences are at the end of a line, where they rhyme with words ending in -ioun; this spelling is

The words discussed in this section show a number of spelling variants which are approximately used in the same way in both Hg and El; for all of them, a

Some of the spelling variants found in the manuscripts copied by Scribe B are thus archetypal, but most of them are due to the scribal adoption of forms that were

This section was most likely produced after the tales that display the dark brown ink used for most of the manuscript, those found in Sections I, IV, V and the first part of

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden. Downloaded

License: Licence agreement concerning inclusion of doctoral thesis in the Institutional Repository of the University of Leiden. Downloaded